Linux kernel

The Linux kernel is a free and open-source, monolithic, Unix-like operating system kernel. The Linux family of operating systems is based on this kernel and deployed on both traditional computer systems such as personal computers and servers, usually in the form of Linux distributions,[7] and on various embedded devices such as routers, wireless access points, PBXes, set-top boxes, FTA receivers, smart TVs, PVRs, and NAS appliances. While the adoption of the Linux kernel in desktop computer operating system is low, Linux-based operating systems dominate nearly every other segment of computing, from mobile devices to mainframes. Since November 2017, all of the world's 500 most powerful supercomputers run Linux.[8] The Android operating system for tablet computers, smartphones, and smartwatches also uses the Linux kernel.

Linux kernel
Tux the penguin, mascot of Linux[1]
Linux kernel 3.0.0 booting
DeveloperLinus Torvalds and thousands of collaborators
Written inC and assembly[2]
OS familyUnix-like
Initial release0.01 (17 September 1991 (1991-09-17))
Latest release5.4.3[3] (13 December 2019 (2019-12-13)) [±]
Latest preview5.5-rc2[4] (15 December 2019 (2019-12-15)) [±]
Available inEnglish
Kernel typeMonolithic
LicenseGPLv2 with optional binary blobs[5][6]

The Linux kernel was conceived and created in 1991 by Linus Torvalds[9] for his personal computer and with no cross-platform intentions, but has since expanded to support a huge array of computer architectures, many more than other operating systems or kernels do. Linux rapidly attracted developers and users who adopted it as the kernel for other free software projects, notably the GNU Operating System,[10] which was created as a free, non-proprietary operating system, and based on UNIX as a by-product of the fallout of the Unix wars.[11]

The Linux kernel API, the application programming interface (API) through which user programs interact with the kernel, is meant to be very stable and to not break userspace programs (some programs, such as those with GUIs, rely on other APIs as well). As part of the kernel's functionality, device drivers control the hardware; "mainlined" (included in the kernel) device drivers are also meant to be very stable. However, the interface between the kernel and loadable kernel modules (LKMs), unlike in many other kernels and operating systems, is not meant to be very stable by design.[12]

The Linux kernel, developed by contributors worldwide, is a prominent example of free and open source software.[13] Day-to-day development discussions take place on the Linux kernel mailing list (LKML). The Linux kernel is released under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2),[14][15] with some firmware images released under various non-free licenses.[6]


In April 1991, Linus Torvalds, at the time a 21-year-old computer science student at the University of Helsinki, Finland, started working on some simple ideas for an operating system. He started with a task switcher in Intel 80386 assembly language and a terminal driver. On 25 August 1991, Torvalds posted the following to comp.os.minix, a newsgroup on Usenet:[16]

I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since April, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things).

I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months [...] Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.

[...] It's mostly in C, but most people wouldn't call what I write C. It uses every conceivable feature of the 386 I could find, as it was also a project to teach me about the 386. As already mentioned, it uses a MMU, for both paging (not to disk yet) and segmentation. It's the segmentation that makes it REALLY 386 dependent (every task has a 64Mb segment for code & data - max 64 tasks in 4Gb. Anybody who needs more than 64Mb/task - tough cookies). [...] Some of my "C"-files (specifically mm.c) are almost as much assembler as C. [...] Unlike minix, I also happen to LIKE interrupts, so interrupts are handled without trying to hide the reason behind them.

After that, many people contributed code to the project. Early on, the MINIX community contributed code and ideas to the Linux kernel. At the time, the GNU Project had created many of the components required for a free operating system, but its own kernel, GNU Hurd, was incomplete and unavailable. The Berkeley Software Distribution had not yet freed itself from legal encumbrances. Despite the limited functionality of the early versions, Linux rapidly gained developers and users.

On 17 September 1991, Torvalds released version 0.01 of the Linux kernel on the FTP server ( of the Finnish University and Research Network (FUNET). It had 10,239 lines of code. On 5 October 1991, version 0.02 of the Linux kernel was released.[17] Torvalds assigned version 0 to the kernel to indicate that it was mainly for testing and not intended for productive use.[18] In December 1991, Linux kernel 0.11 was released. This version was the first to be self-hosted as Linux kernel 0.11 could be compiled by a computer running the same kernel version. When Torvalds released version 0.12 in February 1992, he adopted the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2) over his previous self-drafted license, which had not permitted commercial redistribution.[19]

On 19 January 1992, the first post to the new newsgroup alt.os.linux was submitted.[20] On 31 March 1992, the newsgroup was renamed comp.os.linux.[21] The fact that Linux is a monolithic kernel rather than a microkernel was the topic of a debate between Andrew S. Tanenbaum, the creator of MINIX, and Torvalds.[22] This discussion is known as the Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate and started in 1992 on the Usenet discussion group comp.os.minix as a general debate about Linux and kernel architecture.[23] Tanenbaum argued that microkernels were superior to monolithic kernels and that therefore Linux was obsolete. Unlike traditional monolithic kernels, device drivers in Linux are easily configured as loadable kernel modules and are loaded or unloaded while running the system. This subject was revisited on 9 May 2006,[24] and on 12 May 2006 Tanenbaum wrote a position statement.[25]

In March 1992, the last version 0 Linux kernel was released. Linux version 0.95 was the first to be capable of running X, as the X Window System had been ported to Linux. In March 1994, the first production version of the Linux kernel was released.[18] Linux kernel 1.0.0 had 176,250 lines of code. Linux kernel 1.0.0 started a standard v.x.y versioning system for the kernel, where x represents a major version release. Odd-numbered releases were for tests and development. At the time, only even numbered version releases were production releases. The y is incremented as minor patches are released within a major version release.[18] In March 1995, the Linux kernel 1.2.0 was released, with 310,950 lines of code.

After kernel version 1.3, Torvalds decided that enough changes had been made to the Linux kernel to warrant the release of a new version. Version 2.0.0 of the Linux kernel was released in June 1996.[26] In contrast to Unix, all source files of the Linux kernel are freely available, including device drivers, runtime libraries and development tools.[27] The initial success of the Linux kernel was driven by the support of programmers and testers across the world. By structuring the Linux kernel along POSIX standards, it was compatible with a range of free software and applications that had been developed for universities.[28]

The developers contributing to the Linux kernel have thought it important that the kernel which Torvalds had written for Intel PCs supported different hardware architectures. The kernel can now run on CPUs from Intel (80386, 80486, 80686), Digital Equipment Corporation (Alpha), Motorola (MC680x0 and PowerPC), Silicon Graphics (MIPS) and Sun Microsystems (SPARC). Through an integrated FPU emulator, the Linux kernel can even run on hardware architectures that lack a floating point math coprocessor.[30] Developer teams were established for different architectures and with the release of Linux kernel version 2.0 the sources of the kernel include all components to configure the kernel for different architectures before compiling it.[28] Making the Linux kernel compatible with different file systems has also been a priority. The Linux kernel can operate file systems that have been formatted for Minix, Xenix or System V, while the umsdos format even allows for Linux to be installed within an MS-DOS partition.[30] In December 1999, IBM mainframe patches for 2.2.13 were published, allowing Linux kernel to be used on enterprise-class machines.

In December 2003, with the release of kernel version 2.6.0, Torvalds regarded the Linux kernels to be so stable that he started the 2.6.x.y release cycle. Every 2.6 release was a kernel for production, development releases were indicated with -rc ("release candidate") appended to the version number. Stable 2.6 kernel releases started coming out on a regular schedule every 2–3 months, up through 2.6.39 in May 2011.[26] The shorter release cycle was the result of discussions among kernel developers regarding the release and version scheme in 2004.[31][32]

As a response to the lack of a stable kernel tree where people could coordinate the collection of bug fixes as such, in December 2005 Adrian Bunk announced that he would keep releasing 2.6.16.y kernels when the stable team moved on to 2.6.17.[33][34] He also included some driver updates, making the maintenance of the 2.6.16 series very similar to the old rules for maintenance of a stable series such as 2.4.[35] Since then, the "stable team" had been formed, and it would keep updating kernel versions with bug fixes. In October 2008 Adrian Bunk announced that he would maintain 2.6.27 for a few years as a replacement of 2.6.16.[36] The stable team picked up on the idea and as of 2010 they continue to maintain that version and release bug fixes for it, in addition to others.[37] Andrew Morton decided to repurpose his -mm tree from memory management to serve as the destination for all new and experimental code. In September 2007, Morton decided to stop maintaining this tree.[38] In February 2008 Stephen Rothwell created the linux-next tree to serve as a place where patches aimed to be merged during the next development cycle are gathered.[39][40] Several subsystem maintainers also adopted the suffix -next for trees containing code which is meant to be submitted for inclusion in the next release cycle. As of January 2014, the in-development version of the Linux kernel is held in an unstable branch named linux-next.[41]

The Linux kernel source code used to be maintained without the help of an automated source code management system, mostly because of Torvalds' dislike of centralized SCM systems. In 2002, Linux kernel development switched to BitKeeper, an SCM system which satisfied Torvalds' technical requirements. BitKeeper was made available to Torvalds and several others free of charge but was not free software, which was a source of controversy. The system did provide some interoperability with free SCM systems such as CVS and Subversion. In April 2005, efforts to reverse-engineer the BitKeeper system by Andrew Tridgell led BitMover, the company which maintained BitKeeper, to stop supporting the Linux development community. In response, Torvalds and others wrote a new source code control system for the purpose, called Git. The new system was written within weeks, and in two months the first official kernel release was made using Git.[42]

In 2008, Greg Kroah-Hartman said that since 2005 over 3,700 individual developers from over 200 different companies have contributed to the kernel.[43] The 20th anniversary of the Linux kernel was celebrated by Torvalds in July 2011 with the release of the 3.0.0 kernel version.[26] The Linux Foundation celebrated the 20th anniversary of the kernel in the 2011 edition of its kernel development study. Kernel 3.0 had 15 million lines of code and over 1,300 individual developers had contributed to this version of the Linux kernel. Volunteer developers contributed 16 percent of the total changes to the kernel in 2011. The other changes were contributions by professional software developers who were paid by a company to submit code to the kernel. In 2011, Red Hat developers contributed 10 percent of the changes made to the kernel, the second largest corporate contributor being Intel, followed by IBM and Novell. While Nokia had by that time abandoned its Linux kernel based smartphone operating system MeeGo, in 2011 Nokia developers still contributed more code to the kernel than the developers employed by Google, which had released Android in 2007 and Chrome OS in 2009. By 2011, Microsoft ranged as the 17th most prolific corporate contributor to the kernel. Its developers had first started contributing to the kernel in 2009 to improve the performance of Linux virtual machines running on top of the Windows Hyper-V hypervisor.[44]

Stable 3.x.y kernels were released until 3.19 in February 2015, with development releases carrying the -rc designation. To account for the occasional special patch release, the version 3 series of the kernel added a fourth digit to the version numbering. In April 2015, Torvalds released kernel version 4.0.[26] By February 2015 the Linux kernel had received contributions from nearly 12,000 programmers from more than 1,200 companies, including some of the world's largest software and hardware vendors.[45] Version 4.1 of the Linux kernel, released in June 2015, contains over 19.5 million lines of code contributed by almost 14,000 programmers.[46]


Linux distributions that bundle the Linux kernel with applications, Unix programs and application packages are responsible for the rising popularity of Linux operating systems among users.[28] The popularity of the Android operating system, which includes the Linux kernel, has made the kernel the most popular choice for mobile devices, rivaling the installed base of all other operating systems.[47][48][49]

Many consumer routers also use the Linux kernel,[50] as well as a wide variety of other embedded devices, such as smart TVs, set-top boxes, and webcams. Many desktop Linux distributions including the Linux kernel exist, but the usage share of Linux distributions is low in comparison to other operating systems.


The Linux kernel is a monolithic kernel, supporting true preemptive multitasking (both in user mode and, since the 2.6 series, in kernel mode[51][52]), virtual memory, shared libraries, demand loading, shared copy-on-write executables (via KSM), memory management, the Internet protocol suite, and threading.

Device drivers and kernel extensions run in kernel space (ring 0 in many CPU architectures), with full access to the hardware, although some exceptions run in user space, for example, filesystems based on FUSE/CUSE, and parts of UIO.[53][54] The graphics system most people use with Linux does not run within the kernel. Unlike standard monolithic kernels, device drivers are easily configured as modules, and loaded or unloaded while the system is running. Also, unlike standard monolithic kernels, device drivers can be pre-empted under certain conditions; this feature was added to handle hardware interrupts correctly and to better support symmetric multiprocessing.[52] By choice, the Linux kernel has no binary kernel interface.[55]

The hardware is also incorporated into the file hierarchy. Device drivers interface to user applications via an entry in the /dev or /sys directories.[56] Process information as well is mapped to the file system through the /proc directory.[56]

Various layers within Linux, also showing separation between the userland and kernel space
User mode User applications For example, bash, LibreOffice, GIMP, Blender, 0 A.D., Mozilla Firefox, etc.
Low-level system components: System daemons:
systemd, runit, logind, networkd, PulseAudio, ...
Windowing system:
X11, Wayland, SurfaceFlinger (Android)
Other libraries:
GTK+, Qt, EFL, SDL, SFML, FLTK, GNUstep, etc.
Mesa, AMD Catalyst, ...
C standard library open(), exec(), sbrk(), socket(), fopen(), calloc(), ... (up to 2000 subroutines)
glibc aims to be POSIX/SUS-compatible, musl and uClibc target embedded systems, bionic written for Android, etc.
Kernel mode Linux kernel stat, splice, dup, read, open, ioctl, write, mmap, close, exit, etc. (about 380 system calls)
The Linux kernel System Call Interface (SCI, aims to be POSIX/SUS-compatible)
Process scheduling
Memory management
Virtual files
Other components: ALSA, DRI, evdev, LVM, device mapper, Linux Network Scheduler, Netfilter
Linux Security Modules: SELinux, TOMOYO, AppArmor, Smack
Hardware (CPU, main memory, data storage devices, etc.)

Programming language

The Linux kernel is written in the version of the C programming language supported by GCC (which has introduced a number of extensions and changes to standard C), together with a number of short sections of code written in the assembly language (in GCC's "AT&T-style" syntax) of the target architecture. Because of the extensions to C it supports, GCC was for a long time the only compiler capable of correctly building the Linux kernel.

Compiler compatibility

GCC is the default compiler for the Linux kernel source. In 2004, Intel claimed to have modified the kernel so that its C compiler was also capable of compiling it.[57] There was another such reported success in 2009, with a modified 2.6.22 version of the kernel.[58][59]

Since 2010, effort has been underway to build the Linux kernel with Clang, an alternative compiler for the C language;[60] as of 12 April 2014, the official kernel could almost be compiled by Clang.[61][62] The project dedicated to this effort is named LLVMLinux after the LLVM compiler infrastructure upon which Clang is built.[63] LLVMLinux does not aim to fork either the Linux kernel or the LLVM, therefore it is a meta-project composed of patches that are eventually submitted to the upstream projects. By enabling the Linux kernel to be compiled by Clang that, among other advantages, is known for faster compilation compared with GCC, kernel developers may benefit from a faster workflow due to shorter compilation times.[64]


Conformance to standards is a general policy for the Linux kernel's internals. Another rule is that a kernel component is not accepted into the Linux kernel mainline if there is only proprietary user-space software using that component.

Kernel-to-userspace API

Source code portability ensures that a C program written by conforming to a standard can be successfully compiled and run on any system that also conforms to the same standard. The relevant standards, aiming to achieve source code portability of programs, that the development of the Linux kernel, the GNU C Library, and associated utilities try to adhere to, are POSIX and the Single UNIX Specification.

The Linux kernel API of the Linux kernel, representing the kernel's system call interface, is composed of the available system calls.

Kernel-to-userspace ABI

Binary portability shall guarantee that any program once compiled for a given hardware platform, can be run in its compiled form on any other hardware platform that conforms to the standard. Binary portability is an essential requirement for the commercial viability of independent software vendor (ISV) applications built for the operating systems based on the Linux kernel. Binary compatibility is much more demanding than source code portability; as of February 2014, the only standard concerning itself with binary compatibility is the Linux Standard Base (LSB).

In-kernel API

There are several kernel internal APIs utilized between the different subsystems and subsystems of subsystems. Some of them have been kept stable over several releases, others have not. There are no guarantees regarding the in-kernel APIs. Maintainers and contributors are free to augment or change them at any time.[66]

Examples of in-kernel APIs include software frameworks/APIs for the following classes of device drivers:

In-kernel ABI

The Linux kernel developers choose not to maintain a stable in-kernel ABI.[68]

Technical features


The Linux kernel provides preemptive scheduling under certain conditions. Until kernel version 2.4, only user processes were preemptive, i.e., in addition to time quantum expiration, an execution of current process in user mode would be interrupted if higher dynamic priority processes entered TASK_RUNNING state.[70] Toward 2.6 series of the Linux kernel, an ability to interrupt a task executing kernel code was added, although with that not all sections of the kernel code can be preempted.[71]

The Linux kernel contains different scheduler classes.[72] By default the kernel uses a scheduler mechanism called the Completely Fair Scheduler introduced in the 2.6.23 version of the kernel.[73] Internally this default-scheduler class is also known as SCHED_OTHER, but the kernel also contains two POSIX-compliant[74] real-time scheduling classes named SCHED_FIFO (realtime first-in-first-out) and SCHED_RR (realtime round-robin), both of which take precedence over the default class.[72]

Through the use of the real-time Linux kernel patch PREEMPT_RT, support for full preemption of critical sections, interrupt handlers, and "interrupt disable" code sequences can be supported.[75] Partial mainline integration of the real-time Linux kernel patch already brought some functionality to the kernel mainline.[76] Preemption improves latency, increases responsiveness, and makes Linux more suitable for desktop and real-time applications. Older versions of the kernel had a so-called big kernel lock for synchronization across the entire kernel, which was finally removed by Arnd Bergmann in 2011.[77]

Additional scheduling policy known as SCHED_DEADLINE, implementing the earliest deadline first algorithm (EDF), was added in kernel version 3.14, released on 30 March 2014.[78][79]


While not originally designed to be portable,[16][80] Linux is now one of the most widely ported operating system kernels, running on a diverse range of systems from the ARM architecture to IBM z/Architecture mainframe computers. The first port beyond Linux's original 386 architecture was performed on the Motorola 68000 platform by Amiga users, who accomplished this by replacing major parts of the kernel. The modifications to the kernel were so fundamental that Torvalds viewed the Motorola version as a fork and a "Linux-like operating system"[80] rather than as an actual port. It was, however, the impetus that Torvalds needed to lead a major restructure of the kernel code to facilitate porting to competing computing architectures. The first Linux endorsed port was to the DEC Alpha AXP 64-bit platform which was demonstrated at DECUS in May 1995,[81] supporting both 386 and Alpha in a single source tree.[80] DEC was responsible for supplying the hardware necessary to Torvalds to enable a port of Linux to 64 bits[82] that same year.

Linux runs as the main operating system on IBM's Summit and all other fastest supercomputers, including the Chinese-designed and built Sunway TaihuLight (formerly fastest); as of October 2019, all of the world's 500 fastest supercomputers run some variant of Linux,[8] a big change from 1998 when the first Linux supercomputer got added to the list then ranked 113.[83] Unix had dominated the list previously; the list hit a roughly even split between Unix and Linux in about 2003.

Linux was also been ported to various handheld devices such as Apple's iPhone 3G and iPod.[84]

Kernel variants

There are certain variants of the Linux kernel that provide additional functionality but do not belong to the Linux kernel mainline. Such variants of the Linux kernel include Linux-libre, Compute Node Linux, Cooperative Linux, Longene, grsecurity, INK, L4Linux, MkLinux, RTLinux, and User-Mode Linux (UML). Some of these variants have been partially merged into the mainline.[85] Some operating systems developed for mobile phones initially used heavily modified versions of the Linux kernel, including Google Android, Firefox OS, HP webOS, Nokia Maemo and Jolla Sailfish OS. In 2010, the Linux kernel community criticised Google for effectively starting its own kernel tree:[86][87]

This means that any drivers written for Android hardware platforms, can not get merged into the main kernel tree because they have dependencies on code that only lives in Google's kernel tree, causing it to fail to build in the tree. Because of this, Google has now prevented a large chunk of hardware drivers and platform code from ever getting merged into the main kernel tree. Effectively creating a kernel branch that a number of different vendors are now relying on.[88]

Greg Kroah-Hartman, 2010

Today Android uses a slightly customized Linux kernel[89] where changes are implemented in device drivers so that little or no change to the core kernel code is required. Android developers also submit patches to the mainline Linux kernel and the mainline kernel can boot the Android operating system. A Nexus 7 can boot and run a mainline Linux kernel.[89]

Kernel panic and oopses

In Linux, a "panic" is an unrecoverable system error detected by the kernel, as opposed to similar errors detected by user space code. It is possible for kernel code to indicate such a condition by calling the panic function located in the header file sys/system.h. However, most panics are the result of unhandled processor exceptions in kernel code, such as references to invalid memory addresses. These are typically indicative of a bug somewhere in the call chain leading to the panic. They can also indicate a failure of hardware, such as a failed RAM cell or errors in arithmetic functions in the processor caused by a processor bug, overheating/damaged processor, or a soft error.

A report of a non-fatal bug in the kernel is called an "oops"; such deviations from correct behavior of the Linux kernel may allow continued operation with compromised reliability.[90] These crash reports are automatically collected and can be sent upstream by various software, such as kerneloops,[91] ABRT (Fedora)[92] and apport (Ubuntu). collects these reports and publishes statistics on their website.[93]

The kernel panic message might not be printed visibly in some conditions, such as when using a graphical desktop. To debug such conditions, other methods such as attaching a serial port console can be used.

Live patching

Rebootless updates can even be applied to the kernel by using live patching technologies such as Ksplice, kpatch and kGraft. Minimalistic foundations for live kernel patching were merged into the Linux kernel mainline in kernel version 4.0, which was released on 12 April 2015. Those foundations, known as livepatch and based primarily on the kernel's ftrace functionality, form a common core capable of supporting hot patching by both kGraft and kpatch, by providing an application programming interface (API) for kernel modules that contain hot patches and an application binary interface (ABI) for the userspace management utilities. However, the common core included into Linux kernel 4.0 supports only the x86 architecture and does not provide any mechanisms for ensuring function-level consistency while the hot patches are applied. As of April 2015, there is ongoing work on porting kpatch and kGraft to the common live patching core provided by the Linux kernel mainline.[94][95][96]


Computer security is a much-publicized topic in relation to the Linux kernel because a large portion of the kernel bugs present potential security flaws. For example, they may allow for privilege escalation or create denial-of-service attack vectors. Over the years, numerous such flaws were found and fixed in the Linux kernel.[97] New security features are frequently implemented to improve the Linux kernel's security.[98][99]

Critics have accused kernel developers of covering up security flaws or at least not announcing them; in 2008, Linus Torvalds responded to this with the following:[100][101]

I personally consider security bugs to be just "normal bugs". I don't cover them up, but I also don't have any reason what-so-ever to think it's a good idea to track them and announce them as something reason I refuse to bother with the whole security circus is that I think it glorifies—and thus encourages—the wrong behavior. It makes "heroes" out of security people, as if the people who don't just fix normal bugs aren't as important. In fact, all the boring normal bugs are way more important, just because there's a lot more of them. I don't think some spectacular security hole should be glorified or cared about as being any more "special" than a random spectacular crash due to bad locking.

Linux distributions typically release security updates to fix vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. Many offer long-term support releases that receive security updates for a certain Linux kernel version for an extended period of time.

Feature history

Version 1.0 of the Linux kernel was released on 14 March 1994.[102] This release of the Linux kernel only supported single-processor i386-based computer systems. Portability became a concern, and so version 1.2 (released 7 March 1995)[103] gained support for computer systems using processors based on the Alpha, SPARC, and MIPS architectures.

Version 2.0 was released on 9 June 1996.[104] The series included 41 releases. The major feature of 2.0 was support for symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and support for more types of processors.

Version 2.2, released on 20 January 1999,[105] removed the global spinlock and provided improved SMP support, added support for the m68k and PowerPC architectures, and added new file systems (including read-only support for Microsoft's NTFS).[106]

Version 2.4.0, released on 4 January 2001,[107] contained support for ISA Plug and Play, USB, and PC Cards.[108] It also included support for the PA-RISC processor from Hewlett-Packard. Development for 2.4.x changed a bit in that more features were made available throughout the duration of the series, including support for Bluetooth, Logical Volume Manager (LVM) version 1, RAID support, InterMezzo and ext3 file systems.

Version 2.6.0 was released on 17 December 2003.[109] The development for 2.6.x changed further towards including new features throughout the duration of the series. Among the changes that have been made in the 2.6 series are: integration of µClinux into the mainline kernel sources, PAE support, support for several new lines of CPUs, integration of Advanced Linux Sound Architecture (ALSA) into the mainline kernel sources, support for up to 232 users (up from 216), support for up to 229 process IDs (64-bit only, 32-bit arches still limited to 215),[110] substantially increased the number of device types and the number of devices of each type, improved 64-bit support, support for file systems which support file sizes of up to 16 terabytes, in-kernel preemption, support for the Native POSIX Thread Library (NPTL), User-mode Linux integration into the mainline kernel sources, SELinux integration into the mainline kernel sources, InfiniBand support, and considerably more. Also notable are the addition of several file systems throughout the 2.6.x releases: FUSE, JFS, XFS, ext4 and more. Details on the history of the 2.6 kernel series can be found in the ChangeLog files on the 2.6 kernel series source code release area of[111]

Version 3.0 was released on 22 July 2011.[112] On 30 May 2011, Torvalds announced that the big change was "NOTHING. Absolutely nothing." and asked, "...let's make sure we really make the next release not just an all new shiny number, but a good kernel too."[113] After the expected 6–7 weeks of the development process, it would be released near the 20th anniversary of Linux.

On 11 December 2012, Torvalds decided to reduce kernel complexity by removing support for i386 processors, making the 3.7 kernel series the last one still supporting the original processor.[114][115] The same series unified support for the ARM processor.[116]

Version 3.11, released on 2 September 2013,[117] adds many new features such as new O_TMPFILE flag for open(2) to reduce temporary file vulnerabilities, experimental AMD Radeon dynamic power management, low-latency network polling, and zswap (compressed swap cache).[118]

Version 5.0, released in 2019,[119] includes patches for the Spectre and Meltdown security vulnerabilities and other feature enhancements.[120]

The numbering change from 2.6.39 to 3.0, and from 3.19 to 4.0, involved no meaningful technical differentiation. The major version number was increased to avoid large minor numbers.[112][121]


Developer community

As of 2007, the development of the kernel had shifted from the top 20 most active developers writing 80% of the code to the top 30 writing 30% of the code, with top developers spending more time reviewing changes.[122] Developers can also be categorized by affiliation; in 2007, the top category was unknown while the top corporation was Red Hat with 12% of contributions, and known amateurs at 3.9%.[122] The kernel changes made in the year 2007 have been submitted by over 1900 developers, which may be a significant underestimate because developers working in teams usually count as one.

It is generally assumed that the community of Linux kernel developers comprises 5000 or 6000 members. Update from the 2016 Linux Kernel Development Report, issued by the Linux Foundation, covering the period from 3.18 (December 2014) to 4.7 (July 2016): About 1500 developers are contributing to each release from about 200-250 companies on average per release. The top 30 developers contributed a little more than 16% of the code. As of companies, the top contributors are Intel (12.9%) and Red Hat (8.0%), the third and fourth places are held by the 'none' (7.7%) and 'unknown' (6.8%) categories.

Instead of a roadmap, there are technical guidelines. Instead of a central resource allocation, there are persons and companies who all have a stake in the further development of the Linux kernel, quite independently from one another: People like Linus Torvalds and I don’t plan the kernel evolution. We don’t sit there and think up the roadmap for the next two years, then assign resources to the various new features. That's because we don’t have any resources. The resources are all owned by the various corporations who use and contribute to Linux, as well as by the various independent contributors out there. It's those people who own the resources who decide...

Andrew Morton, 2005

Submitting code to the kernel

A developer who wants to change the Linux kernel starts with developing and testing that change. Depending on how significant the change is and how many subsystems it modifies, the change will either be submitted as a single patch or in multiple patches of source code. In case of a single subsystem that is maintained by a single maintainer, these patches are sent as e-mails to the maintainer of the subsystem with the appropriate mailing list in Cc. The maintainer and the readers of the mailing list will review the patches and provide feedback. Once the review process has finished the subsystem maintainer accepts the patches in the relevant Git kernel tree. If the changes to the Linux kernel are bug fixes that are considered important enough, a pull request for the patches will be sent to Torvalds within a few days. Otherwise, a pull request will be sent to Torvalds during the next merge window. The merge window usually lasts two weeks and starts immediately after the release of the previous kernel version.[123] The Git kernel source tree names all developers who have contributed to the Linux kernel in the Credits directory and all subsystem maintainers are listed in Maintainers.[124]

Development model

The Linux kernel project integrates new code on a rolling basis. Software checked into the project must work and compile without error. For each kernel subsystem there is a maintainer who is responsible for reviewing patches against the kernel code standards and keeps a queue of patches that can be submitted to Linus Torvalds within a merge window of several weeks. Patches are merged by Torvalds into the source code of the prior stable Linux kernel release, creating the -rc release candidate for the next stable kernel. Once the merge window is closed only fixes to the new code in the development release are accepted. The -rc development release of the kernel goes through regression tests and once it is judged to be stable by Torvalds and the kernel subsystem maintainers a new Linux kernel is released and the development process starts all over again.[125]

Developers who feel treated unfairly can report this to the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board.[126] In July 2013 the maintainer of the USB 3.0 driver Sarah Sharp asked Torvalds to address the abusive commentary in the kernel development community. In 2014, Sharp backed out of Linux kernel development, saying that "The focus on technical excellence, in combination with overloaded maintainers, and people with different cultural and social norms, means that Linux kernel maintainers are often blunt, rude, or brutal to get their job done".[127] At the (LCA) conference in 2018, developers expressed the view that the culture of the community has gotten much better in the past few years. Daniel Vetter, the maintainer of the Intel drm/i915 graphics kernel driver, commented that the "rather violent language and discussion" in the kernel community has decreased or disappeared.[128]

Laurent Pinchart asked developers for feedback on their experience with the kernel community at the 2017 Embedded Linux Conference Europe. The issues brought up were a few days later discussed at the Maintainers Summit. Concerns over the lack of consistency in how maintainers responded to patches submitted by developers were echoed by Shuah Khan, the maintainer of the kernel self-test framework. Torvalds contended that there would never be consistency in the handling of patches because different kernel subsystems have over time adopted different development processes. Therefore, it was agreed upon that each kernel subsystem maintainer would document the rules for patch acceptance.[129]

Development community conflicts

There have been several notable conflicts among Linux kernel developers. Examples of such conflicts are:

  • In July 2007, Con Kolivas announced that he would cease developing for the Linux kernel. Discussing his reasons in an interview, he expressed frustration with aspects of the mainline kernel development process, which he felt did not give sufficient priority to desktop interactivity, in addition to hacking taking a toll on his health, work and family.[130][131]
  • In July 2009, Alan Cox quit his role as the TTY layer maintainer after disagreement with Linus Torvalds about the scope of work required to fix an error in that subsystem.[132]
  • In December 2010, there was a discussion between Linux SCSI maintainer James Bottomley and SCST maintainer Vladislav Bolkhovitin about which SCSI target stack should be included in the Linux kernel  SCST or LIO. Although at that time SCST was considered technically superior, LIO was merged upstream.[133] This made some Linux users upset.[134]
  • In June 2012, Torvalds made it very clear that he did not agree with NVIDIA releasing its drivers as closed source drivers by showing the middle finger gesture.[135]
  • In April 2014, Torvalds banned Kay Sievers from submitting patches to the Linux kernel for failing to deal with bugs that caused systemd to negatively interact with the kernel.[136]
  • In October 2014, Lennart Poettering accused Torvalds of tolerating the rough discussion style on Linux kernel related mailing lists and of being a bad role model.[137]
  • In March 2015, Christoph Hellwig filed a lawsuit against VMware for infringement of the copyright on the Linux kernel.[138] Linus Torvalds made it clear that he did not agree with this and similar initiatives by calling lawyers a festering disease.[139]

Prominent Linux kernel developers have been aware of the importance of avoiding conflicts between developers.[140] For a long time there has been no code of conduct for kernel developers due to opposition by Linus Torvalds.[141] However, a Linux Kernel Code of Conflict was introduced on 8 March 2015.[142] It was replaced on 16 September 2018 by a new Code of Conduct based on the Contributor Covenant. This coincided with a public apology by Linus and a brief break from kernel development.[143][144] On 30 November 2018, complying with the Code of Conduct, Jarkko Sakkinen of Intel sent out patches replacing instances of "fuck" appearing in source code comments with suitable versions focused on the word 'hug'.[145]


As of 2013, the 3.10 release of the Linux kernel had 15,803,499 lines of code. As of 2007, roughly 5% of the code is part of the "core" while 52% is drivers.[122]

Linux is evolution, not intelligent design!

Estimated cost to redevelop

The cost to redevelop the Linux kernel version 2.6.0 in a traditional proprietary development setting has been estimated to be US$612 million (€467M, £394M) in 2004 prices using the COCOMO man-month estimation model.[149] In 2006, a study funded by the European Union put the redevelopment cost of kernel version 2.6.8 higher, at €882M ($1.14bn, £744M).[150]

This topic was revisited in October 2008 by Amanda McPherson, Brian Proffitt, and Ron Hale-Evans. Using David A. Wheeler's methodology, they estimated redevelopment of the 2.6.25 kernel now costs $1.3bn (part of a total $10.8bn to redevelop Fedora 9).[151] Again, Garcia-Garcia and Alonso de Magdaleno from University of Oviedo (Spain) estimate that the value annually added to kernel was about €100M between 2005 and 2007 and €225M in 2008, it would cost also more than €1bn (about $1.4bn as of February 2010) to develop in the European Union.[152]

As of 7 March 2011, using then-current LOC (lines of code) of a 2.6.x Linux kernel and wage numbers with David A. Wheeler's calculations it would cost approximately $3bn (about €2.2bn) to redevelop the Linux kernel as it keeps getting bigger. An updated calculation As of 26 September 2018, using then-current 20,088,609 LOC (lines of code) for the 4.14.14 Linux kernel and the current US National average programmer salary of $75,506 show it would cost approximately $14,725,449,000 dollars (£11,191,341,000 pounds) to rewrite the existing GPL-2.0 code that existing contributors still have claimed to if they decided to rescind the grant of license to the kernel source tree.[153]

Maintenance and long-term support

The latest kernel version and older kernel versions are maintained separately. Most latest kernel releases were supervised by Linus Torvalds.[154] Current versions are released by Greg Kroah-Hartman.[155]

The Linux kernel developer community maintains a stable kernel by applying fixes for software bugs that have been discovered during the development of the subsequent stable kernel. Therefore, will always list two stable kernels. The next stable Linux kernel is now released only 8 to 12 weeks later. Therefore, the Linux kernel maintainers have designated some stable kernel releases as longterm, these long-term support Linux kernels are updated with bug fixes for two or more years.[156] In November 2019 there were five longterm Linux kernels: 4.19.84, 4.14.154, 4.9.201, 4.4.201 and 3.16.76.[157] The full list of releases is at Linux kernel version history.

Relation with Linux distributions

Most Linux users run a kernel supplied by their Linux distribution. Some distributions ship the "vanilla" or "stable" kernels. However, several Linux distribution vendors (such as Red Hat and Debian) maintain another set of Linux kernel branches which are integrated into their products. These are usually updated at a slower pace compared to the "vanilla" branch, and they usually include all fixes from the relevant "stable" branch, but at the same time they can also add support for drivers or features which had not been released in the "vanilla" version the distribution vendor started basing their branch from.

Source code management

The Linux kernel development community uses Git to manage the kernel source code. Linus Torvalds initially developed this version control system with speed in mind and as a distributed system. Git users can obtain the latest pushed version of Torvalds' tree and keep up to date with the official kernel tree using the git pull.[158] The kernel source code is distributed in GNU zip (gzip) and bzip2 format. Source code contributions by developers are submitted as patches and incremental changes to the kernel source code means developers can seamlessly move from one Linux kernel version to the next.[159]

GPLv2 licensing terms

The Linux kernel is released under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2),[14][15] with some firmware images released under various non-free licenses.[6] Initially, Torvalds released Linux under a license which forbade any commercial use.[160] This was changed in version 0.12 by a switch to the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2).[19] This license allows distribution and sale of possibly modified and unmodified versions of Linux but requires that all those copies be released under the same license and be accompanied by the complete corresponding source code. Torvalds has described licensing Linux under the GPLv2 as the "best thing I ever did".[160]

The Linux kernel is licensed explicitly only under version 2 of the GPL,[14] without offering the licensee the option to choose "any later version", which is a common GPL extension. There was considerable debate about how easily the license could be changed to use later GPL versions (including version 3), and whether this change is even desirable.[161] Torvalds himself specifically indicated upon the release of version 2.4.0 that his own code is released only under version 2.[162] However, the terms of the GPL state that if no version is specified, then any version may be used,[163] and Alan Cox pointed out that very few other Linux contributors had specified a particular version of the GPL.[164]

In September 2006, a survey of 29 key kernel programmers indicated that 28 preferred GPLv2 to the then-current GPLv3 draft. Torvalds commented, "I think a number of outsiders... believed that I personally was just the odd man out because I've been so publicly not a huge fan of the GPLv3."[165] This group of high-profile kernel developers, including Torvalds, Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, commented on mass media about their objections to the GPLv3.[166] They referred to clauses regarding DRM/tivoization, patents, "additional restrictions" and warned a Balkanisation of the "Open Source Universe" by the GPLv3.[166][167] Linus Torvalds, who decided not to adopt the GPLv3 for the Linux kernel, reiterated his criticism even years later.[168]

Loadable kernel modules

It is debated whether loadable kernel modules (LKMs) are to be considered derivative works under copyright law, and thereby fall under the terms of the GPL.

Torvalds has stated his belief that LKMs using only a limited, "public" subset of the kernel interfaces can sometimes be non-derived works, thus allowing some binary-only drivers and other LKMs that are not licensed under the GPL. A good example for this is the usage of dma_buf by the proprietary Nvidia graphics drivers. dma_buf is a recent kernel feature (like the rest of the kernel, it is licensed under the GPL), which allows multiple GPUs to quickly copy data into each other's framebuffers.[169] One possible use case would be Nvidia Optimus that pairs a fast GPU with an Intel integrated GPU, where the Nvidia GPU writes into the Intel framebuffer when it is active. But, Nvidia cannot use this infrastructure because it uses a technical means to enforce the rule that it can only be used by LKMs that are also GPL. Alan Cox replied on LKML, rejecting a request from one of their engineers to remove this technical enforcement from the API.[170] Not all Linux kernel contributors agree with this interpretation, however, and even Torvalds agrees that many LKMs are clearly derived works, and indeed he writes that "kernel modules ARE derivative 'by default'".[171]

On the other hand, Torvalds has also said that "one gray area in particular is something like a driver that was originally written for another operating system (i.e. clearly not a derived work of Linux in origin). [...] THAT is a gray area, and _that_ is the area where I personally believe that some modules may be considered to not be derived works simply because they weren't designed for Linux and don't depend on any special Linux behaviour".[172] Proprietary graphics drivers, in particular, are heavily discussed. Ultimately, it is likely that such questions can only be resolved by a court.

Firmware binary blobs

One point of licensing controversy is the use of firmware "binary blobs" in the Linux kernel to support several hardware devices. These files are under a variety of licenses, out of which many are restrictive and their exact underlying source code is usually unknown.[6]

In 2002, Richard Stallman stated why, in his point of view, such blobs make the Linux kernel partially non-free software, and that distributing Linux kernel "violates the GPL", which requires "complete corresponding source code" to be available.[5] In 2008, Free Software Foundation Latin America started Linux-libre as a project that creates a completely free variant of the Linux kernel without proprietary objects; it is used by certain completely free Linux distributions, such as those endorsed by the Free Software Foundation, while it can also be used on most distributions.[173]

On 15 December 2010, the Debian Project announced that the next Debian stable version "6.0 Squeeze" would come with a kernel "stripped of all non-free firmware bits".[174] This policy continued to be applied in later stable Debian releases.


Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, the European Union, and some other countries.[175][176] This is the result of an incident in which William Della Croce, Jr., who was not involved in the Linux project, trademarked the name and subsequently demanded royalties for its use.[177] Several Linux backers retained legal counsel and filed suit against Della Croce. The issue was settled in August 1997 when the trademark was assigned to Linus Torvalds.[178][179]

SCO litigation

In early 2007, SCO filed the specific details of a purported copyright infringement. Despite previous claims that SCO was the rightful owner of 1 million lines of code, they specified only 326 lines of code, most of which were uncopyrightable.[180] In August 2007, the court in the Novell case ruled that SCO did not actually own the Unix copyrights, to begin with,[181] though the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2009 that the question of who owned the copyright properly remained for a jury to answer.[182] The jury case was decided on 30 March 2010 in Novell's favour.[183]

See also


  1. "Linux Logos and Mascots". Linux Online. 2008. Archived from the original on 15 August 2010. Retrieved 11 August 2009.
  2. The Linux Kernel Open Source Project on Open Hub: Languages Page
  3. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (13 December 2019). "Linux 5.4.3". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  4. Torvalds, Linus (15 December 2019). "Linux 5.5-rc2". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  5. Stallman, Richard (2002). "Linux, GNU, and freedom". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  6. "kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git". 16 October 2002. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 21 August 2012. path: root/firmware/WHENCE
  7. "README". Archived from the original on 24 July 2012. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  8. "TOP500 Supercomputer Sites: Operating system Family / Linux". Retrieved 5 October 2019.
  9. Richardson, Marjorie (1 November 1999). "Interview: Linus Torvalds". Linux Journal. Retrieved 20 August 2009.
  10. Williams, Sam (March 2002). "Chapter 9: The GNU General Public License". Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software. O'Reilly. ISBN 0-596-00287-4. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  11. Unix System Laboratories v. Berkeley Software, 832 F. Supp. 790 (D.N.J. 1993).
  12. Kroah-Hartman, Greg. "The Linux Kernel Driver Interface". Linux Kernel Documentation. Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  13. Torvalds, Linus (25 September 2006). "Re: GPLv3 Position Statement". LKML (Mailing list).
  14. "Linux Kernel Copying". Archived from the original on 21 December 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2013.
  15. Torvalds, Linus (8 September 2000). "Linux-2.4.0-test8". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 21 November 2015.
  16. Torvalds, Linus Benedict (26 August 1991). "What would you like to see most in minix?". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. Usenet: 1991Aug25.205708.9541@klaava.Helsinki.FI.
  17. Torvalds, Linus Benedict (5 October 1991). "Free minix-like kernel sources for 386-AT". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. Usenet: 1991Oct5.054106.4647@klaava.Helsinki.FI.
  18. Christine Bresnahan & Richard Blum (2016). LPIC-2: Linux Professional Institute Certification Study Guide: Exam 201 and Exam 202. John Wiley & Sons. p. 107. ISBN 9781119150794.
  19. Torvalds, Linus. "Release Notes for Linux v0.12". The Linux Kernel Archives. Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  20. Summers, David W. (19 January 1992). "Troubles with Partitions". Newsgroup: alt.os.linux. Usenet: Retrieved 7 January 2007.
  21. Clegg, Alan B. (31 March 1992). "It's here!". Newsgroup: comp.os.linux. Usenet: Retrieved 7 January 2007.
  22. "Appendix A: The Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate". Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O'Reilly. 1999. ISBN 1-56592-582-3. Retrieved 22 November 2006.
  23. Tanenbaum, Andy (29 January 1992). "LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. Usenet: Retrieved 10 May 2006.
  24. Torvalds, Linus (9 May 2006). "Hybrid kernel, not NT". Retrieved 6 January 2007.
  25. Tanenbaum, Andy (12 May 2006). "Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate: Part II". VU University Amsterdam. Retrieved 6 January 2007.
  26. Christine Bresnahan & Richard Blum (2016). LPIC-2: Linux Professional Institute Certification Study Guide: Exam 201 and Exam 202. John Wiley & Sons. p. 108. ISBN 9781119150794.
  27. Fred Hantelmann (2016). LINUX Start-up Guide: A self-contained introduction. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 1. ISBN 9783642607493.
  28. Fred Hantelmann (2016). LINUX Start-up Guide: A self-contained introduction. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 16. ISBN 9783642607493.
  29. "Linux Distributions Timeline". FabioLolix. 10 August 2019. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  30. Fred Hantelmann (2016). LINUX Start-up Guide: A self-contained introduction. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 1–2. ISBN 9783642607493.
  31. Offline, Jeremy (13 October 2001). "Kernel Release Numbering Redux". KernelTrap. Archived from the original on 24 November 2010. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  32. Torvalds, Linus. "RFD: Kernel release numbering". LKML (Mailing list). LKML. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  33. Jeremy (4 August 2006). "Linux: 2.6.16.y Lives On". KernelTrap. Archived from the original on 14 September 2010. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  34. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (3 August 2006). "Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 21 February 2015.
  35. Jeremy (23 March 2006). "Linux: Maintaining A 2.6.16.y Tree". KernelTrap. Archived from the original on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  36. Bunk, Adrian (11 October 2008). "Linux 2.6.27 will be a longtime supported kernel". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  37. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (8 September 2009). "Re: 2.6.27 maintenance plans after 2.6.32 is released". LKML (Mailing list).
  38. "This Just Isn't Working Any More". 18 September 2007. Archived from the original on 27 January 2008.
  39. Rothwell, Stephen (12 February 2008). "Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  40. Corbet, Jonathan (21 October 2010). "linux-next and patch management process". Eklektix, Inc. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  41. "The Linux Kernel Archives". Retrieved 22 January 2014.
  42. Linux Kernel Mailing List (17 June 2005). "Linux 2.6.12". git-commits-head (Mailing list).
  43. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (April 2008). "Linux Kernel Development: How Fast it is Going, Who is Doing It, What They are Doing, and Who is Sponsoring It".
  44. Ryan Paul (4 March 2012). "Linux kernel in 2011: 15 million total lines of code and Microsoft is a top contributor". arsTechnica. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
  45. "The Linux Foundation Releases Linux Development Report". Linux Foundation. 18 February 2015. Archived from the original on 19 July 2016. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  46. Michael Larabel (23 June 2014). "Linux Kernel At 19.5 Million Lines Of Code, Continues Rising". Phoronix. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
  47. "Gartner Says Sales of Tablets Will Represent Less Than 10 Percent of All Devices in 2014" (Press release). Egham, UK: Gartner. 15 October 2014. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
  48. Lunden, Ingrid (15 October 2014). "Tablet Sales Growth Plummets In 2014 As Android Smartphones Continue To Soar: Gartner". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved 23 October 2014.
  49. "Global PC Shipments Exceed Forecast with Mild Improvement in Consumer Demand, While Apple Moves to #5 Spot, According to IDC" (Press release). Framingham, MA: IDC. 8 October 2014. Archived from the original on 11 October 2014. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
  50. Anthony, Sebastian (29 September 2014). "Shellshock: A deadly new vulnerability that could lay waste to the internet (updated)". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 23 October 2014. most consumer routers run an embedded version of Linux
  51. "FAQ: Preemption". 22 August 2009. Retrieved 7 May 2015.
  52. Jonathan Corbet (24 February 2003). "Driver porting: the preemptible kernel". Retrieved 7 May 2015.
  53. Jake Edge (25 November 2008). "Character devices in user space". Retrieved 7 May 2015.
  54. Jonathan Corbet (2 May 2007). "UIO: user-space drivers". Retrieved 7 May 2015.
  55. Kroah-Hartman, Greg. "The Linux Kernel Driver Interface". Archived from the original on 4 November 2013.
  56. Nguyen, Binh (30 July 2004). "Linux Filesystem Hierarchy: Chapter 1. Linux Filesystem Hierarchy". The Linux Documentation Project. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
  57. Kubbilun, Ingo A. (2 June 2004). "Linux kernel patch for Intel Compiler" (in German). Archived from the original on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  58. timothy (26 February 2009). "High Performance Linux Kernel Project LinuxDNA". Slashdot Linux. Dice Holdings. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  59. Ryan, Justin (25 February 2009). "LinuxDNA Supercharges Linux with the Intel C/C++ Compiler". Linux Journal. Belltown Media, Inc. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  60. Lelbach, Bryce (25 October 2010). "Clang builds a working Linux Kernel (Boots to RL5 with SMP, networking and X, self hosts)". cfe-dev (Mailing list). Archived from the original on 7 September 2015.
  61. Larabel, Michael (12 April 2014). "Linux 3.15 Can Almost Be Compiled Under LLVM's Clang". Phoronix. Retrieved 10 June 2014.
  62. Larabel, Michael. "Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel". Phoronix. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
  63. Edge, Jake (7 May 2013). "LFCS: The LLVMLinux project". Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  64. Möller, Jan-Simon (2 February 2014). "LLVMLinux: The Linux Kernel with Dragon Wings" (PDF). LLVM Project. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  65. Deucher, Alex (7 October 2014). "AMD's New Unified Open Source Driver". X.Org Foundation. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
  66. Greg Kroah-Hartman. "The Linux Kernel Driver Interface". Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  67. "About mac80211". Linux Kernel Organization, Inc. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  68. "Report on ABI changes in the Linux kernel". Andrey Ponomarenko's ABI laboratory. 17 March 2016.
  69. Werner Fischer; Georg Schönberger (1 June 2015). "Linux Storage Stack Diagram". Thomas-Krenn AG. Retrieved 8 June 2015.
  70. Bovet, Daniel P.; Cesati, Marco (October 2000). "Chapter 10: Process Scheduling". Understanding the Linux Kernel. O'Reilly. ISBN 0-596-00002-2. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
  71. Santhanam, Anand (23 September 2003). "Towards Linux 2.6, A look into the workings of the next new kernel". IBM Global Services. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
  72. Bar, Moshe (1 April 2000). "The Linux Scheduler". Linux Journal. Belltown Media, Inc. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  73. Molnár, Ingo (13 April 2007). "[patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  74. "IEEE Standard for Information Technology – Portable Operating System Interface, POSIX.1b, Real-time extensions (IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993)".
  75. McKenney, Paul (10 August 2005). "A realtime preemption overview". Retrieved 5 February 2012.
  76. "OSADL Project: Realtime Linux". OSADL. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
  77. Bergmann, Arnd (5 March 2011). "BKL: That's all, folks". Linux Kernel Organization, Inc. Archived from the original on 20 July 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
  78. Larabel, Michael (24 January 2014). "The Linux 3.14 Kernel Already Has Many Exciting Features". Phoronix. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  79. "Linux kernel 3.14, Section 1.1. Deadline scheduling class for better real-time scheduling". 30 March 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
  80. Torvalds, Linus (January 1999). "The Linux Edge". Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O'Reilly. ISBN 1-56592-582-3. Retrieved 13 October 2013.
  81. "Porting Linux to the DEC Alpha: The Kernel and Shell".
  82. "Linux on Alpha: A Strategic Choice".
  83. "Avalon Cluster | TOP500 Supercomputer Sites". Retrieved 5 October 2019.
  84. Wang, David (6 May 2010). "Android Now Running On iPhone 3G". TechHive. IDG. Retrieved 11 July 2010.
  85. "The state of preempt-rt". Archived from the original on 15 October 2016. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  86. Meyer, David (3 February 2010). "Linux developer explains Android kernel code removal". ZDNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 3 February 2010.
  87. "Chapter 03: maemo Platform Overview". maemo Technology Overview. Nokia. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 June 2008. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
  88. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (2 February 2010). "Android and the Linux kernel community". Retrieved 3 February 2010.
  89. Roger Ye (2017). Android System Programming. Packt Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 9781787120389.
  90. Bradford, John (8 March 2003). "Re: what's an OOPS". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  91. "kerneloops(8) - Linux man page". Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  92. "Features/ABRTF12". FedoraProject. 3 August 2009. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  93. "". Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  94. "Linux kernel 4.0, Section 1.2. Live patching". 26 April 2015. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  95. Jonathan Corbet (25 February 2015). "A rough patch for live patching". Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  96. "kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git: Pull live patching infrastructure from Jiri Kosina (Linux kernel source tree)". 11 February 2015. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  97. Mookhey, K. K.; Burghate, Nilesh (1 July 2005). Linux: Security, Audit and Control Features. USA: ISACA. p. 14. ISBN 1-893209-78-4. Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  98. Hatch, Brian (15 July 2008). Hacking Exposed Linux: Linux Security Secrets and Solutions. McGraw-Hill Osborne Media. p. 524. ISBN 978-0-07-226257-5. Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  99. Jaeger, Trent (7 October 2008). Operating System Security. Morgan and Claypool Publishers. p. 122. ISBN 978-1-59829-212-1. Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  100. Andrews, Jeremy (16 July 2008). "Security Bugs and Full Disclosure". KernelTrap. Archived from the original on 19 July 2008. Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  101. Spengler, Brad (16 July 2008). "Linux's unofficial security-through-coverup policy". Full Disclosure (Mailing list). Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  102. "Kernel 1.0 Source Code Release". Retrieved 7 October 2008.
  103. "Kernel 1.2 Source Code Release". Retrieved 27 October 2008.
  104. Torvalds, Linus (9 June 1996). "Linux 2.0 really _is_ released." LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  105. Torvalds, Linus (20 January 1999). "2.2.0-final". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  106. "The Wonderful World of Linux 2.2". 26 January 1999. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
  107. Torvalds, Linus (4 January 2001). "And oh, btw." LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  108. "The Wonderful World of Linux 2.4". Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
  109. Torvalds, Linus (17 December 2003). "Linux 2.6.0". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 28 February 2015.
  110. "proc(5) - Linux manual page" (see /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max).
  111. "Index of /pub/linux/kernel/v2.6". Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  112. Torvalds, Linus (21 July 2011). "Linux 3.0 release". Linux kernel mailing list. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  113. Torvalds, Linus (30 May 2011). "Linux 3.0-rc1". LKML (Mailing list). Archived from the original on 31 May 2011. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
  114. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. (13 December 2012). "Good-Bye 386: Linux to drop support for i386 chips with next major release". ZDNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 6 February 2013.
  115. Fingas, Jon (15 December 2012). "Linux to drop i386 support in the 3.8 kernel, make us upgrade our Doom rig". Engadget. AOL. Retrieved 22 March 2015.
  116. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. (11 December 2012). "Linux 3.7 arrives, ARM developers rejoice". ZDNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 6 February 2013.
  117. Torvalds, Linus (2 September 2013). "Linux 3.11". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 3 September 2013.
  118. "Linux 3.11". 2 September 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  119. "LKML: Linus Torvalds: Linux 5.1.15".
  120. "Linux Kernel Features: Linus Torvalds: Linux 5.1.15". 13 April 2019.
  121. Torvalds, Linus (12 April 2015). "Linux 4.0 released". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 12 April 2015.
  122. Marti, Don. "Are top Linux developers losing the will to code?". ComputerworldUK. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
  123. "How the development process works". Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  124. Robert Love (2010). Linux Kernel Development: Linux Kernel Development. Pearson Education. p. 13. ISBN 9780768696790.
  125. Gene Sally (2010). Pro Linux Embedded Systems. Apress. p. 252. ISBN 9781430272267.
  126. "Code of Conflict". Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  127. Sharwood, Simon (6 October 2015). "Linux kernel dev who asked Linus Torvalds to stop verbal abuse quits over verbal abuse". The Register.
  128. Edge, Jake (31 January 2018). "Too many lords, not enough stewards". Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  129. Corbet, Jonathan (6 November 2017). "Bash the kernel maintainers". Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  130. "Why I quit: kernel developer Con Kolivas". APC Magazine. ACP Magazines. 24 July 2007. Archived from the original on 7 July 2011. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
  131. Corbet, Jonathan (25 July 2007). "Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23". Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  132. Cox, Alan (28 July 2009). "Re: [PATCH] kdesu broken". Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  133. Rodrigues, Goldwyn (22 January 2011). "A tale of two SCSI targets". Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  134. Steinmetz, Andreas (17 January 2013). "LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation". Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  135. Paul, Ryan (19 June 2012). "Linus Torvalds says "f–k you" to NVIDIA". Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  136. John Gold (3 April 2014). "Linus Torvalds suspends key Linux developer: Kernel panic as Systemd dev pokes the bear". Retrieved 24 March 2019.
  137. Poettering, Lennart (6 October 2014). "On the sickness of the Linux Kernel Community". Google+. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  138. Brodkin, Jon (6 March 2015). "VMware alleged to have violated Linux's open source license for years". Ars Technica. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  139. McCarthy, Kieren (26 August 2016). "Having offended everyone else in the world, Linus Torvalds calls own lawyers a 'nasty festering disease'". The Register. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  140. Corbet, Jonathan (10 September 2007). "KS2007: Developer relations and development process". Retrieved 11 February 2018.
  141. Brodkin, Jon (16 July 2013). "Linus Torvalds defends his right to shame Linux kernel developers". ARS Technica. Retrieved 11 February 2018.
  142. Corbet, Jonathan (9 March 2015). "The kernel's code of conflict". Retrieved 11 February 2018.
  143. Corbet, Jonathan (18 September 2018). "Code, conflict, and conduct".
  144. Cohen, Noam (19 September 2018). "After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside". The New Yorker.
  145. Larabel, Michael. "Dropping Profanity In Kernel Code Comments: Linux Gets "Hugs"". Phoronix. Retrieved 15 June 2019.
  146. "Linux Evolution" (PDF). 26 March 2008.
  147. "Perpetual Development: A Model of the Linux Kernel Life Cycle" (PDF). 25 October 2011.
  148. Kroah-Hartman, Greg (12 February 2008). "Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))". Linux Kernel Mailing List (Mailing list). Retrieved 30 January 2017.
  149. Wheeler, David A. "Linux Kernel 2.6: It's Worth More!".
  150. "Economic impact of FLOSS on innovation and competitiveness of the EU ICT sector" (PDF) (Table 3 on page 50).
  151. "Estimating Total Development Cost Of a Linux Distribution" (PDF) (Table on page 6). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2010.
  152. "The Billion Dollar Kernel". 24 February 2010. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  153. Wheeler, David. "The Linux Kernel: It's Worth More!". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
  154. "Linux MAINTAINERS file". Archived from the original on 12 January 2013.
  155. Torvalds, Linus (16 September 2018). "Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note". LKML. Retrieved 23 September 2018.
  156. Alexandru Vaduva, Alex Gonzalez & Chris Simmonds (2016). Linux: Embedded Development. Packt Publishing. p. 663. ISBN 9781787124455.
  157. "The Linux Kernel Archives". Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  158. Robert Love (2010). Linux Kernel Development: Linux Kernel Development. Pearson Education. p. 11. ISBN 9780768696790.
  159. Robert Love (2010). Linux Kernel Development: Linux Kernel Development. Pearson Education. p. 12. ISBN 9780768696790.
  160. Yamagata, Hiroo (3 August 1997). "The Pragmatist of Free Software". HotWired. Archived from the original on 10 February 2007. Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  161. Corbet, Jonathan (31 January 2006). "GPLv3 and the kernel". Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  162. Torvalds, Linus (8 September 2000). "Linux-2.4.0-test8". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  163. "". Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  164. Cox, Alan (20 January 2006). "Re: GPL V3 and Linux". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  165. Shankland, Stephen (25 September 2006). "Top Linux programmers pan GPL 3". CNET. Retrieved 21 February 2007.
  166. James E.J. Bottomley, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Thomas Gleixner, Christoph Hellwig, Dave Jones, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Tony Luck, Andrew Morton, Trond Myklebust, David Woodhouse (15 September 2006). "Kernel developers' position on GPLv3: The Dangers and Problems with GPLv3". Retrieved 11 March 2015.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  167. Petreley, Nicholas (27 September 2006). "A fight against evil or a fight for attention?". Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  168. "Linus Torvalds says GPL v3 violates everything that GPLv2 stood for". Debconf 2014. 2014. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  169. Clark, Rob; Semwal, Sumit (1 November 2012). "DMA Buffer Sharing Framework: An Introduction" (PDF). Embedded Linux Conference. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  170. Cox, Alan (10 October 2012). "[PATCH] dma-buf: Use EXPORT_SYMBOL". Direct Rendering Infrastructure (Mailing list). Retrieved 3 September 2013.
  171. Torvalds, Linus (10 December 2003). "RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 31 December 2010.
  172. Torvalds, Linus (3 December 2003). "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?". LKML (Mailing list). Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  173. "::[FSFLA]:: GNU Linux-libre project".
  174. "Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" to be released with completely free Linux Kernel". Debian. 15 December 2010. Retrieved 8 January 2011.
  175. "Linux TM registration in the US".
  176. "Linux TM registration in the EU".
  177. Hughes, Phil (1 August 1997). "Linux Trademark Dispute". Linux Journal. Belltown Media, Inc. Retrieved 8 December 2010.
  178. Hughes, Phil (1 March 1997). "Action Taken on Linux Trademark". Linux Journal. Belltown Media, Inc. Retrieved 8 December 2010.
  179. Gisselberg, Tonya (2010). "The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System" (PDF). Gisselberg Law Firm, Inc. Retrieved 8 December 2010.
  180. Jones, Pamela (8 March 2007). "Report from the Courthouse March 7 - Part 1 (IBM's Motion for DJ on 10th CC)". Groklaw. Retrieved 24 March 2007.
  181. Jones, Pamela (10 August 2007). "Court Rules: Novell owns the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights! Novell has right to waive!". Groklaw. Retrieved 12 August 2007.
  182. Ryan, Justin (26 August 2009). "SCO Will Try Again". Linux Journal. Belltown Media, Inc. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
  183. Harvey, Tom (30 March 2010). "Jury says Novell owns Unix copyrights". The Salt Lake Tribune. MediaNews Group. Retrieved 30 March 2010.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.