Nimitz-class aircraft carrier

The Nimitz class is a class of ten nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in service with the United States Navy. The lead ship of the class is named after World War II United States Pacific Fleet commander Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, who was the second-to-last living U.S. Navy officer to hold the rank, preceding William Halsey Jr.. With an overall length of 1,092 ft (333 m) and full-load displacement of over 100,000 long tons (100,000 t),[1] the Nimitz-class ships were the largest warships built and in service until USS Gerald R. Ford entered the fleet in 2017.[5]

Nimitz-class aircraft carrier
USS Nimitz (CVN-68), lead ship of her class of supercarriers, at sea near Victoria, British Columbia after her 1999–2001 refit.
Class overview
Name: Nimitz-class aircraft carrier
Builders: Newport News Shipbuilding Company
Operators:  United States Navy
Preceded by:
Succeeded by: Gerald R. Ford class
Cost: Approximately US$8.5 billion
In commission: 3 May 1975
Planned: 10
Completed: 10
Active: 10
Lost: 0
Retired: 0
General characteristics
Type: Aircraft carrier
Displacement: 100,000 to 104,600 long tons (101,600–106,300 t)[1]
  • Overall: 1,092 feet (332.8 m)
  • Waterline: 1,040 feet (317.0 m)
  • Overall: 252 ft (76.8 m)
  • Waterline: 134 ft (40.8 m)
  • Maximum navigational: 37 feet (11.3 m)
  • Limit: 41 feet (12.5 m)
Speed: 30+ knots (56+ km/h; 35+ mph)
Range: Unlimited distance; 20–25 years
  • Ship's company: 3,532
  • Air wing: 2,480
Crew: 6,012[2] (including airwing)
Sensors and
processing systems:
  • AN/SPS-48E 3-D air search radar
  • AN/SPS-49(V)5 2-D air search radar
  • AN/SPQ-9B target acquisition radar
  • AN/SPN-46 air traffic control radars
  • AN/SPN-43C air traffic control radar
  • AN/SPN-41 landing aid radars
  • 4 × Mk 91 NSSM guidance systems
  • 4 × Mk 95 radars
Electronic warfare
& decoys:
Armor: 2.5 in (64 mm) Kevlar over vital spaces[3]
Aircraft carried: 85–90 fixed wing and helicopters[4]

Instead of the gas turbines or diesel-electric systems used for propulsion on many modern warships, the carriers use two A4W pressurized water reactors which drive four propeller shafts and can produce a maximum speed of over 30 knots (56 km/h) and maximum power of around 260,000 shaft horsepower (190 MW). As a result of the use of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years. They are categorized as nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and are numbered with consecutive hull numbers between CVN-68 and CVN-77.[Note 1]

All ten carriers were constructed by Newport News Shipbuilding Company in Virginia. USS Nimitz, the lead ship of the class, was commissioned on 3 May 1975, and USS George H.W. Bush, the tenth and last of the class, was commissioned on 10 January 2009. Since the 1970s, Nimitz-class carriers have participated in many conflicts and operations across the world, including Operation Eagle Claw in Iran, the Gulf War, and more recently in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The angled flight decks of the carriers use a CATOBAR arrangement to operate aircraft, with steam catapults and arrestor wires for launch and recovery. As well as speeding up flight deck operations, this allows for a much wider variety of aircraft than with the STOVL arrangement used on smaller carriers. An embarked carrier air wing consisting of up to around 90 aircraft is normally deployed on board. After the retirement of the F-14 Tomcat, the air wings' strike fighters are primarily F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornets and F/A-18A+ and F/A-18C Hornets. In addition to their aircraft, the vessels carry short-range defensive weaponry for anti-aircraft warfare and missile defense.

The unit cost was about $8.5 billion in FY 12 dollars,[6] equal to $9.36 billion (2018) inflation adjusted.[7]


The Nimitz-class carriers have a length of 1,092 ft (333 m) overall, 1,040 ft (317 m) at the waterline, and a beam of 134 ft (41 m). They have a full-load displacement of 101,196 long tons (102,820 t). The ship's complement is 558 officers and 5,454 enlisted (including airwing).[2]


The Nimitz-class aircraft carriers were ordered to supplement the aircraft carriers of the Kitty Hawk and Enterprise classes, maintaining the strength and capability of the U.S. Navy after the older carriers were decommissioned.[8] The ships were designed to be improvements on previous U.S. aircraft carriers, in particular the Enterprise and Forrestal-class supercarriers, although the arrangement of the ships is relatively similar to that of the Kitty Hawk class.[9] Among other design improvements, the two reactors on Nimitz-class carriers take up less space than the eight reactors used on Enterprise. Along with a more generally improved design, this means that Nimitz-class carriers can carry 90% more aviation fuel and 50% more ordnance when compared to the Forrestal class.

The U.S. Navy has stated that the carriers could withstand three times the damage sustained by the Essex-class inflicted by Japanese air attacks during World War II.[4] The hangars on the ships are divided into three fire bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire. This addition has been present on U.S. aircraft carriers since World War II, after the fires caused by kamikaze attacks.[10]

The first ships were designed around the time of the Vietnam War, and certain aspects of the design were influenced by operations there. To a certain extent, the carrier operations in Vietnam demonstrated the need for increased capabilities of aircraft carriers over their survivability, as they were used to send sorties into the war and were therefore less subject to attack. As a result of this experience, Nimitz-class carriers were designed with larger stores of aviation fuel and larger magazines in relation to previous carriers, although this was partly as a result of increased space available by the new design of the ships' propulsion systems.[11]

A major purpose of the ships was initially to support the U.S. military during the Cold War, and they were designed with capabilities for that role, including using nuclear power instead of oil for greater endurance when deployed in blue water, and the ability to make adjustments to the carriers' weapons systems on the basis of new intelligence and technological developments.[12] They were initially categorized only as attack carriers, but ships have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since USS Carl Vinson.[13][14] As a result, the ships and their aircraft are now able to participate in a wide range of operations, which can include sea and air blockades, mine laying, and missile strikes on land, air and sea.[15]

Because of a design flaw, ships of this class have inherent lists to starboard when under combat loads that exceed the capability of their list control systems. The problem appears to be especially prevalent on some of the more modern vessels. This problem has been previously rectified by using damage control voids for ballast, but a solution using solid ballast which does not affect the ship's survivability has been proposed.[16][17]


All ten Nimitz-class carriers were constructed between 1968 and 2006 at Newport News Shipbuilding, in Newport News, VA in the largest drydock in the western hemisphere, dry dock 12, now 2,172 feet (662 m) long after a recent expansion.

Beginning with USS Theodore Roosevelt, the aircraft carriers were manufactured with modular construction. This means that whole sections could be welded together with plumbing and electrical equipment already fitted, improving efficiency. Using gantry cranes, the modules were lifted into the dry dock and welded. In the case of the bow sections, these can weigh over 1,500,000 pounds (680 t).[18][19] This method was originally developed by Ingalls Shipbuilding and increases the rate of work because much of the fitting out does not have to be carried out within the confines of the already finished hull.[20]

The total cost of construction for each ship was around $4.5 billion.[Note 2][8]


All ships of the class are powered by two A4W nuclear reactors, housed in separate compartments. The resulting steam spins four propeller shafts, producing a maximum speed of over 30 knots (56 km/h) and maximum power of 260,000 brake horsepower (190 MW).[4] The reactors produce heat through nuclear fission which heats water. This is then passed through four turbines which are shared by the two reactors. The turbines power the four bronze propellers, each with a diameter of 25 feet (7.6 m) and a weight of 66,000 pounds (30 t). Behind these are the two rudders which are 29 feet (8.8 m) high and 22 feet (6.7 m) long, and each weigh 110,000 pounds (50 metric tons).[21]

The Nimitz-class ships constructed since USS Ronald Reagan also have bulbous bows in order to improve speed and fuel efficiency by reducing wave-making resistance.[22] As a result of the use of nuclear power, the ships are capable of operating continuously for over 20 years without refueling and are predicted to have a service life of over 50 years.[21]

Armament and protection

In addition to the aircraft carried on board, the ships carry defensive equipment for use against missiles and hostile aircraft. These consist of either three or four NATO RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missile launchers designed for defense against aircraft and anti-ship missiles as well as either three or four 20 mm Phalanx CIWS missile defense cannon.

USS Ronald Reagan has none of these, having been built with the RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile system, two of which have also been installed on USS Nimitz and USS George Washington. These will be installed on the other ships as they return for Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH).[4][17] Since USS Theodore Roosevelt, the carriers have been constructed with 2.5 in (64 mm) Kevlar armor over vital spaces, and earlier ships have been retrofitted with it: Nimitz in 1983–1984, Dwight D. Eisenhower from 1985 to 1987 and Carl Vinson in 1989.[3][23]

The other countermeasures the ships use are four Sippican SRBOC (super rapid bloom off-board chaff) six-barrel MK36 decoy launchers, which deploy infrared Flare (countermeasure) and chaff to disrupt the sensors of incoming missiles; an SSTDS torpedo defense system; and an AN/SLQ-25 Nixie torpedo countermeasures system. The carriers also use AN/SLQ-32(V) Radar jamming and deception systems to detect and disrupt hostile radar signals in addition to the electronic warfare capabilities of some of the aircraft on board.[24][25]

The presence of nuclear weapons on board U.S. aircraft carriers since the end of the Cold War has neither been confirmed nor denied by the U.S. government. As a result of this, the presence of a U.S. aircraft carrier in a foreign port has occasionally provoked protest from local people, for example when Nimitz docked in Chennai, India, in 2007. At that time, the Strike Group commander Rear Admiral John Terence Blake stated that: "The U.S. policy is that we do not routinely deploy nuclear weapons on board Nimitz."[26][27]

In May 2013, George H.W. Bush conducted the first carrier-borne end-to-end at-sea test of the Surface Ship Torpedo Defense System (SSTDS). The SSTDS combines the passive detection of the Torpedo Warning System (TWS) that finds, classifies, and tracks torpedoes with the hard-kill capability of a Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo (CAT), an encapsulated miniature torpedo designed to locate, home in on, and destroy hostile torpedoes.[28] This increases protection against wake-homing torpedoes like the Type 53 that do not respond to acoustic decoys. The pieces of the SSTDS are engineered to locate and destroy incoming torpedoes in a matter of seconds. Each system includes one TWS and 8 CATs. Initial operational capability (IOC) is planned for 2019 and all aircraft carriers are to be outfitted by 2035.[29][30][31]

Carrier air wing

In order for a carrier to deploy, it must embark one of ten Carrier Air Wings (CVW).[Note 3] The carriers can accommodate a maximum of 130 F/A-18 Hornets[32] or 85–90 aircraft of different types, but current numbers are typically 64 aircraft. Although the air wings are integrated with the operation of the carriers they are deployed to, they are nevertheless regarded as a separate entity. As well as the aircrew, the air wings are also made up of support personnel involved in roles including maintenance, aircraft and ordnance handling and emergency procedures. Each person on the flight deck wears color-coded clothing to make their role easily identifiable.

A typical carrier air wing can include 24–36 F/A-18E or F Super Hornets as strike fighters; two squadrons of 10–12 F/A-18C Hornets, with one of these often provided by the U.S. Marine Corps (VMFA), also as strike fighters; 4–6 EA-18G Growlers for electronic warfare; 4–6 E-2C or D Hawkeyes for airborne early warning (AEW), C-2 Greyhounds used for logistics (to be replaced by MV-22 Ospreys); and a Helicopter Antisubmarine Squadron of 6–8 SH-60F and HH-60H Seahawks. Aircraft that have previously operated from Nimitz-class carriers include F-4 Phantoms, RA-5C Vigilantes, RF-8G Crusaders, F-14 Tomcats, S-3 Vikings, EA-6B Prowlers, A-7 Corsair II and A-6E Intruder aircraft.[33]

Flight deck and aircraft facilities

The flight deck is angled at nine degrees, which allows for aircraft to be launched and recovered simultaneously. This angle of the flight deck was reduced slightly in relation to previous carriers, as the current design improves the air flow around the carrier.[11] Four steam catapults are used to launch fixed-wing aircraft, and four arrestor wires are used for recovery. The two newest carriers, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, have only three arrestor wires each, as the fourth was used infrequently on earlier ships and was therefore deemed unnecessary.

This CATOBAR arrangement allows for faster launching and recovery as well as a much wider range of aircraft that can be used on board compared with smaller aircraft carriers, most of which use a simpler STOVL arrangement without catapults or arrestor wires. The ship's aircraft operations are controlled by the air boss from Primary Flight Control or Pri-Fly. Four large elevators transport aircraft between the flight deck and the hangars below. These hangars are divided into three bays by thick steel doors that are designed to restrict the spread of fire.[10]

Strike groups

When an aircraft carrier deploys, it takes a Carrier Strike Group (CSG), made up of several other warships and supply vessels which allow the operation to be carried out. The armament of the Nimitz class is made up only of short range defensive weapons, used as a last line of defense against enemy missiles and aircraft. An aircraft carrier, as with all surface ships, is particularly vulnerable to attack from below, specifically from submarines. An aircraft carrier is a very expensive, hard to replace and strategically valuable asset and therefore it logically has immense value as a target.[34]

As a result of its target value and vulnerability, aircraft carriers are always escorted by at least one submarine for protection. The other vessels in the Strike Group provide additional capabilities, such as long range Tomahawk missiles or the Aegis Combat System, and also protect the carrier from attack. A typical Strike Group may include, in addition to an aircraft carrier: up to six surface combatants, including guided missile cruisers and guided missile destroyers, used primarily for anti-aircraft warfare and anti-submarine warfare, and frigates/guided missile frigates, prior to their retirement from USN service. When the navy commissions a new class of frigates (FFG(X)), they will again accompany CSGs. Also making up part of the group is one or two attack submarines, for seeking out and destroying hostile surface ships and submarines, and an ammunition, oiler, and supply ship from Military Sealift Command to provide logistical support.[34] The numbers and types of ships that make up each strike group can vary from group to group, depending on deployments, mission and availability.[35]

Design differences within the class

While the designs of the final seven ships, beginning with Theodore Roosevelt, are slightly different from those of the earlier ships, the U.S. Navy considers all ten carriers as a single class.[36] When the older carriers come in for Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH), their nuclear power plants are refueled and they are upgraded to the standards of the later carriers. Other modifications may be performed to update the ships' equipment.[17][37]

The ships were initially classified only as attack carriers but have been constructed with anti-submarine capabilities since Carl Vinson. These improvements include more advanced radar systems and facilities which enable the ships to operate aircraft in a more effective anti-submarine warfare role, including the fitting of common undersea picture (CUP) technology which uses sonar to allow for better assessment of the threat from submarines.[13] The changes included better support for S-3 Viking ASW patrol planes and SH-60F Seahawk helicopters with dipping sonar systems.

Theodore Roosevelt and later carriers have slight structural differences from the earlier Nimitz carriers such as improved protection for ordnance stored in their magazines. Other improvements include upgraded flight deck ballistic protection, first installed on George Washington, and the high-strength low-alloy steel (HSLA-100) used for constructing ships starting with John C. Stennis.[9][38] More recently, older ships have had their flight decks upgraded with a new non-slip material fitted on new-build ships, to improve safety for both crew members and aircraft.[39][40]

The final carrier of the class, George H.W. Bush, was designed as a "transition ship" from the Nimitz class to the replacement Gerald R. Ford class. George H.W. Bush incorporates new technologies including improved propeller and bulbous bow designs, a reduced radar cross-section and electronic and environmental upgrades,[41][42] the ship's cost was $6.2 billion. The earlier Nimitz-class ships each cost around $4.5 billion.[43] To lower costs, some new technologies and design features were also incorporated into USS Ronald Reagan, the previous carrier, including a redesigned island.[44]

Ships in class

The United States Navy lists the following ten ships in the Nimitz class:[36]

Ship Hull Number Laid down Launched Commissioned Refuel,
Homeport References
Nimitz subclass
Nimitz CVN-68 22 June 1968 13 May 1972 3 May 1975 1998–2001 Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington [45][46]
Dwight D. Eisenhower
CVN-69 15 August 1970 11 October 1975 18 October 1977 2001–2005 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia [47][48]
Carl Vinson CVN-70 11 October 1975 15 March 1980 13 March 1982 2005–2009 Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington [49][50]
Theodore Roosevelt subclass
Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 31 October 1981 27 October 1984 25 October 1986 2009–2013 Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, California [1][51]
Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 3 November 1984 13 February 1988 11 November 1989 2013–2017 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia (shifting to San Diego, California in late 2019) [52][53]
George Washington CVN-73 25 August 1986 21 July 1990 4 July 1992 2017– Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia [1][54]
John C. Stennis CVN-74 13 March 1991 11 November 1993 9 December 1995 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia [1][55]
Harry S. Truman
(ex-United States)
CVN-75 29 November 1993 7 September 1996 25 July 1998 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia [1][56]
Ronald Reagan subclass
Ronald Reagan CVN-76 12 February 1998 4 March 2001 12 July 2003 Yokosuka Naval Base, Yokosuka, Japan [1][57]
George H.W. Bush CVN-77 6 September 2003 9 October 2006 10 January 2009 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia [58]

Service history


One of the first major operations in which the ships were involved was Operation Eagle Claw launched by Nimitz in 1980 after she had deployed to the Indian Ocean in response to the taking of hostages in the U.S. embassy in Tehran.[15] Although initially part of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet,[59] Dwight D. Eisenhower relieved Nimitz in this operation after her service in the Mediterranean Sea.[46] Nimitz conducted a Freedom of Navigation exercise alongside the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal in August 1981 in the Gulf of Sidra, near Libya. During this exercise, two of the ship's F-14 Tomcats shot down two Libyan aircraft in what became known as the Gulf of Sidra incident.[60] In 1987, Carl Vinson participated in the first U.S. carrier deployment in the Bering Sea,[61] and Nimitz provided security during the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul.[62]


The two most significant deployments the Nimitz class was involved in during the 1990s were the Gulf War and its aftermath, and Operation Southern Watch in southern Iraq. All active vessels were engaged in both of these to some extent, with Operation Southern Watch continuing until 2003.[63] Most carriers in operation in Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm played supporting roles, with only Theodore Roosevelt playing an active part in combat operations.

Throughout the 1990s and more recently, Nimitz-class carriers have been deployed as part of humanitarian missions. While deployed in the Gulf War, Abraham Lincoln was diverted to the Pacific Ocean to participate alongside 22 other ships in Operation Fiery Vigil, evacuating civilians following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo on Luzon Island in the Philippines. In October 1993, Abraham Lincoln deployed to Somalia to assist UN humanitarian operations there, spending four weeks flying patrols over the area around Mogadishu while supporting U.S. troops during Operation Restore Hope. The same ship also participated in Operation Vigilant Sentinel in the Persian Gulf in 1995.[53]

Theodore Roosevelt flew patrols in support of the Kurds over northern Iraq as part of Operation Provide Comfort in 1991. In 1996, George Washington played a peacekeeping role in Operation Decisive Endeavor in Bosnia and Herzegovina.[64] In 1999, Theodore Roosevelt was called to the Ionian Sea to support Operation Allied Force alongside other NATO militaries.[65]


Harry S. Truman's maiden deployment was in November 2000. The carrier's air wing flew 869 combat sorties in support of Operation Southern Watch, including a strike on Iraqi air defense sites on 16 February 2001, in response to Iraqi surface-to-air missile fire against United Nations coalition forces.[66]

After the September 11 attacks, Carl Vinson and Theodore Roosevelt were among the first warships to participate in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Carl Vinson sailed towards the Persian Gulf intending to support Operation Southern Watch in July 2001. This changed in response to the attacks, and the ship changed course to travel towards the North Arabian Sea, where she launched the first airstrikes in support of the operation on 7 October 2001.[67]

Following the attacks, John C. Stennis and George Washington participated in Operation Noble Eagle, carrying out homeland security operations off the West Coast of the United States. All active ships have been involved to some extent in Iraq and Afghanistan since that time. This included the invasion in 2003, as well as providing subsequent support for Operation Iraqi Freedom since then.[68]

The carriers have also provided aid after natural disasters. In 2005, Abraham Lincoln supported Operation Unified Assistance in Indonesia after the December 2004 tsunami,[69] and Harry S. Truman provided aid after Hurricane Katrina later in 2005.[70]

The Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group performed humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations in the Philippines in June 2008 after Typhoon Fengshen, which killed hundreds from the central island regions and the main island of Luzon.[71] In January 2010 Carl Vinson operated off Haiti, providing aid and drinking water to earthquake survivors as part of the U.S. led Operation Unified Response, alongside other major warships and hospital ship Comfort.[72]

Refueling Complex Overhaul

In order to refuel their nuclear power plants, the carriers each undergo a Refueling and Overhaul (RCOH) once in their service lives. This is also the most substantial overhaul the ships undergo while in service and involves bringing the vessels' equipment up to the standards of the newest ships. The ship is placed in dry dock, and essential maintenance is carried out including painting of the hull below the waterline and replacement of electrical and mechanical components such as valves. Because of the large time periods between the ships' constructions, the armament and designs of the newer ships are more modern than those of the older ships. In RCOH, the older ships are refitted to the standards of the newer ships, which can include major upgrades to the flight deck, aircraft catapults and combat systems as well as other upgrades such as improved radar systems, although precise details can vary significantly between the ships. The improvements normally take around four years to complete. The RCOH for USS Theodore Roosevelt took four years to complete (2009–2013) and cost about US$2.6 billion.[73][74][75][76] Planned Incremental Availability is a similar procedure, although it is less substantial and does not involve refueling of the nuclear power plants.[77]

Symbolic and diplomatic roles

Because of their status as the largest warships in the U.S. Navy, the deployment of an aircraft carrier can fulfill a symbolic role, not just in terms of a deterrent to an enemy, but often as a diplomatic tool, in strengthening relations with allies and potential allies. The latter of these functions can take place either as a single visit to a country, in which senior naval officers are allowed to observe the operating of the carrier and to interact with its senior officers,[78] or as part of an international task force. This can be in combat operations, such as NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999,[79] or other deployments involving training, such as Exercise RIMPAC. In addition, carriers have participated in international Maritime security operations, combating piracy in the Persian Gulf and off the coast of Somalia.[80][81]

Accidents and incidents

As on most large warships, there have been several incidents involving the death or injury of one or more crew members, although most have involved freak accidents or failures, such as a man overboard as a result of poor weather. One of the highest-profile incidents was on 26 May 1981, when an EA-6B Prowler crashed on the flight deck of Nimitz, killing 14 crewmen and injuring 45 others.[15][82] Forensic testing of the personnel involved showed that several tested positive for marijuana. While this in itself was not found to have directly caused the crash, the findings of the investigation prompted the introduction of mandatory drug testing of all service personnel.[83][84]

In cases of ditched aircraft, pilots have been able to eject safely in several cases. However, fatal aircraft crashes have occurred; in 1994, Lieutenant Kara Hultgreen, the first female F-14 Tomcat pilot, was killed while attempting to land on board Abraham Lincoln during a training exercise.[53]

Fires have also caused damage to the ships; in May 2008, while rotating through to her new homeport at Yokosuka Naval Base in Yokosuka, Japan, George Washington suffered a serious fire which cost $70 million in repairs, injured 37 sailors and led to the ship undergoing three months of repairs at San Diego; this led to its having to miss the 2008 RIMPAC exercises and delayed the final withdrawal from service of USS Kitty Hawk. The fire was caused by unauthorized smoking in an area near improperly stored flammable refrigerant compressor oil.[85][86][87]

Future and planned replacement

Nimitz-class carriers were designed to have a 50-year service life.[88] At the end of the service life, ships will be decommissioned. This process will first take place on Nimitz and is estimated to cost from $750 to $900 million. This compares with an estimate of $53 million for a conventionally powered carrier. Most of the difference in cost is attributed to the deactivation of the nuclear power plants and safe removal of radioactive material and other contaminated equipment.[89]

A new class of carriers, the Gerald R. Ford class, is being constructed to replace previous vessels after decommissioning. Ten of these are expected, and the first has entered service as of 22 July 2017 to replace Enterprise. Most of the rest of these new carriers are to replace the oldest Nimitz ships as they reach the end of their service lives.[90] The new carriers will have a similar design to George H.W. Bush (using an almost identical hull shape) and technological and structural improvements.[91]

See also



  1. The letters "CVN" denote the type of ship: "CV" is the hull classification symbol for aircraft carriers, and "N" indicates nuclear-powered propulsion. The number after the "CVN" means that this is the 68th "CV", or large aircraft carrier.
  2. All monetary values are adjusted for inflation to 2000s figures
  3. Although there are ten carrier air wings in the U.S. Navy, they are numbered between CVW-1 (USS Enterprise) and CVW-17 (USS Carl Vinson).


  1. Polmar, p. 112
  2. "Naval Vessel Register - USS NIMITZ (CVN 68)". Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 30 October 2018.
  3. Fontenoy, Paul E. (2006). Aircraft carriers: an illustrated history of their impact. ABC-CLIO Ltd. p. 349. ISBN 978-1-85109-573-5.
  4. Gibbons, Tony (2001). The Encyclopedia of Ships. London, United Kingdom: Amber Books. p. 444. ISBN 978-1-905704-43-9.
  5. "25 Largest Warships In History". Science & Technology. 5 April 2017. Archived from the original on 12 April 2018. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  6. "Aircraft carriers – CVN". Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
  7. "CPI Inflation Calculator". Archived from the original on 10 April 2018. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  8. Ronald O'Rourke (2005). "Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress". US Department of the Navy. Archived from the original on 1 December 2006. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  9. Polmar, p. 113
  10. Darwin, Robert; Bowman, Howard; Hunstad, Mary; Leach, William; Williams, Frederick (2005). Aircraft Carrier Flight and Hangar Deck Fire Protection: History and Current Status. Defense Technical Information Center. p. 10. Retrieved 1 July 2011.
  11. Friedman, p. 316
  12. Jim Wilson "21st Century Carrier Force" Popular Mechanics October 1998, pp. 58–66
  13. Sandra I. Erwin (July 2003). "7th Fleet Experiment Probes Navy's Near-Term Concerns". National Defense Industrial Association. Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
  14. Patricia Kime (September 2003). "Navy Should Bolster Crisis Planning for Theater ASW". Navy League of the United States. Archived from the original on 5 March 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
  15. "Cold War Ship – Nimitz class". Royal Air Force Museum London. 2008. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  16. Wolfson, Dianna. "A Solution to the Inherent List on Nimitz Class Aircraft Carriers Archived 21 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine" MIT thesis 2004
  17. "Aircraft Carriers – CVN". U.S. Navy. 6 November 2009. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
  18. "CVN 78 Construction & Facilities". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  19. "George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) Christening" (PDF). Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. 7 October 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  20. "Our Heritage: Litton Industries". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  21. "Information About Us". U.S. Navy. 14 October 2009. Archived from the original on 3 December 2010. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
  22. Yardley, Roland; Schank, John; Kallimani, James (2007). A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base: Technical Report. RAND Corporation. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-8330-4182-1.
  23. Wertheim, p. 884
  24. Wertheim, p. 885
  25. Polmar, p. 108
  26. "Nimitz docks off Chennai to 'build new relations with India'". The Indian Express. 3 July 2007. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  27. "NAM and Nimitz". Frontline. 14–27 July 2007. Archived from the original on 9 December 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  28. First Carrier Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo Launched Archived 27 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine –, 6 June 2013
  29. Navy Develops Torpedo Killing Torpedo Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine –, 20 June 2013
  30. Navy Deploying New Anti-Torpedo Technology Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine –, 28 October 2013
  31. US Navy Continues Work on Torpedo Warning System/Countermeasure Anti-Torpedo System Archived 8 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine –, 12 March 2015
  32. "Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers Archived 18 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  33. Lambeth, p. 89Lambeth, Benjamin (2005). American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century. RAND Corporation. p. 138. ISBN 0-8330-3842-7.
  34. Stevens, p. 24
  35. Polmar, p. 37
  36. "Aircraft Carriers – CV, CVN". Fact File. U.S. Navy. 12 October 2007. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2009.
  37. "Refueling and Complex Overhaul". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  38. "Costing the CVN-21: A DID Primer". Defense Industry Daily. 19 December 2005. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
  39. "USS Nimitz Flight Deck". Surface Technologies Corporation. Archived from the original on 31 July 2009. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
  40. Lt. Katharine Cerezo (20 February 2010). "Truman Flight Deck Receives New Non-Skid". U.S. Navy. Archived from the original on 22 July 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
  41. "Press Release". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. 11 May 2009. Archived from the original on 21 May 2009. Retrieved 27 March 2010.
  42. "Design Enhancements". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 13 November 2009. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
  43. "Aircraft Carrier Named the USS George H.W. Bush Commissioned". Fox News Channel. 10 January 2009. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2010.
  44. "Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) Christening: Advanced Media Kit" (PDF). Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
  45. "USS Nimitz (CVN 68) Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  46. "USS Nimitz (CVA(N)-68)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History and Heritage Command. 8 May 2009. Retrieved 23 March 2010.
  47. "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  48. Evans, Mark L. (27 September 2006). "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History & Heritage Command. Retrieved 23 March 2010.
  49. "USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  50. Evans, Mark L. (11 July 2007). "USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History & Heritage Command. Retrieved 23 March 2010.
  51. "USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  52. "USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  53. Evans, Mark L. (13 August 2008). "Abraham Lincoln". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History & Heritage Command. Retrieved 23 March 2010.
  54. "USS George Washington (CVN-73)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  55. "USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  56. "USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  57. "USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76)". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  58. "USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77". Naval Vessel Register. 2004. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  59. "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) Multi-purpose aircraft carrier". Naval Vessel Register. 2001. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
  60. Love, Robert William (1992). History of the U.S.Navy: 1942–1991 v. 2. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. p. 755. ISBN 978-0-8117-1863-9.
  61. "1987 Command History Archived 25 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine" U.S. Navy report. 6 December 1988.
  62. Offley, Ed (2001). Pen and Sword: A Journalist's Guide to Covering the Military. Portland, Oregon: Marion Street Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-9665176-4-4.
  63. Lambeth, p. 6
  64. Richelson, Jeffrey (1999). The U.S. Intelligence Community. Boulder, Colorado: Perseus Books Group. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-8133-6893-1.
  65. Kosovo: Operation "Allied Force" (PDF). Parliament of the United Kingdom. 29 April 1999. p. 16. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 November 2006.
  66. "History of the Ship". USS Harry S. Truman, U.S. Navy. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
  67. "USS Carl Vinson". CNN. Archived from the original on 24 October 2010. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
  68. "Appendix A: Navy-Marine Corps: Crisis Response and Combat Actions" (PDF). U.S. Navy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2009. Retrieved 31 May 2010.
  69. "DoD Briefing on Operation Unified Assistance, the Post-Tsunami Relief Effort". US Department of Defense. 14 January 2005. Archived from the original on 29 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  70. Burke, Heather (1 September 2005). "New Orleans Gets More Troops to Stop Katrina Looting". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 10 April 2006. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  71. "U.S. ship coming to help retrieve victims of sea tragedy". GMA News. 25 June 2008. Archived from the original on 18 December 2012. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
  72. Mike Mount and Larry Shaughnessy (13 January 2010). "First U.S. military aid reaches quake-stricken Haiti". CNN. Archived from the original on 18 February 2010. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
  73. "Contracts: Navy". DefenseLink. 26 August 2009. Archived from the original on 1 September 2009. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
  74. "CVN 70 Carl Vinson's Mid-Life RCOH Refueling & Maintenance". Defense Industry Daily. 14 July 2009. Archived from the original on 31 October 2010. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
  75. Schank, John; Arena, Mark; Rushworth, Denis; Birkler, John; Chiesa, James (2003). Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS "Nimitz" (CVN 68): Lessons for the Future. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation. pp. xiii–xviii. ISBN 978-0-8330-3288-1.
  76. "Upgraded Carrier Roosevelt Starts Pre-Deployment Exercises". USNI News. 12 January 2015. Archived from the original on 28 January 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2016.
  77. "Nimitz Begins Planned Incremental Availability". U.S. Navy. 1 March 2004. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  78. "Reagan Sailors Visit Rio". U.S. Navy. June 2004. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 9 January 2010.
  79. Ripley, Tim (2001). Conflict in the Balkans, 1991–2000. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-84176-290-6.
  80. "Aircraft Carriers – CVN". U.S. Navy. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2010.
  81. "USS Nimitz Launches First Sorties, Support Coalition Troops in Afghanistan". U.S. Navy. 21 September 2009. Archived from the original on 23 September 2009. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  82. Anderson, Kurt; Beaty, Jonathan (8 June 1981). "Night of Flaming Terror". Time. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
  83. Coombs, Robert; West, Louis (1991). Drug Testing: Issues and Options. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–21. ISBN 978-0-19-505414-9.
  84. Abrams, Herbert (January 1987). "Human Instability and Nuclear Weapons". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. p. 34.
  85. Dale Eisman (30 July 2008). "Two top Navy officers fired over $70 million carrier blaze". Virginia-Pilot. Archived from the original on 26 August 2009. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
  86. Liewer, Steve (7 October 2008). "Crew Faulted in Blaze on Carrier". San Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on 25 November 2011.
  87. "Casualties: U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Personnel Killed and Injured in Selected Accidents and Other Incidents Not Directly the Result of Enemy Action". Naval Historical Center. Archived from the original on 24 July 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
  88. "Aircraft Carriers – CVN 21 Program". U.S. Navy. 6 November 2009. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2009.
  89. Stevens, p. 10
  90. "CVN-77 Delivery Moved To December, Newport News on Track For January Commissioning". Defense Daily. 2006. Archived from the original on 8 July 2012. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
  91. "CVN-78 Facts". Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.


  • Friedman, Norman (1983). U.S. Aircraft Carriers: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0-87021-739-5.
  • Lambeth, Benjamin (2005). American Carrier Air Power at the Dawn of a New Century. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation. ISBN 978-0-8330-3842-5.
  • Polmar, Norman (2004). The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-685-8.
  • Stevens, Ted (1998). Navy Aircraft Carriers: Cost-effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-powered Carriers: Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office. ISBN 1-4289-7664-7.
  • Wertheim, Eric (2007). The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World: Their Ships, Aircraft and Systems. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-955-2.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.