Cell nucleus

In cell biology, the nucleus (pl. nuclei; from Latin nucleus or nuculeus, meaning kernel or seed) is a membrane-bound organelle found in eukaryotic cells. Eukaryotes usually have a single nucleus, but a few cell types, such as mammalian red blood cells, have no nuclei, and a few others including osteoclasts have many.

Cell biology
The animal cell

The cell nucleus contains all of the cell's genome, except for a small fraction of mitochondrial DNA, organized as multiple long linear DNA molecules in a complex with a large variety of proteins, such as histones, to form chromosomes. The genes within these chromosomes are structured in such a way to promote cell function. The nucleus maintains the integrity of genes and controls the activities of the cell by regulating gene expression—the nucleus is, therefore, the control center of the cell. The main structures making up the nucleus are the nuclear envelope, a double membrane that encloses the entire organelle and isolates its contents from the cellular cytoplasm, and the nuclear matrix (which includes the nuclear lamina), a network within the nucleus that adds mechanical support, much like the cytoskeleton, which supports the cell as a whole.

Because the nuclear envelope is impermeable to large molecules, nuclear pores are required to regulate nuclear transport of molecules across the envelope. The pores cross both nuclear membranes, providing a channel through which larger molecules must be actively transported by carrier proteins while allowing free movement of small molecules and ions. Movement of large molecules such as proteins and RNA through the pores is required for both gene expression and the maintenance of chromosomes. Although the interior of the nucleus does not contain any membrane-bound subcompartments, its contents are not uniform, and a number of nuclear bodies exist, made up of unique proteins, RNA molecules, and particular parts of the chromosomes. The best-known of these is the nucleolus, which is mainly involved in the assembly of ribosomes. After being produced in the nucleolus, ribosomes are exported to the cytoplasm where they translate mRNA.


The nucleus was the first organelle to be discovered. What is most likely the oldest preserved drawing dates back to the early microscopist Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723). He observed a "lumen", the nucleus, in the red blood cells of salmon.[1] Unlike mammalian red blood cells, those of other vertebrates still contain nuclei.

The nucleus was also described by Franz Bauer in 1804[2] and in more detail in 1831 by Scottish botanist Robert Brown in a talk at the Linnean Society of London. Brown was studying orchids under the microscope when he observed an opaque area, which he called the "areola" or "nucleus", in the cells of the flower's outer layer.[3]

He did not suggest a potential function. In 1838, Matthias Schleiden proposed that the nucleus plays a role in generating cells, thus he introduced the name "cytoblast" (cell builder). He believed that he had observed new cells assembling around "cytoblasts". Franz Meyen was a strong opponent of this view, having already described cells multiplying by division and believing that many cells would have no nuclei. The idea that cells can be generated de novo, by the "cytoblast" or otherwise, contradicted work by Robert Remak (1852) and Rudolf Virchow (1855) who decisively propagated the new paradigm that cells are generated solely by cells ("Omnis cellula e cellula"). The function of the nucleus remained unclear.[4]

Between 1877 and 1878, Oscar Hertwig published several studies on the fertilization of sea urchin eggs, showing that the nucleus of the sperm enters the oocyte and fuses with its nucleus. This was the first time it was suggested that an individual develops from a (single) nucleated cell. This was in contradiction to Ernst Haeckel's theory that the complete phylogeny of a species would be repeated during embryonic development, including generation of the first nucleated cell from a "monerula", a structureless mass of primordial protoplasm ("Urschleim"). Therefore, the necessity of the sperm nucleus for fertilization was discussed for quite some time. However, Hertwig confirmed his observation in other animal groups, including amphibians and molluscs. Eduard Strasburger produced the same results for plants in 1884. This paved the way to assign the nucleus an important role in heredity. In 1873, August Weismann postulated the equivalence of the maternal and paternal germ cells for heredity. The function of the nucleus as carrier of genetic information became clear only later, after mitosis was discovered and the Mendelian rules were rediscovered at the beginning of the 20th century; the chromosome theory of heredity was therefore developed.[4]


The nucleus is the largest organelle in animal cells.[5] In mammalian cells, the average diameter of the nucleus is approximately 6 micrometres (µm), which occupies about 10% of the total cell volume.[6] The contents of the nucleus are held in the nucleoplasm similar to the cytoplasm in the rest of the cell. The fluid component of this is termed the nucleosol, similar to the cytosol in the cytoplasm.[7]

In most types of granulocyte, a white blood cell, the nucleus is lobated and can be bi-lobed, tri-lobed or multi-lobed.

Nuclear envelope and pores

The nuclear envelope, otherwise known as nuclear membrane, consists of two cellular membranes, an inner and an outer membrane, arranged parallel to one another and separated by 10 to 50 nanometres (nm). The nuclear envelope completely encloses the nucleus and separates the cell's genetic material from the surrounding cytoplasm, serving as a barrier to prevent macromolecules from diffusing freely between the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm.[8] The outer nuclear membrane is continuous with the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), and is similarly studded with ribosomes.[8] The space between the membranes is called the perinuclear space and is continuous with the RER lumen.

Nuclear pores, which provide aqueous channels through the envelope, are composed of multiple proteins, collectively referred to as nucleoporins. The pores are about 125 million daltons in molecular weight and consist of around 50 (in yeast) to several hundred proteins (in vertebrates).[5] The pores are 100 nm in total diameter; however, the gap through which molecules freely diffuse is only about 9 nm wide, due to the presence of regulatory systems within the center of the pore. This size selectively allows the passage of small water-soluble molecules while preventing larger molecules, such as nucleic acids and larger proteins, from inappropriately entering or exiting the nucleus. These large molecules must be actively transported into the nucleus instead. The nucleus of a typical mammalian cell will have about 3000 to 4000 pores throughout its envelope,[9] each of which contains an eightfold-symmetric ring-shaped structure at a position where the inner and outer membranes fuse.[10] Attached to the ring is a structure called the nuclear basket that extends into the nucleoplasm, and a series of filamentous extensions that reach into the cytoplasm. Both structures serve to mediate binding to nuclear transport proteins.[5]

Most proteins, ribosomal subunits, and some DNAs are transported through the pore complexes in a process mediated by a family of transport factors known as karyopherins. Those karyopherins that mediate movement into the nucleus are also called importins, whereas those that mediate movement out of the nucleus are called exportins. Most karyopherins interact directly with their cargo, although some use adaptor proteins.[11] Steroid hormones such as cortisol and aldosterone, as well as other small lipid-soluble molecules involved in intercellular signaling, can diffuse through the cell membrane and into the cytoplasm, where they bind nuclear receptor proteins that are trafficked into the nucleus. There they serve as transcription factors when bound to their ligand; in the absence of a ligand, many such receptors function as histone deacetylases that repress gene expression.[5]

Nuclear lamina

In animal cells, two networks of intermediate filaments provide the nucleus with mechanical support: The nuclear lamina forms an organized meshwork on the internal face of the envelope, while less organized support is provided on the cytosolic face of the envelope. Both systems provide structural support for the nuclear envelope and anchoring sites for chromosomes and nuclear pores.[12]

The nuclear lamina is composed mostly of lamin proteins. Like all proteins, lamins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and later transported to the nucleus interior, where they are assembled before being incorporated into the existing network of nuclear lamina.[13][14] Lamins found on the cytosolic face of the membrane, such as emerin and nesprin, bind to the cytoskeleton to provide structural support. Lamins are also found inside the nucleoplasm where they form another regular structure, known as the nucleoplasmic veil,[15] that is visible using fluorescence microscopy. The actual function of the veil is not clear, although it is excluded from the nucleolus and is present during interphase.[16] Lamin structures that make up the veil, such as LEM3, bind chromatin and disrupting their structure inhibits transcription of protein-coding genes.[17]

Like the components of other intermediate filaments, the lamin monomer contains an alpha-helical domain used by two monomers to coil around each other, forming a dimer structure called a coiled coil. Two of these dimer structures then join side by side, in an antiparallel arrangement, to form a tetramer called a protofilament. Eight of these protofilaments form a lateral arrangement that is twisted to form a ropelike filament. These filaments can be assembled or disassembled in a dynamic manner, meaning that changes in the length of the filament depend on the competing rates of filament addition and removal.[12]

Mutations in lamin genes leading to defects in filament assembly cause a group of rare genetic disorders known as laminopathies. The most notable laminopathy is the family of diseases known as progeria, which causes the appearance of premature aging in its sufferers. The exact mechanism by which the associated biochemical changes give rise to the aged phenotype is not well understood.[18]


The cell nucleus contains the majority of the cell's genetic material in the form of multiple linear DNA molecules organized into structures called chromosomes. Each human cell contains roughly two meters of DNA. During most of the cell cycle these are organized in a DNA-protein complex known as chromatin, and during cell division the chromatin can be seen to form the well-defined chromosomes familiar from a karyotype. A small fraction of the cell's genes are located instead in the mitochondria.

There are two types of chromatin. Euchromatin is the less compact DNA form, and contains genes that are frequently expressed by the cell.[19] The other type, heterochromatin, is the more compact form, and contains DNA that is infrequently transcribed. This structure is further categorized into facultative heterochromatin, consisting of genes that are organized as heterochromatin only in certain cell types or at certain stages of development, and constitutive heterochromatin that consists of chromosome structural components such as telomeres and centromeres.[20] During interphase the chromatin organizes itself into discrete individual patches,[21] called chromosome territories.[22] Active genes, which are generally found in the euchromatic region of the chromosome, tend to be located towards the chromosome's territory boundary.[23]

Antibodies to certain types of chromatin organization, in particular, nucleosomes, have been associated with a number of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus.[24] These are known as anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and have also been observed in concert with multiple sclerosis as part of general immune system dysfunction.[25] As in the case of progeria, the role played by the antibodies in inducing the symptoms of autoimmune diseases is not obvious.


The nucleolus is the largest of the discrete densely stained, membraneless structures known as nuclear bodies found in the nucleus. It forms around tandem repeats of rDNA, DNA coding for ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These regions are called nucleolar organizer regions (NOR). The main roles of the nucleolus are to synthesize rRNA and assemble ribosomes. The structural cohesion of the nucleolus depends on its activity, as ribosomal assembly in the nucleolus results in the transient association of nucleolar components, facilitating further ribosomal assembly, and hence further association. This model is supported by observations that inactivation of rDNA results in intermingling of nucleolar structures.[26]

In the first step of ribosome assembly, a protein called RNA polymerase I transcribes rDNA, which forms a large pre-rRNA precursor. This is cleaved into the subunits 5.8S, 18S, and 28S rRNA.[27] The transcription, post-transcriptional processing, and assembly of rRNA occurs in the nucleolus, aided by small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) molecules, some of which are derived from spliced introns from messenger RNAs encoding genes related to ribosomal function. The assembled ribosomal subunits are the largest structures passed through the nuclear pores.[5]

When observed under the electron microscope, the nucleolus can be seen to consist of three distinguishable regions: the innermost fibrillar centers (FCs), surrounded by the dense fibrillar component (DFC) (that contains fibrillarin and nucleolin), which in turn is bordered by the granular component (GC) (that contains the protein nucleophosmin). Transcription of the rDNA occurs either in the FC or at the FC-DFC boundary, and, therefore, when rDNA transcription in the cell is increased, more FCs are detected. Most of the cleavage and modification of rRNAs occurs in the DFC, while the latter steps involving protein assembly onto the ribosomal subunits occur in the GC.[27]

Other nuclear bodies

Subnuclear structure sizes
Structure name Structure diameter
Cajal bodies0.2–2.0 µm[28]
Clastosomes 0.2-0.5 µm [29]
PIKA5 µm[30]
PML bodies0.2–1.0 µm[31]
Paraspeckles0.5–1.0 µm[32]
Speckles20–25 nm[30]

Besides the nucleolus, the nucleus contains a number of other nuclear bodies. These include Cajal bodies, gemini of Cajal bodies, polymorphic interphase karyosomal association (PIKA), promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) bodies, paraspeckles, and splicing speckles. Although little is known about a number of these domains, they are significant in that they show that the nucleoplasm is not a uniform mixture, but rather contains organized functional subdomains.[31]

Other subnuclear structures appear as part of abnormal disease processes. For example, the presence of small intranuclear rods has been reported in some cases of nemaline myopathy. This condition typically results from mutations in actin, and the rods themselves consist of mutant actin as well as other cytoskeletal proteins.[33]

Cajal bodies and gems

A nucleus typically contains between 1 and 10 compact structures called Cajal bodies or coiled bodies (CB), whose diameter measures between 0.2 µm and 2.0 µm depending on the cell type and species.[28] When seen under an electron microscope, they resemble balls of tangled thread[30] and are dense foci of distribution for the protein coilin.[34] CBs are involved in a number of different roles relating to RNA processing, specifically small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA) maturation, and histone mRNA modification.[28]

Similar to Cajal bodies are Gemini of Cajal bodies, or gems, whose name is derived from the Gemini constellation in reference to their close "twin" relationship with CBs. Gems are similar in size and shape to CBs, and in fact are virtually indistinguishable under the microscope.[34] Unlike CBs, gems do not contain small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), but do contain a protein called survival of motor neuron (SMN) whose function relates to snRNP biogenesis. Gems are believed to assist CBs in snRNP biogenesis,[35] though it has also been suggested from microscopy evidence that CBs and gems are different manifestations of the same structure.[34] Later ultrastructural studies have shown gems to be twins of Cajal bodies with the difference being in the coilin component; Cajal bodies are SMN positive and coilin positive, and gems are SMN positive and coilin negative.[36]

PIKA and PTF domains

PIKA domains, or polymorphic interphase karyosomal associations, were first described in microscopy studies in 1991. Their function remains unclear, though they were not thought to be associated with active DNA replication, transcription, or RNA processing.[37] They have been found to often associate with discrete domains defined by dense localization of the transcription factor PTF, which promotes transcription of small nuclear RNA (snRNA).[38]

PML bodies

Promyelocytic leukemia bodies (PML bodies) are spherical bodies found scattered throughout the nucleoplasm, measuring around 0.1–1.0 µm. They are known by a number of other names, including nuclear domain 10 (ND10), Kremer bodies, and PML oncogenic domains.[39] PML bodies are named after one of their major components, the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML). They are often seen in the nucleus in association with Cajal bodies and cleavage bodies.[31] Pml-/- mice, which are unable to create PML bodies, develop normally without obvious ill effects, showing that PML bodies are not required for most essential biological processes.[40]

Splicing speckles

Speckles are subnuclear structures that are enriched in pre-messenger RNA splicing factors and are located in the interchromatin regions of the nucleoplasm of mammalian cells. At the fluorescence-microscope level they appear as irregular, punctate structures, which vary in size and shape, and when examined by electron microscopy they are seen as clusters of interchromatin granules. Speckles are dynamic structures, and both their protein and RNA-protein components can cycle continuously between speckles and other nuclear locations, including active transcription sites. Studies on the composition, structure and behaviour of speckles have provided a model for understanding the functional compartmentalization of the nucleus and the organization of the gene-expression machinery[41] splicing snRNPs[42][43] and other splicing proteins necessary for pre-mRNA processing.[41] Because of a cell's changing requirements, the composition and location of these bodies changes according to mRNA transcription and regulation via phosphorylation of specific proteins.[44] The splicing speckles are also known as nuclear speckles (nuclear specks), splicing factor compartments (SF compartments), interchromatin granule clusters (IGCs), and B snurposomes.[45] B snurposomes are found in the amphibian oocyte nuclei and in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. B snurposomes appear alone or attached to the Cajal bodies in the electron micrographs of the amphibian nuclei.[46] IGCs function as storage sites for the splicing factors.[47]


Discovered by Fox et al. in 2002, paraspeckles are irregularly shaped compartments in the interchromatin space of the nucleus.[48] First documented in HeLa cells, where there are generally 10–30 per nucleus,[49] paraspeckles are now known to also exist in all human primary cells, transformed cell lines, and tissue sections.[50] Their name is derived from their distribution in the nucleus; the "para" is short for parallel and the "speckles" refers to the splicing speckles to which they are always in close proximity.[49]

Paraspeckles are dynamic structures that are altered in response to changes in cellular metabolic activity. They are transcription dependent[48] and in the absence of RNA Pol II transcription, the paraspeckle disappears and all of its associated protein components (PSP1, p54nrb, PSP2, CFI(m)68, and PSF) form a crescent shaped perinucleolar cap in the nucleolus. This phenomenon is demonstrated during the cell cycle. In the cell cycle, paraspeckles are present during interphase and during all of mitosis except for telophase. During telophase, when the two daughter nuclei are formed, there is no RNA Pol II transcription so the protein components instead form a perinucleolar cap.[50]

Perichromatin fibrils

Perichromatin fibrils are visible only under electron microscope. They are located next to the transcriptionally active chromatin and are hypothesized to be the sites of active pre-mRNA processing.[47]


Clastosomes are small nuclear bodies (0.2–0.5 µm) described as having a thick ring-shape due to the peripheral capsule around these bodies.[29] This name is derived from the Greek klastos, broken and soma, body.[29] Clastosomes are not typically present in normal cells, making them hard to detect. They form under high proteolytic conditions within the nucleus and degrade once there is a decrease in activity or if cells are treated with proteasome inhibitors.[29][51] The scarcity of clastosomes in cells indicates that they are not required for proteasome function.[52] Osmotic stress has also been shown to cause the formation of clastosomes.[53] These nuclear bodies contain catalytic and regulatory sub-units of the proteasome and its substrates, indicating that clastosomes are sites for degrading proteins.[52]

Fougaro System

The fougaro system (Greek; Fougaro, chimney) is a sub-organelle system in the nucleus that may be a mechanism to recycle or remove molecules from the cell to the external medium. The molecules or peptides are ubiquitinated before being released from the nucleus of the cells. The ubiquitinated molecules are released independently or associated with endosomal proteins such as Beclin[54][55]


The nucleus provides a site for genetic transcription that is segregated from the location of translation in the cytoplasm, allowing levels of gene regulation that are not available to prokaryotes. The main function of the cell nucleus is to control gene expression and mediate the replication of DNA during the cell cycle.

The nucleus is an organelle found in eukaryotic cells. Inside its fully enclosed nuclear membrane, it contains the majority of the cell's genetic material. This material is organized as DNA molecules, along with a variety of proteins, to form chromosomes.

Cell compartmentalization

The nuclear envelope allows the nucleus to control its contents, and separate them from the rest of the cytoplasm where necessary. This is important for controlling processes on either side of the nuclear membrane. In most cases where a cytoplasmic process needs to be restricted, a key participant is removed to the nucleus, where it interacts with transcription factors to downregulate the production of certain enzymes in the pathway. This regulatory mechanism occurs in the case of glycolysis, a cellular pathway for breaking down glucose to produce energy. Hexokinase is an enzyme responsible for the first the step of glycolysis, forming glucose-6-phosphate from glucose. At high concentrations of fructose-6-phosphate, a molecule made later from glucose-6-phosphate, a regulator protein removes hexokinase to the nucleus,[56] where it forms a transcriptional repressor complex with nuclear proteins to reduce the expression of genes involved in glycolysis.[57]

In order to control which genes are being transcribed, the cell separates some transcription factor proteins responsible for regulating gene expression from physical access to the DNA until they are activated by other signaling pathways. This prevents even low levels of inappropriate gene expression. For example, in the case of NF-κB-controlled genes, which are involved in most inflammatory responses, transcription is induced in response to a signal pathway such as that initiated by the signaling molecule TNF-α, binds to a cell membrane receptor, resulting in the recruitment of signalling proteins, and eventually activating the transcription factor NF-κB. A nuclear localisation signal on the NF-κB protein allows it to be transported through the nuclear pore and into the nucleus, where it stimulates the transcription of the target genes.[12]

The compartmentalization allows the cell to prevent translation of unspliced mRNA.[58] Eukaryotic mRNA contains introns that must be removed before being translated to produce functional proteins. The splicing is done inside the nucleus before the mRNA can be accessed by ribosomes for translation. Without the nucleus, ribosomes would translate newly transcribed (unprocessed) mRNA, resulting in malformed and nonfunctional proteins.

Gene expression

Gene expression first involves transcription, in which DNA is used as a template to produce RNA. In the case of genes encoding proteins, that RNA produced from this process is messenger RNA (mRNA), which then needs to be translated by ribosomes to form a protein. As ribosomes are located outside the nucleus, mRNA produced needs to be exported.[59]

Since the nucleus is the site of transcription, it also contains a variety of proteins that either directly mediate transcription or are involved in regulating the process. These proteins include helicases, which unwind the double-stranded DNA molecule to facilitate access to it, RNA polymerases, which bind to the DNA promoter to synthesize the growing RNA molecule, topoisomerases, which change the amount of supercoiling in DNA, helping it wind and unwind, as well as a large variety of transcription factors that regulate expression.[60]

Processing of pre-mRNA

Newly synthesized mRNA molecules are known as primary transcripts or pre-mRNA. They must undergo post-transcriptional modification in the nucleus before being exported to the cytoplasm; mRNA that appears in the cytoplasm without these modifications is degraded rather than used for protein translation. The three main modifications are 5' capping, 3' polyadenylation, and RNA splicing. While in the nucleus, pre-mRNA is associated with a variety of proteins in complexes known as heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particles (hnRNPs). Addition of the 5' cap occurs co-transcriptionally and is the first step in post-transcriptional modification. The 3' poly-adenine tail is only added after transcription is complete.

RNA splicing, carried out by a complex called the spliceosome, is the process by which introns, or regions of DNA that do not code for protein, are removed from the pre-mRNA and the remaining exons connected to re-form a single continuous molecule. This process normally occurs after 5' capping and 3' polyadenylation but can begin before synthesis is complete in transcripts with many exons.[5] Many pre-mRNAs, including those encoding antibodies, can be spliced in multiple ways to produce different mature mRNAs that encode different protein sequences. This process is known as alternative splicing, and allows production of a large variety of proteins from a limited amount of DNA.

Dynamics and regulation

Nuclear transport

The entry and exit of large molecules from the nucleus is tightly controlled by the nuclear pore complexes. Although small molecules can enter the nucleus without regulation,[61] macromolecules such as RNA and proteins require association karyopherins called importins to enter the nucleus and exportins to exit. "Cargo" proteins that must be translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus contain short amino acid sequences known as nuclear localization signals, which are bound by importins, while those transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm carry nuclear export signals bound by exportins. The ability of importins and exportins to transport their cargo is regulated by GTPases, enzymes that hydrolyze the molecule guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to release energy. The key GTPase in nuclear transport is Ran, which can bind either GTP or GDP (guanosine diphosphate), depending on whether it is located in the nucleus or the cytoplasm. Whereas importins depend on RanGTP to dissociate from their cargo, exportins require RanGTP in order to bind to their cargo.[11]

Nuclear import depends on the importin binding its cargo in the cytoplasm and carrying it through the nuclear pore into the nucleus. Inside the nucleus, RanGTP acts to separate the cargo from the importin, allowing the importin to exit the nucleus and be reused. Nuclear export is similar, as the exportin binds the cargo inside the nucleus in a process facilitated by RanGTP, exits through the nuclear pore, and separates from its cargo in the cytoplasm.

Specialized export proteins exist for translocation of mature mRNA and tRNA to the cytoplasm after post-transcriptional modification is complete. This quality-control mechanism is important due to these molecules' central role in protein translation. Mis-expression of a protein due to incomplete excision of exons or mis-incorporation of amino acids could have negative consequences for the cell; thus, incompletely modified RNA that reaches the cytoplasm is degraded rather than used in translation.[5]

Assembly and disassembly

During its lifetime, a nucleus may be broken down or destroyed, either in the process of cell division or as a consequence of apoptosis (the process of programmed cell death). During these events, the structural components of the nucleus — the envelope and lamina — can be systematically degraded. In most cells, the disassembly of the nuclear envelope marks the end of the prophase of mitosis. However, this disassembly of the nucleus is not a universal feature of mitosis and does not occur in all cells. Some unicellular eukaryotes (e.g., yeasts) undergo so-called closed mitosis, in which the nuclear envelope remains intact. In closed mitosis, the daughter chromosomes migrate to opposite poles of the nucleus, which then divides in two. The cells of higher eukaryotes, however, usually undergo open mitosis, which is characterized by breakdown of the nuclear envelope. The daughter chromosomes then migrate to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle, and new nuclei reassemble around them.

At a certain point during the cell cycle in open mitosis, the cell divides to form two cells. In order for this process to be possible, each of the new daughter cells must have a full set of genes, a process requiring replication of the chromosomes as well as segregation of the separate sets. This occurs by the replicated chromosomes, the sister chromatids, attaching to microtubules, which in turn are attached to different centrosomes. The sister chromatids can then be pulled to separate locations in the cell. In many cells, the centrosome is located in the cytoplasm, outside the nucleus; the microtubules would be unable to attach to the chromatids in the presence of the nuclear envelope.[62] Therefore, the early stages in the cell cycle, beginning in prophase and until around prometaphase, the nuclear membrane is dismantled.[15] Likewise, during the same period, the nuclear lamina is also disassembled, a process regulated by phosphorylation of the lamins by protein kinases such as the CDC2 protein kinase.[63] Towards the end of the cell cycle, the nuclear membrane is reformed, and around the same time, the nuclear lamina are reassembled by dephosphorylating the lamins.[63]

However, in dinoflagellates, the nuclear envelope remains intact, the centrosomes are located in the cytoplasm, and the microtubules come in contact with chromosomes, whose centromeric regions are incorporated into the nuclear envelope (the so-called closed mitosis with extranuclear spindle). In many other protists (e.g., ciliates, sporozoans) and fungi, the centrosomes are intranuclear, and their nuclear envelope also does not disassemble during cell division.

Apoptosis is a controlled process in which the cell's structural components are destroyed, resulting in death of the cell. Changes associated with apoptosis directly affect the nucleus and its contents, for example, in the condensation of chromatin and the disintegration of the nuclear envelope and lamina. The destruction of the lamin networks is controlled by specialized apoptotic proteases called caspases, which cleave the lamin proteins and, thus, degrade the nucleus' structural integrity. Lamin cleavage is sometimes used as a laboratory indicator of caspase activity in assays for early apoptotic activity.[15] Cells that express mutant caspase-resistant lamins are deficient in nuclear changes related to apoptosis, suggesting that lamins play a role in initiating the events that lead to apoptotic degradation of the nucleus.[15] Inhibition of lamin assembly itself is an inducer of apoptosis.[64]

The nuclear envelope acts as a barrier that prevents both DNA and RNA viruses from entering the nucleus. Some viruses require access to proteins inside the nucleus in order to replicate and/or assemble. DNA viruses, such as herpesvirus replicate and assemble in the cell nucleus, and exit by budding through the inner nuclear membrane. This process is accompanied by disassembly of the lamina on the nuclear face of the inner membrane.[15]

Initially, it has been suspected that immunoglobulins in general and autoantibodies in particular do not enter the nucleus. Now there is a body of evidence that under pathological conditions (e.g. lupus erythematosus) IgG can enter the nucleus.[65]

Nuclei per cell

Most eukaryotic cell types usually have a single nucleus, but some have no nuclei, while others have several. This can result from normal development, as in the maturation of mammalian red blood cells, or from faulty cell division.

Anucleated cells

An anucleated cell contains no nucleus and is, therefore, incapable of dividing to produce daughter cells. The best-known anucleated cell is the mammalian red blood cell, or erythrocyte, which also lacks other organelles such as mitochondria, and serves primarily as a transport vessel to ferry oxygen from the lungs to the body's tissues. Erythrocytes mature through erythropoiesis in the bone marrow, where they lose their nuclei, organelles, and ribosomes. The nucleus is expelled during the process of differentiation from an erythroblast to a reticulocyte, which is the immediate precursor of the mature erythrocyte.[66] The presence of mutagens may induce the release of some immature "micronucleated" erythrocytes into the bloodstream.[67][68] Anucleated cells can also arise from flawed cell division in which one daughter lacks a nucleus and the other has two nuclei.

In flowering plants, this condition occurs in sieve tube elements.

Multinucleated cells

Multinucleated cells contain multiple nuclei. Most acantharean species of protozoa[69] and some fungi in mycorrhizae[70] have naturally multinucleated cells. Other examples include the intestinal parasites in the genus Giardia, which have two nuclei per cell.[71] In humans, skeletal muscle cells, called myocytes and syncytium, become multinucleated during development; the resulting arrangement of nuclei near the periphery of the cells allows maximal intracellular space for myofibrils.[5] Other multinucleate cells in the human are osteoclasts a type of bone cell. Multinucleated and binucleated cells can also be abnormal in humans; for example, cells arising from the fusion of monocytes and macrophages, known as giant multinucleated cells, sometimes accompany inflammation[72] and are also implicated in tumor formation.[73]

A number of dinoflagellates are known to have two nuclei.[74] Unlike other multinucleated cells these nuclei contain two distinct lineages of DNA: one from the dinoflagellate and the other from a symbiotic diatom. The mitochondria and the plastids of the diatom somehow remain functional.


As the major defining characteristic of the eukaryotic cell, the nucleus' evolutionary origin has been the subject of much speculation. Four major hypotheses have been proposed to explain the existence of the nucleus, although none have yet earned widespread support.[75]

The first model known as the "syntrophic model" proposes that a symbiotic relationship between the archaea and bacteria created the nucleus-containing eukaryotic cell. (Organisms of the Archaea and Bacteria domain have no cell nucleus.[76]) It is hypothesized that the symbiosis originated when ancient archaea, similar to modern methanogenic archaea, invaded and lived within bacteria similar to modern myxobacteria, eventually forming the early nucleus. This theory is analogous to the accepted theory for the origin of eukaryotic mitochondria and chloroplasts, which are thought to have developed from a similar endosymbiotic relationship between proto-eukaryotes and aerobic bacteria.[77] The archaeal origin of the nucleus is supported by observations that archaea and eukarya have similar genes for certain proteins, including histones. Observations that myxobacteria are motile, can form multicellular complexes, and possess kinases and G proteins similar to eukarya, support a bacterial origin for the eukaryotic cell.[78]

A second model proposes that proto-eukaryotic cells evolved from bacteria without an endosymbiotic stage. This model is based on the existence of modern planctomycetes bacteria that possess a nuclear structure with primitive pores and other compartmentalized membrane structures.[79] A similar proposal states that a eukaryote-like cell, the chronocyte, evolved first and phagocytosed archaea and bacteria to generate the nucleus and the eukaryotic cell.[80]

The most controversial model, known as viral eukaryogenesis, posits that the membrane-bound nucleus, along with other eukaryotic features, originated from the infection of a prokaryote by a virus. The suggestion is based on similarities between eukaryotes and viruses such as linear DNA strands, mRNA capping, and tight binding to proteins (analogizing histones to viral envelopes). One version of the proposal suggests that the nucleus evolved in concert with phagocytosis to form an early cellular "predator".[81] Another variant proposes that eukaryotes originated from early archaea infected by poxviruses, on the basis of observed similarity between the DNA polymerases in modern poxviruses and eukaryotes.[82][83] It has been suggested that the unresolved question of the evolution of sex could be related to the viral eukaryogenesis hypothesis.[84]

A more recent proposal, the exomembrane hypothesis, suggests that the nucleus instead originated from a single ancestral cell that evolved a second exterior cell membrane; the interior membrane enclosing the original cell then became the nuclear membrane and evolved increasingly elaborate pore structures for passage of internally synthesized cellular components such as ribosomal subunits.[85]

See also


  1. Leeuwenhoek, A. van: Opera Omnia, seu Arcana Naturae ope exactissimorum Microscopiorum detecta, experimentis variis comprobata, Epistolis ad varios illustres viros. J. Arnold et Delphis, A. Beman, Lugdinum Batavorum 1719–1730. Cited after: Dieter Gerlach, Geschichte der Mikroskopie. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2009. ISBN 978-3-8171-1781-9.
  2. Harris H (1999). The Birth of the Cell. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07384-3.
  3. Brown R (1866). "On the Organs and Mode of Fecundation of Orchidex and Asclepiadea". Miscellaneous Botanical Works I: 511–514.
  4. Cremer T (1985). Von der Zellenlehre zur Chromosomentheorie. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-13987-4. Online Version here
  5. Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipursky SL, Darnell J (2004). Molecular Cell Biology (5th ed.). New York: WH Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-2672-2.
  6. Alberts, B (2002). Molecular biology of the cell (4th ed.). Garland Science. p. 197. ISBN 978-0815340720.
  7. Clegg JS (February 1984). "Properties and metabolism of the aqueous cytoplasm and its boundaries". The American Journal of Physiology. 246 (2 Pt 2): R133–51. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.2.R133. PMID 6364846.
  8. Paine PL, Moore LC, Horowitz SB (March 1975). "Nuclear envelope permeability". Nature. 254 (5496): 109–14. doi:10.1038/254109a0. PMID 1117994.
  9. Rodney Rhoades; Richard Pflanzer, eds. (1996). "Ch3". Human Physiology (3rd ed.). Saunders College Publishing.
  10. Shulga N, Mosammaparast N, Wozniak R, Goldfarb DS (May 2000). "Yeast nucleoporins involved in passive nuclear envelope permeability". The Journal of Cell Biology. 149 (5): 1027–38. doi:10.1083/jcb.149.5.1027. PMC 2174828. PMID 10831607.
  11. Pemberton LF, Paschal BM (March 2005). "Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export". Traffic. 6 (3): 187–98. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00270.x. PMID 15702987.
  12. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P, eds. (2002). "Chapter 4". Molecular Biology of the Cell (4th ed.). Garland Science. pp. 191–234.
  13. Stuurman N, Heins S, Aebi U (1998). "Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions". Journal of Structural Biology. 122 (1–2): 42–66. doi:10.1006/jsbi.1998.3987. PMID 9724605.
  14. Goldman AE, Moir RD, Montag-Lowy M, Stewart M, Goldman RD (November 1992). "Pathway of incorporation of microinjected lamin A into the nuclear envelope". The Journal of Cell Biology. 119 (4): 725–35. doi:10.1083/jcb.119.4.725. PMC 2289687. PMID 1429833.
  15. Goldman RD, Gruenbaum Y, Moir RD, Shumaker DK, Spann TP (March 2002). "Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture". Genes & Development. 16 (5): 533–47. doi:10.1101/gad.960502. PMID 11877373.
  16. Moir RD, Yoon M, Khuon S, Goldman RD (December 2000). "Nuclear lamins A and B1: different pathways of assembly during nuclear envelope formation in living cells". The Journal of Cell Biology. 151 (6): 1155–68. doi:10.1083/jcb.151.6.1155. PMC 2190592. PMID 11121432.
  17. Spann TP, Goldman AE, Wang C, Huang S, Goldman RD (February 2002). "Alteration of nuclear lamin organization inhibits RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription". The Journal of Cell Biology. 156 (4): 603–8. doi:10.1083/jcb.200112047. PMC 2174089. PMID 11854306.
  18. Mounkes LC, Stewart CL (June 2004). "Aging and nuclear organization: lamins and progeria". Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 16 (3): 322–7. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.009. PMID 15145358.
  19. Ehrenhofer-Murray AE (June 2004). "Chromatin dynamics at DNA replication, transcription and repair". European Journal of Biochemistry. 271 (12): 2335–49. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04162.x. PMID 15182349.
  20. Grigoryev SA, Bulynko YA, Popova EY (2006). "The end adjusts the means: heterochromatin remodelling during terminal cell differentiation". Chromosome Research. 14 (1): 53–69. doi:10.1007/s10577-005-1021-6. PMID 16506096.
  21. Schardin M, Cremer T, Hager HD, Lang M (December 1985). "Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories" (PDF). Human Genetics. 71 (4): 281–7. doi:10.1007/BF00388452. PMID 2416668.
  22. Lamond AI, Earnshaw WC (April 1998). "Structure and function in the nucleus". Science. 280 (5363): 547–53. doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.547. PMID 9554838.
  23. Kurz A, Lampel S, Nickolenko JE, Bradl J, Benner A, Zirbel RM, Cremer T, Lichter P (December 1996). "Active and inactive genes localize preferentially in the periphery of chromosome territories". The Journal of Cell Biology. 135 (5): 1195–205. doi:10.1083/jcb.135.5.1195. PMC 2121085. PMID 8947544. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007.
  24. Rothfield NF, Stollar BD (November 1967). "The relation of immunoglobulin class, pattern of anti-nuclear antibody, and complement-fixing antibodies to DNA in sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 46 (11): 1785–94. doi:10.1172/JCI105669. PMC 292929. PMID 4168731.
  25. Barned S, Goodman AD, Mattson DH (February 1995). "Frequency of anti-nuclear antibodies in multiple sclerosis". Neurology. 45 (2): 384–5. doi:10.1212/WNL.45.2.384. PMID 7854544.
  26. Hernandez-Verdun D (January 2006). "Nucleolus: from structure to dynamics". Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 125 (1–2): 127–37. doi:10.1007/s00418-005-0046-4. PMID 16328431.
  27. Lamond AI, Sleeman JE (October 2003). "Nuclear substructure and dynamics". Current Biology. 13 (21): R825–8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.012. PMID 14588256.
  28. Cioce M, Lamond AI (2005). "Cajal bodies: a long history of discovery". Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 21: 105–31. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.103738. PMID 16212489.
  29. Lafarga M, Berciano MT, Pena E, Mayo I, Castaño JG, Bohmann D, Rodrigues JP, Tavanez JP, Carmo-Fonseca M (August 2002). "Clastosome: a subtype of nuclear body enriched in 19S and 20S proteasomes, ubiquitin, and protein substrates of proteasome". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 13 (8): 2771–82. CiteSeerX doi:10.1091/mbc.e02-03-0122. PMC 117941. PMID 12181345.
  30. Pollard TD, Earnshaw WC (2004). Cell Biology. Philadelphia: Saunders. ISBN 978-0-7216-3360-2.
  31. Dundr M, Misteli T (June 2001). "Functional architecture in the cell nucleus". The Biochemical Journal. 356 (Pt 2): 297–310. doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3560297. PMC 1221839. PMID 11368755.
  32. Bond CS, Fox AH (September 2009). "Paraspeckles: nuclear bodies built on long noncoding RNA". The Journal of Cell Biology. 186 (5): 637–44. doi:10.1083/jcb.200906113. PMC 2742191. PMID 19720872.
  33. Goebel HH, Warlo I (January 1997). "Nemaline myopathy with intranuclear rods--intranuclear rod myopathy". Neuromuscular Disorders. 7 (1): 13–9. doi:10.1016/S0960-8966(96)00404-X. PMID 9132135.
  34. Matera AG, Frey MR (August 1998). "Coiled bodies and gems: Janus or gemini?". American Journal of Human Genetics. 63 (2): 317–21. doi:10.1086/301992. PMC 1377332. PMID 9683623.
  35. Matera AG (August 1998). "Of coiled bodies, gems, and salmon". Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 70 (2): 181–92. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(19980801)70:2<181::aid-jcb4>3.0.co;2-k. PMID 9671224.
  36. Navascues J, Berciano MT, Tucker KE, Lafarga M, Matera AG (June 2004). "Targeting SMN to Cajal bodies and nuclear gems during neuritogenesis". Chromosoma. 112 (8): 398–409. doi:10.1007/s00412-004-0285-5. PMC 1592132. PMID 15164213.
  37. Saunders WS, Cooke CA, Earnshaw WC (November 1991). "Compartmentalization within the nucleus: discovery of a novel subnuclear region". The Journal of Cell Biology. 115 (4): 919–31. doi:10.1083/jcb.115.4.919. PMC 2289954. PMID 1955462.
  38. Pombo A, Cuello P, Schul W, Yoon JB, Roeder RG, Cook PR, Murphy S (March 1998). "Regional and temporal specialization in the nucleus: a transcriptionally-active nuclear domain rich in PTF, Oct1 and PIKA antigens associates with specific chromosomes early in the cell cycle". The EMBO Journal. 17 (6): 1768–78. doi:10.1093/emboj/17.6.1768. PMC 1170524. PMID 9501098.
  39. Zimber A, Nguyen QD, Gespach C (October 2004). "Nuclear bodies and compartments: functional roles and cellular signalling in health and disease". Cellular Signalling. 16 (10): 1085–104. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.03.020. PMID 15240004.
  40. Lallemand-Breitenbach V, de Thé H (May 2010). "PML nuclear bodies". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2 (5): a000661. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000661. PMC 2857171. PMID 20452955.
  41. Lamond AI, Spector DL (August 2003). "Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles". Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 4 (8): 605–12. doi:10.1038/nrm1172. PMID 12923522.
  42. Tripathi K, Parnaik VK (September 2008). "Differential dynamics of splicing factor SC35 during the cell cycle" (PDF). Journal of Biosciences. 33 (3): 345–54. doi:10.1007/s12038-008-0054-3. PMID 19005234. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 November 2011.
  43. Tripathi K, Parnaik VK (September 2008). "Differential dynamics of splicing factor SC35 during the cell cycle". Journal of Biosciences. 33 (3): 345–54. doi:10.1007/s12038-008-0054-3. PMID 19005234.
  44. Handwerger KE, Gall JG (January 2006). "Subnuclear organelles: new insights into form and function". Trends in Cell Biology. 16 (1): 19–26. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2005.11.005. PMID 16325406.
  45. "Cellular component Nucleus speckle". UniProt: UniProtKB. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
  46. Gall JG, Bellini M, Wu Z, Murphy C (December 1999). "Assembly of the nuclear transcription and processing machinery: Cajal bodies (coiled bodies) and transcriptosomes". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 10 (12): 4385–402. doi:10.1091/mbc.10.12.4385. PMC 25765. PMID 10588665.
  47. Matera AG, Terns RM, Terns MP (March 2007). "Non-coding RNAs: lessons from the small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs". Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 8 (3): 209–20. doi:10.1038/nrm2124. PMID 17318225.
  48. Fox AH, Lam YW, Leung AK, Lyon CE, Andersen J, Mann M, Lamond AI (January 2002). "Paraspeckles: a novel nuclear domain". Current Biology. 12 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00632-7. PMID 11790299.
  49. Fox A, Bickmore W (2004). "Nuclear Compartments: Paraspeckles". Nuclear Protein Database. Archived from the original on 10 September 2008. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  50. Fox AH, Bond CS, Lamond AI (November 2005). "P54nrb forms a heterodimer with PSP1 that localizes to paraspeckles in an RNA-dependent manner". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 16 (11): 5304–15. doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0587. PMC 1266428. PMID 16148043.
  51. Kong XN, Yan HX, Chen L, Dong LW, Yang W, Liu Q, Yu LX, Huang DD, Liu SQ, Liu H, Wu MC, Wang HY (October 2007). "LPS-induced down-regulation of signal regulatory protein {alpha} contributes to innate immune activation in macrophages". The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 204 (11): 2719–31. doi:10.1084/jem.20062611. PMC 2118489. PMID 17954568.
  52. Carmo-Fonseca M, Berciano MT, Lafarga M (September 2010). "Orphan nuclear bodies". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2 (9): a000703. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000703. PMC 2926751. PMID 20610547.
  53. Sampuda KM, Riley M, Boyd L (April 2017). "Stress induced nuclear granules form in response to accumulation of misfolded proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans". BMC Cell Biology. 18 (1): 18. doi:10.1186/s12860-017-0136-x. PMC 5395811. PMID 28424053.
  54. Thomas S, Hoxha K, Alexander W, Gilligan J, Dilbarova R, Whittaker K, Kossenkov A, Prendergast GC, Mullin JM. J Cell Biochem. 2019 Mar; 120(3):4225-4237
  55. Thomas S, Hoxha K, Tran A, Prendergast GC. (2019) J. Cell. Biochem 120:18320-18331
  56. Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (2000). Lehninger principles of biochemistry (3rd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. ISBN 978-1-57259-931-4.
  57. Moreno F, Ahuatzi D, Riera A, Palomino CA, Herrero P (February 2005). "Glucose sensing through the Hxk2-dependent signalling pathway". Biochemical Society Transactions. 33 (Pt 1): 265–8. doi:10.1042/BST0330265. PMID 15667322.
  58. Görlich D, Kutay U (1999). "Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm". Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 15 (1): 607–60. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.607. PMID 10611974.
  59. Nierhaus KH, Wilson DN (2004). Protein Synthesis and Ribosome Structure: Translating the Genome. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-30638-1.
  60. Nicolini CA (1997). Genome Structure and Function: From Chromosomes Characterization to Genes Technology. Springer. ISBN 978-0-7923-4565-7.
  61. Watson JD, Baker TA, Bell SP, Gann A, Levine M, Losick R (2004). "Ch9–10". Molecular Biology of the Gene (5th ed.). Peason Benjamin Cummings; CSHL Press. ISBN 978-0-8053-9603-4.
  62. Lippincott-Schwartz J (March 2002). "Cell biology: ripping up the nuclear envelope". Nature. 416 (6876): 31–2. doi:10.1038/416031a. PMID 11882878.
  63. Boulikas T (1995). "Phosphorylation of transcription factors and control of the cell cycle". Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. 5 (1): 1–77. PMID 7549180.
  64. Steen RL, Collas P (April 2001). "Mistargeting of B-type lamins at the end of mitosis: implications on cell survival and regulation of lamins A/C expression". The Journal of Cell Biology. 153 (3): 621–6. doi:10.1083/jcb.153.3.621. PMC 2190567. PMID 11331311.
  65. Böhm I. IgG deposits can be detected in cell nuclei of patients with both lupus erythematosus and malignancy. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26(11) 1877–1882
  66. Skutelsky E, Danon D (June 1970). "Comparative study of nuclear expulsion from the late erythroblast and cytokinesis". Experimental Cell Research. 60 (3): 427–36. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(70)90536-7. PMID 5422968.
  67. Torous DK, Dertinger SD, Hall NE, Tometsko CR (February 2000). "Enumeration of micronucleated reticulocytes in rat peripheral blood: a flow cytometric study". Mutation Research. 465 (1–2): 91–9. doi:10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00216-8. PMID 10708974.
  68. Hutter KJ, Stöhr M (1982). "Rapid detection of mutagen induced micronucleated erythrocytes by flow cytometry". Histochemistry. 75 (3): 353–62. doi:10.1007/bf00496738. PMID 7141888.
  69. Zettler LA, Sogin ML, Caron DA (October 1997). "Phylogenetic relationships between the Acantharea and the Polycystinea: a molecular perspective on Haeckel's Radiolaria". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 94 (21): 11411–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.21.11411. PMC 23483. PMID 9326623.
  70. Horton TR (2006). "The number of nuclei in basidiospores of 63 species of ectomycorrhizal Homobasidiomycetes". Mycologia. 98 (2): 233–8. doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.2.233. PMID 16894968.
  71. Adam RD (December 1991). "The biology of Giardia spp". Microbiological Reviews. 55 (4): 706–32. PMC 372844. PMID 1779932.
  72. McInnes A, Rennick DM (February 1988). "Interleukin 4 induces cultured monocytes/macrophages to form giant multinucleated cells". The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 167 (2): 598–611. doi:10.1084/jem.167.2.598. PMC 2188835. PMID 3258008.
  73. Goldring SR, Roelke MS, Petrison KK, Bhan AK (February 1987). "Human giant cell tumors of bone identification and characterization of cell types". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 79 (2): 483–91. doi:10.1172/JCI112838. PMC 424109. PMID 3027126.
  74. Imanian B, Pombert JF, Dorrell RG, Burki F, Keeling PJ (2012). "Tertiary endosymbiosis in two dinotoms has generated little change in the mitochondrial genomes of their dinoflagellate hosts and diatom endosymbionts". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e43763. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...743763I. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043763. PMC 3423374. PMID 22916303.
  75. Pennisi E (August 2004). "Evolutionary biology. The birth of the nucleus". Science. 305 (5685): 766–8. doi:10.1126/science.305.5685.766. PMID 15297641.
  76. C.Michael Hogan. 2010. Archaea. eds. E.Monosson & C.Cleveland, Encyclopedia of Earth. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington DC. Archived 11 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  77. Margulis L (1981). Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company. pp. 206–227. ISBN 978-0-7167-1256-5.
  78. López-García P, Moreira D (May 2006). "Selective forces for the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus". BioEssays. 28 (5): 525–33. doi:10.1002/bies.20413. PMID 16615090.
  79. Fuerst JA (2005). "Intracellular compartmentation in planctomycetes". Annual Review of Microbiology. 59: 299–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121258. PMID 15910279.
  80. Hartman H, Fedorov A (February 2002). "The origin of the eukaryotic cell: a genomic investigation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99 (3): 1420–5. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.1420H. doi:10.1073/pnas.032658599. PMC 122206. PMID 11805300.
  81. Bell PJ (September 2001). "Viral eukaryogenesis: was the ancestor of the nucleus a complex DNA virus?". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 53 (3): 251–6. Bibcode:2001JMolE..53..251L. doi:10.1007/s002390010215. PMID 11523012.
  82. Takemura M (May 2001). "Poxviruses and the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 52 (5): 419–25. Bibcode:2001JMolE..52..419T. doi:10.1007/s002390010171. PMID 11443345.
  83. Villarreal LP, DeFilippis VR (August 2000). "A hypothesis for DNA viruses as the origin of eukaryotic replication proteins". Journal of Virology. 74 (15): 7079–84. doi:10.1128/JVI.74.15.7079-7084.2000. PMC 112226. PMID 10888648.
  84. Bell PJ (November 2006). "Sex and the eukaryotic cell cycle is consistent with a viral ancestry for the eukaryotic nucleus". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 243 (1): 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.015. PMID 16846615.
  85. de Roos AD (2006). "The origin of the eukaryotic cell based on conservation of existing interfaces". Artificial Life. 12 (4): 513–23. doi:10.1162/artl.2006.12.4.513. PMID 16953783.

Further reading

  • Goldman RD, Gruenbaum Y, Moir RD, Shumaker DK, Spann TP (March 2002). "Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture". Genes & Development. 16 (5): 533–47. doi:10.1101/gad.960502. PMID 11877373.
A review article about nuclear lamins, explaining their structure and various roles
A review article about nuclear transport, explains the principles of the mechanism, and the various transport pathways
A review article about the nucleus, explaining the structure of chromosomes within the organelle, and describing the nucleolus and other subnuclear bodies
A review article about the evolution of the nucleus, explaining a number of different theories
  • Pollard TD, Earnshaw WC (2004). Cell Biology. Philadelphia: Saunders. ISBN 978-0-7216-3360-2.
A university level textbook focusing on cell biology. Contains information on nucleus structure and function, including nuclear transport, and subnuclear domains

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.