# Hamming distance

In information theory, the **Hamming distance** between two strings of equal length is the number of positions at which the corresponding symbols are different. In other words, it measures the minimum number of *substitutions* required to change one string into the other, or the minimum number of *errors* that could have transformed one string into the other. In a more general context, the Hamming distance is one of several string metrics for measuring the edit distance between two sequences. It is named after the American mathematician Richard Hamming.

A major application is in coding theory, more specifically to block codes, in which the equal-length strings are vectors over a finite field.

## Examples

The Hamming distance between:

- "
**karolin**" and "**kathrin**" is 3. - "
**karolin**" and "**kerstin**" is 3. **1011101**and**1001001**is 2.**2173896**and**2233796**is 3.

## Properties

For a fixed length *n*, the Hamming distance is a metric on the set of the words of length n (also known as a Hamming space), as it fulfills the conditions of non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles and symmetry, and it can be shown by complete induction that it satisfies the triangle inequality as well.[1] The Hamming distance between two words *a* and *b* can also be seen as the Hamming weight of *a* − *b* for an appropriate choice of the − operator, much as the difference between two integers can be seen as a distance from zero on the number line.

For binary strings *a* and *b* the Hamming distance is equal to the number of ones (population count) in *a* XOR *b*.[2] The metric space of length-*n* binary strings, with the Hamming distance, is known as the *Hamming cube*; it is equivalent as a metric space to the set of distances between vertices in a hypercube graph. One can also view a binary string of length *n* as a vector in by treating each symbol in the string as a real coordinate; with this embedding, the strings form the vertices of an *n*-dimensional hypercube, and the Hamming distance of the strings is equivalent to the Manhattan distance between the vertices.

## Error detection and error correction

The **minimum Hamming distance** is used to define some essential notions in coding theory, such as error detecting and error correcting codes. In particular, a code *C* is said to be *k* error detecting if, and only if, the minimum Hamming distance between any two of its codewords is at least *k*+1.[1]

A code *C* is said to be *k-errors correcting* if, for every word *w* in the underlying Hamming space *H*, there exists at most one codeword *c* (from *C*) such that the Hamming distance between *w* and *c* is at most *k*. In other words, a code is *k*-errors correcting if, and only if, the minimum Hamming distance between any two of its codewords is at least 2*k*+1. This is more easily understood geometrically as any closed balls of radius *k* centered on distinct codewords being disjoint.[1] These balls are also called *Hamming spheres* in this context.[3]

Thus a code with minimum Hamming distance *d* between its codewords can detect at most *d*-1 errors and can correct ⌊(*d*-1)/2⌋ errors.[1] The latter number is also called the *packing radius* or the *error-correcting capability* of the code.[3]

## History and applications

The Hamming distance is named after Richard Hamming, who introduced the concept in his fundamental paper on Hamming codes *Error detecting and error correcting codes* in 1950.[4] Hamming weight analysis of bits is used in several disciplines including information theory, coding theory, and cryptography.

It is used in telecommunication to count the number of flipped bits in a fixed-length binary word as an estimate of error, and therefore is sometimes called the **signal distance**.[5] For *q*-ary strings over an alphabet of size *q* ≥ 2 the Hamming distance is applied in case of the q-ary symmetric channel, while the Lee distance is used for phase-shift keying or more generally channels susceptible to synchronization errors because the Lee distance accounts for errors of ±1.[6] If or both distances coincide because any pair of elements from or differ by 1, but the distances are different for larger .

The Hamming distance is also used in systematics as a measure of genetic distance.[7]

However, for comparing strings of different lengths, or strings where not just substitutions but also insertions or deletions have to be expected, a more sophisticated metric like the Levenshtein distance is more appropriate.

In processor interconnects, the dynamic energy consumption depends on the number of transitions. With level-signaling scheme, the number of transitions depends on Hamming distance between consecutively transmitted buses.[8] Hence, by reducing this Hamming distance, the data-movement energy can be reduced.

## Algorithm example

The function `hamming_distance()`

, implemented in Python 2.3+, computes the Hamming distance between
two strings (or other iterable objects) of equal length by creating a sequence of Boolean values indicating mismatches and matches between corresponding positions in the two inputs and then summing the sequence with False and True values being interpreted as zero and one.

```
def hamming_distance(s1, s2) -> int:
"""Return the Hamming distance between equal-length sequences."""
if len(s1) != len(s2):
raise ValueError("Undefined for sequences of unequal length.")
return sum(el1 != el2 for el1, el2 in zip(s1, s2))
```

where the zip() function merges two equal-length collections in pairs.

The following C function will compute the Hamming distance of two integers (considered as binary values, that is, as sequences of bits). The running time of this procedure is proportional to the Hamming distance rather than to the number of bits in the inputs. It computes the bitwise exclusive or of the two inputs, and then finds the Hamming weight of the result (the number of nonzero bits) using an algorithm of Wegner (1960) that repeatedly finds and clears the lowest-order nonzero bit. Some compilers support the __builtin_popcount function which can calculate this using specialized processor hardware where available.

```
int hamming_distance(unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
int dist = 0;
// Count the number of bits set
for (unsigned val = x ^ y; val > 0; val >> 1)
{
// If A bit is set, so increment the count
if (val & 1)
dist++;
// Clear (delete) val's lowest-order bit
}
// Return the number of differing bits
return dist;
}
```

Or, a much faster hardware alternative (for compilers that support builtins) is to use popcount like so.

```
int hamming_distance(unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
return __builtin_popcount(x ^ y);
}
//if your compiler supports 64-bit integers
int hamming_distance(unsigned long long x, unsigned long long y)
{
return __builtin_popcountll(x ^ y);
}
```

## See also

## References

- Robinson, Derek J. S. (2003).
*An Introduction to Abstract Algebra*. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 255–257. ISBN 978-3-11-019816-4. - Warren, Jr., Henry S. (2013) [2002].
*Hacker's Delight*(2 ed.). Addison Wesley - Pearson Education, Inc. pp. 81–96. ISBN 978-0-321-84268-8. 0-321-84268-5. - Cohen, G.; Honkala, I.; Litsyn, S.; Lobstein, A. (1997),
*Covering Codes*, North-Holland Mathematical Library,**54**, Elsevier, pp. 16–17, ISBN 9780080530079 - Hamming, R. W. (April 1950). "Error detecting and error correcting codes" (PDF).
*The Bell System Technical Journal*.**29**(2): 147–160. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x. ISSN 0005-8580. - Ayala, Jose (2012).
*Integrated Circuit and System Design*. Springer. p. 62. ISBN 978-3-642-36156-2. - Roth, Ron (2006).
*Introduction to Coding Theory*. Cambridge University Press. p. 298. ISBN 978-0-521-84504-5. - Pilcher, Christopher D.; Wong, Joseph K.; Pillai, Satish K. (2008-03-18). "Inferring HIV Transmission Dynamics from Phylogenetic Sequence Relationships".
*PLOS Medicine*.**5**(3): e69. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050069. ISSN 1549-1676. PMC 2267810. PMID 18351799. - "A Survey of Encoding Techniques for Reducing Data-Movement Energy", JSA, 2018

## Further reading

This article incorporates public domain material from the General Services Administration document "Federal Standard 1037C". - Wegner, Peter (1960). "A technique for counting ones in a binary computer".
*Communications of the ACM*.**3**(5): 322. doi:10.1145/367236.367286. - MacKay, David J. C. (2003).
*Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-64298-1.