Schematic representation


The Phall-O-meter was developed by Kiira Triea[4][5] based on a concept by professor of psychology Suzanne Kessler. Kessler summarized the range of medically acceptable infant penis and clitoris sizes in the book Lessons from the Intersexed.[6] Kessler states that normative tables for clitoral length appeared in the late 1980s, while normative tables for penis length appeared more than forty years before that. She combined those standard tables to demonstrate an "intermediate area of phallic length that neither females nor males are permitted to have", that is, a clitoris larger than 9 mm or a penis shorter than 25 mm.[6]

The meter was printed by the now-defunct Intersex Society of North America as a means of demonstrating concerns with the medical treatment of intersex bodies.[5][7][8][9]

Anne Fausto-Sterling described how members of the intersex rights movement had developed a phall-o-meter, in her book Sexing the Body in 2000.[10] Fausto-Sterling noted that, despite the existence of normative tables, clinicians' practices are more subjective: "doctors may use only their personal impressions to decide" on an appropriate clitoris size.[11] Similarly, in a paper presented to the American Sociological Association in 2003, Sharon Preves cites Melissa Hendricks, writing in the Johns Hopkins Magazine, November 1993 on subjective clinical norms and their relationship to surgical management:[12]

In truth, the choice of gender still often comes down to what the external genitals look like. Doctors who work with children with ambiguous genitalia sometimes put it this way, “You can make a hole [vagina] but you can’t build a pole [penis].” Surgeons can decrease the size of a phallus and create a vagina, but constructing a penis that will grow as the child grows is another matter

Copies of the Phall-O-Meter are now held by the Wellcome Library in London,[13] and the Smithsonian Institution.[14] An image of the Phall-O-Meter has been used to illustrate a report on the numbers of surgeries on intersex children in Germany between 2005 and 2014.[15]

While the scale as used by the Intersex Society of North America was a satirical tool for activism, numerous clinical scales and measurement systems exist to define genitals as normal male or female, or "abnormal", including the orchidometer, Prader scale and Quigley scale.

See also


  1. Forrester, John (2009). "The psychology of the sexual–reproductive–gender system" (PDF). Wellcome History (42): 13–15.
  2. Marchal, Joseph (2010-07-03). "Bodies Bound for Circumcision and Baptism: An Intersex Critique and the Interpretation of Galatians". Theology & Sexuality. 16 (2): 163–182. doi:10.1558/tse.v16i2.163. ISSN 1355-8358.
  3. García López, Daniel J (March 2015). "La intersexualidad en el discurso médico-jurídico". Eunomía. 0 (8): 54–70. ISSN 2253-6655.
  4. Larochelle, Renée (June 7, 2012). "La vie secrète du troisième sexe". Le Fil. 47 (32).
  5. Dreger, Alice (February 12, 2008), A note on Kiira Triea's place in the history of intersex activism
  6. Kessler, Suzanne (1998). Lessons from the Intersexed. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-8135-2530-3.
  7. White, Ryan L. (2013). "Preferred Private Parts: Importing Intersex Autonomy for M.C. v. Aaronson". Fordham International Law Journal. 37: 777.
  8. Intersex Society of North America (2005). "Hermaphrodites with Attitude" (PDF). Hermaphrodites with Attitude, Winter 2005.
  9. Feder, E. K. (January 1, 2009). "Imperatives of Normality: From "Intersex" to "Disorders of Sex Development"". GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 15 (2): 225–247. doi:10.1215/10642684-2008-135. ISSN 1064-2684.
  10. Fausto-Sterling, Anne (2000). Sexing the Body. New York: Basic Books. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-465-07714-4.
  11. Fausto-Sterling, Anne (2000). Sexing the Body. New York: Basic Books. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-465-07714-4.
  12. Preves, Sharon (August 16, 2003). "Hermaphrodites With Attitude: The Intersex Patients' Rights Movement and Clinical Reform". annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.
  13. "L0031936". Wellcome Library.
  14. Dreger, Professor Alice D. (2006). "Intersex and Human Rights: The Long View". In Professor Sharon E. Sytsma (ed.). Ethics and Intersex. International Library of Ethics, Law and the New Medicine. 29. Springer Netherlands. pp. 73–86. doi:10.1007/1-4220-4314-7_4. ISBN 978-1-4020-4314-7.
  15. Klöppel, Ulrike (December 2016). "Zur Aktualität kosmetischer Operationen "uneindeutiger" Genitalien im Kindesalter". Gender Bulletin (42). ISSN 0947-6822. Archived from the original on 2017-02-04. Retrieved 2017-07-10.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.