In general topology, the pseudo-arc is the simplest nondegenerate hereditarily indecomposable continuum. The pseudo-arc is an arc-like homogeneous continuum, and played a central role in the classification of homogeneous planar continua. R.H. Bing proved that, in a certain well-defined sense, most continua in Rn, n ≥ 2, are homeomorphic to the pseudo-arc.
In 1920, Bronisław Knaster and Kazimierz Kuratowski asked whether a nondegenerate homogeneous continuum in the Euclidean plane R2 must be a Jordan curve. In 1921, Stefan Mazurkiewicz asked whether a nondegenerate continuum in R2 that is homeomorphic to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua must be an arc. In 1922, Knaster discovered the first example of a hereditarily indecomposable continuum K, later named the pseudo-arc, giving a negative answer to a Mazurkiewicz question. In 1948, R.H. Bing proved that Knaster's continuum is homogeneous, i.e. for any two of its points there is a homeomorphism taking one to the other. Yet also in 1948, Edwin Moise showed that Knaster's continuum is homeomorphic to each of its non-degenerate subcontinua. Due to its resemblance to the fundamental property of the arc, namely, being homeomorphic to all its nondegenerate subcontinua, Moise called his example M a pseudo-arc. Bing's construction is a modification of Moise's construction of M, which he had first heard described in a lecture. In 1951, Bing proved that all hereditarily indecomposable arc-like continua are homeomorphic — this implies that Knaster's K, Moise's M, and Bing's B are all homeomorphic. Bing also proved that the pseudo-arc is typical among the continua in a Euclidean space of dimension at least 2 or an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space. Bing and F. Burton Jones constructed a decomposable planar continuum that admits an open map onto the circle, with each point preimage homeomorphic to the pseudo-arc, called the circle of pseudo-arcs. Bing and Jones also showed that it is homogeneous. In 2016 Logan Hoehn and Lex Oversteegen classified all planar homogeneous continua, up to a homeomorphism, as the circle, pseudo-arc and circle of pseudo-arcs. In 2019 Hoehn and Oversteegen showed that the pseudo-arc is topologically the only, other than the arc, hereditarily equivalent planar continuum, thus providing a complete solution to the planar case of Mazurkiewicz's problem from 1921.
The following construction of the pseudo-arc follows (Wayne Lewis 1999).
At the heart of the definition of the pseudo-arc is the concept of a chain, which is defined as follows:
- A chain is a finite collection of open sets in a metric space such that if and only if The elements of a chain are called its links, and a chain is called an ε-chain if each of its links has diameter less than ε.
While being the simplest of the type of spaces listed above, the pseudo-arc is actually very complex. The concept of a chain being crooked (defined below) is what endows the pseudo-arc with its complexity. Informally, it requires a chain to follow a certain recursive zig-zag pattern in another chain. To 'move' from the mth link of the larger chain to the nth, the smaller chain must first move in a crooked manner from the mth link to the (n-1)th link, then in a crooked manner to the (m+1)th link, and then finally to the nth link.
- Let and be chains such that
- each link of is a subset of a link of , and
- for any indices i, j, m, and n with , , and , there exist indices and with (or ) and and
- Then is crooked in
For any collection C of sets, let denote the union of all of the elements of C. That is, let
The pseudo-arc is defined as follows:
- Let p and q be distinct points in the plane and be a sequence of chains in the plane such that for each i,
- the first link of contains p and the last link contains q,
- the chain is a -chain,
- the closure of each link of is a subset of some link of , and
- the chain is crooked in .
- Then P is a pseudo-arc.
- R.H. Bing, A homogeneous indecomposable plane continuum, Duke Math. J., 15:3 (1948), 729–742
- R.H. Bing, Concerning hereditarily indecomposable continua, Pacific J. Math., 1 (1951), 43–51
- R.H. Bing and F. Burton Jones, "Another homogeneous plane continuum", Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 90 (1959), 171–192
- Henderson, George W. "Proof that every compact decomposable continuum which is topologically equivalent to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua is an arc". Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 421–428
- L.C. Hoehn and Oversteegen, L., "A complete classification of homogeneous plane continua". Acta Math. 216 (2016), no. 2, 177-216.
- L.C. Hoehn and Oversteegen, L., "A complete classification of hereditarily equivalent plane continua". "arXiv:1812.08846".
- Trevor Irwin and Sławomir Solecki, Projective Fraïssé limits and the pseudo-arc, Trans. AMS, 358:7 (2006), 3077-3096.
- Kazuhiro Kawamura, "On a conjecture of Wood", Glasg. Math. J. 47 (2005) 1–5
- Bronisław Knaster, Un continu dont tout sous-continu est indécomposable. Fundamenta Mathematicae 3 (1922): pp. 247–286
- Wayne Lewis, The Pseudo-Arc, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana, 5 (1999), 25–77.
- Wayne Lewis and Piotr Minc, Drawing the pseudo-arc, Houston J. Math. 36 (2010), 905-934.
- Edwin Moise, An indecomposable plane continuum which is homeomorphic to each of its nondegenerate subcontinua, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 63, no. 3 (1948), 581–594
- Nadler, Sam B., Jr. "Continuum theory. An introduction". Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 158. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992. xiv+328 pp. ISBN 0-8247-8659-9
- Fernando Rambla, "A counterexample to Wood's conjecture", J. Math. Anal. Appl. 317 (2006) 659–667.
- Lasse Rempe-Gillen, "Arc-like continua, Julia sets of entire functions, and Eremenko's Conjecture", "arXiv:1610.06278v3"