Scroll compressor

A scroll compressor (also called spiral compressor, scroll pump and scroll vacuum pump) is a device for compressing air or refrigerant.[1] It is used in air conditioning equipment, as an automobile supercharger (where it is known as a scroll-type supercharger) and as a vacuum pump. Many residential central heat pump and air conditioning systems and a few automotive air conditioning systems employ a scroll compressor instead of the more traditional rotary, reciprocating, and wobble-plate compressors.

A scroll compressor operating in reverse is a scroll expander, and can generate mechanical work.


Léon Creux first patented a scroll compressor in 1905 in France and the US (Patent number 801182).[2] Creux invented the compressor as a rotary steam engine concept, but the metal casting technology of the period was not sufficiently advanced to construct a working prototype, since a scroll compressor demands very tight tolerances to function effectively. In the 1905 patent, Creux defines a co-orbiting or spinning reversible steam expander driven by a fixed radius crank on a single shaft.[3] However, the scroll expander engine could not overcome the machining hurdles of radial compliance inherit to achieving efficiency in scroll operation that would not be adequately addressed until the works of Niels Young in 1975.[4] The first practical scroll compressors did not appear on the market until after World War II, when higher-precision machine tools enabled their construction. In 1981, Sanden began manufacturing the first commercially available scroll compressors for automobile air conditioners.[5][1] They were not commercially produced for air conditioning until 1983 when Hitachi launched the world's first air conditioner with a scroll compressor.[6][7]


A scroll compressor uses two interleaving scrolls to pump, compress or pressurize fluids such as liquids and gases. The vane geometry may be involute, Archimedean spiral, or hybrid curves.[8][9][10][11][12]

Often, one of the scrolls is fixed, while the other orbits eccentrically without rotating, thereby trapping and pumping or compressing pockets of fluid between the scrolls. Another method for producing the compression motion is co-rotating the scrolls, in synchronous motion, but with offset centers of rotation. The relative motion is the same as if one were orbiting.

Leaks from axial gaps are prevented by the use of spiral-shaped tip seals, placed into grooves on the tips of both spirals.[13] These tip seals also help lower the friction and can be replaced when worn down.

Another variation is with flexible (layflat) tubing where the archimedean spiral acts as a peristaltic pump, which operates on much the same principle as a toothpaste tube. They have casings filled with lubricant to prevent abrasion of the exterior of the pump tube and to aid in the dissipation of heat, and use reinforced tubes, often called 'hoses'. This class of pump is often called a 'hose pumper'. Since there are no moving parts in contact with the fluid, peristaltic pumps are inexpensive to manufacture. Their lack of valves, seals and glands makes them comparatively inexpensive to maintain, and the hose or tube is a low-cost maintenance item compared to other pump types.


Engineering comparison to other pumps

These devices are known for operating more smoothly, quietly, and reliably than conventional compressors in some applications.[14] Unlike pistons, the orbiting scroll’s mass can be perfectly counterbalanced, with simple masses, to minimize vibration. (An orbiting scroll cannot be balanced if Oldham coupling is used.) The scroll’s gas processes are more continuous. Additionally, a lack of dead space gives an increased volumetric efficiency.

Rotations and pulse flow

The compression process occurs over approximately 2 to 2½ rotations of the crankshaft, compared to one rotation for rotary compressors, and one-half rotation for reciprocating compressors. The scroll discharge and suction processes occur for a full rotation, compared to less than a half-rotation for the reciprocating suction process, and less than a quarter-rotation for the reciprocating discharge process. Reciprocating compressor have multiple cylinders (typically, anywhere from two to six), while scroll compressors only have one compression element. The presence of multiple cylinders in reciprocating compressors reduces suction and discharge pulsations. Therefore, it is difficult to state whether scroll compressors have lower pulsation levels than reciprocating compressors as has often been claimed by some suppliers of scroll compressors. The more steady flow yields lower gas pulsations, lower sound and lower vibration of attached piping, while having no influence on the compressor operating efficiency.


Scroll compressors never have a suction valve, but depending on the application may or may not have a discharge valve. The use of a dynamic discharge valve is more prominent in high pressure ratio applications, typical of refrigeration. Typically, an air-conditioning scroll does not have a dynamic discharge valve. The use of a dynamic discharge valve improves scroll compressor efficiency over a wide range of operating conditions, when the operating pressure ratio is well above the built-in pressure ratio of the compressors. If the compressor is designed to operate near a single operating point, then the scroll compressor can actually gain efficiency around this point if there is no dynamic discharge valve present (since there are additional discharge flow losses associated with the presence of the discharge valve as well as discharge ports tend to be smaller when the discharge is present).[15][16]


The isentropic efficiency of scroll compressors is slightly higher than that of a typical reciprocating compressor when the compressor is designed to operate near one selected rating point.[17] The scroll compressors are more efficient in this case because they do not have a dynamic discharge valve that introduces additional throttling losses. However, the efficiency of a scroll compressor that does not have a discharge valve begins to decrease as compared to the reciprocating compressor at higher pressure ratio operation. This is a result of under-compression losses that occur at high pressure ratio operation of the positive displacement compressors that do not have a dynamic discharge valve.

The scroll compression process is nearly 100% volumetrically efficient in pumping the trapped fluid. The suction process creates its own volume, separate from the compression and discharge processes further inside. By comparison, reciprocating compressors leave a small amount of compressed gas in the cylinder, because it is not practical for the piston to touch the head or valve plate. That remnant gas from the last cycle then occupies space intended for suction gas. The reduction in capacity (i.e. volumetric efficiency) depends on the suction and discharge pressures with greater reductions occurring at higher ratios of discharge to suction pressures.


Scroll compressors have fewer moving parts than reciprocating compressors which, theoretically, should improve reliability. According to Emerson Climate Technologies, manufacturer of Copeland scroll compressors, scroll compressors have 70 percent fewer moving parts than conventional reciprocating compressors.[18]

In 2006 a major manufacturer of food service equipment, Stoelting, chose to change the design of one of their soft serve ice cream machines from reciprocating to scroll compressor. They found through testing that the scroll compressor design delivered better reliability and energy efficiency in operation.[19]


Scroll compressors tend to be very compact and smooth running and so do not require spring suspension. This allows them to have very small shell enclosures which reduces overall cost but also results in smaller free volume.[20] This is a weakness in terms of liquid handling. Their corresponding strength is in the lack of suction valves which moves the most probable point of failure to the drive system which may be made somewhat stronger. Thus the scroll mechanism is itself more tolerant of liquid ingestion but at the same time is more prone to experience it in operation. The small size and quiet operation of a scroll compressor allow for the unit to be built into high power density computers, like IBM mainframes. Scroll compressors also simplify the piping design, since they require no external connection for the primary coolant.

Scroll Expander

The scroll expander is a work producing device used mostly in low-pressure heat recovery applications. It is essentially a scroll compressor working in reverse; high enthalpy working fluid or gas enters the discharge side of the compressor and rotates the eccentric scroll before discharging from the compressor inlet. The basic modification required to convert the scroll compressor to a scroll expander is to remove the non-return valve from the compressor discharge.[21]

See also


  1. McCullough, John E. "Japanese and American Competition in the Development of Scroll Compressors and its impact on the American Air Conditioning Industry". U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 26 April 2019.
  2. US 801182, Creux, Léon, "Rotary Engine"
  3. Bush, James W.; Beagle, Wayne P. (1994). "Co-Orbiting Scroll Design and Operational Characteristics". Purdue e-Pubs. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  4. US 3874827, Young, Niels O., "Positive Displacement Scroll Apparatus With Axial Radially Compliant Scroll Member"
  5. "History". Sanden Corporation. Sanden International (Europe) Ltd. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  7. Gerken, David T.; Calhoun, John L. (March 2000). "Design Review of Cast Aluminum Scroll Compressor Components". SAE 2000 World Congress. SAE International. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  8. US 4216661, Nobukatsu, Arai; Kousokabe Hirokatu & Sato Eiji et al., "Scroll Compressor With Means For End Plate Bias And Cooled Gas Return To Sealed Compressor Spaces"
  9. US 4522575, Tischer, J. & R Utter, "Scroll Machine Using Discharge Pressure For Axial Sealing"
  10. US 4767293, Caillat, J.; R. Weatherston & J Bush, "Scroll-Type Machine With Axially Compliant Mounting"
  11. US 4875838, Richardson, Jr., Hubert, "Scroll Compressor With Orbiting Scroll Member Biased By Oil Pressure"
  12. US 4834633, Etemad, S.; D. Yannascoli & M. Hatzikazakis, "Scroll Machine With Wraps Of Different Thicknesses"
  13. Mitsuhiro Fukuta; Daisuke Ogi; Masaaki Motozawa; Tadashi Yanagisawa; Shigeki Iwanami; Tadashi Hotta (14–17 July 2014). Seal Mechanism of Tip Seal in Scroll Compressor. 22nd International Compressor Engineering Conference at Purdue. p. 1255.
  14. "HVAC Compressor". Powered by The People Resources Company. July 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-21.
  15. Jim Wheeler (November 1988). "Scroll Compressors: The Inside Story". Contracting Business. Penton Media: 36.
  16. Bush, James W.; Elson, John P. (July 1988). "Scroll Compressor Design Criteria for Residential Air Conditioning and Heat Pump Applications". Proceedings of the 1988 International Compressor Engineering Conference. 1: 83–92.
  17. Elson, John P.; Kaemmer, Norbert; Wang, Simon; Perevozchikov, Michael (14–17 July 2008). Scroll Technology: An Overview of Past, Present, and Future Developments. International Compressor Engineering Conference. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  18. "Scroll Compressors: Design Benefits". Emerson Climate Technologies. Retrieved 2013-01-11.
  19. Russell, Jill (February 2006). "Commercial Foodservice Equipment, A Continuous Cool". Appliance Magazine. Retrieved 2007-01-10.
  20. Mraz, Stephen. "Scanning for Ideas: Air Squared developed world's smallest continuous-duty scroll compressor". Machine Design. Penton Media, Inc. Retrieved 25 May 2019.
  21. Emhardt, Simon; Tian, Guohong; Chew, John (August 2018). "A review of scroll expander geometries and their performance" (PDF). Applied Thermal Engineering. 141: 1020–1034. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.045. ISSN 1359-4311.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.