Rank of an elliptic curve
In mathematics, the rank of an elliptic curve is the rational Mordell–Weil rank of an elliptic curve defined over the field of rational numbers. The rank is related to several outstanding problems in number theory, most notably the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. It is widely believed that there is no maximum rank for an elliptic curve, and it has been shown that there exist curves with rank as large as 28, but it is widely believed that such curves are rare. Indeed, Goldfeld and later Katz–Sarnak conjectured that in a suitable asymptotic sense (see below), the rank of elliptic curves should be 1/2 on average. In other words, half of all elliptic curves should have rank 0 (meaning that the infinite part of its Mordell–Weil group is trivial) and the other half should have rank 1; all remaining ranks consist of a total of 0% of all elliptic curves.
Mordell–Weil's theorem shows is a finitely generated abelian group, thus where is the finite torsion subgroup and r is the rank of the elliptic curve.
In order to obtain a reasonable notion of 'average', one must be able to count elliptic curves somehow. This requires the introduction of a height function on the set of rational elliptic curves. To define such a function, recall that a rational elliptic curve can be given in terms of a Weierstrass form, that is, we can write
for some integers . Moreover, this model is unique if for any prime number such that divides , we have . We can then assume that are integers that satisfy this property and define a height function on the set of elliptic curves by
It can then be shown that the number of elliptic curves with bounded height is finite.
We denote by the Mordell–Weil rank of the elliptic curve . With the height function in hand, one can then define the "average rank" as a limit, provided that it exists:
It is not known whether or not this limit exists. However, by replacing the limit with the limit superior, one can obtain a well-defined quantity. Obtaining estimates for this quantity is therefore obtaining upper bounds for the size of the average rank of elliptic curves (provided that an average exists).
Upper bounds for the average rank
In the past two decades there has been some progress made towards the task of finding upper bounds for the average rank. A. Brumer showed that, conditioned on the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture and the Generalized Riemann hypothesis that one can obtain an upper bound of for the average rank. Heath-Brown showed that one can obtain an upper bound of , still assuming the same two conjectures. Finally, Young showed that one can obtain a bound of ; still assuming both conjectures.
Bhargava and Shankar showed that the average rank of elliptic curves is bounded above by and without assuming either the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture or the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis. This is achieved by computing the average size of the -Selmer and -Selmer groups of elliptic curves respectively.
Bhargava and Shankar's approach
Bhargava and Shankar's unconditional proof of the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves is obtained by using a certain exact sequence involving the Mordell-Weil group of an elliptic curve . Denote by the Mordell-Weil group of rational points on the elliptic curve , the -Selmer group of , and let Ш denote the -part of the Tate–Shafarevich group of . Then we have the following exact sequence
This shows that the rank of , also called the -Selmer rank of , defined as the non-negative integer such that , is an upper bound for the Mordell-Weil rank of . Therefore, if one can compute or obtain an upper bound on -Selmer rank of , then one would be able to bound the Mordell-Weil rank on average as well.
In Binary quartic forms having bounded invariants, and the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves, Bhargava and Shankar computed the 2-Selmer rank of elliptic curves on average. They did so by counting binary quartic forms, using a method used by Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer in their original computation of the analytic rank of elliptic curves which led to their famous conjecture.
Largest known ranks
A common conjecture is that there is no bound on the largest possible rank for an elliptic curve. In 2006, Noam Elkies discovered an elliptic curve with a rank of at least 28:
- y2 + xy + y = x3 − x2 − 20067762415575526585033208209338542750930230312178956502x + 34481611795030556467032985690390720374855944359319180361266008296291939448732243429
- y2 + xy + y = x3 − x2 + 31368015812338065133318565292206590792820353345x + 302038802698566087335643188429543498624522041683874493555186062568159847
- Hartnett, Kevin (31 October 2018). "Without a Proof, Mathematicians Wonder How Much Evidence Is Enough". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
- Dujella, Andrej. "History of elliptic curves rank records". Retrieved 3 August 2016.
- D. Goldfeld, Conjectures on elliptic curves over quadratic fields, in Number Theory, Carbondale 1979 (Proc. Southern Illinois Conf., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, Ill., 1979), Lecture Notes in Math. 751, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979, pp. 108–118. MR0564926. Zbl 0417.14031. doi:10.1007/BFb0062705.
- N. M. Katz and P. Sarnak, Random Matrices, Frobenius Eigenvalues, and Monodromy, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 45, Amer. Math. Soc., 1999. MR1659828. Zbl 0958.11004.
- A. Brumer, The average rank of elliptic curves. I, Invent. Math. 109 (1992), 445–472. MR1176198. Zbl 0783.14019. doi:10.1007/BF01232033.
- D. R. Heath-Brown, The average analytic rank of elliptic curves, Duke Math. J. 122 (2004), 591–623. MR2057019. Zbl 1063.11013. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12235-3.
- M. P. Young, Low-lying zeros of families of elliptic curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19 (2006), 205–250. MR2169047. Zbl 1086.11032. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-05-00503-5.
- M. Bhargava and A. Shankar, Binary quartic forms having bounded invariants, and the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves, Annals of Mathematics 181 (2015), 191–242 doi:10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.3
- M. Bhargava and A. Shankar, Ternary cubic forms having bounded invariants, and the existence of a positive proportion of elliptic curves having rank 0, Annals of Mathematics 181 (2015), 587–621 doi:10.4007/annals.2015.181.2.4