Hyperbaric welding is the process of welding at elevated pressures, normally underwater. Hyperbaric welding can either take place wet in the water itself or dry inside a specially constructed positive pressure enclosure and hence a dry environment. It is predominantly referred to as "hyperbaric welding" when used in a dry environment, and "underwater welding" when in a wet environment. The applications of hyperbaric welding are diverse—it is often used to repair ships, offshore oil platforms, and pipelines. Steel is the most common material welded.
Dry welding is used in preference to wet underwater welding when high quality welds are required because of the increased control over conditions which can be exerted, such as through application of prior and post weld heat treatments. This improved environmental control leads directly to improved process performance and a generally much higher quality weld than a comparative wet weld. Thus, when a very high quality weld is required, dry hyperbaric welding is normally utilized. Research into using dry hyperbaric welding at depths of up to 1,000 metres (3,300 ft) is ongoing. In general, assuring the integrity of underwater welds can be difficult (but is possible using various nondestructive testing applications), especially for wet underwater welds, because defects are difficult to detect if the defects are beneath the surface of the weld.
Underwater hyperbaric welding was invented by the Russian metallurgist Konstantin Khrenov in 1932.
Welding processes have become increasingly important in almost all manufacturing industries and for structural application. Although a large number of techniques are available for welding in atmosphere, many of these techniques cannot be applied in offshore and marine application where presence of water is of major concern. In this regard, it is relevant to note that a great majority of offshore repairing and surfacing work is carried out at a relatively shallow depth, in the region intermittently covered by the water known as the splash zone. Though numerically, most ship repair and welding jobs are carried out at a shallow depth, the most technologically challenging task is repair at greater depths, especially in pipelines and repair of accidental failure. The advantages of underwater welding are largely of an economic nature, because underwater-welding for marine maintenance and repair jobs bypasses the need to pull the structure out of the sea and saves valuable time and dry docking costs. It is also an important technique for emergency repairs which allow the damaged structure to be safely transported to dry facilities for permanent repair or scrapping. Underwater welding is applied in both inland and offshore environments, though seasonal weather inhibits offshore underwater welding during winter. In either location, surface supplied air is the most common diving method for underwater welders.
Dry hyperbaric welding involves the weld being performed at raised pressure in a chamber filled with a gas mixture sealed around the structure being welded.
Most arc welding processes such as shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), flux-cored arc welding (FCAW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), plasma arc welding (PAW) could be operated at hyperbaric pressures, but all suffer as the pressure increases. Gas tungsten arc welding is most commonly used. The degradation is associated with physical changes of the arc behaviour as the gas flow regime around the arc changes and the arc roots contract and become more mobile. Of note is a dramatic increase in arc voltage which is associated with the increase in pressure. Overall a degradation in capability and efficiency results as the pressure increases.
Special control techniques have been applied which have allowed welding down to 2,500 m (8,200 ft) simulated water depth in the laboratory, but dry hyperbaric welding has thus far been limited operationally to less than 400 m (1,300 ft) water depth by the physiological capability of divers to operate the welding equipment at high pressures and practical considerations concerning construction of an automated pressure / welding chamber at depth.
Wet underwater welding directly exposes the diver and electrode to the water and surrounding elements. Divers usually use around 300–400 amps of direct current to power their electrode, and they weld using varied forms of arc welding. This practice commonly uses a variation of shielded metal arc welding, employing a waterproof electrode. Other processes that are used include flux-cored arc welding and friction welding. In each of these cases, the welding power supply is connected to the welding equipment through cables and hoses. The process is generally limited to low carbon equivalent steels, especially at greater depths, because of hydrogen-caused cracking.
Wet welding with a stick electrode is done with similar equipment to that used for dry welding, but the electrode holders are designed for water cooling and are more heavily insulated. They will overheat if used out of the water. A constant current welding machine is used for manual metal arc welding. Direct current is used, and a heavy duty isolation switch is installed in the welding cable at the surface control position, so that the welding current can be disconnected when not in use. The welder instructs the surface operator to make and break the contact as required during the procedure. The contacts should only be closed during actual welding, and opened at other times, particularly when changing electrodes.
The electric arc heats the workpiece and the welding rod, and the molten metal is transferred through the gas bubble around the arc. The gas bubble is partly formed from decomposition of the flux coating on the electrode but it is usually contaminated to some extent by steam. Current flow induces transfer of metal droplets from the electrode to the workpiece and enables positional welding by a skilled operator. Slag deposition on the weld surface helps to slow the rate of cooling, but rapid cooling is one of the biggest problems in producing a quality weld.
Hazards and risks
The hazards of underwater welding include the risk of electric shock for the welder. To prevent this, the welding equipment must be adaptable to a marine environment, properly insulated and the welding current must be controlled. Commercial divers must also consider the occupational safety issues that divers face; most notably, the risk of decompression sickness due to the increased pressure of breathing gases. Many divers have reported a metallic taste that is related to the galvanic breakdown of dental amalgam. There may also be long term cognitive and possibly musculoskeletal effects associated with underwater welding.
- Keats, DJ (2005). Underwater Wet Welding - A Welder's Mate. Speciality Welds Ltd. p. 300. ISBN 1-899293-99-X.
- Cary, HB; Helzer, SC (2005). Modern Welding Technology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education. pp. 677–681. ISBN 0-13-113029-3.
- Bennett PB, Schafstall H (1992). "Scope and design of the GUSI international research program". Undersea Biomedical Research. 19 (4): 231–41. PMID 1353925. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
- Carl W. Hall A biographical dictionary of people in engineering: from the earliest records until 2000, Vol. 1, Purdue University Press, 2008 ISBN 1-55753-459-4 p. 120
- Khanna, 2004
- Smith, Matt. "Underwater Welding Salary & Risk Factor". Water Welders. Matt Smith. Retrieved 8 May 2015.
- Properties of the constricted gas Tungsten (Plasma) Arc at Elevated Pressures. Ph.D. Thesis. Cranfield University, UK. 1991.
- Hart, PR (1999). A Study of non-consumable welding processes for diverless deepwater hyperbaric welding to 2500m water depth. Ph.D. Thesis. Cranfield University, UK.
- Smith, Matt. "Dry or Wet Welding? Similarities, Differences and Objectives". Water Welders. Retrieved 8 April 2014.
- Bevan, John, ed. (2005). "Section 3.3". The Professional Divers's Handbook (second ed.). 5 Nepean Close, Alverstoke, GOSPORT, Hampshire PO12 2BH: Submex Ltd. pp. 122–125. ISBN 978-0950824260.
- US Navy Diving Manual, 6th revision. United States: US Naval Sea Systems Command. 2006. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
- Ortendahl TW, Dahlén G, Röckert HO (March 1985). "Evaluation of oral problems in divers performing electrical welding and cutting under water". Undersea Biomed Res. 12 (1): 69–76. PMID 4035819. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
- Ortendahl TW, Högstedt P (November 1988). "Magnetic field effects on dental amalgam in divers welding and cutting electrically underwater". Undersea Biomed Res. 15 (6): 429–41. PMID 3227576. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
- Ortendahl TW, Högstedt P, Odelius H, Norén JG (November 1988). "Effects of magnetic fields from underwater electrical cutting on in vitro corrosion of dental amalgam". Undersea Biomed Res. 15 (6): 443–55. PMID 3227577. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
- Macdiarmid JI, Ross JA, Semple S, Osman LM, Watt SJ, Crawford JR (2005). "Further investigation of possible musculoskeletal and cognitive deficit due to welding in divers identified in the ELTHI diving study" (PDF). Health and Safety Executive. Technical Report rr390. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Underwater welding.|
- Health and Safety Executive - Performs research on long term health effects from underwater welding.