# Flat topology

In mathematics, the **flat topology** is a Grothendieck topology used in algebraic geometry. It is used to define the theory of **flat cohomology**; it also plays a fundamental role in the theory of descent (faithfully flat descent).[1] The term *flat* here comes from flat modules.

There are several slightly different flat topologies, the most common of which are the **fppf topology** and the **fpqc topology**. *fppf* stands for * fidèlement plate de présentation finie*, and in this topology, a morphism of affine schemes is a covering morphism if it is faithfully flat and of finite presentation.

*fpqc*stands for

*, and in this topology, a morphism of affine schemes is a covering morphism if it is faithfully flat. In both categories, a covering family is defined be a family which is a cover on Zariski open subsets.[2] In the fpqc topology, any faithfully flat and quasi-compact morphism is a cover.[3] These topologies are closely related to descent. The "pure" faithfully flat topology without any further finiteness conditions such as quasi compactness or finite presentation is not used much as is not subcanonical; in other words, representable functors need not be sheaves.*

*fidèlement plate et quasi-compacte*Unfortunately the terminology for flat topologies is not standardized. Some authors use the term "topology" for a pretopology, and there are several slightly different pretopologies sometimes called the fppf or fpqc (pre)topology, which sometimes give the same topology.

Flat cohomology was introduced by Grothendieck in about 1960.[4]

## The big and small fppf sites

Let *X* be an affine scheme. We define an **fppf cover** of *X* to be a finite and jointly surjective family of morphisms

- (
*φ*_{a}:*X*_{a}→*X*)

with each *X*_{a} affine and each *φ*_{a} flat, finitely presented. This generates a pretopology: for *X* arbitrary, we define an fppf cover of *X* to be a family

- (
*φ'*X_{a}:X_{a}→*)*

which is an fppf cover after base changing to an open affine subscheme of *X*. This pretopology generates a topology called the *fppf topology*. (This is not the same as the topology we would get if we started with arbitrary *X* and *X*_{a} and took covering families to be jointly surjective families of flat, finitely presented morphisms.) We write *Fppf* for the category of schemes with the fppf topology.

The **small fppf site of ***X*** ** is the category *O*(*X*_{fppf}) whose objects are schemes *U* with a fixed morphism *U* → *X* which is part of some covering family. (This does not imply that the morphism is flat, finitely presented.) The morphisms are morphisms of schemes compatible with the fixed maps to *X*. The **large fppf site of ***X*** ** is the category *Fppf/X*, that is, the category of schemes with a fixed map to *X*, considered with the fppf topology.

"Fppf" is an abbreviation for "fidèlement plate de présentation finie", that is, "faithfully flat and of finite presentation". Every surjective family of flat and finitely presented morphisms is a covering family for this topology, hence the name. The definition of the fppf pretopology can also be given with an extra quasi-finiteness condition; it follows from Corollary 17.16.2 in
EGA IV_{4} that this gives the same topology.

## The big and small fpqc sites

Let *X* be an affine scheme. We define an **fpqc cover** of *X* to be a finite and jointly surjective family of morphisms {*u*_{α} : *X*_{α} → *X*} with each *X*_{α} affine and each *u*_{α} flat. This generates a pretopology: For *X* arbitrary, we define an fpqc cover of *X* to be a family {*u*_{α} : *X*_{α} → *X*} which is an fpqc cover after base changing to an open affine subscheme of *X*. This pretopology generates a topology called the *fpqc topology*. (This is not the same as the topology we would get if we started with arbitrary *X* and *X*_{α} and took covering families to be jointly surjective families of flat morphisms.) We write *Fpqc* for the category of schemes with the fpqc topology.

The **small fpqc site of ***X*** ** is the category *O*(*X*_{fpqc}) whose objects are schemes *U* with a fixed morphism *U* → *X* which is part of some covering family. The morphisms are morphisms of schemes compatible with the fixed maps to *X*. The **large fpqc site of ***X*** ** is the category *Fpqc/X*, that is, the category of schemes with a fixed map to *X*, considered with the fpqc topology.

"Fpqc" is an abbreviation for "fidèlement plate quasi-compacte", that is, "faithfully flat and quasi-compact". Every surjective family of flat and quasi-compact morphisms is a covering family for this topology, hence the name.

## Flat cohomology

The procedure for defining the cohomology groups is the standard one: cohomology is defined as the sequence of derived functors of the functor taking the sections of a sheaf of abelian groups.

While such groups have a number of applications, they are not in general easy to compute, except in cases where they reduce to other theories, such as the étale cohomology.

## Example

The following example shows why the "faithfully flat topology" without any finiteness conditions does not behave well. Suppose *X* is the affine line over an algebraically closed field *k*. For each closed point *x* of *X* we can consider the local ring *R*_{x} at this point, which is a discrete valuation ring whose spectrum has one closed point and one open (generic) point. We glue these spectra together by identifying their open points to get a scheme *Y*. There is a natural map from *Y* to *X*. The affine line *X* is covered by the sets Spec(*R*_{x}) which are open in the faithfully flat topology, and each of these sets has a natural map to *Y*, and these maps are the same on intersections. However they cannot be combined to give a map from *X* to *Y*, because the underlying spaces of *X* and *Y* have different topologies.

## See also

## Notes

- Springer EoM article
- SGA III
_{1}, IV 6.3. - SGA III
_{1}, IV 6.3, Proposition 6.3.1(v). -
- Grothendieck, Alexander; Raynaud, Michèle (2003) [1971],
*Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental (SGA 1)*, Documents Mathématiques (Paris) [Mathematical Documents (Paris)],**3**, Paris: Société Mathématique de France, p. XI.4.8, arXiv:math/0206203, Bibcode:2002math......6203G, ISBN 978-2-85629-141-2, MR 2017446

- Grothendieck, Alexander; Raynaud, Michèle (2003) [1971],

## References

*Éléments de géométrie algébrique*, Vol. IV. 2- Milne, James S. (1980),
*Étale Cohomology*, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-08238-7 - Michael Artin and J. S. Milne, "Duality in the flat cohomology of curves",
*Inventiones Mathematicae*, Volume 35, Number 1, December, 1976

## External links

*Arithmetic Duality Theorems*(PDF), online book by James Milne, explains at the level of flat cohomology duality theorems originating in the Tate–Poitou duality of Galois cohomology