Latin grammar

Latin is a heavily inflected language with largely free word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case; pronouns and adjectives (including participles) are inflected for number, case, and gender; and verbs are inflected for person, number, tense, aspect, voice, and mood. The inflections are often changes in the ending of a word, but can be more complicated, especially with verbs.

Thus verbs can take any of over 100 different endings to express different meanings, for example regō "I rule", regor "I am ruled", regere "to rule", regī "to be ruled".

Nouns belong to one of three genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter). The gender of a noun is shown by the adjectives and pronouns that refer to it: e.g., hic vir "this man", haec mulier "this woman", hoc nōmen "this name". There are also two numbers: singular (mulier "woman") and plural (mulierēs "women").

There is no definite or indefinite article in Latin, so that rēx can mean "king", "a king", or "the king" according to context.

As well as having gender and number, nouns have different endings according to their function in the sentence. These different forms of the noun are called cases. For example, masculine and feminine nouns have different forms depending on whether they are the subject or the object of the verb: rēx videt "the king sees", but rēgem videt "he sees the king"; these two are called the nominative and accusative cases respectively. Other cases are the genitive (rēgis "of the king"), dative (rēgī "to/for the king"), ablative (rēge "with the king") and vocative (rēx "o king!"); the last is often the same as the nominative. A seventh case, the locative, is mostly found with the names of towns and cities, e.g. Rōmae "in Rome".

Pronouns, adjectives, participles, and some numerals also change their endings to show case and number. These also have different masculine, feminine, and neuter forms to agree with the gender of the noun they refer to.

Latin word order is commonly subject–object–verb. However, other word orders are common. Different word orders can also be used to express subtle nuances, even in prose. (See Latin word order.)

In Latin an adjective can come either before or after a noun, e.g. vir bonus or bonus vir "a good man", although some kinds of adjectives, such as adjectives of nationality (vir Rōmānus "a Roman man") usually follow the noun. The adjective may also be separated from its noun by other words, especially in poetry.

Latin usually omits pronouns as the subject except for emphasis; so for example amās by itself means "you love" without the need to add the pronoun "you". (A language with this characteristic is known as a pro-drop language.) Latin also exhibits verb framing in which the path of motion is encoded into the verb rather than shown by a separate word or phrase. For example, the Latin verb exit (a compound of ex and it) means "he/she/it goes out".

In this article a line over a vowel (e.g. ē) indicates that it is long.



Most Latin nouns have two numbers, singular and plural: rēx "king", rēgēs "kings". A few nouns, called plūrālia tantum ("plural only"), although plural, have a singular meaning, e.g. castra "a camp", litterae "a letter", nūptiae "a wedding".


Nouns are divided into three genders, known as masculine, feminine, and neuter. The difference is shown in the pronouns and adjectives that refer to them, for example:

  • ipse rēx "the king himself" (masculine)
  • ipsa puella "the girl herself" (feminine)
  • ipsum bellum "the war itself" (neuter)

To a certain extent, the genders follow the meanings of the words (for example, winds are masculine, tree-names feminine):

  • Masculine nouns include all those referring to males, such as dominus "master", puer "boy", deus "god", but also some inanimate objects such as hortus "garden", exercitus "army", mōs "custom". Words in the second declension ending in -us or -er are usually masculine.
  • Feminine nouns include all those referring to females, such as puella "girl", mulier "woman", dea "goddess", but also inanimate or abstract nouns such as arbor "tree", urbs "city", hūmānitās "kindness", nātiō "nation". Words in the 1st declension like puella ending in -a are usually feminine, with a few exceptions such as poēta "poet", and also feminine are 3rd declension nouns ending in -tās and -tiō.
  • Neuter nouns (apart from scortum "a (male or female) whore") all refer to things, such as nōmen "name", corpus "body", bellum "war", venēnum 'poison'.

Masculine and feminine nouns, of whatever declension, always add -m to make the object singular (e.g. puellam, puerum, rēgem), and -s to make the object plural (puellās, puerōs, rēgēs).

Neuter nouns differ from masculine and feminine in two ways: (1) the plural ends in -a, e.g. bella "wars", corpora "bodies"; (2) the subject (nominative) and object (accusative) cases are identical.


Nouns in Latin have a series of different forms, called cases of the noun, which have different functions or meanings. For example, the word for "king" is rēx when subject of a verb, but rēgem when it is the object:

  • rēx videt "the king sees" (nominative case)
  • rēgem videt "he sees the king" (accusative case)

Further cases mean "of" (genitive case), "to/for" (dative case), and "with" (ablative case). A few nouns have a separate form used for addressing a person (vocative case), but in most nouns the vocative is the same as the nominative.

Some nouns, such as the names of cities and small islands, and the word domus "home", have a seventh case called the locative, for example Rōmae "in Rome" or domī "at home". But most nouns do not have this case.

All the cases except nominative and vocative are called the "oblique" cases.[1]

The order in which the cases are given in grammar books differs in different countries. In Britain and countries influenced by Britain the order nominative, vocative, accusative is used as in the table below.[2] In the United States in grammars such as Gildersleeve and Lodge (1895) the traditional order is used, with the genitive case in the second place and ablative last. In the popularly used Wheelock's Latin (1956, 7th edition 2011) and Allen and Greenough's New Latin Grammar (1903), however, the vocative is placed at the end.

The following table shows the endings of a typical noun of the 3rd declension.[3] If Gildersleeve and Lodge's order is preferred, click on the symbol "GL" in the seventh column in the table below; for Wheelock's order click on "Wh":

Name of case Use sing. meaning plur. meaning Br GL Wh
Nominative Subject rēx a king, the king rēgēs kings, the kings 1 1 1
Vocative Addressing rēx o king! rēgēs o kings! 2 5 6
Accusative Object, goal rēgem a king, the king (object) rēgēs kings, the kings (object) 3 4 4
Genitive of rēgis of the king, of a king rēgum of kings, of the kings 4 2 2
Dative to, for rēgī to the king rēgibus to kings, to the kings 5 3 3
Ablative with, by, from, in rēge with the king rēgibus with the kings 6 6 5

Sometimes the same endings, e.g. -ēs and -ibus, are used for more than one case. Since the function of a word in Latin is shown by ending rather than word order, in theory rēgēs dūcunt could mean either "the kings lead" or "they lead the kings". In practice, however, such ambiguities are rare.


1st and 2nd declensions

The endings of nouns vary according to their declension. Nouns of the 1st and 2nd declensions generally follow the following patterns, showing the declension of puella "girl", dominus "lord, master", and bellum "war":[4]

Case 1 sg. 1 pl. 2 sg. 2 pl. 2n sg. 2n pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative puellapuellaedominusdominībellumbella111
Vocative puellapuellaedominedominībellumbella256
Accusative puellampuellāsdominumdominōsbellumbella344
Genitive puellaepuellārumdominīdominōrumbellībellōrum422
Dative puellaepuellīsdominōdominīsbellōbellīs533
Ablative puellāpuellīsdominōdominīsbellōbellīs665

1st declension nouns are usually feminine, except for a few referring to men, such as agricola "farmer" or poēta "poet". The nouns fīlia "daughter" and dea "goddess" have dative and ablative plural fīliābus, deābus. The locative case ends in -ae, pl. -īs, e.g. Rōmae "in Rome", Athēnīs "in Athens".[5]

2nd declension nouns in -us are usually masculine, except for those referring to trees (e.g. pīnus "pine tree") and some place names (e.g. Aegyptus "Egypt"), which are feminine. vīrus "poison" and vulgus "crowd" are neuter. A few 2nd declension nouns, such as vir "man" and puer "boy", lack endings in the nominative and vocative singular. In the 2nd declension, the genitive plural in some words is optionally -um, especially in poetry:[6][7] deum or deōrum "of the gods", virum or virōrum "of men".

Neuter nouns such as bellum "war" have -a in the nominative plural. In neuter nouns, the vocative and accusative are always the same as the nominative; the genitive, dative, and ablative are the same as the masculine.

3rd declension

Third declension nouns have various patterns of declension. Some decline like the following: mīles "soldier", urbs "city", corpus "body":[8]

Case 3 sg. 3 pl. 3 sg. 3 pl. 3n sg. 3n pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative mīlesmīlitēsurbsurbēscorpuscorpora111
Vocative mīlesmīlitēsurbsurbēscorpuscorpora256
Accusative mīlitemmīlitēsurbemurbēs/-īscorpuscorpora345
Genitive mīlitismīlitumurbisurbiumcorporiscorporum422
Dative mīlitīmīlitibusurbīurbibuscorporīcorporibus533
Ablative mīlitemīlitibusurbeurbibuscorporecorporibus665

There are some variations, however. A few, such as vīs, vim, vī "force", have accusative singular -im and ablative singular ; some, like ignis "fire", optionally have instead of -e in the ablative singular. The genitive plural in some nouns is -um, in others -ium. (For details, see Latin declension.) 3rd declension nouns can be of any gender.

It is not usually possible to guess the genitive of a noun from the nominative. dux "leader" has genitive ducis but rēx "king" has rēgis; pater "father" has genitive patris but iter "journey" has itineris. For this reason the genitive is always given in dictionaries, and can be used to discover the remaining cases.

4th and 5th declension

4th and 5th declension nouns are less common. They decline like the following (manus "hand", genū "knee", diēs "day"):[9]

Case 4 sg. 4 pl. 4n sg. 4n pl. 5 sg. 5 pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative manusmanūsgenūgenuadiēsdiēs111
Vocative manusmanūsgenūgenuadiēsdiēs256
Accusative manummanūsgenūgenuadiēmdiēs344
Genitive manūsmanuumgenūsgenuumdiēīdiērum422
Dative manuīmanibusgenuī, genūgenibusdiēīdiēbus533
Ablative manūmanibusgenūgenibusdiēdiēbus665

4th declension nouns are usually masculine, but a few, such as manus "hand" and anus "old lady", are feminine. There are only four 4th declension neuter nouns.[10]

5th declension nouns (except for diēs (m) "day") are usually feminine. rēs "thing" is similar to diēs except for a short e in the genitive and dative singular reī.

Other nouns

In addition to the above there are some irregularly declined nouns, mostly borrowed from Greek, such as the name Aenēās "Aeneas" (1st declension masculine).[11]

The vocative is nearly always the same as the nominative, except in 1st and 2nd declension masculine singular words, such as Aenēā! "Aeneas!" and domine! "master!/lord!". Some words, such as deus "god", have no separate vocative, however.

Use of cases


The nominative case is used for the subject of an active or a passive verb, or the complement of a copula verb such as est "is":[12]

rēx respondit = the king replied
rēx occīsus est = the king was killed
rēx erat Aenēās nōbīs = our king was Aeneas / Aeneas was our king
rēx factus est = he was made king / he became king


The vocative case is used when addressing someone:

iubēsne mē, rēx, foedus ferīre? = do you order me, king, to strike a treaty?


The accusative case is used for the object of a sentence:[13]

rēgem petiērunt = they begged for a king

It can also be used with a place name to refer to the destination:

Rōmam profectus est = he set out for Rome

The accusative is also used after various prepositions (especially those that imply motion towards):

senātus ad rēgem lēgātōs mīsit = the Senate sent ambassadors to the king
cōnsul in urbem rediit = the consul returned to the city

Another use of the accusative is to give a length of time or distance:

rēgnāvit annōs quīnque = he reigned for five years
quīnque pedēs longus = five foot tall


The genitive case means "of":

rēgis fīlia = the king's daughter, daughter of the king

If the head noun is derived from a verb, the genitive can be subjective or objective:[14]

Caesaris adventus = Caesar's arrival (compare: "Caesar arrives")
dēsīderium tuī = longing for you (compare: "I miss you")

A frequent type of genitive is the partitive genitive, expressing the quantity of something:[15]

satis temporis = enough time

Certain verbs take the genitive, such as misereor "I pity", interest "it is in the interest of", oblīvīscor "I forget" (but oblīvīscor also takes the accusative):[16]

oblītus sum meī = I have forgotten myself[17]


The dative case means "to" or "for". It is also used with certain verbs such as pāreō "I obey" or persuādeō "I persuade":[18]

rēgī nūntiātum est = it was announced to the king
pāruit rēgī = he was obedient to (i.e. obeyed) the king
pecūniam rēgī crēdidit = he entrusted the money to the king

There are also various idiomatic uses, such as the dative of possession:

quid est tibī nōmen? = what's your name?[19]


The ablative case can mean "with", especially when the noun it refers to is a thing rather than a person:[20]

gladiō sē transfīgit = he stabbed himself with a sword

Often a phrase consisting of a noun plus participle in the ablative can express time or circumstance. This is known as an "ablative absolute":[21]

rēgibus exāctīs = with the kings driven out, i.e. after the kings were driven out

It is also frequently used with prepositions, especially those meaning "from", "with", "in", or "by":

ūnus ē rēgibus = one from (i.e. one of) the kings
cum rēgibus = with the kings
ā rēgibus = by the kings, from the kings
prō rēge = for/on behalf of the king

Another use is in expressions of time and place (except those that give the length of time or distance):

eō tempore = at that time
hōc locō = at this place
paucīs diēbus = in a few days

The ablative can also mean "from", especially with place names:[22]

Rōmā profectus est = he set out from Rome
locō ille mōtus est = he was dislodged from his position


The locative is a rare case used only with names of cities, small islands, and one or two other words such as domus "home". It means "at" or "in":[23]

cōnsul alter Rōmae mānsit = one of the two consuls remained in Rome[24]
multōs annōs nostrae domī vīxit = he lived at our house for many years[25]


Declension of adjectives

Adjectives, like nouns, have different endings for the different cases singular and plural. They also differ as to gender, having different forms for masculine, feminine, and neuter. (But masculine and neuter are identical in the genitive, dative, and ablative cases.)

Many adjectives belong to the 1st and 2nd declensions, declining in the same way as the nouns puella, dominus, bellum. An example is the adjective bonus "good" shown below:

Case m. sg. f. sg. n. sg. m. pl f. pl. n. pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative bonusbonabonumbonībonaebona111
Vocative bonebonabonumbonībonaebona256
Accusative bonumbonambonumbonōsbonāsbona344
Genitive bonībonaebonībonōrumbonārumbonōrum422
Dative bonōbonaebonōbonīsbonīsbonīs533
Ablative bonōbonābonōbonīsbonīsbonīs665

Other adjectives belong to the 3rd declension, in which case the masculine and feminine are usually identical. Most 3rd declension adjectives are i-stems, and have ablative singular and genitive plural -ium. An example is ingēns "huge" shown below:

Case m/f. sg. n. sg. m/f. pl n. pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative ingēnsingēnsingentēsingentia111
Vocative ingēnsingēnsingentēsingentia256
Accusative ingentemingēnsingentēs/-īsingentia344
Genitive ingentisingentisingentiumingentium422
Dative ingentīingentīingentibusingentibus533
Ablative ingentīingentīingentibusingentibus665

In a very few 3rd declension adjectives such as ācer, ācris, ācre "sharp, keen", the feminine is different from the masculine, but only in the nominative and vocative singular.

A few adjectives (especially comparative adjectives) decline as consonant stems, and have ablative singular -e and genitive plural -um. An example is melior "better":

Case m/f. sg. n. sg. m/f. pl n. pl. Br GL Wh
Nominative meliormeliusmeliōremmeliōra111
Vocative meliormeliusmeliōrēsmeliōra256
Accusative meliōremmeliusmeliōrēsmeliōra344
Genitive meliōrismeliōrismeliōrummeliōrum422
Dative meliōrīmeliōrīmeliōribusmeliōribus533
Ablative meliōremeliōremeliōribusmeliōribus665

Participles such as dūcēns "leading" usually have -e in the ablative singular, but -ium in the genitive plural.[26]

There are no adjectives in the 4th or 5th declensions.

The adjectives sōlus "only" and tōtus "the whole of" decline like pronouns, with genitive singular -īus and dative singular :

tōtīus Graeciae = of the whole of Greece (genitive case)
tibī sōlī = to you alone (dative case)

Agreement of adjectives

Any adjective that describes or refers to a noun must be in the same case as the noun, as well as the same number and gender. Thus in the phrase below, where rēx is in the vocative singular case, bonus must be in the vocative singular also:

ō bone rēx = o good king

Comparative and superlative adjectives

Adjectives have positive, comparative and superlative forms. Superlative adjectives are declined according to the first and second declension, but comparative adjectives are third declension.

When used in sentences, a comparative adjective can be used in several ways:

  • Absolutely (with the meaning "rather" or "more than usual")
  • With quam (Latin for "than")
  • With an ablative meaning "than"
  • With the genitive


  • Cornēlia est fortis puella: Cornelia is a brave girl.

The comparative adjective can be used absolutely (i.e. without any overt comparison) or with the comparison made explicit:

  • Cornēlia est fortior puella: Cornelia is a rather brave girl.
  • Cornēlia est fortior puella quam Flāvia: Cornelia is a braver girl than Flavia. (Here quam is used, Flavia is in the nominative to match Cornelia)
  • Cornēlia est fortior Flāviā: Cornelia is braver than Flavia. (Here Flavia is in the ablative.)
  • Cornēlia est fortior puellārum: Cornelia is the braver of the girls

Superlative adjectives are most frequently used absolutely, but they can also be used with the genitive omnium "of all":

  • Cornēlia est puella fortissima: Cornelia is a very brave girl
  • Cornēlia est puella omnium fortissima: Cornelia is the bravest girl of all.
Some comparative and superlative adjectives
longus, -a, -um
long, tall
longior, -ius
longer, taller
longissimus, -a, -um
very long, longest
brevis, -e
brevior, -ius
brevissimus, -a, -um
very short, shortest
pulcher, -chra, -chrum
pulchrior, -ius
more beautiful
pulcherrimus, -a, -um
very beautiful, most beautiful
bonus, -a, -um
melior, -ius
optimus, -a, -um
very good, best
facilis, -is, -e
facilior, -ius
facillimus, -a, -um
very easy, easiest
magnus, -a, -um
māior, -ius
maximus, -a, -um
very great, greatest
malus, -a, -um
pēior, -ius
pessimus, -a, -um
very bad, worst
multus, -a, -um
plūs (+ genitive)
plūrimus, -a, -um
very much, most
multī, -ae, -a
plūres, plūra
plūrimī, -ae, -a
very many, most
parvus, -a, -um
minimus, -a, -um
very small, smallest
superus, -a, -um
situated above
superior, -ius
higher, previous
suprēmus, -a, -um / summus, -a, -um
highest, last
prior, prius
prīmus, -a, -um

Detailed information and declension tables can be found at Latin declension.


Pronouns are of two kinds, personal pronouns and 3rd person pronouns. Personal pronouns decline as follows.

Case I you sg. himself/
we you pl. themselves Br Am
Nominative egōnōsvōs11
Accusative sē / sēsēnōsvōssē / sēsē34
Genitive meītuīsuīnostrum/-trīvestrum/-trīsuī42
Dative mihītibīsibīnōbīsvōbīssibī53
Ablative sē / sēsēnōbīsvōbīssē / sēsē66

mē, tē, nōs, vōs can also be used reflexively ("I see myself" etc.).[27]

Nōs is frequently used in classical Latin for "I", but vōs is never used in a singular sense.[28]

The genitive nostrum is used partitively (ūnusquisque nostrum "each one of us"), nostrī objectively (memor nostrī "remembering us, mindful of us").[29][30]

3rd person pronouns are those such as hic "this" and ipse "(he) himself". The 3rd person pronouns can also be used adjectivally (except that quid "what?" when adjectival becomes quod). The declension of these pronouns tends to be irregular. They generally have -īus in the genitive singular, and in the dative singular. In a few pronouns (illud "that", istud "that {of yours)", id "it, that", quod "which", quid "anything; what?", aliud "another", aliquid "something") the neuter singular ends in -d.

The declension of ille "that" is as follows:[31]

Case m. sg. f. sg. n. sg. m. pl f. pl. n. pl. Br Am
Nominative illeillailludillīillaeilla11
Accusative illumillamilludillōsillāsilla34
Genitive illīus (illius)illīusillīusillōrumillārumillōrum42
Dative illīillīillīillīsillīsillīs53
Ablative illōillāillōillīsillīsillīs66

Ipse "he himself" is very similar, except that the neuter singular ipsum ends in -m instead of -d.

Other very common 3rd person pronouns are hic, haec, hoc "this" and is, ea, id "he, she, it; that". Like other 3rd person pronouns, these can be used either independently (is "he") or adjectivally (is homō "that man"):

Case m. sg. f. sg. n. sg. m. pl f. pl. n. pl. Br Am
Nominative hichaechochaehaec11
Accusative hunchanchochōshāshaec34
Genitive huiushuiushuiushōrumhārumhōrum42
Dative huichuichuichīshīshīs53
Ablative hōchāchōchīshīshīs66

Hic and hoc are generally pronounced as if spelled hicc and hocc. Huius is pronounced as if spelled huiius with a long first syllable.[32]

Case m. sg. f. sg. n. sg. m. pl f. pl. n. pl. Br Am
Nominative iseaideaeea11
Accusative eumeamideōseāsea34
Genitive eiuseiuseiuseōrumeārumeōrum42
Dative eīs/iīseīs/iīseīs/iīs53
Ablative eīs/iīseīs/iīseīs/iīs66

Also very common is the relative pronoun quī, quae, quod "who, which". The interrogative quis? quid? "who? what?" and indefinite quis, qua, quid "anyone, anything" are similar apart from the nominative singular:[33]

Case m. sg. f. sg. n. sg. m. pl f. pl. n. pl. Br Am
Nominative quīquaequodquīquaequae11
Accusative quemquamquodquōsquāsquae34
Genitive cuiuscuiuscuiusquōrumquārumquōrum42
Dative cuīcuīcuīquibusquibusquibus53
Ablative quōquāquōquibusquibusquibus66

Like adjectives, pronouns must agree in gender, case, and number with the nouns they refer to, as in the following, where hic is masculine agreeing with amor, but haec is feminine, agreeing with patria:

hic amor, haec patria est = this is my love, this my country[34]

There is no indefinite article or definite article (the, a, an). Sometimes the weak determiner is, ea, id (English "that, this") can serve for the definite article:

Persuāsīt populō ut eā pecūniā classis aedificārētur[35]
"He persuaded the people that a fleet should be built with the money (with that money)"


Adverbs modify verbs, adjectives and other adverbs by indicating time, place or manner. Latin adverbs are indeclinable and invariable. Like adjectives, adverbs have positive, comparative and superlative forms.

The positive form of an adverb can often be formed from an adjective by appending the suffix (2nd declension adjectives) or -(t)er (3rd declension adjectives). Thus the adjective clārus, -a, -um, which means "bright", can be contrasted to the adverb clārē, which means "brightly". The adverbial ending -(i)ter is used to form adverbs from 3rd declension adjectives, for example celer "quick", celeriter "quickly". Other endings such as , -e, -tim are also found.

The comparative form of an adverb is the same as the neuter nominative singular form of a comparative adjective and usually ends in -ius. Instead of the adjective clārior, which means "brighter", the adverb is clārius, which means "more brightly".

The superlative adverb has the same base as the superlative adjective and always ends in a long . Instead of the adjective clārissimus, which mean "very bright" or "brightest", the adverb is clārissimē, which means "very brightly" or "most brightly".

Some comparative and superlative adverbs[36]
more worthily
very worthily, most worthily
more bravely
very bravely, most bravely
more easily
very easily, most easily
very well, best
very badly, worst
very greatly, most, especially
a little
very little, least
very much, most
for a long time
for a longer time, any longer
for a very long time
more often
very often, most often



A prepositional phrase in Latin is made up of a preposition followed by a noun phrase in the accusative or ablative case. The preposition determines the case that is used, with some prepositions allowing different cases depending on the meaning. For example, Latin in takes the accusative case when it indicates motion (English "into") and the ablative case when it indicates position (English "on" or "inside"):

in urbem = "into the city" (accusative)
in urbe = "in the city" (ablative)

Most prepositions take one case only. For example, all those that mean "from", "by", or "with" take the ablative:

ex urbe = "out of the city"
ab urbe = "(away) from the city"
cum Caesare = "with Caesar"

Other prepositions take only the accusative:

extrā urbem = "outside the city"
ad urbem = "to/near the city"
per urbem = "through(out) the city"
circum urbem = "around the city"


In addition, there are a few postpositions. tenus "as far as" usually follows an ablative, sometimes a genitive plural case:[37]

Taurō tenus "as far as Taurus"
Cūmārum tenus "as far as Cumae"

versus "towards" is usually combined with ad or in:

ad Alpēs versus "towards the Alps"

causā "for the sake of" follows a genitive:

honōris causā "for the sake of (doing) honour"

The word cum "with" is usually a preposition, but with the personal pronouns mē, tē, sē, nōbīs, vōbīs "me, you sg., him/herself/themselves, us, you pl." it follows the pronoun and is joined to it in writing:

cum eō "with him"
mēcum "with me"

Both quōcum and cum quō "with whom" are found.

Prepositions and postpositions in Latin (extensive list)
Preposition Grammar case Comments
ā, ab, abs + abl from; down from; at, in, on, (of time) after, since (source of action or event) by, of
absque + abl without (archaic, cf. sine and praeter)
ad + acc towards, to, at
adversus, adversum + acc towards, against (also an adverb)
ante + acc before (also an adverb)
apud +acc at, by, near, among; chez; before, in the presence of, in the writings of, in view of
causā + gen for the sake of (normally after its noun; simply the abl. of causa)
circum + acc about, around, near;
circā + acc around, near, about; regarding, concerning
circiter + acc (of place and time) near, close, round about
cis + acc on, to this, the near side of, short of; before
citrā + acc on this side of (also an adverb)
clam + acc &
+ abl
without the knowledge of, unknown to (also an adverb). Its use with the ablative is rare. Clanculum is a variant of this preposition.
contrā + acc against, opposite to, contrary to, otherwise, in return to, back
cōram + abl in person, face to face; publicly, openly
cum + abl with
+ abl from, concerning, about; down from, out of
ergā + acc against, opposite; towards, with regard to (sometimes placed after the noun or pronoun)
ex, ē + abl out of, from
extrā + acc outside of, beyond
fīne, fīnī + gen up to (ablative of fīnis). Can also be a postposition.[38]
grātiā + gen for the sake of. Usually placed after the noun.[39]
in + acc into, onto, to; about, respecting; according to; against
+ abl in, among, at, on (space); during, at (time)
īnfrā + acc below
inter + acc between, among; during, while
intrā + acc within, inside; during; in less than
iūxtā + acc nearly; near, close to, just as. Can also follow the noun.[40]
ob + acc in the direction of, to, towards; on account of, according to, because of, due to, for (the purpose of); against; facing
palam + abl without concealment, openly, publicly, undisguisedly, plainly, unambiguously
penes + acc Under one's government or command; In one's disposal or custody; At, with, about, concerning
per + acc through, by means of; during
pōne + acc behind; in the rear of
post + acc behind (of space); afterwards, after (of time)
prae + abl before, in front of, because of
praeter + acc besides, except; beyond; more than
prō + abl for, on behalf of; before; in front, instead of; about; according to; as, like; as befitting
procul + abl far, at a distance
prope + acc near, nearby, (figuratively) towards, about (in time)
propter + acc near, close to, hard by; because of, on account of, for; (rare) through, by means of
secundum + acc next, along, according to
simul + abl with
sine + abl without
sub + acc under, up to, up under, close to (of a motion); until, before, up to, about
+ abl (to) under, (to) beneath; near to, up to, towards; about, around (time)
subter + acc under, underneath; following (in order or rank); in the reign of
+ abl underneath, (figuratively) below inferior
super + acc above, over, beyond; during
+ abl concerning, regarding, about
suprā + acc above, over, more than, before
tenus + gen &
+ abl
(with genitive and ablative) right up to, as far as, just as far as;
(with ablative, of a process) up to (a given stage of);
(with genitive and ablative, of limitation) to the maximum extent of, within. Used as a postposition.[41]
trāns + acc across, beyond
+ acc towards (postposition, usually combined with ad or in)[42]
ultrā + acc beyond

Numerals and numbers

The first three numbers have masculine, feminine and neuter forms fully declined as follows:[43]

Declension 1 m f n 2 m f n 3 mf n Br GL Wh
Nominative ūnusūnaūnumduoduaeduotrēstria111
Vocative ūneūnaūnumduoduaeduotrēstria256
Accusative ūnumūnamūnumduōs/duoduāsduotrēs/trīstria344
Genitive ūnīus/-iusūnīusūnīusduōrumduārumduōrumtriumtrium422
Dative ūnīūnīūnīduōbusduābusduōbustribustribus533
Ablative ūnōūnāūnōduōbusduābusduōbustribustribus665

ūnus (one) can also be used in the plural, with plural-only nouns, e.g. ūna castra "one camp", ūnae litterae "one letter". For larger numbers plural-only nouns use special numerals: bīna castra "two camps", trīna castra "three camps". (See Latin numerals.)

The numbers quattuor (four) through decem (ten) are not declined:

quattuor (4)
quīnque (5)
sex (6)
septem (7)
octō (8)
novem (9)
decem (10)

The "tens" numbers are also not declined:

vīgintī (20)
trīgintā (30)
quadrāgintā (40)
quīnquāgintā (50)
sexāgintā (60)
septuāgintā (70)
octōgintā (80)
nōnāgintā (90)

The numbers 11 to 17 are formed by affixation of the corresponding digit to the base -decim, hence ūndecim, duodecim, tredecim, quattuordecim, quīndecim, sēdecim, septendecim. The numbers 18 and 19 are formed by subtracting 2 and 1, respectively, from 20: duodēvīgintī and ūndēvīgintī. For the numbers 21 to 27, the digits either follow or are added to 20 by the conjunction et: vīgintī ūnus or ūnus et vīgintī, vīgintī duo or duo et vīgintī etc. The numbers 28 and 29 are again formed by subtraction: duodētrīgintā and ūndētrīgintā. Each group of ten numerals through 100 follows the patterns of the 20s but 98 is nōnāgintā octō and 99 is nōnāgintā novem rather than *duodēcentum and *ūndēcentum respectively.

Compounds ending in 1 2 and 3 are the only ones to decline:

I saw 20 blackbirds = vīgintī merulās vīdī
I saw 22 blackbirds = vīgintī duās merulās vīdī (where duās changes to agree with merulās)

The "hundreds" numbers are the following:

centum (indeclinable)
ducentī, -ae, -a (200)
trecentī, -ae, -a (300)
quadringentī, -ae, -a (400)
quīngentī, -ae, -a (500)
sēscentī, -ae, -a (600)
septingentī, -ae, -a (700)
octingentī, -ae, -a (800)
nōngentī, -ae, -a (900)

However, 1000 is mille, an indeclinable adjective, but multiples such as duo mīlia (2000) have mīlia as a neuter plural substantive followed by a partitive genitive:

I saw a thousand lions = mīlle leōnēs vīdī
I saw three thousand lions = tria mīlia leōnum vīdī

Ordinal numbers are all adjectives with regular first- and second-declension endings. Most are built off of the stems of cardinal numbers (for example, trīcēsimus, -a, -um (30th) from trīgintā (30), sēscentēsimus, -a, -um nōnus, -a, -um (609th) for sēscentī novem (609). However, "first" is prīmus, -a, -um, and "second" is secundus, -a, -um (literally "following" the first; sequi means "to follow").


Persons of the verb

Each tense has endings corresponding to three persons in the singular, known as 1st person singular ("I"), 2nd person singular ("you sg."), 3rd person singular ("he, she, it"), and three in the plural, known as 1st person plural ("we"), 2nd person plural ("you pl.") , and 3rd person plural ("they"). Unlike Ancient Greek, there is no dual number in the Latin verb.

1st sg.
2nd sg.
3rd sg.
you sg.
he, she, it
I love
you sg. love
he, she, it loves
1st pl.
2nd pl.
3rd pl.
you pl.
we love
you pl. love
they love

Unlike in Spanish, French, and other Romance languages, there are no respectful 2nd person forms in Latin grammar: the 2nd person singular is used even when addressing a person of high status. However, the 1st person plural is often used to mean "I".[44]


Most verbs do not show grammatical gender: the same ending is used whether the subject is "he", "she", or "it". However, when a verb is made periphrastically out of a participle and part of the verb sum "I am", the participle shows gender, for example:

  • missus est "he was sent"
  • missa est "she was sent"

Impersonal verbs, such as nūntiātum est "it was reported", are neuter singular.


Latin verbs have two voices, active (e.g. dūcō "I lead") and passive (e.g. dūcor "I am led").

Active (doing) dūcō I lead, I am leading
Passive (being done) dūcor I am led, I am being led

In addition there are a few verbs (e.g. sequor "I follow") which have the endings of passive verbs but with an active meaning. These verbs are known as deponent verbs.[45]

Intransitive verbs such as sum "I am" usually have no passive voice. However, some intransitive verbs can be used in the passive voice, but only when impersonal, e.g. pugnātum est "(a battle) was fought", ventum est "they came" (literally, "it was come").


Latin verbs have three moods: indicative, subjunctive, and imperative:[46]

Indicative (actual) dūcit he leads, he is leading
Subjunctive (potential) dūcat he may/would/should lead
Imperative (command) dūc! lead!

Ordinary statements such as dūcō "I lead" or vēnit "he came" are said to be in the indicative mood. The subjunctive mood (e.g. dūcat "he may lead, he would lead" or dūxisset "he would have led") is used for potential or hypothetical statements, wishes, and also in reported speech and certain types of subordinate clause. The imperative mood (e.g. dūc "lead!") is a command.

In addition Latin verbs have a number of non-finite forms, such as the infinitive and various participles.

Regular and irregular verbs

Most Latin verbs are regular and follow one of the five patterns below.[47] These are referred to as the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th conjugation, according to whether the infinitive ends in -āre, -ēre, -ere or -īre.[48] (Verbs like capiō are regarded as variations of the 3rd conjugation, with some forms like those of the 4th conjugation.)

Other verbs like sum "I am" are irregular and have their own pattern.[49]

REGULAR I loveI seeI leadI captureI hear
you sg.
he, she, it
you pl.
Infinitive to amāre (1) vidēre (2) dūcere (3) capere (3) audīre (4)
I am lovedI am seenI am ledI am capturedI am heard
you sg.
he, she, it
you pl.
Infinitive to amārī (1) vidērī (2) dūcī (3) capī (3) audīrī (4)
IRREGULAR I amI am ableI bringI wantI go
you sg.
he, she, it
you pl.

Infinitive to esse posse ferre velle īre

Compound verbs such as adsum "I am present", nōlō "I don't want", redeō "I go back", etc., usually have the same endings as the simple verbs from which they are made.


A 3rd conjugation example

Latin verbs have six basic tenses in the indicative mood. Three of these are based on the present stem (e.g. dūc-) and three on the perfect stem (e.g. dūx-).

In addition, there are four tenses in the subjunctive mood, and two in the imperative.

Further tenses can be made periphrastically by combining participles with the verbs sum "I am" or habeō "I have", for example ductūrus eram "I was going to lead" or ductum habeō "I have led".

The following table gives the various forms of a 3rd conjugation verb dūcō. As with other verbs, three different stems are needed to make the various tenses: dūc- in the three non-perfect tenses, dūx- in the three perfect tenses, and duct- in the perfect participle and supine. The perfect and supine stems for any particular verb cannot always be predicted and usually have to be looked up in a dictionary.

INDICATIVE Active Passive
Present dūcō
I lead, I am leading
you lead
he/she/it leads
we lead
you pl. lead
they lead
I am led, I am being led
you are led
he/she/it is led
we are led
you pl. are led
they are led
Future dūcam
I will lead, I will be leading
you will lead
he/she/it will lead
we will lead
you pl. will lead
they will lead
I will be led, I will be being led
you will be led
he/she/it will be led
we will be led
you pl. will be led
they will be led
Imperfect dūcēbam
I was leading, used to lead
you were leading
he/she/it was leading
we were leading
you pl. were leading
they were leading
I was being led, I used to be led
you were being led
he/she/it was being led
we were being led
you pl. were being led
they were being led
Perfect dūxī
I led, I have led
you led
he/she/it led
we led
you pl. led
they led
ductus sum
ductus es
ductus est
ductī sumus
ductī estis
ductī sunt
I was led, I have been led
you were led
he was led
we were led
you pl. were led
they were led
Future Perfect dūxerō
I will have led
you will have led
he/she/it will have led
we will have led
you pl. will have led
they will have led
ductus erō
ductus eris
ductus erit
ductī erimus
ductī eritis
ductī erunt
I will have been led
you will have been led
he will have been led
we will have been led
you pl. will have been led
they will have been led
Pluperfect dūxeram
I had led
you had led
he/she/it had led
we had led
you pl. had led
they had led
ductus eram
ductus erās
ductus erat
ductī erāmus
ductī erātis
ductī erant
I had been led
you had been led
he had been led
we had been led
you pl. had been led
they had been led
Present dūcam
I may lead, I would lead
you would lead
he/she/it would lead
we would lead
you pl. would lead
they would lead
I may be led, I would be led
you would be led
he/she/it would be led
we would be led
you pl. would be led
they would be led
Imperfect dūcerem
I might lead, should lead
you might lead
he/she/it might lead
we might lead
you pl. might lead
they might lead
I might be led
you might be led
he/she/it might be led
we might be led
you pl. might be led
they might be led
Perfect dūxerim
I would have led, I led
you would have led
he/she/it would have led
we would have led
you pl. would lead
they would have led
ductus sim
ductus sīs
ductus sit
ductī sīmus
ductī sītis
ductī sint
I would have been led, I was led
you were led
he was led
we were led
you pl. were led
they were led
Pluperfect dūxissem
I would have led, I had led
you would have led
he/she/it would have led
we would have led
you pl. would have led
they would have led
ductus essem
ductus essēs
ductus esset
ductī essēmus
ductī essētis
ductī essent
I would have been led
you would have been led
he would have been led
we would have been led
you pl. would have been led
they would have been led
Present dūc!
lead! (sg.)
lead! (pl.)
be led!
be led! (pl.)
Future dūcitō!
lead! (sg.)
lead! (pl.)
3rd person dūcitō
he must lead
they must lead
Present dūcere to lead dūcī to be led
Future ductūrus esse to be going to lead ductum īrī to be going to be led
Perfect dūxisse to have led ductus esse to have been led
Periphrastic perfect ductūrus fuisse to have been going to lead
Present dūcēns
(while) leading (sg.)
(while) leading (pl.)
Future ductūrus/a/um going to lead
Perfect ductus/a/um having been led
GERUNDIVE dūcendus/a/um (needing) to be led
GERUND ad dūcendum
with a view to leading
of leading
by leading
SUPINE ductum (it)
(facile) ductū
(he goes) in order to lead
(easy) to lead

A distinction between perfective aspect (I did) and imperfective aspect (I was doing) is found only in the past in Latin. In the present or future, the same tenses have both aspectual meanings.

Unlike in Ancient Greek or modern English, there is no distinction between perfect (I have done) and simple past (I did). The same tense, known in Latin grammar as the perfect tense, has both meanings.

The passive imperative is almost never used except in deponent verbs, e.g. sequere mē! "follow me!"


The different conjugations differ in some tenses. For example, in the future tense:

  • 1st and 2nd conjugation verbs and have the endings -bō, -bis, -bit, -bimus, -bitis, -bunt (e.g. amābō "I will love", vidēbō "I will see", ībō "I will go").
  • 3rd and 4th conjugation verbs and volō and ferō have the endings -am, -ēs, -et, -ēmus, -ētis, -ent (dūcam "I will lead", audiam "I will hear").
  • Sum and possum have the endings erō, eris, erit, erimus, eritis, erunt (erō "I will be", poterō "I will be able")

In the imperfect indicative:

  • Most verbs have the endings -bam, -bās, -bat, -bāmus, -bātis, -bant (e.g. amābam, vidēbam, dūcēbam, capiēbam, ferēbam, volēbam)
  • Sum and possum have eram, erās, erat, erāmus, erātis, erant (e.g. poteram "I was able")

They also differ in the present subjunctive:

  • 1st conjugation verbs have the endings -em, -ēs, -et, -ēmus, -ētis, -ent (e.g. amem "I may love")
  • 2nd, 3rd, 4th conjugations have -am, -ās, -at, -āmus, -ātis, -ant (videam "I may see", dūcam "I may lead", audiam "I may hear", eam "I may go")
  • Sum, possum, volō have -im, -īs, -it, -īmus, -ītis, -int (sim "I may be", possim "I may be able", velim "I may wish")

The imperfect subjunctive of every verb looks like the infinitive + an ending:

  • Regular: amārem, vidērem, dūcerem, caperem, audīrem
  • Irregular: essem, possem, ferrem, vellem, īrem

In the various perfect tenses, all verbs have regular endings. However, the stem to which the perfect endings are added cannot always be guessed, and so is given in dictionaries.

Word order

Latin allows a very flexible word order because of its inflectional syntax. Ordinary prose tended to follow the pattern of subject, direct object, indirect object, adverbial words or phrases, verb (with the proviso that when noun and verb make a compound, as impetum facio "I attack / make an attack" the noun is generally placed close to the verb).[50] Any extra but subordinate verb, such as an infinitive, is placed before the main verb. Adjectives and participles usually directly follow nouns unless they are adjectives of beauty, size, quantity, goodness, or truth, in which case they usually precede the noun being modified. However, departures from these rules are frequent.

Relative clauses are commonly placed after the antecedent that the relative pronoun describes. Since grammatical function in a sentence is based not on word order but on inflection, the usual word order in Latin was often abandoned with no detriment to understanding but with various changes in emphasis.

While these patterns of word order were the most frequent in Classical Latin prose, they were frequently varied. The strongest surviving evidence suggests that the word order of colloquial Latin was mostly Subject-Object-Verb. That can be found in some very conservative Romance languages, such as Sardinian and Sicilian in which the verb is still often placed at the end of the sentence (see Vulgar Latin). On the other hand, subject-verb-object word order was probably also common in ancient Latin conversation, as it is prominent in the Romance languages, which evolved from Latin.[51]

In poetry, however, word order was often changed for the sake of the meter for which vowel quantity (short vowels vs. long vowels and diphthongs) and consonant clusters, not rhyme and word stress, governed the patterns. One must bear in mind that poets in the Roman world wrote primarily for the ear, not the eye; many premiered their work in recitation for an audience. Hence, variations in word order served a rhetorical as well as a metrical purpose; they certainly did not prevent understanding.

In Virgil's Eclogues, for example, he writes, Omnia vincit amor, et nōs cēdāmus amōrī!: "Love conquers all, let us too yield to love!". The words omnia (all), amor (love) and amōrī (to love) are thrown into relief by their unusual position in their respective phrases.

The ending of the common Roman name Mārcus is different in each of the following pairs of examples because of its grammatical usage in each pair. The ordering in the second sentence of each pair would be correct in Latin and clearly understood, whereas in English it is awkward, at best, and meaningless, at worst:

Mārcus ferit Cornēliam: Marcus hits Cornelia. (subject–verb–object)
Mārcus Cornēliam ferit: Marcus Cornelia hits. (subject–object–verb)
Cornēlia dedit Mārcō dōnum: Cornelia has given Marcus a gift. (subject–verb–indirect object–direct object)
Cornēlia Mārcō dōnum dedit: Cornelia (to) Marcus a gift has given. (subject–indirect object–direct object–verb)

See also


  • Bennett, Charles Edwin (1895). Latin Grammar. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens (2006), Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xii, 639. ISBN 0-19-518168-9.
  • Gildersleeve, B.L. & Gonzalez Lodge (1895). Gildersleeve's Latin Grammar. 3rd Edition. (Macmillan)
  • Greenough, J.B. et al. (1903). Allen and Greenough's New Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges. Boston and London.
  • Kennedy, Benjamin Hall (1871). The Revised Latin Primer. Edited and further revised by Sir James Mountford, Longman 1930; reprinted 1962.
  • Kühner, Raphael; & Karl Stegmann (1912) [1879]. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache
  • Leumann, Manu; J.B. Hofmann, & Anton Szantyr (1977) [1926]. Lateinische Grammatik. Munich.


  1. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 13.
  2. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 13.
  3. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 22.
  4. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 17–19.
  5. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 17.
  6. Greenough (1903), §49.
  7. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 19.
  8. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 22–26.
  9. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 30–31.
  10. Greenough (1903) New Latin Grammar, §91.
  11. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 34–36.
  12. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 119.
  13. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 119–122.
  14. Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 232–3.
  15. Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 235–7.
  16. Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 240–2.
  17. Terence, Eun. 2, 3, 15.
  18. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 123–127.
  19. Plautus, Pseudolus 634.
  20. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 128–132.
  21. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p, 130.
  22. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 128.
  23. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 132.
  24. Livy, 2.33.4.
  25. Cicero, Tusc. Disp. 5.113.
  26. Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 42.
  27. Greenough (1903), p. 64.
  28. Greenough (1903), p. 63.
  29. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 48.
  30. Greenough (1903), p. 64.
  31. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 49.
  32. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 48, 42.
  33. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 51.
  34. Virgil, Aeneid, 4.345.
  35. Nepos, Themistocles 2.2.
  36. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 44.
  37. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. tenus.
  38. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. finis.
  39. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. gratia.
  40. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. iuxta.
  41. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. tenus.
  42. Lewis & Short, Latin Dictionary, s.v. verto.
  43. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 45.
  44. Greenough (1903), p. 63.
  45. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 59.
  46. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 58.
  47. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 64–84.
  48. Kennedy (1962 ed.), p. 60.
  49. Kennedy (1962 ed.), pp. 62, 85–88.
  50. Andrew M. Devine, Laurence D. Stephens, Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, page 79.
  51. Devine, Andrew M.; Stephens, Laurence D. (2006). Latin word order: structured meaning and information. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–5. Word order is what gets the reader of Latin from disjoint sentences to coherent and incrementally interpretable text.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.