Zero divisor

In abstract algebra, an element a of a ring R is called a left zero divisor if there exists a nonzero x such that ax = 0,[1] or equivalently if the map from R to R that sends x to ax is not injective.[lower-alpha 1] Similarly, an element a of a ring is called a right zero divisor if there exists a nonzero y such that ya = 0. This is a partial case of divisibility in rings. An element that is a left or a right zero divisor is simply called a zero divisor.[2] An element a that is both a left and a right zero divisor is called a two-sided zero divisor (the nonzero x such that ax = 0 may be different from the nonzero y such that ya = 0). If the ring is commutative, then the left and right zero divisors are the same.

An element of a ring that is not a zero divisor is called regular, or a non-zero-divisor. A zero divisor that is nonzero is called a nonzero zero divisor or a nontrivial zero divisor. If there are no nontrivial zero divisors in R, then R is a domain.


  • In the ring , the residue class is a zero divisor since .
  • The only zero divisor of the ring of integers is .
  • A nilpotent element of a nonzero ring is always a two-sided zero divisor.
  • An idempotent element of a ring is always a two-sided zero divisor, since .
  • The ring of matrices over a field has zero divisors if . Examples of zero divisors in the ring of matrices (over any nonzero ring) are shown here:
  • A direct product of two or more nonzero rings always has nonzero zero divisors. For example, in with each nonzero, , so is a zero divisor.

One-sided zero-divisor

  • Consider the ring of (formal) matrices with and . Then and . If , then is a left zero divisor iff is even, since , and it is a right zero divisor iff is even for similar reasons. If either of is , then it is a two-sided zero-divisor.
  • Here is another example of a ring with an element that is a zero divisor on one side only. Let be the set of all sequences of integers . Take for the ring all additive maps from to , with pointwise addition and composition as the ring operations. (That is, our ring is , the endomorphism ring of the additive group .) Three examples of elements of this ring are the right shift , the left shift , and the projection map onto the first factor . All three of these additive maps are not zero, and the composites and are both zero, so is a left zero divisor and is a right zero divisor in the ring of additive maps from to . However, is not a right zero divisor and is not a left zero divisor: the composite is the identity. Note also that is a two-sided zero-divisor since , while is not in any direction.



  • In the ring of n-by-n matrices over a field, the left and right zero divisors coincide; they are precisely the singular matrices. In the ring of n-by-n matrices over an integral domain, the zero divisors are precisely the matrices with determinant zero.
  • Left or right zero divisors can never be units, because if a is invertible and ax = 0, then 0 = a−10 = a−1ax = x, whereas x must be nonzero.

Zero as a zero divisor

There is no need for a separate convention regarding the case a = 0, because the definition applies also in this case:

  • If R is a ring other than the zero ring, then 0 is a (two-sided) zero divisor, because 0 · a = 0 = a · 0, where a is a nonzero element of R.
  • If R is the zero ring, in which 0 = 1, then 0 is not a zero divisor, because there is no nonzero element that when multiplied by 0 yields 0.

Such properties are needed in order to make the following general statements true:

  • In a commutative ring R, the set of non-zero-divisors is a multiplicative set in R. (This, in turn, is important for the definition of the total quotient ring.) The same is true of the set of non-left-zero-divisors and the set of non-right-zero-divisors in an arbitrary ring, commutative or not.
  • In a commutative Noetherian ring R, the set of zero divisors is the union of the associated prime ideals of R.

Some references choose to exclude 0 as a zero divisor by convention, but then they must introduce exceptions in the two general statements just made.

Zero divisor on a module

Let R be a commutative ring, let M be an R-module, and let a be an element of R. One says that a is M-regular if the multiplication by a map is injective, and that a is a zero divisor on M otherwise.[3] The set of M-regular elements is a multiplicative set in R.[3]

Specializing the definitions of "M-regular" and "zero divisor on M" to the case M = R recovers the definitions of "regular" and "zero divisor" given earlier in this article.

See also


  1. Since the map is not injective, we have ax = ay, in which x differs from y, and thus a(xy) = 0.


  1. N. Bourbaki (1989), Algebra I, Chapters 1–3, Springer-Verlag, p. 98
  2. Charles Lanski (2005), Concepts in Abstract Algebra, American Mathematical Soc., p. 342
  3. Hideyuki Matsumura (1980), Commutative algebra, 2nd edition, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., p. 12

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.