Brownian model of financial markets
The Brownian motion models for financial markets are based on the work of Robert C. Merton and Paul A. Samuelson, as extensions to the one-period market models of Harold Markowitz and William F. Sharpe, and are concerned with defining the concepts of financial assets and markets, portfolios, gains and wealth in terms of continuous-time stochastic processes.
Under this model, these assets have continuous prices evolving continuously in time and are driven by Brownian motion processes. This model requires an assumption of perfectly divisible assets and a frictionless market (i.e. that no transaction costs occur either for buying or selling). Another assumption is that asset prices have no jumps, that is there are no surprises in the market. This last assumption is removed in jump diffusion models.
Financial market processes
A financial market is defined as that satisfies the following:
- A probability space .
- A time interval .
- A -dimensional Brownian process where adapted to the augmented filtration .
- A measurable risk-free money market rate process .
- A measurable mean rate of return process .
- A measurable dividend rate of return process .
- A measurable volatility process , such that .
- A measurable, finite variation, singularly continuous stochastic .
- The initial conditions given by .
The augmented filtration
The difference between and is that the latter is both left-continuous, in the sense that:
and right-continuous, such that:
A share of a bond (money market) has price at time with , is continuous, adapted, and has finite variation. Because it has finite variation, it can be decomposed into an absolutely continuous part and a singularly continuous part , by Lebesgue's decomposition theorem. Define:
resulting in the SDE:
Thus, it can be easily seen that if is absolutely continuous (i.e. ), then the price of the bond evolves like the value of a risk-free savings account with instantaneous interest rate , which is random, time-dependent and measurable.
Stock prices are modeled as being similar to that of bonds, except with a randomly fluctuating component (called its volatility). As a premium for the risk originating from these random fluctuations, the mean rate of return of a stock is higher than that of a bond.
Let be the strictly positive prices per share of the stocks, which are continuous stochastic processes satisfying:
Here, gives the volatility of the -th stock, while is its mean rate of return.
In order for an arbitrage-free pricing scenario, must be as defined above. The solution to this is:
and the discounted stock prices are:
Note that the contribution due to the discontinuities in the bond price does not appear in this equation.
Each stock may have an associated dividend rate process giving the rate of dividend payment per unit price of the stock at time . Accounting for this in the model, gives the yield process :
Portfolio and gain processes
Consider a financial market .
A portfolio process for this market is an measurable, valued process such that:
- , almost surely, and
- , almost surely.
The gains process for this portfolio is:
We say that the portfolio is self-financed if:
It turns out that for a self-financed portfolio, the appropriate value of is determined from and therefore sometimes is referred to as the portfolio process. Also, implies borrowing money from the money-market, while implies taking a short position on the stock.
The term in the SDE of is the risk premium process, and it is the compensation received in return for investing in the -th stock.
Consider time intervals , and let be the number of shares of asset , held in a portfolio during time interval at time . To avoid the case of insider trading (i.e. foreknowledge of the future), it is required that is measurable.
Therefore, the incremental gains at each trading interval from such a portfolio is:
and is the total gain over time , while the total value of the portfolio is .
Define , let the time partition go to zero, and substitute for as defined earlier, to get the corresponding SDE for the gains process. Here denotes the dollar amount invested in asset at time , not the number of shares held.
Income and wealth processes
Given a financial market , then a cumulative income process is a semimartingale and represents the income accumulated over time , due to sources other than the investments in the assets of the financial market.
A wealth process is then defined as:
and represents the total wealth of an investor at time . The portfolio is said to be -financed if:
The corresponding SDE for the wealth process, through appropriate substitutions, becomes:
Note, that again in this case, the value of can be determined from .
The standard theory of mathematical finance is restricted to viable financial markets, i.e. those in which there are no opportunities for arbitrage. If such opportunities exists, it implies the possibility of making an arbitrarily large risk-free profit.
In a financial market , a self-financed portfolio process is considered to be an arbitrage opportunity if the associated gains process , almost surely and strictly. A market in which no such portfolio exists is said to be viable.
In a viable market , there exists a adapted process such that for almost every :
This is called the market price of risk and relates the premium for the -the stock with its volatility .
Conversely, if there exists a D-dimensional process such that it satisfies the above requirement, and:
then the market is viable.
Also, a viable market can have only one money-market (bond) and hence only one risk-free rate. Therefore, if the -th stock entails no risk (i.e. ) and pays no dividend (i.e.), then its rate of return is equal to the money market rate (i.e. ) and its price tracks that of the bond (i.e. ).
Standard financial market
A financial market is said to be standard if:
- (i) It is viable.
- (ii) The number of stocks is not greater than the dimension of the underlying Brownian motion process .
- (iii) The market price of risk process satisfies:
- , almost surely.
- (iv) The positive process is a martingale.
In case the number of stocks is greater than the dimension , in violation of point (ii), from linear algebra, it can be seen that there are stocks whose volatilies (given by the vector ) are linear combination of the volatilities of other stocks (because the rank of is ). Therefore, the stocks can be replaced by equivalent mutual funds.
The standard martingale measure on for the standard market, is defined as:
is a -dimensional Brownian motion process on the filtration with respect to .
Complete financial markets
A complete financial market is one that allows effective hedging of the risk inherent in any investment strategy.
Let be a standard financial market, and be an -measurable random variable, such that:
The market is said to be complete if every such is financeable, i.e. if there is an -financed portfolio process , such that its associated wealth process satisfies
- , almost surely.
If a particular investment strategy calls for a payment at time , the amount of which is unknown at time , then a conservative strategy would be to set aside an amount in order to cover the payment. However, in a complete market it is possible to set aside less capital (viz. ) and invest it so that at time it has grown to match the size of .
A standard financial market is complete if and only if , and the volalatily process is non-singular for almost every , with respect to the Lebesgue measure.
Karatzas, Ioannis; Shreve, Steven E. (1998). Methods of mathematical finance. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-94839-2.
Korn, Ralf; Korn, Elke (2001). Option pricing and portfolio optimization: modern methods of financial mathematics. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 0-8218-2123-7.
Merton, R. C. (1 August 1969). "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: the Continuous-Time Case". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 51 (3): 247–257. doi:10.2307/1926560. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926560.
Merton, R.C. (1970). "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model" (PDF). Journal of Economic Theory. 3 (4): 373–413. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-x. Retrieved 2009-05-29.