# Collineation

In projective geometry, a **collineation** is a one-to-one and onto map (a bijection) from one projective space to another, or from a projective space to itself, such that the images of collinear points are themselves collinear. A collineation is thus an *isomorphism* between projective spaces, or an automorphism from a projective space to itself. Some authors restrict the definition of collineation to the case where it is an automorphism.[1] The set of all collineations of a space to itself form a group, called the **collineation group**.

## Definition

Simply, a collineation is a one-to-one map from one projective space to another, or from a projective space to itself, such that the images of collinear points are themselves collinear. One may formalize this using various ways of presenting a projective space. Also, the case of the projective line is special, and hence generally treated differently.

### Linear algebra

For a projective space defined in terms of linear algebra (as the projectivization of a vector space), a collineation is a map between the projective spaces that is order-preserving with respect to inclusion of subspaces.

Formally, let *V* be a vector space over a field *K* and *W* a vector space over a field *L*. Consider the projective spaces *PG*(*V*) and *PG*(*W*), consisting of the vector lines of *V* and *W*.
Call *D*(*V*) and *D*(*W*) the set of subspaces of *V* and *W* respectively. A collineation from *PG*(*V*) to *PG*(*W*) is a map α : *D*(*V*) → *D*(*W*), such that:

- α is a bijection.
*A*⊆*B*⇔ α(*A*) ⊆ α(*B*) for all*A*,*B*in*D*(*V*).[2]

### Axiomatically

Given a projective space defined axiomatically in terms of an incidence structure (a set of points *P,* lines *L,* and an incidence relation *I* specifying which points lie on which lines, satisfying certain axioms), a collineation between projective spaces thus defined then being a bijective function *f* between the sets of points and a bijective function *g* between the set of lines, preserving the incidence relation.[3]

Every projective space of dimension greater than or equal to three is isomorphic to the projectivization of a linear space over a division ring, so in these dimensions this definition is no more general than the linear-algebraic one above, but in dimension two there are other projective planes, namely the non-Desarguesian planes, and this definition permits one to define collineations in such projective planes.

For dimension one, the set of points lying on a single projective line defines a projective space, and the resulting notion of collineation is just any bijection of the set.

### Collineations of the projective line

For a projective space of dimension one (a projective line; the projectivization of a vector space of dimension two), all points are collinear, so the collineation group is exactly the symmetric group of the points of the projective line. This is different from the behavior in higher dimensions, and thus one gives a more restrictive definition, specified so that the fundamental theorem of projective geometry holds.

In this definition, when *V* has dimension two, a collineation from *PG*(*V*) to *PG*(*W*) is a map *α* : *D*(*V*) → *D*(*W*), such that:

- The zero subspace of
*V*is mapped to the zero subspace of*W*. *V*is mapped to*W*.- There is a nonsingular semilinear map
*β*from*V*to*W*such that, for all*v*in*V*,

This last requirement ensures that collineations are all semilinear maps.

## Types

The main examples of collineations are projective linear transformations (also known as homographies) and automorphic collineations. For projective spaces coming from a linear space, the fundamental theorem of projective geometry states that all collineations are a combination of these, as described below.

### Projective linear transformations

Projective linear transformations (homographies) are collineations (planes in a vector space correspond to lines in the associated projective space, and linear transformations map planes to planes, so projective linear transformations map lines to lines), but in general not all collineations are projective linear transformations. PGL is in general a proper subgroup of the collineation group.

### Automorphic collineations

An **automorphic collineation** is a map that, in coordinates, is a field automorphism applied to the coordinates.

## Fundamental theorem of projective geometry

If the geometric dimension of a pappian projective space is at least 2, then every collineation is the product of a homography (a projective linear transformation) and an automorphic collineation. More precisely, the collineation group is the projective semilinear group, which is the semidirect product of homographies by automorphic collineations.

In particular, the collineations of PG(2, **R**) are exactly the homographies, as **R** has no nontrivial automorphisms (that is, Gal(**R**/**Q**) is trivial).

Suppose *φ* is a nonsingular semilinear map from *V* to *W*, with the dimension of *V* at least three. Define *α* : *D*(*V*) → *D*(*W*) by saying that *Z*^{α} = { *φ*(*z*) | *z* ∈ *Z* } for all *Z* in *D*(*V*). As *φ* is semilinear, one easily checks that this map is properly defined, and further more, as *φ* is not singular, it is bijective. It is obvious now that *α* is a collineation. We say that *α* is induced by *φ*.

The fundamental theorem of projective geometry states the converse:

Suppose *V* is a vector space over a field *K* with dimension at least three, *W* is a vector space over a field *L*, and *α* is a collineation from PG(*V*) to PG(*W*). This implies *K* and *L* are isomorphic fields, *V* and *W* have the same dimension, and there is a semilinear map *φ* such that *φ* induces *α*.

For *n* ≥ 3, the collineation group is the projective semilinear group, PΓL – this is PGL, twisted by field automorphisms; formally, the semidirect product PΓL ≅ PGL ⋊ Gal(*K*/*k*), where *k* is the prime field for *K*.

### Linear structure

Thus for *K* a prime field ( or ), we have PGL = PΓL, but for *K* not a prime field (such as for *n* ≥ 2 or ), the projective linear group is in general a proper subgroup of the collineation group, which can be thought of as "transformations preserving a projective *semi*-linear structure". Correspondingly, the quotient group PΓL / PGL ≅ Gal(*K*/*k*) corresponds to "choices of linear structure", with the identity (base point) being the existing linear structure. Given a projective space without an identification as the projectivization of a linear space, there is no natural isomorphism between the collineation group and PΓL, and the choice of a linear structure (realization as projectivization of a linear space) corresponds to a choice of subgroup PGL < PΓL, these choices forming a torsor over Gal(*K*/*k*).

## History

The idea of a line was abstracted to a ternary relation determined by collinearity (points lying on a single line). According to Wilhelm Blaschke[4] it was August Möbius that first abstracted this essence of geometrical transformation:

- What do our geometric transformations mean now? Möbius threw out and fielded this question already in his
*Barycentric Calculus*(1827). There he spoke not of*transformations*but of*permutations*[Verwandtschaften], when he said two elements drawn from a domain were*permuted*when they were interchanged by an arbitrary equation. In our particular case, linear equations between homogeneous point coordinates, Möbius called a permutation [Verwandtschaft] of both point spaces in particular a*collineation*. This signification would be changed later by Chasles to*homography*. Möbius’ expression is immediately comprehended when we follow Möbius in calling points collinear when they lie on the same line. Möbius' designation can be expressed by saying, collinear points are mapped by a permutation to collinear points, or in plain speech, straight lines stay straight.

Contemporary mathematicians view geometry as an incidence structure with an automorphism group consisting of mappings of the underlying space that preserve incidence. Such a mapping permutes the lines of the incidence structure, and the notion of collineation persists.

As mentioned by Blaschke and Klein, Michel Chasles preferred the term *homography* to *collineation*. A distinction between the terms arose when the distinction was clarified between the real projective plane and the complex projective line. Since there are no non-trivial field automorphisms of the real number field, all the collineations are homographies in the real projective plane.,[5] however due to the field automorphism complex conjugation, not all collineations of the complex projective line are homographies. In applications such as computer vision where the underlying field is the real number field, *homography* and *collineation* can be used interchangeably.

## Anti-homography

The operation of taking the complex conjugate in the complex plane amounts to a reflection in the real line. With the notation *z*^{∗} for the conjugate of *z*, an **anti-homography** is given by

Thus an anti-homography is the composition of conjugation with a homography, and so is an example of a collineation which is not an homography. For example, geometrically, the mapping amounts to circle inversion.[6] The transformations of inversive geometry of the plane are frequently described as the collection of all homographies and anti-homographies of the complex plane.[7]

## Notes

- For instance, Beutelspacher & Rosenbaum 1998, p.21, Casse 2006, p. 56 and Yale 2004, p. 226
- Geometers still commonly use an exponential type notation for functions and this condition will often appear as
*A*⊆*B*⇔*A*^{α}⊆*B*^{α}for all*A*,*B*in*D*(*V*). - "Preserving the incidence relation" means that if point
*p*is on line*l*then*f*(*p*) is in*g*(*l*); formally, if (*p*,*l*) ∈*I*then (*f*(*p*),*g*(*l*)) ∈*I*′. - Felix Klein (1926, 1949)
*Vorlesungen über Höhere Geometrie*, edited by Blaschke, Seite 138 - Casse 2006, p. 64, Corollary 4.29
- Morley & Morley 1933, p. 38
- Blair 2000, p. 43; Schwerdtfeger 2012, p. 42.

## References

- Beutelspacher, Albrecht; Rosenbaum, Ute (1998),
*Projective Geometry / From Foundations to Applications*, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-48364-6 - Blair, David E. (2000),
*Inversion Theory and Conformal Mapping*, Student mathematical library,**9**, American Mathematical Society, ISBN 9780821826362 - Blaschke, Wilhelm (1948),
*Projective Geometrie*, Wolfenbütteler Verlagsanstalt - Casse, Rey (2006),
*Projective Geometry / An Introduction*, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199298860 - Morley, Frank; Morley, F.V. (1933),
*Inversive Geometry*, London: G. Bell and Sons - Schwerdtfeger, Hans (2012),
*Geometry of Complex Numbers*, Courier Dover Publications, ISBN 9780486135861 - Yale, Paul B. (2004) [first published 1968],
*Geometry and Symmetry*, Dover, ISBN 0-486-43835-X