Micromechanics (or, more precisely, micromechanics of materials) is the analysis of composite or heterogeneous materials on the level of the individual constituents that constitute these materials.

Aims of micromechanics of materials

Heterogeneous materials, such as composites, solid foams, polycrystals, or bone, consist of clearly distinguishable constituents (or phases) that show different mechanical and physical material properties. While the constituents can often be modeled as having isotropic behaviour, the microstructure characteristics (shape, orientation, varying volume fraction, ..) of heterogeneous materials often leads to an anisotropic behaviour.

Anisotropic material models are available for linear elasticity. In the nonlinear regime, the modeling is often restricted to orthotropic material models which does not capture the physics for all heterogeneous materials. Micromechanics goal is to predict the anisotropic response of the heterogeneous material on the basis of the geometries and properties of the individual phases, a task known as homogenization.[1]

Micromechanics allows to predicting multi-axial properties that are often difficult to measure experimentally. A typical example is the out-of-plane properties for unidirectional composites.

The main advantage of micromechanics is to perform virtual testing in order to reduce the cost of an experimental campaign. Indeed, an experimental campaign of heterogeneous material is often expensive and involve a larger number of permutations : constituent material combinations; fiber and particle volume fractions; fiber and particle arrangements; and processing histories). Once the constituents properties are known, all these permutations can be simulated through virtual testing using micromechanics.

There is several ways to obtain the material properties of each constituents: by identifying the behaviour based on molecular dynamics simulation results; by identifying the behaviour through an experimental campaign on each constituents; by reverse engineering the properties through a reduced experimental campaign on the heterogeneous material. The latter option is typically used since some constituents are difficult to test, there is always some uncertainties on the real microstructure and it allows to take into account the weakness of the micromechanics approach into the constituents material properties. The obtained material models need to be validated through comparison with a different set of experimental data than the one use for the reverse engineering.

Generality on micromechanics

The key point of micromechanics of materials is the localization, which aims at evaluating the local (stress and strain) fields in the phases for given macroscopic load states, phase properties, and phase geometries. Such knowledge is especially important in understanding and describing material damage and failure.

Because most heterogeneous materials show a statistical rather than a deterministic arrangement of the constituents, the methods of micromechanics are typically based on the concept of the representative volume element (RVE). An RVE is understood to be a sub-volume of an inhomogeneous medium that is of sufficient size for providing all geometrical information necessary for obtaining an appropriate homogenized behavior.

Most methods in micromechanics of materials are based on continuum mechanics rather than on atomistic approaches such as nanomechanics or molecular dynamics. In addition to the mechanical responses of inhomogeneous materials, their thermal conduction behavior and related problems can be studied with analytical and numerical continuum methods. All these approaches may be subsumed under the name of "continuum micromechanics".

Analytical methods of continuum micromechanics

Voigt[2] (1887) - Strains constant in composite, rule of mixtures for stiffness components.

Reuss (1929)[3] - Stresses constant in composite, rule of mixtures for compliance components.

Strength of Materials (SOM) - Longitudinally: strains constant in composite, stresses volume-additive. Transversely: stresses constant in composite, strains volume-additive.

Vanishing Fiber Diameter (VFD)[4] - Combination of average stress and strain assumptions that can be visualized as each fiber having a vanishing diameter yet finite volume.

Composite Cylinder Assemblage (CCA)[5] - Composite composed of cylindrical fibers surrounded by cylindrical matrix layer, cylindrical elasticity solution. Analogous method for macroscopically isotropic inhomogeneous materials: Composite Sphere Assemblage (CSA)[6]

Hashin-Shtrikman Bounds - Provide bounds on the elastic moduli and tensors of transversally isotropic composites[7] (reinforced, e.g., by aligned continuous fibers) and isotropic composites[8] (reinforced, e.g., by randomly positioned particles).

Self-Consistent Schemes[9] - Effective medium approximations based on Eshelby's[10] elasticity solution for an inhomogeneity embedded in an infinite medium. Uses the material properties of the composite for the infinite medium.

Mori-Tanaka Method[11][12] - Effective field approximation based on Eshelby's[10] elasticity solution for inhomogeneity in infinite medium. As is typical for mean field micromechanics models, fourth-order concentration tensors relate the average stress or average strain tensors in inhomogeneities and matrix to the average macroscopic stress or strain tensor, respectively; inhomogeneity "feels" effective matrix fields, accounting for phase interaction effects in a collective, approximate way.

Numerical approaches to continuum micromechanics

Methods based on Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Most such micromechanical methods use periodic homogenization, which approximates composites by periodic phase arrangements. A single repeating volume element is studied, appropriate boundary conditions being applied to extract the composite's macroscopic properties or responses. The Method of Macroscopic Degrees of Freedom[13] can be used with commercial FE codes, whereas analysis based on asymptotic homogenization[14] typically requires special-purpose codes. The Variational Asymptotic Method for Unit Cell Homogenization (VAMUCH)[15] and its development, Mechanics of Structural Genome (see below), are recent Finite Element based approaches for periodic homogenization.

In addition to studying periodic microstructures, embedding models[16] and analysis using macro-homogeneous or mixed uniform boundary conditions[17] can be carried out on the basis of FE models. Due to its high flexibility and efficiency, FEA at present is the most widely used numerical tool in continuum micromechanics, allowing, e.g., the handling of viscoelastic, elastoplastic and damage behavior. Examples of the practical use of FEA in micromechanics can be found in many disciplines including biomaterials (bone,[18] tendon[19]), construction materials (concrete[20]), and engineering materials (composite [21]). Parallel finite element programs such as ParaFEM have enabled researchers to study very large volume elements derived from 3D tomography data.[18]

Mechanics of Structure Genome (MSG)

A unified theory called mechanics of structure genome (MSG) has been introduced to treat structural modeling of anisotropic heterogeneous structures as special applications of micromechanics.[22] Using MSG, it is possible to directly compute structural properties of a beam, plate, shell or 3D solid in terms of its microstructural details.[23] [24] [25] The companion code SwiftComp can be freely executed in the cloud at https://cdmhub.org/resources/scstandard.

Generalized Method of Cells (GMC)

Explicitly considers fiber and matrix subcells from periodic repeating unit cell. Assumes 1st-order displacement field in subcells and imposes traction and displacement continuity. It was developed into the High-Fidelity GMC (HFGMC), which uses quadratic approximation for the displacement fields in the subcells.

Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT)

A further group of periodic homogenization models make use of Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT), e.g., for solving an equivalent to the Lippmann–Schwinger equation.[26] FFT-based methods at present appear to provide the numerically most efficient approach to periodic homogenization of elastic materials.

Volume Elements

Ideally, the volume elements used in numerical approaches to continuum micromechanics should be sufficiently big to fully describe the statistics of the phase arrangement of the material considered, i.e., they should be Representative Volume Elements (RVEs). In practice, smaller volume elements must typically be used due to limitations in available computational power. Such volume elements are often referred to as Statistical Volume Elements (SVEs). Ensemble averaging over a number of SVEs may be used for improving the approximations to the macroscopic responses.[27].

See also


  1. S. Nemat-Nasser and M. Hori, Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials, Second Edition, North-Holland, 1999, ISBN 0444500847.
  2. Voigt, W. (1887). "Theoretische Studien über die Elasticitätsverhältnisse der Krystalle". Abh. KGL. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math. Kl. 34: 3–51.
  3. Reuss, A. (1929). "Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle". Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 9 (1): 49–58. Bibcode:1929ZaMM....9...49R. doi:10.1002/zamm.19290090104.
  4. Dvorak, G.J., Bahei-el-Din, Y.A. (1982). "Plasticity Analysis of Fibrous Composites". J. Appl. Mech. 49 (2): 327–335. Bibcode:1982JAM....49..327D. doi:10.1115/1.3162088.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. Hashin, Z. (1965). "On Elastic Behavior of Fibre Reinforced Materials of Arbitrary Transverse Phase Geometry". J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 13 (3): 119–134. Bibcode:1965JMPSo..13..119H. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(65)90015-3.
  6. Hashin, Z. (1962). "The Elastic Moduli of Heterogeneous Materials". J. Appl. Mech. 29 (1): 143–150. Bibcode:1962JAM....29..143H. doi:10.1115/1.3636446.
  7. Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S. (1963). "A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Elastic Behavior of Multiphase Materials". J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 11 (4): 127–140. Bibcode:1962JMPSo..10..343H. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(62)90005-4.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S. (1961). "Note on a Variational Approach to the Theory of Composite Elastic Materials". J. Franklin Inst. 271 (4): 336–341. doi:10.1016/0016-0032(61)90032-1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. Hill, R. (1965). "A Self-Consistent Mechanics of Composite Materials". J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 13 (4): 213–222. Bibcode:1965JMPSo..13..213H. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(65)90010-4.
  10. Eshelby, J.D. (1957). "The Determination of the Elastic Field of an Ellipsoidal Inclusion and Related Problems". Proceedings of the Royal Society. A241 (1226): 376–396. JSTOR 100095.
  11. Mori, T., Tanaka, K. (1973). "Average Stress in the Matrix and Average Elastic Energy of Materials with Misfitting Inclusions". Acta Metall. 21 (5): 571–574. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. Benveniste Y. (1987). "A New Approach to the Application of Mori-Tanaka's Theory in Composite Materials". Mech. Mater. 6 (2): 147–157. doi:10.1016/0167-6636(87)90005-6.
  13. Michel, J.C., Moulinec, H., Suquet, P. (1999). "Effective Properties of Composite Materials with Periodic Microstructure: A Computational Approach". Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 172 (1–4): 109–143. Bibcode:1999CMAME.172..109M. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00227-8.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. Suquet, P. (1987). "Elements of Homogenization for Inelastic Solid Mechanics". In Sanchez-Palencia E.; Zaoui A. (eds.). Homogenization Techniques in Composite Media. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 194–278. ISBN 0387176160.
  15. Yu, W., Tang, T. (2007). "Variational Asymptotic Method for Unit Cell Homogenization of Periodically Heterogeneous Materi-als". International Journal of Solids and Structures. 44 (11–12): 3738–3755. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.10.020.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. González C.; LLorca J. (2007). "Virtual Fracture Testing of Composites: A Computational Micromechanics Approach". Eng. Fract. Mech. 74 (7): 1126–1138. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.013.
  17. Pahr D.H.; Böhm H.J. (2008). "Assessment of Mixed Uniform Boundary Conditions for Predicting the Mechanical Behavior of Elastic and Inelastic Discontinuously Reinforced Composites". Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 34: 117–136. doi:10.3970/cmes.2008.034.117.
  18. Levrero, F.; Margetts, L.; et al. (2016). "Evaluating the macroscopic yield behaviour of trabecular bone using a nonlinear homogenisation approach". Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 61: 384–396. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.008.
  19. Rawson, S.D.; Margetts, L.; et al. (2015). "Sutured tendon repair: A multi-scale finite element model". Journal of Biomechanics and Modelling in Mechanobiology. 14 (1): 123–133. doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0593-5. PMC 4282689.
  20. Qsymah, A.; Sharma, R.; et al. (2017). "Micro X-ray computed tomography image-based two-scale homogenisation of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete". Journal of Construction and Building Materials. 130: 230–240. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.020.
  21. Aghdam, M. M.; Hosseini, S. M. A.; Morsali, S. R. (2015-10-01). "Simulation of interface damage in metal matrix composites under off-axis loading using cohesive zone model". Computational Materials Science. 108, Part A: 42–47. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.05.030.
  22. Yu W. (2016). "A Unified Theory for Constitutive Modeling of Composites". Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures. 11 (4): 379–411. doi:10.2140/jomms.2016.11.379.
  23. Liu X., Yu W. (2016). "A Novel Approach to Analyze Beam-like Composite Structures Using Mechanics of Structure Genome". Advances in Engineering Software. 100: 238–251. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.08.003.
  24. Peng B., Goodsell J., Pipes R. B., Yu W. (2016). "Generalized Free-Edge Stress Analysis Using Mechanics of Structure Genome". Journal of Applied Mechanics. 83 (10): 101013. doi:10.1115/1.4034389.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. Liu X., Rouf K., Peng B., Yu W. (2017). "Two-Step Homogenization of Textile Composites Using Mechanics of Structure Genome". Composite Structures. 171: 252–262. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.029.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Moulinec H.; Suquet P. (1997). "A Numerical Method for Computing the Overall Response of Nonlinear Composites with Complex Microstructure". Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 157 (1–2): 69–94. Bibcode:1998CMAME.157...69M. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-1.
  27. Kanit T.; Forest S.; Galliet I.; Mounoury V.; Jeulin D. (2003). "Determination of the Size of the Representative Volume Element for Random Composites: Statistical and Numerical Approach". Int. J. Sol. Struct. 40 (13–14): 3647–3679. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4.

Further reading

  • Aboudi, J., Arnold, S.M., Bednarcyk, B.A. (2013). Micromechanics of Composite Materials A Generalized Multiscale Analysis Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-397035-0.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Mura, T. (1987). Micromechanics of Defects in Solids. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. ISBN 978-90-247-3256-2.
  • Aboudi, J. (1991). Mechanics of Composite Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-88452-1.
  • Nemat-Nasser S.; Hori M. (1993). Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Solids. Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 978-0-444-50084-7.
  • Torquato, S. (2002). Random Heterogeneous Materials. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-95167-6.
  • Nomura, Seiichi (2016). Micromechanics with Mathematica. Hoboken: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-94503-1.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.