Microfluidics refers to the behaviour, precise control, and manipulation of fluids that are geometrically constrained to a small scale (typically sub-millimeter) at which capillary penetration governs mass transport. It is a multidisciplinary field that involves engineering, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, nanotechnology, and biotechnology. It has practical applications in the design of systems that process low volumes of fluids to achieve multiplexing, automation, and high-throughput screening. Microfluidics emerged in the beginning of the 1980s and is used in the development of inkjet printheads, DNA chips, lab-on-a-chip technology, micro-propulsion, and micro-thermal technologies.

Typically, micro means one of the following features:

  • Small volumes (μL, nL, pL, fL)
  • Small size
  • Low energy consumption
  • Microdomain effects

Typically microfluidic systems transport, mix, separated, or otherwise process fluids. Various applications rely on passive fluid control using capillary forces, in the form of capillary flow modifying elements, akin to flow resistors and flow accelerators. In some applications, external actuation means are additionally used for a directed transport of the media. Examples are rotary drives applying centrifugal forces for the fluid transport on the passive chips. Active microfluidics refers to the defined manipulation of the working fluid by active (micro) components such as micropumps or microvalves. Micropumps supply fluids in a continuous manner or are used for dosing. Microvalves determine the flow direction or the mode of movement of pumped liquids. Often, processes normally carried out in a lab are miniaturised on a single chip, which enhances efficiency and mobility, and reduces sample and reagent volumes.

Microscale behaviour of fluids

The behaviour of fluids at the microscale can differ from "macrofluidic" behaviour in that factors such as surface tension, energy dissipation, and fluidic resistance start to dominate the system. Microfluidics studies how these behaviours change, and how they can be worked around, or exploited for new uses.[1][2][3][4][5]

At small scales (channel size of around 100 nanometers to 500 micrometers) some interesting and sometimes unintuitive properties appear. In particular, the Reynolds number (which compares the effect of the momentum of a fluid to the effect of viscosity) can become very low. A key consequence is co-flowing fluids do not necessarily mix in the traditional sense, as flow becomes laminar rather than turbulent; molecular transport between them must often be through diffusion.[6]

High specificity of chemical and physical properties (concentration, pH, temperature, shear force, etc.) can also be ensured resulting in more uniform reaction conditions and higher grade products in single and multi-step reactions.[7][8]

Key application areas

Microfluidic structures include micropneumatic systems, i.e. microsystems for the handling of off-chip fluids (liquid pumps, gas valves, etc.), and microfluidic structures for the on-chip handling of nanoliter (nl) and picoliter (pl) volumes.[9] To date, the most successful commercial application of microfluidics is the inkjet printhead.[10] Additionally, microfluidic

manufacturing advances mean that makers can produce the devices in low-cost plastics[11] and automatically verify part quality.[12]

Advances in microfluidics technology are revolutionizing molecular biology procedures for enzymatic analysis (e.g., glucose and lactate assays), DNA analysis (e.g., polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing), proteomics, and in chemical synthesis.[13][14] The basic idea of microfluidic biochips is to integrate assay operations such as detection, as well as sample pre-treatment and sample preparation on one chip.[15][16]

An emerging application area for biochips is clinical pathology, especially the immediate point-of-care diagnosis of diseases[17]. In addition, microfluidics-based devices, capable of continuous sampling and real-time testing of air/water samples for biochemical toxins and other dangerous pathogens, can serve as an always-on "bio-smoke alarm" for early warning.

Microfluidic technology has led to the creation of powerful tools for biologists to control the complete cellular environment, leading to new questions and discoveries. Many diverse advantages of this technology for microbiology are listed below:

  • General single cell studies including growth [18][19]
  • Cellular aging: microfluidic devices such as the "mother machine" allow tracking of thousands of individual cells for many generations until they die.[18]
  • Microenvironmental control: ranging from mechanical environment [20] to chemical environment [21] [22]
  • Precise spatiotemporal concentration gradients by incorporating multiple chemical inputs to a single device [23]
  • Force measurements of adherent cells or confined chromosomes: objects trapped in a microfluidic device can be directly manipulated using optical tweezers or other force-generating methods [24]
  • Confining cells and exerting controlled forces by coupling with external force-generation methods such as Stokes flow, optical tweezer, or controlled deformation of the PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane) device [24][25][26]
  • Electric field integration [26]
  • Plant on a chip and plant tissue culture [27]
  • Antibiotic resistance: microfluidic devices can be used as heterogeneous environments for microorganisms. In a heterogeneous environment, it is easier for a microorganism to evolve. This can be useful for testing the acceleration of evolution of a microorganism / for testing the development of antibiotic resistance.

Some of these areas are further elaborated in the sections below.

Open microfluidics

In open microfluidics, at least one boundary of the system is removed, exposing the fluid to air or another interface (i.e. liquid).[28][29][30] Advantages of open microfluidics include accessibility to the flowing liquid for intervention, larger liquid-gas surface area, and minimized bubble formation.[28][30][31] Another advantage of open microfluidics is the ability to integrate open systems with surface-tension driven fluid flow, which eliminates the need for external pumping methods such as peristaltic or syringe pumps.[32] Open microfluidic devices are also easy and inexpensive to fabricate by milling, thermoforming, and hot embossing.[33][34][35][36] In addition, open microfluidics eliminates the need to glue or bond a cover for devices, which could be detrimental to capillary flows. Examples of open microfluidics include open-channel microfluidics, rail-based microfluidics, paper-based, and thread-based microfluidics.[28][32][37] Disadvantages to open systems include susceptibility to evaporation,[38] contamination,[39] and limited flow rate.[30]

Continuous-flow microfluidics

Continuous flow microfluidics rely on the control of a steady state liquid flow through narrow channels or porous media predominantly by accelerating or hindering fluid flow in capillary elements. In paper based microfluidics, capillary elements can be achieved through the simple variation of section geometry. In general, the actuation of liquid flow is implemented either by external pressure sources, external mechanical pumps, integrated mechanical micropumps, or by combinations of capillary forces and electrokinetic mechanisms.[40][41] Continuous-flow microfluidic operation is the mainstream approach because it is easy to implement and less sensitive to protein fouling problems. Continuous-flow devices are adequate for many well-defined and simple biochemical applications, and for certain tasks such as chemical separation, but they are less suitable for tasks requiring a high degree of flexibility or fluid manipulations. These closed-channel systems are inherently difficult to integrate and scale because the parameters that govern flow field vary along the flow path making the fluid flow at any one location dependent on the properties of the entire system. Permanently etched microstructures also lead to limited reconfigurability and poor fault tolerance capability. Computer-aided design automation approaches for continuous-flow microfluidics have been proposed in recent years to alleviate the design effort and to solve the scalability problems.[42]

Process monitoring capabilities in continuous-flow systems can be achieved with highly sensitive microfluidic flow sensors based on MEMS technology, which offers resolutions down to the nanoliter range.

Droplet-based microfluidics

Droplet-based microfluidics is a subcategory of microfluidics in contrast with continuous microfluidics; droplet-based microfluidics manipulates discrete volumes of fluids in immiscible phases with low Reynolds number and laminar flow regimes. Interest in droplet-based microfluidics systems has been growing substantially in past decades. Microdroplets allow for handling miniature volumes (μl to fl) of fluids conveniently, provide better mixing, encapsulation, sorting, and sensing, and suit high throughput experiments.[19] Exploiting the benefits of droplet-based microfluidics efficiently requires a deep understanding of droplet generation [44] to perform various logical operations[45][46] such as droplet motion, droplet sorting, droplet merging, and droplet breakup.[47]

Digital microfluidics

Alternatives to the above closed-channel continuous-flow systems include novel open structures, where discrete, independently controllable droplets are manipulated on a substrate using electrowetting. Following the analogy of digital microelectronics, this approach is referred to as digital microfluidics. Le Pesant et al. pioneered the use of electrocapillary forces to move droplets on a digital track.[48] The "fluid transistor" pioneered by Cytonix[49] also played a role. The technology was subsequently commercialised by Duke University. By using discrete unit-volume droplets,[44] a microfluidic function can be reduced to a set of repeated basic operations, i.e., moving one unit of fluid over one unit of distance. This "digitisation" method facilitates the use of a hierarchical and cell-based approach for microfluidic biochip design. Therefore, digital microfluidics offers a flexible and scalable system architecture as well as high fault-tolerance capability. Moreover, because each droplet can be controlled independently, these systems also have dynamic reconfigurability, whereby groups of unit cells in a microfluidic array can be reconfigured to change their functionality during the concurrent execution of a set of bioassays. Although droplets are manipulated in confined microfluidic channels, since the control on droplets is not independent, it should not be confused as "digital microfluidics". One common actuation method for digital microfluidics is electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD). Many lab-on-a-chip applications have been demonstrated within the digital microfluidics paradigm using electrowetting. However, recently other techniques for droplet manipulation have also been demonstrated using magnetic force,[50] surface acoustic waves, optoelectrowetting, mechanical actuation,[51] etc.

Paper-based microfluidics

Paper-based microfluidic devices fill a growing niche for portable, cheap, and user-friendly medical diagnostic systems.[52] Paper based microfluidics rely on the phenomenon of capillary penetration in porous media.[53] To tune fluid penetration in porous substrates such as paper in two and three dimensions, the pore structure, wettability and geometry of the microfluidic devices can be controlled while the viscosity and evaporation rate of the liquid play a further significant role. Many such devices feature hydrophobic barriers on hydrophilic paper that passively transport aqueous solutions to outlets where biological reactions take place.[54] Current applications include portable glucose detection[55] and environmental testing,[56] with hopes of reaching areas that lack advanced medical diagnostic tools.

DNA chips (microarrays)

Early biochips were based on the idea of a DNA microarray, e.g., the GeneChip DNAarray from Affymetrix, which is a piece of glass, plastic or silicon substrate, on which pieces of DNA (probes) are affixed in a microscopic array. Similar to a DNA microarray, a protein array is a miniature array where a multitude of different capture agents, most frequently monoclonal antibodies, are deposited on a chip surface; they are used to determine the presence and/or amount of proteins in biological samples, e.g., blood. A drawback of DNA and protein arrays is that they are neither reconfigurable nor scalable after manufacture. Digital microfluidics has been described as a means for carrying out Digital PCR.

Molecular biology

In addition to microarrays, biochips have been designed for two-dimensional electrophoresis,[57] transcriptome analysis,[58] and PCR amplification.[59] Other applications include various electrophoresis and liquid chromatography applications for proteins and DNA, cell separation, in particular, blood cell separation, protein analysis, cell manipulation and analysis including cell viability analysis [19] and microorganism capturing.[16]

Evolutionary biology

By combining microfluidics with landscape ecology and nanofluidics, a nano/micro fabricated fluidic landscape can be constructed by building local patches of bacterial habitat and connecting them by dispersal corridors. The resulting landscapes can be used as physical implementations of an adaptive landscape,[60] by generating a spatial mosaic of patches of opportunity distributed in space and time. The patchy nature of these fluidic landscapes allows for the study of adapting bacterial cells in a metapopulation system. The evolutionary ecology of these bacterial systems in these synthetic ecosystems allows for using biophysics to address questions in evolutionary biology.

Cell behavior

The ability to create precise and carefully controlled chemoattractant gradients makes microfluidics the ideal tool to study motility [61], chemotaxis and the ability to evolve / develop resistance to antibiotics in small populations of microorganisms and in a short period of time. These microorganisms including bacteria [62] and the broad range of organisms that form the marine microbial loop,[63] responsible for regulating much of the oceans' biogeochemistry.

Microfluidics has also greatly aided the study of durotaxis by facilitating the creation of durotactic (stiffness) gradients.

Cellular biophysics

By rectifying the motion of individual swimming bacteria,[64] microfluidic structures can be used to extract mechanical motion from a population of motile bacterial cells.[65] This way, bacteria-powered rotors can be built.[66][67]


The merger of microfluidics and optics is typical known as optofluidics. Examples of optofluidic devices are tunable microlens arrays[68][69] and optofluidic microscopes.

Microfluidic flow enables fast sample throughput, automated imaging of large sample populations, as well as 3D capabilities.[70][71] or superresolution.[72]

Acoustic droplet ejection (ADE)

Acoustic droplet ejection uses a pulse of ultrasound to move low volumes of fluids (typically nanoliters or picoliters) without any physical contact. This technology focuses acoustic energy into a fluid sample to eject droplets as small as a millionth of a millionth of a litre (picoliter = 10−12 litre). ADE technology is a very gentle process, and it can be used to transfer proteins, high molecular weight DNA and live cells without damage or loss of viability. This feature makes the technology suitable for a wide variety of applications including proteomics and cell-based assays.

Fuel cells

Microfluidic fuel cells can use laminar flow to separate the fuel and its oxidant to control the interaction of the two fluids without the physical barrier that conventional fuel cells require.[73][74][75]


To understand the prospects for life to exist elsewhere in the universe, astrobiologists are interested in measuring the chemical composition of extraplanetary bodies.[76] Because of their small size and wide-ranging functionality, microfluidic devices are uniquely suited for these remote sample analyses.[77][78][79] From an extraterrestrial sample, the organic content can be assessed using microchip capillary electrophoresis and selective fluorescent dyes.[80] These devices are capable of detecting amino acids,[81] peptides,[82] fatty acids,[83] and simple aldehydes, ketones,[84] and thiols.[85] These analyses coupled together could allow powerful detection of the key components of life, and hopefully inform our search for functioning extraterrestrial life.[86]

Future directions

  • Microfluidic drug assays:[87]
  • On-chip characterization:[88]
  • Microfluidics in the classroom: On-chip acid-base titrations[89]
  • Sepsis detection in minutes not days.
  • Unlocking multi-angle imaging for microfluidic devices [90]

See also


  1. S.C.Terry, J.H.Jerman and J.B.Angell:A Gas Chromatographic Air Analyzer Fabricated on a Silicon Wafer, IEEE Trans.Electron Devices, ED-26,12(1979)1880-1886.
  2. Kirby, B.J. (2010). Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Karniadakis, G.M., Beskok, A., Aluru, N. (2005). Microflows and Nanoflows. Springer Verlag.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Bruus, H. (2007). Theoretical Microfluidics. Oxford University Press.
  5. Shkolnikov, V (2019). Principles of Microfluidics. ISBN 978-1790217281.
  6. Tabeling, P. (2005). Introduction to Microfluidics. Oxford University Press.
  7. Chokkalingam, V.; Weidenhof, B.; Kraemer, M.; Maier, W. F.; Herminghaus, S.; Seemann, R. (2010). "Optimized droplet-based microfluidics scheme for sol–gel reactions". Lab Chip. 10 (13): 1700–5. doi:10.1039/b926976b. PMID 20405061.
  8. Shestopalov, J; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. (2004). "Multi-step synthesis of nanoparticles performed on millisecond time scale in a microfluidic droplet-based system" (PDF). Lab Chip. 4 (4): 316–321. doi:10.1039/b403378g. PMID 15269797.
  9. Nguyen, N.T., Wereley, S. (2006). Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics. Artech House.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. Andrew (2006). "Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems". Nature. 442 (7101): 394–402. Bibcode:2006Natur.442..394D. doi:10.1038/nature05062. PMID 16871207.
  11. Ryan S. Pawell, David W. Inglis, Tracie J. Barber, and Robert A. Taylor, Manufacturing and wetting low-cost microfluidic cell separation devices, Biomicrofluidics 7, 056501 (2013); doi:10.1063/1.4821315
  12. Automating microfluidic part verification - Online First - Springer
  13. Morin, Stephen A.; Konda, Abhiteja (2017-06-22). "Flow-directed synthesis of spatially variant arrays of branched zinc oxide mesostructures". Nanoscale. 9 (24): 8393–8400. doi:10.1039/C7NR02655B. ISSN 2040-3372. PMID 28604901.
  14. Cheng, Jayce J.; Nicaise, Samuel M.; Berggren, Karl K.; Gradečak, Silvija (2016-01-13). "Dimensional Tailoring of Hydrothermally Grown Zinc Oxide Nanowire Arrays". Nano Letters. 16 (1): 753–759. Bibcode:2016NanoL..16..753C. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04625. ISSN 1530-6984. PMID 26708095.
  15. Herold, KE; Rasooly, A (editor) (2009). Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Fabrication and Microfluidics. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-46-2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  16. Herold, KE; Rasooly, A (editor) (2009). Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  17. Michael P. Barrett; Jonathan M. Cooper; Clément Regnault; Stefan H. Holm; Jason P. Beech; Jonas O. Tegenfeldt; Axel Hochstetter (5 October 2017). "Microfluidics-Based Approaches to the Isolation of African Trypanosomes". Pathogens. 6 (4): 47. doi:10.3390/pathogens6040047. PMC 5750571. PMID 28981471. Unknown parameter |pmcid= ignored (|pmc= suggested) (help)
  18. Wang, P; Robert, L; Dang, WL; Taddei, F; Wright, A; Jun, S (2010). "Robust growth of Escherichia coli". Current Biology. 20 (12): 1099–1103. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.045. PMC 2902570. PMID 20537537.
  19. Venkat Chokkalingam, Jurjen Tel, Florian Wimmers, Xin Liu, Sergey Semenov, Julian Thiele, Carl G. Figdor, Wilhelm T.S. Huck, Probing cellular heterogeneity in cytokine-secreting immune cells using droplet-based microfluidics, Lab on a Chip, 13, 4740-4744, 2013, DOI: 10.1039/C3LC50945A, http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/lc/c3lc50945a#!divAbstract
  20. Amir Manbachi; Shamit Shrivastava; Margherita Cioffi; Bong Geun Chung; Matteo Moretti; Utkan Demirci; Marjo Yliperttula; Ali Khademhosseini (2008). "Microcirculation within grooved substrates regulates cell positioning and cell docking inside microfluidic channels". Lab Chip. 8 (5): 747–754. doi:10.1039/B718212K. PMC 2668874. PMID 18432345.
  21. Marjo Yliperttulaa, Bong Geun Chunga, Akshay Navaladia, Amir Manbachi, Arto Urtt (October 2008). "High-throughput screening of cell responses to biomaterials". European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 35 (3): 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2008.04.012. PMID 18586092.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. Daniel F. Gilbert, Sepideh Abolpour Mofrad, Oliver Friedrich, Joachim Wiest (February 2019). "Proliferation characteristics of cells cultured under periodic versus static conditions". Cytotechnology. 71 (1): 443–452. doi:10.1007/s10616-018-0263-z. PMC 6368509. PMID 30515656.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. Chung BG, Manbachi A, Saadi W, Lin F, Jeon NL, Khademhosseini A (2007). "A gradient-generating microfluidic device for cell biology". J Vis Exp. 7 (7): 271. doi:10.3791/271. PMC 2565846. PMID 18989442.
  24. Pelletier, J; Halvorsen, K; Ha, BY; Paparcone, R; Sandler, S; Woldringh, CL; Wong, WP; Jun, S (2012). "Physical manipulation of the Escherichia coli chromosome reveals its soft nature". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (40): E2649–E2656. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109E2649P. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208689109. PMC 3479577. PMID 22984156.
  25. Amir, A; Babaeipour, F; McIntosh, D; Nelson, D; Jun, S (2014). "Bending forces plastically deform growing bacterial cell walls". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (16): 5778–5783. arXiv:1305.5843. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.5778A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317497111. PMC 4000856. PMID 24711421.
  26. Choi, J.W., Rosset, S., Niklaus, M., Adleman, J.R., Shea, H., Psaltis, D. "3-dimensional electrode patterning within a microfluidic channel using a metal ion implantation", Lab on a Chip 10, 738-788, 2010. doi:10.1039/B917719A
  27. AK Yetisen; L Jiang; J R Cooper; Y Qin; R Palanivelu; Y Zohar (May 2011). "A microsystem-based assay for studying pollen tube guidance in plant reproduction". J. Micromech. Microeng. 25 (5): 054018. Bibcode:2011JMiMi..21e4018Y. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/21/5/054018.
  28. Berthier, Jean; Brakke, Kenneth A.; Berthier, Erwin (2016-08-01). Open Microfluidics. doi:10.1002/9781118720936. ISBN 9781118720936.
  29. Pfohl, Thomas; Mugele, Frieder; Seemann, Ralf; Herminghaus, Stephan (2003-12-08). "Trends in Microfluidics with Complex Fluids". ChemPhysChem. 4 (12): 1291–1298. doi:10.1002/cphc.200300847. ISSN 1439-4235. PMID 14714376.
  30. Kaigala, Govind V.; Lovchik, Robert D.; Delamarche, Emmanuel (2012-10-30). "Microfluidics in the "Open Space" for Performing Localized Chemistry on Biological Interfaces". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 51 (45): 11224–11240. doi:10.1002/anie.201201798. ISSN 1433-7851. PMID 23111955.
  31. Li, C.; Boban, M.; Tuteja, A. (2017). "Open-channel, water-in-oil emulsification in paper-based microfluidic devices". Lab on a Chip. 17 (8): 1436–1441. doi:10.1039/c7lc00114b. ISSN 1473-0197. PMID 28322402.
  32. Casavant, B. P.; Berthier, E.; Theberge, A. B.; Berthier, J.; Montanez-Sauri, S. I.; Bischel, L. L.; Brakke, K.; Hedman, C. J.; Bushman, W. (2013-05-31). "Suspended microfluidics". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (25): 10111–10116. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11010111C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302566110. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3690848. PMID 23729815.
  33. Guckenberger, David J.; de Groot, Theodorus E.; Wan, Alwin M. D.; Beebe, David J.; Young, Edmond W. K. (2015). "Micromilling: a method for ultra-rapid prototyping of plastic microfluidic devices". Lab on a Chip. 15 (11): 2364–2378. doi:10.1039/c5lc00234f. ISSN 1473-0197. PMC 4439323. PMID 25906246.
  34. Truckenm$uuml$ller, R; Rummler, Z; Schaller, Th; Schomburg, W K (2002-06-13). "Low-cost thermoforming of micro fluidic analysis chips". Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 12 (4): 375–379. Bibcode:2002JMiMi..12..375T. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/12/4/304. ISSN 0960-1317.
  35. Jeon, Jessie S.; Chung, Seok; Kamm, Roger D.; Charest, Joseph L. (2010-11-27). "Hot embossing for fabrication of a microfluidic 3D cell culture platform". Biomedical Microdevices. 13 (2): 325–333. doi:10.1007/s10544-010-9496-0. ISSN 1387-2176. PMC 3117225. PMID 21113663.
  36. Young, Edmond W. K.; Berthier, Erwin; Guckenberger, David J.; Sackmann, Eric; Lamers, Casey; Meyvantsson, Ivar; Huttenlocher, Anna; Beebe, David J. (2011-02-15). "Rapid Prototyping of Arrayed Microfluidic Systems in Polystyrene for Cell-Based Assays". Analytical Chemistry. 83 (4): 1408–1417. doi:10.1021/ac102897h. ISSN 0003-2700. PMC 3052265. PMID 21261280.
  37. Bouaidat, Salim; Hansen, Ole; Bruus, Henrik; Berendsen, Christian; Bau-Madsen, Niels Kristian; Thomsen, Peter; Wolff, Anders; Jonsmann, Jacques (2005). "Surface-directed capillary system; theory, experiments and applications". Lab on a Chip. 5 (8): 827–36. doi:10.1039/b502207j. ISSN 1473-0197. PMID 16027933.
  38. Kachel, Sibylle; Zhou, Ying; Scharfer, Philip; Vrančić, Christian; Petrich, Wolfgang; Schabel, Wilhelm (2014). "Evaporation from open microchannel grooves". Lab Chip. 14 (4): 771–778. doi:10.1039/c3lc50892g. ISSN 1473-0197. PMID 24345870.
  39. Higashi, Kazuhiko; Ogawa, Miho; Fujimoto, Kazuma; Onoe, Hiroaki; Miki, Norihisa (2017-06-03). "Hollow Hydrogel Microfiber Encapsulating Microorganisms for Mass-Cultivation in Open Systems". Micromachines. 8 (6): 176. doi:10.3390/mi8060176. ISSN 2072-666X. PMC 6190135.
  40. Chang, H.C., Yeo, Leslie (2009). Electrokinetically Driven Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  41. fluid transistor Archived July 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  42. Columba 2.0: A co-layout synthesis tool for continuous-flow microfluidic biochips
  43. Churchman, Adam (2018) Data associated with 'Combined flow-focus and self-assembly routes for the formation of lipid stabilized oil-shelled microbubbles'. University of Leeds. [Dataset] https://doi.org/10.5518/153
  44. Chokkalingam, V.; Herminghaus, S.; Seemann, R. (2008). "Self-synchronizing Pairwise Production of Monodisperse Droplets by Microfluidic Step Emulsification". Applied Physics Letters. 93 (25): 254101. Bibcode:2008ApPhL..93y4101C. doi:10.1063/1.3050461. Archived from the original on 2013-01-13.
  45. Teh, Shia-Yen and Lin, Robert and Hung, Lung-Hsin and Lee, Abraham P (2008). "Droplet microfluidics". Lab on a Chip. 8 (2): 198–220. doi:10.1039/B715524G. PMID 18231657.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. Prakash, Manu; Gershenfeld, Neil (2007-02-09). "Microfluidic Bubble Logic". Science. 315 (5813): 832–835. Bibcode:2007Sci...315..832P. CiteSeerX doi:10.1126/science.1136907. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17289994.
  47. Samie, Milad; Salari, Shafii (May 2013). "Breakup of microdroplets in asymmetric T junctions". Physical Review E. 87 (5): 053003. Bibcode:2013PhRvE..87e3003S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.053003. PMID 23767616.
  48. Le Pesant et al., Electrodes for a device operating by electrically controlled fluid displacement, U.S. Pat. No. 4,569,575, Feb. 11, 1986.
  49. NSF Award Search: Advanced Search Results
  50. Zhang, Yi, and Nam-Trung Nguyen. "Magnetic digital microfluidics–a review." Lab on a Chip 17.6 (2017): 994-1008.
  51. J. Shemesh, A. Bransky, M. Khoury, S. Levenberg,"Advanced microfluidic droplet manipulation based on piezoelectric actuation" Biomedical Microdevices doi:10.1007/s10544-010-9445-y, 2010.
  52. Berthier, Jean; Brakke, Kenneth A.; Berthier, Erwin (2016). Open Microfluidics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 229–256. doi:10.1002/9781118720936.ch7. ISBN 9781118720936.
  53. Liu, Mingchao; Suo, Si; Wu, Jian; Gan, Yixiang; Ah Hanaor, Dorian; Chen, C.Q. (2019). "Tailoring porous media for controllable capillary flow". Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 539: 379–387. Bibcode:2019JCIS..539..379L. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.068. PMID 30594833.
  54. Galindo-Rosales, Francisco José (2017-05-26). Complex Fluid-Flows in Microfluidics. Springer. ISBN 9783319595931.
  55. Martinez, Andres W.; Phillips, Scott T.; Butte, Manish J.; Whitesides, George M. (2007). "Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays". Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. In English). 46 (8): 1318–1320. doi:10.1002/anie.200603817. ISSN 1433-7851. PMC 3804133. PMID 17211899.
  56. Park, Tu San; Yoon, Jeong-Yeol (2015-03-01). "Smartphone Detection of Escherichia coli From Field Water Samples on Paper Microfluidics". IEEE Sensors Journal. 15 (3): 1902. Bibcode:2015ISenJ..15.1902P. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2014.2367039.
  57. Fan; et al. (2009). "Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis in a Chip". Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
  58. Bontoux; et al. (2009). "Elaborating Lab-on-a-Chips for Single-cell Transcriptome Analysis". Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
  59. Cady, NC (2009). "Microchip-based PCR Amplification Systems". Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Biomolecular Separation and Analysis. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-47-9.
  60. Keymer J.E.; P. Galajda; C. Muldoon R. & R. Austin (November 2006). "Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes". PNAS. 103 (46): 17290–295. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10317290K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607971103. PMC 1635019. PMID 17090676.
  61. Axel Hochstetter; Eric Stellamanns; Siddharth Deshpande; Sravanti Uppaluri; Markus Engstler; Thomas Pfohl (2015). "Microfluidics-based single cell analysis reveals drug-dependent motility changes in trypanosomes" (PDF). Lab Chip. 15 (8): 1961–1968. doi:10.1039/C5LC00124B. PMID 18432345.
  62. Ahmed, T.; Shimizu, T.S.; Stocker, R. (2010). "Microfluidics for bacterial chemotaxis". Integrative Biology. 2 (11–12): 604–629. doi:10.1039/C0IB00049C. hdl:1721.1/66851. PMID 20967322.
  63. Seymour, J.R.; Simo', R.; Ahmed, T.; Stocker, R. (2010). "Chemoattraction to dimethylsulfoniopropionate throughout the marine microbial food web". Science. 329 (5989): 342–345. Bibcode:2010Sci...329..342S. doi:10.1126/science.1188418. PMID 20647471.
  64. Galajda P; J.E. Keymer; P Chaikin; R. Austin (December 2007). "A Wall of Funnels Concentrates Swimming Bacteria". Journal of Bacteriology. 189 (23): 8704–8707. doi:10.1128/JB.01033-07. PMC 2168927. PMID 17890308.
  65. Angelani L.; R. Di Leonardo; G. Ruocco (2009). "Self-Starting Micromotors in a Bacterial Bath". Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (4): 048104. arXiv:0812.2375. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102d8104A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.048104. PMID 19257480.
  66. Di Leonardo, R.; Angelani, L.; Ruocco, G.; Iebba, V.; Conte, M.P.; Schippa, S.; De Angelis, F.; Mecarini, F.; Di Fabrizio, E. (2010). "A bacterial ratchet motor". PNAS. 107 (21): 9541–9545. arXiv:0910.2899. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.9541D. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910426107. PMC 2906854. PMID 20457936.
  67. Sokolova A.; M.M. Apodacac; B.A. Grzybowskic; I.S. Aransona (December 2009). "Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears". PNAS. 107 (3): 969–974. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107..969S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913015107. PMC 2824308. PMID 20080560.
  68. Liquid micro-lens array activated by selective electrowetting on lithium niobate substrates S. Grilli, L. Miccio, V. Vespini, A. Finizio, S. De Nicola, and P. Ferraro Optics Express 16, 8084-8093 (2008). doi:10.1364/OE.16.008084
  69. P. Ferraro, L. Miccio, S. Grilli, A. Finizio, S. De Nicola, and V. Vespini, "Manipulating Thin Liquid Films for Tunable Microlens Arrays," Optics & Photonics News 19, 34-34 (2008) http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPN-19-12-34
  70. Flow-scanning optical tomography N. C. Pégard, M. L. Toth, M. Driscoll, and J. W. Fleischer Lab Chip, (2014),14, 4447-4450
  71. N. C. Pégard and J. W. Fleischer, Journal of Biomedical Optics 18 040503 (2013)
  72. C-H. Lu, N. C. Pégard and J. W. Fleischer, 2013, Applied Physics Letters, 102 161115 (2013) Archived 2013-12-04 at Archive.today
  73. Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells Archived June 28, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  74. Building a Better Fuel Cell Using Microfluidics
  75. Fuel Cell Initiative at MnIT Microfluidics Laboratory
  76. "NASA Astrobiology Strategy, 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-22.
  77. Beebe, David J.; Mensing, Glennys A.; Walker, Glenn M. (2002). "Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology". Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 4: 261–286. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112601.125916. ISSN 1523-9829. PMID 12117759.
  78. Theberge, Ashleigh B.; Courtois, Fabienne; Schaerli, Yolanda; Fischlechner, Martin; Abell, Chris; Hollfelder, Florian; Huck, Wilhelm T. S. (2010-08-09). "Microdroplets in microfluidics: an evolving platform for discoveries in chemistry and biology" (PDF). Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. In English). 49 (34): 5846–5868. doi:10.1002/anie.200906653. ISSN 1521-3773. PMID 20572214.
  79. van Dinther, A. M. C.; Schroën, C. G. P. H.; Vergeldt, F. J.; van der Sman, R. G. M.; Boom, R. M. (2012-05-15). "Suspension flow in microfluidic devices--a review of experimental techniques focussing on concentration and velocity gradients". Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 173: 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2012.02.003. ISSN 1873-3727. PMID 22405541.
  80. Mora, Maria F.; Greer, Frank; Stockton, Amanda M.; Bryant, Sherrisse; Willis, Peter A. (2011-11-15). "Toward Total Automation of Microfluidics for Extraterrestial [sic] In Situ Analysis". Analytical Chemistry. 83 (22): 8636–8641. doi:10.1021/ac202095k. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 21972965.
  81. Chiesl, Thomas N.; Chu, Wai K.; Stockton, Amanda M.; Amashukeli, Xenia; Grunthaner, Frank; Mathies, Richard A. (2009-04-01). "Enhanced Amine and Amino Acid Analysis Using Pacific Blue and the Mars Organic Analyzer Microchip Capillary Electrophoresis System". Analytical Chemistry. 81 (7): 2537–2544. doi:10.1021/ac8023334. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 19245228.
  82. Kaiser, R. I.; Stockton, A. M.; Kim, Y. S.; Jensen, E. C.; Mathies, R. A. (2013). "On the Formation of Dipeptides in Interstellar Model Ices". The Astrophysical Journal. 765 (2): 111. Bibcode:2013ApJ...765..111K. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/111. ISSN 0004-637X.
  83. Stockton, Amanda M.; Tjin, Caroline Chandra; Chiesl, Thomas N.; Mathies, Richard A. (July 2011). "Analysis of carbonaceous biomarkers with the Mars Organic Analyzer microchip capillary electrophoresis system: carboxylic acids". Astrobiology. 11 (6): 519–528. Bibcode:2011AsBio..11..519S. doi:10.1089/ast.2011.0634. ISSN 1557-8070. PMID 21790324.
  84. Stockton, Amanda M.; Tjin, Caroline Chandra; Huang, Grace L.; Benhabib, Merwan; Chiesl, Thomas N.; Mathies, Richard A. (2010-11-01). "Analysis of carbonaceous biomarkers with the Mars Organic Analyzer microchip capillary electrophoresis system: Aldehydes and ketones". Electrophoresis. 31 (22): 3642–3649. doi:10.1002/elps.201000424. ISSN 1522-2683. PMID 20967779.
  85. Mora, Maria F.; Stockton, Amanda M.; Willis, Peter A. (2015). Microchip Capillary Electrophoresis Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1274. Humana Press, New York, NY. pp. 43–52. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2353-3_4. ISBN 9781493923526. PMID 25673481.
  86. Bowden, Stephen A.; Wilson, Rab; Taylor, Colin; Cooper, Jonathan M.; Parnell, John (January 2007). "The extraction of intracrystalline biomarkers and other organic compounds from sulphate minerals using a microfluidic format – a feasibility study for remote fossil-life detection using a microfluidic H-cell". International Journal of Astrobiology. 6 (1): 27–36. Bibcode:2007IJAsB...6...27B. doi:10.1017/S147355040600351X. ISSN 1475-3006.
  87. Regnault, Clément; Dheeman, Dharmendra S.; Hochstetter, Axel (2018). "Microfluidic Devices for Drug Assays". High Throughput. 7 (2): 18. doi:10.3390/ht7020018. PMC 6023517. PMID 29925804.
  88. Jesse; Debono, Michael; Kwan, Chi-Hang; Abolhasani, Milad; Guenther, Axel; Kumacheva, Eugenia (2012). "Development and applications of a microfluidic reactor with multiple analytical probes". Analyst. 137 (2): 444–450. Bibcode:2012Ana...137..444G. doi:10.1039/C1AN15940B. PMID 22108956.
  89. Greener, Jesse; Tumarkin, Ethan; Debono, Michael; Kumacheva, Eugenia (2012). "Education: a microfluidic platform for university-level analytical chemistry laboratories". Lab Chip. 12 (4): 696–701. doi:10.1039/C2LC20951A. PMID 22237720.
  90. Axel Hochstetter (December 2019). "Presegmentation Procedure Generates Smooth-Sided Microfluidic Devices: Unlocking Multiangle Imaging for Everyone?". ACS Omega. 4 (25): 20972–20977. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b02139.

Further reading

Review papers


  • Bruus, Henrik (2008). Theoretical Microfluidics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199235094.
  • Herold, KE; Rasooly, A (editor) (2009). Lab-on-a-Chip Technology: Fabrication and Microfluidics. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-46-2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  • Title: Advances in Microfluidics, Editor: Dr. Ryan kelly, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA. ISBN 978-953-510-106-2, 2012.
  • Tabeling, P (2006). Introduction to Microfluidics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-856864-3.
  • Jenkins, G; Mansfield, CD (editors) (2012). Microfluidic Diagnostics. Humana Press. ISBN 978-1-62703-133-2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  • Li, Xiujun (James); Zhou, Yu (editors) (2013). Microfluidic devices for biomedical applications. Woodhead Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85709-697-5.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.