Lindbladian
In quantum mechanics, the Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad equation (GKSL equation, named after Vittorio Gorini, Andrzej Kossakowski, George Sudarshan and Göran Lindblad), master equation in Lindblad form, or Lindbladian is the most general type of Markovian and time-homogeneous master equation describing (in general non-unitary) evolution of the density matrix ρ that preserves the laws of quantum mechanics (i.e., is trace-preserving and completely positive for any initial condition).[1]
The Schrödinger equation is a special case of the more general Lindblad equation, which has led to some speculation that quantum mechanics may be productively extended and expanded through further application and analysis of the Lindblad equation.[2] The Schrödinger equation deals with state vectors, which can only describe pure quantum states and are thus less general than density matrices, which can describe mixed states as well.
Motivation
In the canonical formulation of quantum mechanics, a system's time evolution is governed by unitary dynamics. This implies that there is no decay and phase coherence is maintained throughout the process, and is a consequence of the fact that all participating degrees of freedom are considered. However, any real physical system is not absolutely isolated, and will interact with its environment. This interaction with degrees of freedom external to the system results in dissipation of energy into the surroundings, causing decay and randomization of phase. These effects are the reasons quantum mechanics is difficult to observe on a macroscopic scale. More so, understanding the interaction of a quantum system with its environment is necessary for understanding many commonly observed phenomena like the spontaneous emission of atoms, or the performance of many quantum technological devices, like the laser.
Certain mathematical techniques have been introduced to treat the interaction of a quantum system with its environment. One of these is the use of the density matrix, and its associated master equation. While in principle this approach to solving quantum dynamics is equivalent to the Schrödinger picture or Heisenberg picture, it allows more easily for the inclusion of incoherent processes, which represent environmental interactions. The density operator has the property that it can represent a classical mixture of quantum states, and is thus vital to accurately describe the dynamics of so-called open quantum systems.
Definition
More generally, the Lindblad master equation for an N-dimensional system's density matrix ρ can be written as[1]
where H is a (Hermitian) Hamiltonian part, and A_{m} are an arbitrary orthonormal basis of the operators on the system's Hilbert space with the restriction that A_{N 2} is proportional to the identity operator. Our convention implies that the other A_{m} are traceless. Note that the summation only runs to N ^{2} − 1. The coefficient matrix h, together with the Hamiltonian, determines the system dynamics. It must be positive semidefinite to ensure that the equation is trace-preserving and completely positive. The anticommutator is defined as
If the h_{mn} are all zero, then this is quantum Liouville equation (for a closed system), which is the quantum analog of the classical Liouville equation.
Since the matrix h is positive semidefinite, it can be diagonalized with a unitary transformation u:
where the eigenvalues γ_{i} are non-negative. If we define another orthonormal operator basis
we can rewrite Lindblad equation in diagonal form
The new operators L_{i} are commonly called the Lindblad or jump operators of the system.
Quantum dynamical semigroup
The maps generated by a Lindbladian for various times are collectively referred to as a quantum dynamical semigroup—a family of quantum dynamical maps on the space of density matrices indexed by a single time parameter that obey the semigroup property
The Lindblad equation can be obtained by
which, by the linearity of , is a linear superoperator. The semigroup can be recovered as
Invariance properties
The Lindblad equation is invariant under any unitary transformation v of Lindblad operators and constants,
and also under the inhomogeneous transformation
where a_{i} are complex numbers and b is a real number. However, the first transformation destroys the orthonormality of the operators L_{i} (unless all the γ_{i} are equal) and the second transformation destroys the tracelessness. Therefore, up to degeneracies among the γ_{i}, the L_{i} of the diagonal form of the Lindblad equation are uniquely determined by the dynamics so long as we require them to be orthonormal and traceless.
Heisenberg picture
The Lindblad-type evolution of the density matrix in the Schrödinger picture can be equivalently described in the Heisenberg picture using the following (diagonalized) equation of motion for each quantum observable X:
A similar equation describes the time evolution of the expectation values of observables, given by the Ehrenfest theorem. Corresponding to the trace-preserving property of the Schrödinger picture Lindblad equation, the Heisenberg picture equation is unital, i.e. it preserves the identity operator.
Physical derivation
The Lindblad master equation describes the evolution of various types of open quantum systems, e.g. a system weakly coupled to a Markovian reservoir.[1] Note that the H appearing in the equation is not necessarily equal to the bare system Hamiltonian, but may also incorporate effective unitary dynamics arising from the system-environment interaction.
A heuristic derivation, e.g., in the notes by Preskill,[3] begins with a more general form of an open quantum system and converts it into Lindblad form by making the Markovian assumption and expanding in small time. A more physically motivated standard treatment[4][5] covers three common types of derivations of the Lindbladian starting from a Hamiltonian acting on both the system and environment: the weak coupling limit (described in detail below), the low density approximation, and the singular coupling limit. Each of these relies on specific physical assumptions regarding, e.g., correlation functions of the environment. For example, in the weak coupling limit derivation, one typically assumes that (a) correlations of the system with the environment develop slowly, (b) excitations of the environment caused by system decay quickly, and (c) terms which are fast-oscillating when compared to the system timescale of interest can be neglected. These three approximations are called Born, Markov, and rotating wave, respectively.[6]
The weak-coupling limit derivation assumes a quantum system with a finite number of degrees of freedom coupled to a bath containing an infinite number of degrees of freedom. The system and bath each possess a Hamiltonian written in terms of operators acting only on the respective subspace of the total Hilbert space. These Hamiltonians govern the internal dynamics of the uncoupled system and bath. There is a third Hamiltonian that contains products of system and bath operators, thus coupling the system and bath. The most general form of this Hamiltonian is
The dynamics of the entire system can be described by the Liouville equation of motion, . This equation, containing an infinite number of degrees of freedom, is impossible to solve analytically except in very particular cases. What's more, under certain approximations, the bath degrees of freedom need not be considered, and an effective master equation can be derived in terms of the system density matrix, . The problem can be analyzed more easily by moving into the interaction picture, defined by the unitary transformation , where is an arbitrary operator, and . Also note that is the total unitary operator of the entire system. It is straightforward to confirm that the Liouville equation becomes
where the Hamiltonian is explicitly time dependent. Also, according to the interaction picture, , where . This equation can be integrated directly to give
This implicit equation for can be substituted back into the Liouville equation to obtain an exact differo-integral equation
We proceed with the derivation by assuming the interaction is initiated at , and at that time there are no correlations between the system and the bath. This implies that the initial condition is factorable as , where is the density operator of the bath initially.
Tracing over the bath degrees of freedom, , of the aforementioned differo-integral equation yields
This equation is exact for the time dynamics of the system density matrix but requires full knowledge of the dynamics of the bath degrees of freedom. A simplifying assumption called the Born approximation rests on the largeness of the bath and the relative weakness of the coupling, which is to say the coupling of the system to the bath should not significantly alter the bath eigenstates. In this case the full density matrix is factorable for all times as . The master equation becomes
The equation is now explicit in the system degrees of freedom, but is very difficult to solve. A final assumption is the Born-Markov approximation that the time derivative of the density matrix depends only on its current state, and not on its past. This assumption is valid under fast bath dynamics, wherein correlations within the bath are lost extremely quickly, and amounts to replacing on the right hand side of the equation.
If the interaction Hamiltonian is assumed to have the form
for system operators and bath operators , the master equation becomes
which can be expanded as
The expectation values are with respect to the bath degrees of freedom. By assuming rapid decay of these correlations (ideally ), above form of the Lindblad superoperator L is achieved.
Examples
For one jump operator and no unitary evolution, the Lindblad superoperator, acting on the density matrix , is
Such a term is found regularly in the Lindblad equation as used in quantum optics, where it can express absorption or emission of photons from a reservoir. If one wants to have both absorption and emission, one would need a jump operator for each. This leads to the most common Lindblad equation describing the damping of a quantum harmonic oscillator (representing e.g. a Fabry–Perot cavity) coupled to a thermal bath, with jump operators
Here is the mean number of excitations in the reservoir damping the oscillator and γ is the decay rate. If we also add additional unitary evolution generated by the quantum harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian with frequency , we obtain
Additional Lindblad operators can be included to model various forms of dephasing and vibrational relaxation. These methods have been incorporated into grid-based density matrix propagation methods.
References
- Breuer, Heinz-Peter; Petruccione, F. (2002). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1985-2063-4.
- Weinberg, Steven (2014). "Quantum Mechanics Without State Vectors". Phys. Rev. A. 90: 042102. arXiv:1405.3483. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042102.
- Preskill, John. Lecture notes on Quantum Computation.
- Alicki, Robert; Lendi, Karl (2007). Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications. Springer. doi:10.1007/b11976790.
- Carmichael, Howard. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics. Springer Verlag, 1991
- This paragraph was adapted from Albert, Victor V. "Lindbladians with multiple steady states: theory and applications". arXiv:1802.00010.
- Chruściński, Dariusz; Pascazio, Saverio. "A Brief History of the GKLS Equation". arXiv:1710.05993.
- Kossakowski, A. (1972). "On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems". Rep. Math. Phys. 3 (4): 247. Bibcode:1972RpMP....3..247K. doi:10.1016/0034-4877(72)90010-9.
- Belavin, A.A.; Zel'dovich, B. Ya.; Perelomov, A.M.; Popov, V.S. (1969). "Relaxation of Quantum Systems with Equidistant Spectra". JETP. 29: 145. Bibcode:1969JETP...29..145B.
- Lindblad, G. (1976). "On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups". Commun. Math. Phys. 48 (2): 119. Bibcode:1976CMaPh..48..119L. doi:10.1007/BF01608499.
- Gorini, V.; Kossakowski, A.; Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1976). "Completely positive semigroups of N-level systems". J. Math. Phys. 17 (5): 821. Bibcode:1976JMP....17..821G. doi:10.1063/1.522979.
- Banks, T.; Susskind, L.; Peskin, M.E. (1984). "Difficulties for the evolution of pure states into mixed states". Nuclear Physics B. 244: 125–134. Bibcode:1984NuPhB.244..125B. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90184-6.
- Accardi, Luigi; Lu, Yun Gang; Volovich, I.V. (2002). Quantum Theory and Its Stochastic Limit. New York: Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-3-5404-1928-0.
- Alicki, Robert. "Invitation to quantum dynamical semigroups". arXiv:quant-ph/0205188.
- Alicki, Robert; Lendi, Karl (1987). Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications. Berlin: Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-0-3871-8276-6.
- Attal, Stéphane; Joye, Alain; Pillet, Claude-Alain (2006). Open Quantum Systems II: The Markovian Approach. Springer. ISBN 978-3-5403-0992-5.
- Gardiner, C.W.; Zoller, Peter (2010). Quantum Noise. Springer Series in Synergetics (3rd ed.). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-642-06094-6.
- Ingarden, Roman S.; Kossakowski, A.; Ohya, M. (1997). Information Dynamics and Open Systems: Classical and Quantum Approach. New York: Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-0-7923-4473-5.
- Lindblad, G. (1983). Non-Equilibrium Entropy and Irreversibility. Dordrecht: Delta Reidel. ISBN 1-4020-0320-X.; Comm. Math. Phys. 48 (1976), 119-130. online
- Tarasov, Vasily E. (2008). Quantum Mechanics of Non-Hamiltonian and Dissipative Systems. Amsterdam, Boston, London, New York: Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-0805-5971-1.
- Pearle, P. (2012). "Simple derivation of the Lindblad equation". European Journal of Physics, 33(4), 805.
External links
- Quantum Optics Toolbox for Matlab
- mcsolve Quantum jump (monte carlo) solver from QuTiP.
- QuantumOptics.jl the quantum optics toolbox in Julia.
- The Lindblad master equation