Sulcalization (from Latin sulcus, "groove"), in phonetics, is the pronunciation of a sound, typically a sibilant consonant, such as English /s/ and /z/, with a deep groove running along the back of the tongue that focuses the airstream on the teeth, producing a more intense sound. That is accomplished by raising the sides of the back of the tongue ("lateral contraction") and leaving a hollow along the mid-line. It is not clear if all sibilants are so grooved: Catford (1977) observed that the degree of sulcalization differs between places of articulation as well as between languages, but no language is known to contrast a grooved and non-grooved sibilant.
|Places of articulation|
English [ɹ], which allows various tongue positions without apparent distinction, may also receive its characteristic quality from being sulcal.
In phonology and historical linguistics, sulcalization is the development of such a groove in a non-sulcal consonant. For example, close vowels trigger the effect in Japanese, in which historic *tu and *ti have become [tsu] and [tɕi], respectively. A similar sound changes as operated in the Senufo languages. (The palatalization of *tsi to [tɕi] in Japanese is a different process and does not occur in Senufo.)
Vowels may also be sulcalized, which has been described as giving them a "throaty" sound (Jones 1967:82). The /ɒ/ vowel of Received Pronunciation, which is normally described as a rounded, is pronounced by some speakers without rounded lips for whom the characteristic quality is rather one of sulcality (Lass 1984:124).
One scholar has also suggested that the vowel in the RP pronunciation of words like bird, typically transcribed [ɜ], is actually a sulcal schwa, retaining the sulcality of the original rhotic consonant. Accordingly, the realization of the /ə/-element of the centering diphthongs /ɪə/, /ʊə/, /ɛə/ in words such as near, pure and scare, is interpreted as the product of a loss of sulcality (Erickson 2003:197).
- J.C. Catford, 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Indiana University Press.
- Daniel Jones, 1967. The phoneme: its nature and use. Heffer.
- Blaine Erickson, 2003. "On the development of English r", in Minkova & Stockwell, eds, Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective. Walter de Gruyter.
- Roger Lass, 1984. Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts. CUP.