# Parabola

In mathematics, a **parabola** is a plane curve which is mirror-symmetrical and is approximately U shaped. It fits several other superficially different mathematical descriptions, which can all be proved to define exactly the same curves.

One description of a parabola involves a point (the focus) and a line (the directrix). The focus does not lie on the directrix. The parabola is the locus of points in that plane that are equidistant from both the directrix and the focus. Another description of a parabola is as a conic section, created from the intersection of a right circular conical surface and a plane which is parallel to another plane that is tangential to the conical surface.[lower-alpha 1]

The line perpendicular to the directrix and passing through the focus (that is, the line that splits the parabola through the middle) is called the "axis of symmetry". The point where the parabola intersects its axis of symmetry is called the "vertex", and is the point where the parabola is most sharply curved. The distance between the vertex and the focus, measured along the axis of symmetry, is the "focal length". The "latus rectum" is the chord of the parabola which is parallel to the directrix and passes through the focus. Parabolas can open up, down, left, right, or in some other arbitrary direction. Any parabola can be repositioned and rescaled to fit exactly on any other parabola—that is, all parabolas are geometrically similar.

Parabolas have the property that, if they are made of material that reflects light, then light which travels parallel to the axis of symmetry of a parabola and strikes its concave side is reflected to its focus, regardless of where on the parabola the reflection occurs. Conversely, light that originates from a point source at the focus is reflected into a parallel ("collimated") beam, leaving the parabola parallel to the axis of symmetry. The same effects occur with sound and other forms of energy. This reflective property is the basis of many practical uses of parabolas.

The parabola has many important applications, from a parabolic antenna or parabolic microphone to automobile headlight reflectors to the design of ballistic missiles. They are frequently used in physics, engineering, and many other areas.

## History

The earliest known work on conic sections was by Menaechmus in the 4th century BC. He discovered a way to solve the problem of doubling the cube using parabolas. (The solution, however, does not meet the requirements of compass-and-straightedge construction.) The area enclosed by a parabola and a line segment, the so-called "parabola segment", was computed by Archimedes via the method of exhaustion in the 3rd century BC, in his *The Quadrature of the Parabola*. The name "parabola" is due to Apollonius who discovered many properties of conic sections. It means "application", referring to "application of areas" concept, that has a connection with this curve, as Apollonius had proved.[1] The focus–directrix property of the parabola and other conic sections is due to Pappus.

Galileo showed that the path of a projectile follows a parabola, a consequence of uniform acceleration due to gravity.

The idea that a parabolic reflector could produce an image was already well known before the invention of the reflecting telescope.[2] Designs were proposed in the early to mid seventeenth century by many mathematicians including René Descartes, Marin Mersenne,[3] and James Gregory.[4] When Isaac Newton built the first reflecting telescope in 1668, he skipped using a parabolic mirror because of the difficulty of fabrication, opting for a spherical mirror. Parabolic mirrors are used in most modern reflecting telescopes and in satellite dishes and radar receivers.[5]

## Definition as a locus of points

A parabola can be defined geometrically as a set of points (locus of points) in the Euclidean plane:

- A parabola is a set of points, such that for any point of the set the distance to a fixed point , the
*focus*, is equal to the distance to a fixed line , the*directrix*:

The midpoint of the perpendicular from the focus onto the directrix is called *vertex* and the line the *axis of symmetry* of the parabola.

## In a cartesian coordinate system

### Axis of symmetry parallel to the y-axis

If one introduces cartesian coordinates, such that and the directrix has the equation one obtains for a point from the equation . Solving for yields

- .

This parabola is U-shaped (*opening to the top*).

The horizontal chord through the focus (see picture in opening section) is called the *latus rectum*; one half of it is the *semi-latus rectum*. The latus rectum is parallel to the directrix. The semi-latus rectum is designated by the letter . From the picture one obtains

- .

The latus rectum is defined similarly for the other two conics, namely the ellipse and the hyperbola, respectively. The latus rectum is the line drawn through a focus of a conic section parallel to the directrix and terminated both ways by the curve. For any case, is the radius of the osculating circle at the vertex. For a parabola, the semi-latus rectum, , is the distance of the focus from the directrix. Using the parameter , the equation of the parabola can be rewritten as

- .

More generally, if the vertex is , the focus and the directrix , one obtains the equation

- .

*Remark:*

- In the case of the parabola has a downward opening.
- The presumption that the
*axis is parallel to the y-axis*allows one to consider a parabola as the graph of a polynomial of degree 2, and vice versa: the graph of an arbitrary polynomial of degree 2 is a parabola (see next section). - If one exchanges and , one obtains equations of the form . These parabolas open to the left (if ) or to the right (if ).

### General case

If the focus is and the directrix one obtains the equation

(The left side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance .)

For a parametric equation of a parabola in general position see § As the affine image of the unit parabola.

The implicit equation of a parabola is defined by an irreducible polynomial of degree two

such that or, equivalently, such that is the square of a linear polynomial.

## As a graph of a function

The previous section shows: any parabola with the origin as vertex and the y-axis as axis of symmetry can be considered as the graph of a function

- .

For the parabolas are opening to the top and for opening to the bottom (see picture). From the section above one obtains:

- The
*focus*is , - the
*focal length*, the*semi-latus rectum*is , - the
*vertex*is , - the
*directrix*has the equation , - the
*tangent*at point has the equation ,

For the parabola is the **unit parabola** with equation .
Its focus is , the semi-latus rectum and the directrix has the equation .

The general function of degree 2 is

- .

Completing the square yields

- ,

which is the equation of a parabola with

- the axis (parallel to the y-axis),
- the
*focal length*, the*semi-latus rectum*, - the
*vertex*, - the
*focus*, - the
*directrix*, - the point of the parabola intersecting the y-axis has coordinates ,
- the
*tangent*at a point on the y-axis has the equation .

## Similarity to the unit parabola

Two objects in the Euclidean plane are *similar* if one can be transformed to the other by a *similarity*, that is, an arbitrary composition of rigid motions (translations and rotations) and uniform scalings.

A parabola with vertex can be transformed by the translation to one with the origin as vertex. A suitable rotation around the origin can then transform the parabola to one that has the *y*-axis as axis of symmetry. Hence the parabola can be transformed by a rigid motion to a parabola with an equation . Such a parabola can then be transformed by the uniform scaling into the unit parabola with equation . Thus, any parabola can be mapped to the unit parabola by a similarity.[6]

A synthetic approach, using similar triangles, can also be used to establish this result.[7]

The general result is that two conic sections (necessarily of the same type) are similar if and only if they have the same eccentricity.[6] Thus, only circles (all having eccentricity 0) share this property with parabolas (all having eccentricity 1), while general ellipses and hyperbolas do not.

There are other simple affine transformations that map the parabola onto the unit parabola, such as . But this mapping is not a similarity, and only shows that all parabolas are affinely equivalent (see § As the affine image of the unit parabola).

## As a special conic section

The pencil of conic sections with the x-axis as axis of symmetry, one vertex at the origin (0,0) and the same semi-latus rectum can be represented by the equation

- ,

with the eccentricity.

- For the conic is a
*circle*(osculating circle of the pencil), - for an
*ellipse,* - for the
**parabola**with equation and - for a hyperbola (see picture).

## In polar coordinates

If *p* > 0, the parabola with equation (opening to the right) has the polar coordinate representation:

- (.)

Its vertex is and its focus is .

If one shifts the origin into the focus, that is, , one obtains the equation

*Remark 1:* Inverting this polar form shows: a parabola is the inverse of a cardioid.

*Remark 2:* The second polar form is a special case of a pencil of conics with focus (see picture):

- , (: eccentricity).

## Conic section and quadratic form

### Diagram, description, and definitions

The diagram represents a cone with its axis vertical.[lower-alpha 2] The point A is its apex. An inclined cross-section of the cone, shown in pink, is inclined from the vertical by the same angle, θ, as the side of the cone. According to the definition of a parabola as a conic section, the boundary of this pink cross-section, EPD, is a parabola.

A horizontal cross-section of the cone passes through the vertex, P, of the parabola. This cross-section is circular, but appears elliptical when viewed obliquely, as is shown in the diagram. Its centre is V, and PK is a diameter. We will call its radius r.

Another horizontal, circular cross-section of the cone is farther from the apex, A, than the one just described. It has a chord DE, which joins the points where the parabola intersects the circle. Another chord, BC, is the perpendicular bisector of DE, and is consequently a diameter of the circle. These two chords and the parabola's axis of symmetry, PM, all intersect at the point M.

All the labelled points, except D and E, are coplanar. They are in the plane of symmetry of the whole figure. This includes the point F, which is not mentioned above. It is defined and discussed below, in the paragraph "Position of the focus".

Let us call the length of DM and of EM x, and the length of PM y.

### Derivation of quadratic equation

The lengths of BM and CM are:

- (triangle BPM is isosceles, because )
- (PMCK is a parallelogram.)

Using the intersecting chords theorem on the chords BC and DE, we get:

Substituting:

Rearranging:

For any given cone and parabola, r and θ are constants, but x and y are variables which depend on the arbitrary height at which the horizontal cross-section BECD is made. This last equation shows the relationship between these variables. They can be interpreted as Cartesian coordinates of the points D and E, in a system in the pink plane with P as its origin. Since x is squared in the equation, the fact that D and E are on opposite sides of the y-axis is unimportant. If the horizontal cross-section moves up or down, toward or away from the apex of the cone, D and E move along the parabola, always maintaining the relationship between x and y shown in the equation. The parabolic curve is therefore the locus of points where the equation is satisfied, which makes it a Cartesian graph of the quadratic function in the equation.

### Focal length

It is proved in a preceding section that if a parabola has its vertex at the origin, and if it opens in the positive y direction, then its equation is *y* = *x*^{2}/4*f*, where f is its focal length.[lower-alpha 3] Comparing this with the last equation above shows that the focal length of the parabola in the cone is *r* sin *θ*.

### Position of the focus

In the diagram above, the point V is the foot of the perpendicular from the vertex of the parabola to the axis of the cone. **The point F is the foot of the perpendicular from the point V to the plane of the parabola.**[lower-alpha 4] By symmetry, F is on the axis of symmetry of the parabola. Angle VPF is complementary to θ, and angle PVF is complementary to angle VPF, therefore angle PVF is θ. Since the length of PV is r, the distance of F from the vertex of the parabola is *r* sin *θ*. It is shown above that this distance equals the focal length of the parabola, which is the distance from the vertex to the focus. The focus and the point F are therefore equally distant from the vertex, along the same line, which implies that they are the same point. Therefore, **the point F, defined above, is the focus of the parabola.**

This discussion started from the definition of a parabola as a conic section, but it has now led to a description as a graph of a quadratic function. This shows that these two descriptions are equivalent. They both define curves of exactly the same shape.

### Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres

An alternative proof can be done using Dandelin spheres. It works without calculation and uses elementary geometric considerations only (see the derivation below).

The intersection of an upright cone by a plane , whose inclination from vertical is the same as a generatrix (a.k.a. generator line, a line containing the apex and a point on the cone surface) of the cone, is a parabola (see diagram: red curve).

This generatrix is the only generatrix of the cone that's parallel to plane . Otherwise, if there are two generatrices parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be a hyperbola (or degenerate hyperbola, if the two generatrices are in the intersecting plane); If there is no generatrix parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be an ellipse or a circle (or a point).

Let plane be the plane that contains the vertical axis of the cone and line . The inclination of plane from vertical is the same as line means that, viewing from the side (that is, the plane is perpendicular to plane ), .

In order to prove the directrix property of a parabola (see "Definition as a locus of points" section above), one uses a Dandelin sphere , which is a sphere that touches the cone along a circle and plane at point . The plane containing the circle intersects with plane at line . There is a mirror symmetry in the system consisting of plane , Dandelin sphere and the cone (the plane of symmetry is ).

Since the plane containing the circle is perpendicular to plane and , their intersection line must also be perpendicular to plane . Since line is in plane , .

It turns out: is the *focus* of the parabola, and is the *directrix* of the parabola.

- Let be an arbitrary point of the intersection curve .
- The generatrix of the cone containing intersects circle at point .
- The line segments and are tangential to the sphere and, hence, are of equal length.
- Generatrix intersects the circle at point . The line segments and are tangential to the sphere and, hence, are of equal length.
- Let line be the line parallel to and passes through point . Since and point is in plane , line must be in plane ; Since , we know that as well.
- Let point be
**the foot of the perpendicular**from point to line , that is, is a segment of line , and hence . - From intercept theorem and we know that . Since , we know that , which means the distance from to the focus is equal to the distance from to the directrix .

## Proof of the reflective property

The reflective property states that, if a parabola can reflect light, then light which enters it travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry is reflected toward the focus. This is derived from geometrical optics, based on the assumption that light travels in rays. This derivation is valid, but may not be satisfying to readers who would prefer a mathematical approach. In the following proof, the fact that every point on the parabola is equidistant from the focus and from the directrix is taken as axiomatic.

Consider the parabola *y* = *x*^{2}. Since all parabolas are similar, this simple case represents all others. The right-hand side of the diagram shows part of this parabola.

### Construction and definitions

The point E is an arbitrary point on the parabola, with coordinates (*x*, *x*^{2}). The focus is F, the vertex is A (the origin), and the line FA (the y-axis) is the axis of symmetry. The line EC is parallel to the axis of symmetry, and intersects the x-axis at D. The point C is located on the directrix (which is not shown, to minimize clutter). The point B is the midpoint of the line segment FC.

### Deductions

Measured along the axis of symmetry, the vertex, A, is equidistant from the focus, F, and from the directrix. According to the Intercept theorem, since C is on the directrix, the y-coordinates of F and C are equal in absolute value and opposite in sign. B is the midpoint of FC, so its y-coordinate is zero, so it lies on the x-axis. Its x-coordinate is half that of E, D, and C, that is, *x*/2. The slope of the line BE is the quotient of the lengths of ED and BD, which is *x*^{2}/*x*/2, which comes to 2*x*. But 2*x* is also the slope (first derivative) of the parabola at E. Therefore, the line BE is the tangent to the parabola at E.

The distances EF and EC are equal because E is on the parabola, F is the focus and C is on the directrix. Therefore, since B is the midpoint of FC, triangles △FEB and △CEB are congruent (three sides), which implies that the angles marked α are congruent. (The angle above E is vertically opposite angle ∠BEC.) This means that a ray of light which enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry will be reflected by the line BE so it travels along the line EF, as shown in red in the diagram (assuming that the lines can somehow reflect light). Since BE is the tangent to the parabola at E, the same reflection will be done by an infinitesimal arc of the parabola at E. Therefore, light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola is reflected by the parabola toward its focus.

The point E has no special characteristics. This conclusion about reflected light applies to all points on the parabola, as is shown on the left side of the diagram. This is the reflective property.

### Other consequences

There are other theorems that can be deduced simply from the above argument.

#### Tangent bisection property

The above proof and the accompanying diagram show that the tangent BE bisects the angle ∠FEC. In other words, the tangent to the parabola at any point bisects the angle between the lines joining the point to the focus, and perpendicularly to the directrix.

#### Intersection of a tangent and perpendicular from focus

Since triangles △FBE and △CBE are congruent, FB is perpendicular to the tangent BE. Since B is on the x-axis, which is the tangent to the parabola at its vertex, it follows that the point of intersection between any tangent to a parabola and the perpendicular from the focus to that tangent lies on the line that is tangential to the parabola at its vertex. See animated diagram [8] and pedal curve.

#### Reflection of light striking the convex side

If light travels along the line CE, it moves parallel to the axis of symmetry and strikes the convex side of the parabola at E. It is clear from the above diagram that this light will be reflected directly away from the focus, along an extension of the segment FE.

### Alternative proofs

The above proofs of the reflective and tangent bisection properties use a line of calculus. For readers who are not comfortable with calculus, the following alternative is presented.

In this diagram, F is the focus of the parabola, and T and U lie on its directrix. P is an arbitrary point on the parabola. PT is perpendicular to the directrix, and the line MP bisects angle ∠FPT. Q is another point on the parabola, with QU perpendicular to the directrix. We know that FP = PT and FQ = QU. Clearly, QT > QU, so QT > FQ. All points on the bisector MP are equidistant from F and T, but Q is closer to F than to T. This means that Q is to the left of MP, that is, on the same side of it as the focus. The same would be true if Q were located anywhere else on the parabola (except at the point P), so the entire parabola, except the point P, is on the focus side of MP. Therefore, MP is the tangent to the parabola at P. Since it bisects the angle ∠FPT, this proves the tangent bisection property.

The logic of the last paragraph can be applied to modify the above proof of the reflective property. It effectively proves the line BE to be the tangent to the parabola at E if the angles α are equal. The reflective property follows as shown previously.

## Pin and string construction

The definition of a parabola by its focus and directrix can be used for drawing it with help of pins and strings:[9]

(0) Choose the *focus* and the *directrix* of the parabola.

(1) Take a triangle of a *set square* and prepare a *string* with length (see diagram).

(2) Pin one end of the string at point of the triangle and the other one to the focus .

(3) Position the triangle such that the second edge of the right angle is free to *slide* along the directrix.

(4) Take a *pen* and hold the string tight to the triangle.

(5) While moving the triangle along the directrix the pen *draws* an arc of a parabola, because of (see definition of a parabola).

## Properties related to Pascal's theorem

A parabola can be considered as the affine part of a non degenerated projective conic with a point on the line of infinity , which is the tangent at . The 5-,4- and 3- point degenerations of Pascal's theorem are properties of a conic dealing with at least one tangent. If one considers this tangent as the line at infinity and its point of contact as the point at infinity of the *y*-axis, one obtains three statements for a parabola.

The following properties of a parabola deal only with terms *connect, intersect, parallel*, which are invariants of similarities. So, it is sufficient to prove any property for the *unit parabola* with equation .

### 4-points-property

Any parabola can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation .

- Let be four points of the parabola and the intersection of the secant line with the line and let be the intersection of the secant line with the line (see picture). Then the secant line is parallel to line .

- (The lines and are parallel to the axis of the parabola.)

*Proof:* straightforward calculation for the unit parabola .

*Application:* The 4-points-property of a parabola can be used for the construction of point , while and are given.

*Remark:* the 4-points-property of a parabola is an affine version of the 5-point-degeneration of Pascal's theorem.

### 3-points-1-tangent-property

- Let be three points of the parabola with equation and the intersection of the secant line with the line and the intersection of the secant line with the line (see picture), then the tangent at point is parallel to the line .

- (The lines and are parallel to the axis of the parabola.)

*Proof:* can be performed for the unit parabola . A short calculation shows: line has slope which is the slope of the tangent at point .

*Application:* The 3-points-1-tangent-property of a parabola can be used for the construction of the tangent at point , while are given.

*Remark:* The 3-points-1-tangent-property of a parabola is an affine version of the 4-point-degeneration of Pascal's theorem.

### 2-points-2-tangents-property

- Let be two points of the parabola with equation and the intersection of the tangent at point with the line and the intersection of the tangent at point with the line (see picture) then the secant is parallel to the line .

- (The lines and are parallel to the axis of the parabola.)

*Proof:* straight forward calculation for the unit parabola .

*Application:* The 2-points-2-tangents-property can be used for the construction of the tangent of a parabola at point while and the tangent at are given.

*Remark 1:* The 2-points-2-tangents-property of a parabola is an affine version of the 3-point-degeneration of Pascal's theorem.

*Remark 2:* The 2-points-2-tangents-property should not be confused with the following property of a parabola, which deals with 2 points and 2 tangents, too, but is *not* related to Pascal's theorem.

### Axis-direction

The statements above presume the knowledge of the axis-direction of the parabola, in order to construct the points . The following property determines the points by two given points and their tangents only, and the result is: the line is parallel to the axis of the parabola.

- Let
- be two points of the parabola and be their tangents;
- be the intersection of the tangents ,
- be the intersection of the parallel line to through with the parallel line to through (see picture). Then the line is parallel to the axis of the parabola and has the equation

*Proof:* can be done (like the properties above) for the unit parabola .

*Application:* This property can be used to determine the direction of the axis of a parabola, if two points and their tangents are given. An alternative way is to determine the midpoints of two parallel chords, see section on parallel chords.

*Remark:* This property is an affine version of the theorem of two *perspective triangles* of a non-degenerate conic.[10]

## Steiner generation

### Parabola

Steiner established the following procedure for the construction of a non-degenerate conic (see Steiner conic):

- Given two pencils of lines at two points (all lines containing and respectively) and a projective but not perspective mapping of onto . Then the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non-degenerate projective conic section.

This procedure can be used for a simple construction of points on the parabola :

- Consider the pencil at the vertex and the set of lines , which are parallel to the
*y*-axis.

- Let be a point on the parabola and , .
- The line segment is divided into
*n*equally spaced segments and this division is projected (in the direction ) onto the line segment (see figure). This projection gives rise to a projective mapping from pencil onto the pencil . - The intersection of the line and the
*i*-th parallel to the*y*-axis is a point on the parabola.

*Proof:* straightforward calculation.

*Remark:* Steiner's generation is also available for ellipses and hyperbolas.

### Dual parabola

- A
*dual parabola*consists of the set of tangents of an ordinary parabola.

The Steiner generation of a conic can be applied to the generation of a dual conic by changing the meanings of points and lines:

- Let be given two point sets on two lines and a projective but not perspective mapping between these point sets, then the connecting lines of corresponding points form a non degenerate dual conic.

In order to generate elements of a dual parabola, one starts with

- three points not on a line,
- divides the line sections and each into equally spaced line segments and adds numbers as shown in the picture.
- Then the lines are tangents of a parabola, hence elements of a dual parabola.
- The parabola is a Bezier curve of degree 2 with the control points .

The *proof* is a consequence of the *de Casteljau algorithm* for a Bezier curve of degree 2.

## Inscribed angles and the 3-point-form

A parabola with equation is uniquely determined by three points with different x-coordinates. The usual procedure to determine the coefficients is to insert the point coordinates into the equation. The result is a linear system of three equations, which can be solved by Gaussian elimination or Cramer's rule, for example. An alternative way uses the *inscribed angle theorem* for parabolas:

In the following, the angle of two lines will be measured by the difference of the slopes of the line with respect to the directrix of the parabola. That is, for a parabola of equation the angle between two lines of equations is measured by

Analogous to the inscribed angle theorem for circles one has the *Inscribed angle theorem for parabolas*:[11][12]

- Four points with different x-coordinates (see picture), are on a parabola with equation if and only if the angles at and have the same measure, as defined above. That is,

(Proof: straightforward calculation: If the points are on a parabola, one may translate the coordinates for having the equation then one has if the points are on the parabola.)

A consequence is that the equation (in ) of the parabola determined by 3 points with different x-coordinates is (if two x-coordinates are equal there is no parabola with directrix parallel to the x-axis, which passes through the points)

Multiplying by the denominators that depend on one obtains the more standard form

## Pole-polar relation

In a suitable coordinate system any parabola can be described by an equation . The equation of the tangent at a point is

- .

One obtains the function

on the set of points of the parabola onto the set of tangents.

Obviously this function can be extended onto the set of all points of to a bijection between the points of and the lines with equations . The inverse mapping is

- line point .

This relation is called the *pole-polar relation of the parabola*, where the point is the *pole* and the corresponding line its *polar*.

By calculation one checks the following properties of the pole-polar relation of the parabola:

- For a point (pole)
*on*the parabola the polar is the tangent at this point (see picture: ). - For a pole
*outside*the parabola the intersection points of its polar with the parabola are the touching points of the two tangents passing (see picture: ). - For a point
*within*the parabola the polar has no point with the parabola in common. (see picture: and ). - The intersection point of two polar lines (for example: ) is the pole of the connecting line of their poles (in example: ).
- focus and directrix of the parabola are a pole-polar pair.

*Remark:* Pole-polar relations exist for ellipses and hyperbolas, too.

## Tangent properties

### Two tangent properties related to the latus rectum

Let the line of symmetry intersect the parabola at point Q, and denote the focus as point F and its distance from point Q as f. Let the perpendicular to the line of symmetry, through the focus, intersect the parabola at a point T. Then (1) the distance from F to T is 2*f*, and (2) a tangent to the parabola at point T intersects the line of symmetry at a 45° angle.[13]^{:p.26}

### Orthoptic property

If two tangents to a parabola are perpendicular to each other, then they intersect on the directrix. Conversely, two tangents which intersect on the directrix are perpendicular.

### Lambert's theorem

Let three tangents to a parabola form a triangle. Then **Lambert's theorem** states that the focus of the parabola lies on the circumcircle of the triangle.[14][8]^{:Corollary 20}

Tsukerman's converse to Lambert's theorem states that, given three lines that bound a triangle, if two of the lines are tangent to a parabola whose focus lies on the circumcircle of the triangle, then the third line is also tangent to the parabola.[15]

## Facts related to chords

### Focal length calculated from parameters of a chord

Suppose a chord crosses a parabola perpendicular to its axis of symmetry. Let the length of the chord between the points where it intersects the parabola be c and the distance from the vertex of the parabola to the chord, measured along the axis of symmetry, be d. The focal length, f, of the parabola is given by:

- Proof

Suppose a system of Cartesian coordinates is used such that the vertex of the parabola is at the origin, and the axis of symmetry is the y-axis. The parabola opens upward. It is shown elsewhere in this article that the equation of the parabola is 4*fy* = *x*^{2}, where f is the focal length. At the positive x end of the chord, *x* = *c*/2 and *y* = *d*. Since this point is on the parabola, these coordinates must satisfy the equation above. Therefore, by substitution, 4*fd* = (*c*/2)^{2}_{}. From this, *f* = *c*^{2}/16*d*.

### Area enclosed between a parabola and a chord

The area enclosed between a parabola and a chord (see diagram) is two-thirds of the area of a parallelogram which surrounds it. One side of the parallelogram is the chord, and the opposite side is a tangent to the parabola.[16][17] The slope of the other parallel sides is irrelevant to the area. Often, as here, they are drawn parallel with the parabola's axis of symmetry, but this is arbitrary.

A theorem equivalent to this one, but different in details, was derived by Archimedes in the 3rd century BCE. He used the areas of triangles, rather than that of the parallelogram.[lower-alpha 5] See the article "The Quadrature of the Parabola".

If the chord has length b, and is perpendicular to the parabola's axis of symmetry, and if the perpendicular distance from the parabola's vertex to the chord is h, the parallelogram is a rectangle, with sides of b and h. The area, A, of the parabolic segment enclosed by the parabola and the chord is therefore:

This formula can be compared with the area of a triangle: 1/2*bh*.

In general, the enclosed area can be calculated as follows. First, locate the point on the parabola where its slope equals that of the chord. This can be done with calculus, or by using a line that is parallel with the axis of symmetry of the parabola and passes through the midpoint of the chord. The required point is where this line intersects the parabola.[lower-alpha 6] Then, using the formula given in the article "Distance from a point to a line", calculate the perpendicular distance from this point to the chord. Multiply this by the length of the chord to get the area of the parallelogram, then by 2/3 to get the required enclosed area.

### Corollary concerning midpoints and endpoints of chords

A corollary of the above discussion is that if a parabola has several parallel chords, their midpoints all lie on a line which is parallel to the axis of symmetry. If tangents to the parabola are drawn through the endpoints of any of these chords, the two tangents intersect on this same line parallel to the axis of symmetry (see Axis-direction of a parabola).[lower-alpha 7]

## Arc length

If a point X is located on a parabola which has focal length f, and if p is the perpendicular distance from X to the axis of symmetry of the parabola, then the lengths of arcs of the parabola which terminate at X can be calculated from f and p as follows, assuming they are all expressed in the same units.[lower-alpha 8]

This quantity, s, is the length of the arc between X and the vertex of the parabola.

The length of the arc between X and the symmetrically opposite point on the other side of the parabola is 2*s*.

The perpendicular distance, p, can be given a positive or negative sign to indicate on which side of the axis of symmetry X is situated. Reversing the sign of p reverses the signs of h and s without changing their absolute values. If these quantities are signed, **the length of the arc between any two points on the parabola is always shown by the difference between their values of s.** The calculation can be simplified by using the properties of logarithms:

This can be useful, for example, in calculating the size of the material needed to make a parabolic reflector or parabolic trough.

This calculation can be used for a parabola in any orientation. It is not restricted to the situation where the axis of symmetry is parallel to the y-axis.

## A geometrical construction to find a sector area

S is the Focus and V is the Principal Vertex of the parabola VG. Draw VX perpendicular to SV.

Take any point B on VG and drop a perpendicular BQ from B to VX. Draw perpendicular ST intersecting BQ, extended if necessary, at T. At B draw the perpendicular BJ, intersecting VX at J.

For the parabola, the segment VBV, the area enclosed by the chord VB and the arc VB, is equal to ∆VBQ / 3, also

The Area of the Parabolic Sector SVB = ∆SVB + ∆VBQ / 3

Since triangles TSB and QBJ are similar:

Therefore, the Area of the Parabolic Sector , and can be found from the length of VJ, as found above.

A circle through S, V and B also passes through J.

Conversely, if a point, B on the parabola VG is to be found so that the Area of the Sector SVB is equal to a specified value, determine the point J on VX, and construct a circle through S, V and J. Since SJ is the diameter, the center of the circle is at its midpoint, and it lies on the perpendicular bisector of SV, a distance of one half VJ from SV. The point required, B is where this circle intersects the parabola.

If a body traces the path of the parabola due to an inverse square force directed towards S, the area SVB increases at a constant rate as point B moves forward. It follows that J moves at constant speed along VX as B moves along the parabola.

If the speed of the body at the vertex, where it is moving perpendicularly to SV is v, then the speed of J is equal to 3v/4.

The construction can be extended simply to include the case where neither radius coincides with the axis, SV as follows. Let A be a fixed point on VG between V and B, and point H be the intersection on VX with the perpendicular to SA at A. From the above, the Area of the Parabolic Sector

Conversely, if it is required to find the point B for a particular area SAB, find point J from HJ and point B as before. By Book 1 Proposition 16, Corollary 6 of the Principia, the speed of a body moving along a parabola with a force directed towards the focus is inversely proportional to the square root of the radius. If the speed at A is v, then at the vertex, V it is , and point J moves at a constant speed of

The above construction was devised by Isaac Newton and can be found in Book 1 of the Principia as Proposition 30.

## Focal length and radius of curvature at the vertex

The focal length of a parabola is half of its radius of curvature at its vertex.

- Proof

Consider a point (*x*, *y*) on a circle of radius R and with center at the point (0, *R*). The circle passes through the origin. If the point is near the origin, the Pythagorean theorem shows that:

But if (*x*, *y*) is extremely close to the origin, since the x-axis is a tangent to the circle, y is very small compared with x, so *y*^{2} is negligible compared with the other terms. Therefore, extremely close to the origin:

- (Equation 1)

Compare this with the parabola:

- (Equation 2)

which has its vertex at the origin, opens upward, and has focal length f. (See preceding sections of this article.)

Equations 1 and 2 are equivalent if *R* = 2*f*. Therefore, this is the condition for the circle and parabola to coincide at and extremely close to the origin. The radius of curvature at the origin, which is the vertex of the parabola, is twice the focal length.

- Corollary

A concave mirror which is a small segment of a sphere behaves approximately like a parabolic mirror, focusing parallel light to a point which is midway between the centre and the surface of the sphere.

## As the affine image of the unit parabola

Another definition of a parabola uses affine transformations:

- Any
*parabola*is the affine image of the unit parabola with equation .

An affine transformation of the Euclidean plane has the form , where is a regular matrix (determinant is not 0) and is an arbitrary vector. If are the column vectors of the matrix , the unit parabola is mapped onto the parabola

- is a
*point*of the parabola and - is a
*tangent vector*at point . - is
*parallel to the axis*of the parabola (axis of symmetry through the vertex).

In general the two vectors are not perpendicular and is *not* the vertex, unless the affine transformation is a similarity.

The tangent vector at the point is . At the vertex the tangent vector is orthogonal to . Hence the parameter of the vertex is the solution of the equation , which is and

- is the
*vertex*.

The *focal length* can be determined by a suitable parameter transformation (which does not change the geometric shape of the parabola). The focal length is

- .

Hence

- is the
*focus*of the parabola.

*Remark: *The advantage of this definition is, one obtains a simple parametric representation of an arbitrary parabola, even in the space, if the vectors are vectors of the Euclidean space.

## As quadratic Bézier curve

A quadratic Bézier curve is a curve defined by three points , and , its *control points*:

This curve is an arc of a parabola (see § As the affine image of the unit parabola).

## Numerical integration

In one method of numerical integration one replaces the graph of a function by arcs of parabolas and integrates the parabola arcs. A parabola is determined by three points. The formula for one arc is

The method is called Simpson's rule.

## As plane section of quadric

The following quadrics contain parabolas as plane sections:

- Elliptical Cone
- Parabolic cylinder
- Elliptical paraboloid
- Hyperbolic paraboloid
- Hyperboloid of one sheet
- Hyperboloid of two sheets

## As trisectrix

A parabola can be used as a trisectrix, that is it allows the exact trisection of an arbitrary angle with straightedge and compass. This is not in contradiction to the impossibility of an angle trisection with compass-and-straightedge constructions alone, as the use of parabolas is not allowed in the classic rules for compass-and-straightedge constructions.

To trisect place its leg on the *x*-axis such that the vertex is in the coordinate system's origin. The coordinate system also contains the parabola . The unit circle with radius 1 around the origin intersects the angle's other leg and from this point of intersection draw the perpendicular onto the *y*-axis. The parallel to *y*-axis through the midpoint of that perpendicular and the tangent on the unit circle in intersect in . The circle around with radius intersects the parabola in . The perpendicular from onto the *x*-axis intersects the unit circle in and is exactly one third of .

The correctness of this construction can be seen by showing that the *x*-coordinate of is . Solving the equation system given by the circle around and the parabola leads to the cubic equation . The triple angle formula then shows that is indeed a solution of that cubic equation.

This trisection goes back to René Descartes who described it in his book *La Geometria* (1637).[18]

## Generalizations

If one replaces the real numbers by an arbitrary field, many geometric properties of the parabola are still valid: 1) a line intersects in at most two points. 2) At any point the line is the tangent.... Essentially new phenomena arise, if the field has characteristic 2 (that is, ) : the tangents are all parallel.

In algebraic geometry, the parabola is generalized by the rational normal curves, which have coordinates (*x*, *x*^{2}, *x*^{3},…,*x ^{n}*); the standard parabola is the case

*n*=2, and the case

*n*= 3 is known as the twisted cubic. A further generalization is given by the Veronese variety, when there is more than one input variable.

In the theory of quadratic forms, the parabola is the graph of the quadratic form *x*^{2} (or other scalings), while the elliptic paraboloid is the graph of the positive-definite quadratic form *x*^{2} + *y*^{2} (or scalings) and the hyperbolic paraboloid is the graph of the indefinite quadratic form *x*^{2} − *y*^{2}. Generalizations to more variables yield further such objects.

The curves *y* = *x*^{p} for other values of p are traditionally referred to as the **higher parabolas**, and were originally treated implicitly, in the form *x*^{p} = *ky*^{q} for p and q both positive integers, in which form they are seen to be algebraic curves. These correspond to the explicit formula *y* = *x*^{p/q} for a positive fractional power of x. Negative fractional powers correspond to the implicit equation *x*^{p}*y*^{q} = *k*, and are traditionally referred to as **higher hyperbolas**. Analytically, x can also be raised to an irrational power (for positive values of x); the analytic properties are analogous to when x is raised to rational powers, but the resulting curve is no longer algebraic, and cannot be analyzed via algebraic geometry.

## In the physical world

In nature, approximations of parabolas and paraboloids are found in many diverse situations. The best-known instance of the parabola in the history of physics is the trajectory of a particle or body in motion under the influence of a uniform gravitational field without air resistance (for instance, a ball flying through the air, neglecting air friction).

The parabolic trajectory of projectiles was discovered experimentally in the early 17th century by Galileo, who performed experiments with balls rolling on inclined planes. He also later proved this mathematically in his book *Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences*.[19][lower-alpha 9] For objects extended in space, such as a diver jumping from a diving board, the object itself follows a complex motion as it rotates, but the center of mass of the object nevertheless forms a parabola. As in all cases in the physical world, the trajectory is always an approximation of a parabola. The presence of air resistance, for example, always distorts the shape, although at low speeds, the shape is a good approximation of a parabola. At higher speeds, such as in ballistics, the shape is highly distorted and doesn't resemble a parabola.

Another hypothetical situation in which parabolas might arise, according to the theories of physics described in the 17th and 18th centuries by Sir Isaac Newton, is in two-body orbits; for example the path of a small planetoid or other object under the influence of the gravitation of the Sun. Parabolic orbits do not occur in nature; simple orbits most commonly resemble hyperbolas or ellipses. The parabolic orbit is the degenerate intermediate case between those two types of ideal orbit. An object following a parabolic orbit would travel at the exact escape velocity of the object it orbits; objects in elliptical or hyperbolic orbits travel at less or greater than escape velocity, respectively. Long-period comets travel close to the Sun's escape velocity while they are moving through the inner solar system, so their paths are near parabolic.

Approximations of parabolas are also found in the shape of the main cables on a simple suspension bridge. The curve of the chains of a suspension bridge is always an intermediate curve between a parabola and a catenary, but in practice the curve is generally nearer to a parabola, and in calculations the second degree parabola is used.[20][21] Under the influence of a uniform load (such as a horizontal suspended deck), the otherwise catenary-shaped cable is deformed toward a parabola. Unlike an inelastic chain, a freely hanging spring of zero unstressed length takes the shape of a parabola. Suspension-bridge cables are, ideally, purely in tension, without having to carry other forces, for example, bending. Similarly, the structures of parabolic arches are purely in compression.

Paraboloids arise in several physical situations as well. The best-known instance is the parabolic reflector, which is a mirror or similar reflective device that concentrates light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation to a common focal point, or conversely, collimates light from a point source at the focus into a parallel beam. The principle of the parabolic reflector may have been discovered in the 3rd century BC by the geometer Archimedes, who, according to a dubious legend,[22] constructed parabolic mirrors to defend Syracuse against the Roman fleet, by concentrating the sun's rays to set fire to the decks of the Roman ships. The principle was applied to telescopes in the 17th century. Today, paraboloid reflectors can be commonly observed throughout much of the world in microwave and satellite-dish receiving and transmitting antennas.

In parabolic microphones, a parabolic reflector is used to focus sound onto a microphone, giving it highly directional performance.

Paraboloids are also observed in the surface of a liquid confined to a container and rotated around the central axis. In this case, the centrifugal force causes the liquid to climb the walls of the container, forming a parabolic surface. This is the principle behind the liquid mirror telescope.

Aircraft used to create a weightless state for purposes of experimentation, such as NASA's "Vomit Comet", follow a vertically parabolic trajectory for brief periods in order to trace the course of an object in free fall, which produces the same effect as zero gravity for most purposes.

In the United States, vertical curves in roads are usually parabolic by design.

### Gallery

Click on any image to enlarge it.

## See also

## Footnotes

- The tangential plane just touches the conical surface along a line which passes through the apex of the cone
- In the diagram, the axis is not exactly vertical. This is the result of a technical problem that occurs when a 3-dimensional model is converted into a 2-dimensional image. Readers should imagine the cone rotated slightly clockwise, so the axis, AV, is vertical.
- As stated above in the lead, the focal length of a parabola is the distance between its vertex and focus.
- The point V is the centre of the smaller circular cross-section of the cone. The point F is in the (pink) plane of the parabola, and the line VF is perpendicular to the plane of the parabola.
- Archimedes proved that the area of the enclosed parabolic segment was 4/3 as large as that of a triangle that he inscribed within the enclosed segment. It can easily be shown that the parallelogram has twice the area of the triangle, so Archimedes' proof also proves the theorem with the parallelogram.
- This method can be easily proved correct by calculus. It was also known and used by Archimedes, although he lived nearly 2000 years before calculus was invented.
- A proof of this sentence can be inferred from the proof of the orthoptic property, above. It is shown there that the tangents to the parabola
*y*=*x*^{2}at (*p*,*p*^{2}) and (*q*,*q*^{2}) intersect at a point whose x-coordinate is the mean of p and q. Thus if there is a chord between these two points, the intersection point of the tangents has the same x-coordinate as the midpoint of the chord. - In this calculation, the square root, q, must be positive. The quantity ln
*a*is the natural logarithm of a, that is, its logarithm to base e. - However, this parabolic shape, as Newton recognized, is only an approximation of the actual elliptical shape of the trajectory, and is obtained by assuming that the gravitational force is constant (not pointing toward the center of the earth) in the area of interest. Often, this difference is negligible, and leads to a simpler formula for tracking motion.

## Citations

- "Can You Really Derive Conic Formulae from a Cone? - Deriving the Symptom of the Parabola - Mathematical Association of America". Retrieved 30 September 2016.
- Wilson, Ray N. (2004).
*Reflecting Telescope Optics: Basic design theory and its historical development*(2 ed.). Springer. p. 3. ISBN 3-540-40106-7. Extract of page 3 -
*Stargazer*, p. 115. -
*Stargazer*, pp. 123 and 132 - Fitzpatrick, Richard (July 14, 2007). "Spherical Mirrors".
*Electromagnetism and Optics, lectures*. University of Texas at Austin. Paraxial Optics. Retrieved October 5, 2011. - Kumpel, P.G. (1975), "Do similar figures always have the same shape?",
*The Mathematics Teacher*,**68**(8): 626–628, ISSN 0025-5769 - Shriki, Atara; David, Hamatal (2011), "Similarity of Parabolas - A Geometrical Perspective",
*Learning and Teaching Mathematics*,**11**: 29–34 - Tsukerman, Emmanuel (2013). "On Polygons Admitting a Simson Line as Discrete Analogs of Parabolas" (PDF).
*Forum Geometricorum*.**13**: 197–208. - Frans van Schooten:
*Mathematische Oeffeningen*, Leyden, 1659, p. 334 -
*Planar Circle Geometries, an Introduction to Moebius-, Laguerre- and Minkowski-planes*, p. 36 - E. Hartmann: Lecture Note
*Planar Circle Geometries*, an Introduction to Möbius-, Laguerre- and Minkowski Planes, p. 72 - W. Benz,
*Vorlesungen über Geomerie der Algebren*, Springer (1973) - Downs, J. W. (2003).
*Practical Conic Sections*. Dover Publishing. - Sondow, Jonathan (2013). "The parbelos, a parabolic analog of the arbelos".
*American Mathematical Monthly*.**120**: 929–935. arXiv:1210.2279. doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.10.929. - Tsukerman, Emmanuel (2014). "Solution of Sondow's problem: a synthetic proof of the tangency property of the parbelos".
*American Mathematical Monthly*.**121**: 438–443. arXiv:1210.5580. doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.121.05.438. - "Sovrn Container". Mathwarehouse.com. Retrieved 2016-09-30.
- "Parabola". Mysite.du.edu. Retrieved 2016-09-30.
- Yates, Robert C. (1941). "The Trisection Problem".
*National Mathematics Magazine*.**15**(4): 191–202. JSTOR 3028133. - Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences (1638) (The Motion of Projectiles: Theorem 1)
- Troyano, Leonardo Fernández (2003).
*Bridge engineering: a global perspective*. Thomas Telford. p. 536. ISBN 0-7277-3215-3. - Drewry, Charles Stewart (1832).
*A memoir of suspension bridges*. Oxford University. p. 159. - Middleton, W. E. Knowles (December 1961). "Archimedes, Kircher, Buffon, and the Burning-Mirrors".
*Isis*. Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society.**52**(4): 533–543. doi:10.1086/349498. JSTOR 228646.

## Further reading

- Lockwood, E. H. (1961).
*A Book of Curves*. Cambridge University Press.

## External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to .Parabolas |

Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article .Parabola |

- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Parabola",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4 - Weisstein, Eric W. "Parabola".
*MathWorld*. - Interactive parabola-drag focus, see axis of symmetry, directrix, standard and vertex forms
- Archimedes Triangle and Squaring of Parabola at cut-the-knot
- Two Tangents to Parabola at cut-the-knot
- Parabola As Envelope of Straight Lines at cut-the-knot
- Parabolic Mirror at cut-the-knot
- Three Parabola Tangents at cut-the-knot
- Focal Properties of Parabola at cut-the-knot
- Parabola As Envelope II at cut-the-knot
- The similarity of parabola at Dynamic Geometry Sketches, interactive dynamic geometry sketch.
- Frans van Schooten:
*Mathematische Oeffeningen*, 1659