Stream Control Transmission Protocol
The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a computer networking communications protocol which operates at the transport layer and serves a role similar to the popular protocols TCP and UDP. It is standardized by IETF in RFC 4960.
|Internet protocol suite|
SCTP provides some of the features of both UDP and TCP: it is message-oriented like UDP and ensures reliable, in-sequence transport of messages with congestion control like TCP. It differs from those protocols by providing multi-homing and redundant paths to increase resilience and reliability.
In the absence of native SCTP support in operating systems, it is possible to tunnel SCTP over UDP, as well as to map TCP API calls to SCTP calls so existing applications can use SCTP without modification. The reference implementation was released as part of FreeBSD version 7. It has since been widely ported.
The IETF Signaling Transport (SIGTRAN) working group defined the protocol (number 132) in the year 2000, and the IETF Transport Area (TSVWG) working group maintains it. RFC 4960 defines the protocol. RFC 3286 provides an introduction.
SCTP applications submit their data to be transmitted in messages (groups of bytes) to the SCTP transport layer. SCTP places messages and control information into separate chunks (data chunks and control chunks), each identified by a chunk header. The protocol can fragment a message into a number of data chunks, but each data chunk contains data from only one user message. SCTP bundles the chunks into SCTP packets. The SCTP packet, which is submitted to the Internet Protocol, consists of a packet header, SCTP control chunks (when necessary), followed by SCTP data chunks (when available).
One can characterize SCTP as message-oriented, meaning it transports a sequence of messages (each being a group of bytes), rather than transporting an unbroken stream of bytes as does TCP. As in UDP, in SCTP a sender sends a message in one operation, and that exact message is passed to the receiving application process in one operation. In contrast, TCP is a stream-oriented protocol, transporting streams of bytes reliably and in order. However TCP does not allow the receiver to know how many times the sender application called on the TCP transport passing it groups of bytes to be sent out. At the sender, TCP simply appends more bytes to a queue of bytes waiting to go out over the network, rather than having to keep a queue of individual separate outbound messages which must be preserved as such.
The term multi-streaming refers to the capability of SCTP to transmit several independent streams of chunks in parallel, for example transmitting web page images together with the web page text. In essence, it involves bundling several connections into a single SCTP association, operating on messages (or chunks) rather than bytes.
TCP preserves byte order in the stream by including a byte sequence number with each segment. SCTP, on the other hand, assigns a sequence number or a message-id to each message sent in a stream. This allows independent ordering of messages in different streams. However, message ordering is optional in SCTP; a receiving application may choose to process messages in the order of receipt instead of in the order of sending.
Features of SCTP include:
- Reliable transmission of both ordered and unordered data streams.
- Multihoming support in which one or both endpoints of a connection can consist of more than one IP address, enabling transparent fail-over between redundant network paths.
- Delivery of chunks within independent streams eliminates unnecessary head-of-line blocking, as opposed to TCP byte-stream delivery.
- Explicit partial reliability.
- Path selection and monitoring to select a primary data transmission path and test the connectivity of the transmission path.
- Validation and acknowledgment mechanisms protect against flooding attacks and provide notification of duplicated or missing data chunks.
- Improved error detection suitable for Ethernet jumbo frames.
The designers of SCTP originally intended it for the transport of telephony (Signaling System 7) over Internet Protocol, with the goal of duplicating some of the reliability attributes of the SS7 signaling network in IP. This IETF effort is known as SIGTRAN. In the meantime, other uses have been proposed, for example, the Diameter protocol and Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool).
Motivations and adoption
TCP has provided the primary means to transfer data reliably across the Internet. However, TCP has imposed limitations on several applications. From RFC 4960:
- TCP provides both reliable data transfer and strict order-of-transmission delivery of data. Some applications need reliable transfer without sequence maintenance, while others would be satisfied with partial ordering of the data. In both of these cases, the head-of-line blocking property of TCP causes unnecessary delay.
- For applications exchanging distinct records or messages, the stream-oriented nature of TCP requires the addition of explicit markers or other encoding to delineate the individual records.
- In order to avoid sending many small IP packets where one single larger packet would have sufficed, the TCP implementation may delay transmitting data while waiting for possibly more data being queued by the application (Nagle's algorithm). If and when such a small delay is undesirable, the application must explicitly request undelayed transmission on a case-by-case basis using the push facility (i.e. by setting the PSH flag in the TCP packet header). SCTP on the other hand allows undelayed transmission to be configured as a default for an association, eliminating any undesired delays, but at the cost of higher transfer overhead.
- The limited scope of TCP sockets complicates the task of providing highly-available data transfer capability using multi-homed hosts.
- TCP is relatively vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks, such as SYN attacks.
SCTP provides redundant paths to increase reliability.
Each SCTP end point needs to check reachability of the primary and redundant addresses of the remote end point using a heartbeat. Each SCTP end point needs to acknowledge the heartbeats it receives from the remote end point.
When SCTP sends a message to a remote address, the source interface will only be decided by the routing table of the host (and not by SCTP).
Asymmetric multi homing
In asymmetric multi homing, one of the two end points does not support multi homing.
Local multi homing - Remote single homing
In Local multi homing and Remote single homing, if the remote primary address is not reachable, the SCTP association fails even if an alternate path is possible.
Local single homing - Remote multi homing
An SCTP packet consists of two basic sections:
- The common header, which occupies the first 12 bytes and is highlighted in blue, and
- The data chunks, which occupy the remaining portion of the packet. The first chunk is highlighted in green, and the last of N chunks (Chunk N) is highlighted in red.
Each chunk starts with a one byte type identifier, with 15 chunk types defined by RFC 4960, and at least 5 more defined by additional RFCs. Eight flag bits, a two byte length field and the data compose the remainder of the chunk. If the chunk does not form a multiple of 4 bytes (i.e., the length is not a multiple of 4) then it is padded with zeros which are not included in the chunk length. The two byte length field limits each chunk to a 65,535 byte length (including the type, flags and length fields).
Although encryption was not part of the original SCTP design, SCTP was designed with features for improved security, such as 4-way handshake (compared to TCP 3-way handshake) to protect against SYN flooding attacks, and large "cookies" for association verification and authenticity.
Reliability was also a key part of the security design of SCTP. Multihoming enables an association to stay open even when some routes and interfaces are down. This is of particular importance for SIGTRAN as it carries SS7 over an IP network using SCTP, and requires strong resilience during link outages to maintain telecommunication service even when enduring network anomalies.
SCTP is sometimes a good fingerprinting candidate. Some operating systems ship with SCTP support enabled, and, as it is not as well known as TCP or UDP, it is sometimes overlooked in firewall and intrusion detection configurations, thus often permitting probing traffic.
The following operating systems implement SCTP:
- AIX Version 5 and newer
- Generic BSD with external patch at KAME project
- NetBSD since 8.0
- Cisco IOS 12
- DragonFly BSD since version 1.4, however support is being deprecated in version 4.2
- FreeBSD, version 7 and above, contains the reference SCTP implementation
- HP-UX, 11i v2 and above
- Linux kernel-based 2.4 and newer
- QNX Neutrino Realtime OS, 6.3.0 to 6.3.2, deprecated since 6.4.0
- Sun Solaris 10 and above
- VxWorks versions 6.2.x to 6.4.x, and 6.7 and newer
- Microsoft Windows:
The following applications implement SCTP:
- RFC 7829 SCTP-PF: A Quick Failover Algorithm for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
- RFC 7765 TCP and Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) RTO Restart
- RFC 7496 Additional Policies for the Partially Reliable Stream Control Transmission Protocol Extension
- RFC 7053 SACK-IMMEDIATELY Extension for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (updates RFC 4960)
- RFC 6951 UDP Encapsulation of Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Packets for End-Host to End-Host Communication
- RFC 6525 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration
- RFC 6458 Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
- RFC 6096 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Chunk Flags Registration (updates RFC 4960)
- RFC 5062 Security Attacks Found Against the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) and Current Countermeasures
- RFC 5061 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration
- RFC 5043 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Direct Data Placement (DDP) Adaptation
- RFC 4960 Stream Control Transmission Protocol
- RFC 4895 Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
- RFC 4820 Padding Chunk and Parameter for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
- RFC 4460 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Specification Errata and Issues
- RFC 3873 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Management Information Base (MIB)
- RFC 3758 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Partial Reliability Extension
- RFC 3554 On the Use of Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) with IPsec
- RFC 3436 Transport Layer Security over Stream Control Transmission Protocol
- RFC 3309 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Checksum Change (obsoleted by RFC 4960)
- RFC 3286 An Introduction to the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
- RFC 3257 Stream Control Transmission Protocol Applicability Statement
- RFC 2960 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (updated by RFC 3309 and obsoleted by RFC 4960)
- Transport Layer § Comparison of transport layer protocols
- Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) – which may initiate multiple streams over SCTP, TCP or UDP
- Multipath TCP – which allows a TCP connection to use multiple paths to maximize resource usage and increase redundancy
- Happy Eyeballs – originally designed for efficient selection of IPv4 or IPv6 for a connection; could also be adapted for selecting from different transport protocols, e.g.: TCP and SCTP
- Tuexen, Michael; Stewart, Randall R. (May 2013). UDP Encapsulation of Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Packets for End-Host to End-Host Communication. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC6951. RFC 6951.
- Bickhart, Ryan; Paul D. Amer; Randall R. Stewart (2007). "Transparent TCP-to-SCTP Translation Shim Layer" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-09-13.
- "Protocol Numbers". iana.org. IANA. Retrieved 2014-09-09.
- Stream Control Transmission Protocol. IETF. October 2000. doi:10.17487/RFC2960. RFC 2960.
- "Transport". Diameter Base Protocol. IETF. sec. 2.1. doi:10.17487/RFC3588. RFC 3588. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
- "Example Scenario Using RSerPool Session Services". An Overview of Reliable Server Pooling Protocols. IETF. p. 10. sec. 4.2. doi:10.17487/RFC5351. RFC 5351.
- RFC 4960, section 1.5.5
- Hogg, Scott. "What About Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)?". Network World. Retrieved 2017-10-04.
"Reference Implementation for SCTP - RFC4960". Retrieved 2013-10-14.
This is the reference implementation for SCTP. It is portable and runs on FreeBSD/MAC-OS/Windows and in User Space (including linux).
- "sys/netinet/sctp.h". BSD Cross Reference. NetBSD. 2017-06-27. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
- "man4/sctp.4". BSD Cross Reference. NetBSD. 2018-07-31. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
- "DragonFly Removes SCTP". Lists.dragonflybsd.org. Retrieved 2016-04-28.
- "About FreeBSD's Technological Advances". The FreeBSD Project. 2008-03-09. Retrieved 2008-09-13.
SCTP: FreeBSD 7.0 is the reference implementation for the new IETF Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) protocol, intended to support VoIP, telecommunications, and other applications with strong reliability and variable quality transmission through features such as multi-path delivery, fail-over, and multi-streaming.
- "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)". Hewlett-Packard Development Company. Archived from the original on 2013-01-03.
- "TCP/IP Networking". QNX Developer Support. QNX Software Systems. Retrieved 2008-09-13."What's New in this Reference". QNX Library Reference. QNX Software Systems. Retrieved 2012-12-18.
- "QNX Software Development Platform 6.4.0".
- "Solaris 10 Operating System Networking — Extreme Network Performance". Sun Microsystems. Retrieved 2008-09-13.
- "SctpDrv: an SCTP driver for Microsoft Windows". Archived from the original on 2011-01-08. Retrieved 2011-02-04.
- "SCTP Network Kernel Extension for Mac OS X".
- "SCTP Download Page". 2006-05-29. Retrieved 2011-02-04.
- "Windows SCTP library installer". Retrieved 2011-02-04.
- Seggelmann, R.; Tuxen, M.; Rathgeb, E.P. (18–20 July 2012). SSH over SCTP — Optimizing a multi-channel protocol by adapting it to SCTP. Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), 2012 8th International Symposium on. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/CSNDSP.2012.6292659. ISBN 978-1-4577-1473-3.
- D. Wing; A. Yourtchenko (April 2012). "Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts". tools.ietf.org. IETF.
- Khademi, Naeem; Brunstrom, Anna; Hurtig, Per; Grinnemo, Karl-Johan (July 21, 2016). "Happy Eyeballs for Transport Selection". tools.ietf.org. IETF. Retrieved 2017-01-09.