In statistical mechanics, the Fokker–Planck equation is a partial differential equation that describes the time evolution of the probability density function of the velocity of a particle under the influence of drag forces and random forces, as in Brownian motion. The equation can be generalized to other observables as well. It is named after Adriaan Fokker and Max Planck, and is also known as the Kolmogorov forward equation, after Andrey Kolmogorov, who independently discovered the concept in 1931. When applied to particle position distributions, it is better known as the Smoluchowski equation (after Marian Smoluchowski), and in this context it is equivalent to the convection–diffusion equation. The case with zero diffusion is known in statistical mechanics as the Liouville equation. The Fokker–Planck equation is obtained from the master equation through Kramers–Moyal expansion.
While the Fokker–Planck equation is used with problems where the initial distribution is known, if the problem is to know the distribution at previous times, the Feynman–Kac formula can be used, which is a consequence of the Kolmogorov backward equation.
The stochastic process defined above in the Itō sense can be rewritten within the Stratonovich convention as a Stratonovich SDE:
It includes an added noise-induced drift term due to diffusion gradient effects if the noise is state-dependent. This convention is more often used in physical applications. Indeed, it is well known that any solution to the Stratonovich SDE is a solution to the Itō SDE.
The zero-drift equation with constant diffusion can be considered as a model of classical Brownian motion:
This model has discrete spectrum of solutions if the condition of fixed boundaries is added for :
Here is a minimal value of a corresponding diffusion spectrum , while and represent the uncertainty of coordinate–velocity definition.
More generally, if
with drift vector and diffusion tensor , i.e.
If instead of an Itō SDE, a Stratonovich SDE is considered,
Here the drift term is zero and the diffusion coefficient is 1/2. Thus the corresponding Fokker–Planck equation is
which is the simplest form of a diffusion equation. If the initial condition is , the solution is
The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is a process defined as
with . The corresponding Fokker–Planck equation is
The stationary solution () is
where the third term includes the particle acceleration due to the Lorentz force and the Fokker–Planck term at the right-hand side represents the effects of particle collisions. The quantities and are the average change in velocity a particle of type experiences due to collisions with all other particle species in unit time. Expressions for these quantities are given elsewhere. If collisions are ignored, the Boltzmann equation reduces to the Vlasov equation.
Brownian motion follows the Langevin equation, which can be solved for many different stochastic forcings with results being averaged (the Monte Carlo method, canonical ensemble in molecular dynamics). However, instead of this computationally intensive approach, one can use the Fokker–Planck equation and consider the probability of the particle having a velocity in the interval when it starts its motion with at time 0.
Being a partial differential equation, the Fokker–Planck equation can be solved analytically only in special cases. A formal analogy of the Fokker–Planck equation with the Schrödinger equation allows the use of advanced operator techniques known from quantum mechanics for its solution in a number of cases. Furthermore, in the case of overdamped dynamics when the Fokker–Planck equation contains second partial derivatives with respect to all variables, the equation can be written in the form of a master equation that can easily be solved numerically . In many applications, one is only interested in the steady-state probability distribution , which can be found from . The computation of mean first passage times and splitting probabilities can be reduced to the solution of an ordinary differential equation which is intimately related to the Fokker–Planck equation.
Particular cases with known solution and inversion
In mathematical finance for volatility smile modeling of options via local volatility, one has the problem of deriving a diffusion coefficient consistent with a probability density obtained from market option quotes. The problem is therefore an inversion of the Fokker–Planck equation: Given the density f(x,t) of the option underlying X deduced from the option market, one aims at finding the local volatility consistent with f. This is an inverse problem that has been solved in general by Dupire (1994, 1997) with a non-parametric solution. Brigo and Mercurio (2002, 2003) propose a solution in parametric form via a particular local volatility consistent with a solution of the Fokker–Planck equation given by a mixture model. More information is available also in Fengler (2008), Gatheral (2008) and Musiela and Rutkowski (2008).
Fokker–Planck equation and path integral
Every Fokker–Planck equation is equivalent to a path integral. The path integral formulation is an excellent starting point for the application of field theory methods. This is used, for instance, in critical dynamics.
A derivation of the path integral is possible in a similar way as in quantum mechanics. The derivation for a Fokker–Planck equation with one variable is as follows. Start by inserting a delta function and then integrating by parts:
The -derivatives here only act on the -function, not on . Integrate over a time interval ,
Insert the Fourier integral
for the -function,
This equation expresses as functional of . Iterating times and performing the limit gives a path integral with action
Although formally equivalent, different problems may be solved more easily in the Fokker–Planck equation or the path integral formulation. The equilibrium distribution for instance may be obtained more directly from the Fokker–Planck equation.
Notes and references
- Leo P. Kadanoff (2000). Statistical Physics: statics, dynamics and renormalization. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-3764-6.
- Fokker, A. D. (1914). "Die mittlere Energie rotierender elektrischer Dipole im Strahlungsfeld". Ann. Phys. 348 (4. Folge 43): 810–820. Bibcode:1914AnP...348..810F. doi:10.1002/andp.19143480507.
- Planck, M. (1917). "Über einen Satz der statistischen Dynamik und seine Erweiterung in der Quantentheorie". Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. 24: 324–341.
- Kolmogorov, Andrei (1931). "Über die analytischen Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie" [On Analytical Methods in the Theory of Probability]. Mathematische Annalen (in German). 104 (1): 415–458 [pp. 448–451]. doi:10.1007/BF01457949.
- N. N. Bogolyubov Jr. and D. P. Sankovich (1994). "N. N. Bogolyubov and statistical mechanics". Russian Math. Surveys 49(5): 19—49. doi:10.1070/RM1994v049n05ABEH002419
- N. N. Bogoliubov and N. M. Krylov (1939). Fokker–Planck equations generated in perturbation theory by a method based on the spectral properties of a perturbed Hamiltonian. Zapiski Kafedry Fiziki Akademii Nauk Ukrainian SSR 4: 81–157 (in Ukrainian).
- Dhont, J. K. G. (1996). An Introduction to Dynamics of Colloids. Elsevier. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-08-053507-4.
- Öttinger, Hans Christian (1996). Stochastic Processes in Polymeric Fluids. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p. 75. ISBN 978-3-540-58353-0.
- Kamenshchikov, S. (2014). "Clustering and Uncertainty in Perfect Chaos Systems". Journal of Chaos. 2014: 1–6. arXiv:1301.4481. doi:10.1155/2014/292096.
- Rosenbluth, M. N. (1957). "Fokker–Planck Equation for an Inverse-Square Force". Physical Review. 107 (1): 1–6. Bibcode:1957PhRv..107....1R. doi:10.1103/physrev.107.1.
- Holubec Viktor, Kroy Klaus, and Steffenoni Stefano (2019). "Physically consistent numerical solver for time-dependent Fokker-Planck equations". Phys. Rev. E. 99 (4): 032117. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032117. PMID 30999402.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Zinn-Justin, Jean (1996). Quantum field theory and critical phenomena. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-851882-2.
- Janssen, H. K. (1976). "On a Lagrangean for Classical Field Dynamics and Renormalization Group Calculation of Dynamical Critical Properties". Z. Phys. B23 (4): 377–380. Bibcode:1976ZPhyB..23..377J. doi:10.1007/BF01316547.
- Bruno Dupire (1994) Pricing with a Smile. Risk Magazine, January, 18–20.
- Bruno Dupire (1997) Pricing and Hedging with Smiles. Mathematics of Derivative Securities. Edited by M.A.H. Dempster and S.R. Pliska, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 103–111. ISBN 0-521-58424-8.
- Brigo, D.; Mercurio, Fabio (2002). "Lognormal-Mixture Dynamics and Calibration to Market Volatility Smiles". International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance. 5 (4): 427–446. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.210.4165. doi:10.1142/S0219024902001511.
- Brigo, D.; Mercurio, F.; Sartorelli, G. (2003). "Alternative asset-price dynamics and volatility smile". Quantitative Finance. 3 (3): 173–183. doi:10.1088/1469-7688/3/3/303.
- Fengler, M. R. (2008). Semiparametric Modeling of Implied Volatility, 2005, Springer Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-26234-3
- Crispin Gardiner (2009), "Stochastic Methods", 4th edition, Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-70712-7.
- Jim Gatheral (2008). The Volatility Surface. Wiley and Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-79251-2.
- Marek Musiela, Marek Rutkowski. Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling, 2008, 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-20966-9.
- Hannes Risken, "The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solutions and Applications", 2nd edition, Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, ISBN 3-540-61530-X.
- Giorgio Orfino, "Simulazione dell'equazione di Fokker–Planck in Ottica Quantistica", Università degli Studi di Pavia, A.a. 94/95: https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100605/http://www.qubit.it/educational/thesis/orfino.pdf