Associative property
In mathematics, the associative property[1] is a property of some binary operations. In propositional logic, associativity is a valid rule of replacement for expressions in logical proofs.
Transformation rules 

Propositional calculus 
Rules of inference 
Rules of replacement 
Predicate logic 
Within an expression containing two or more occurrences in a row of the same associative operator, the order in which the operations are performed does not matter as long as the sequence of the operands is not changed. That is, (after rewriting the expression with parentheses and in infix notation if necessary) rearranging the parentheses in such an expression will not change its value. Consider the following equations:
Even though the parentheses were rearranged on each line, the values of the expressions were not altered. Since this holds true when performing addition and multiplication on any real numbers, it can be said that "addition and multiplication of real numbers are associative operations".
Associativity is not the same as commutativity, which addresses whether or not the order of two operands changes the result. For example, the order does not matter in the multiplication of real numbers, that is, a × b = b × a, so we say that the multiplication of real numbers is a commutative operation.
Associative operations are abundant in mathematics; in fact, many algebraic structures (such as semigroups and categories) explicitly require their binary operations to be associative.
However, many important and interesting operations are nonassociative; some examples include subtraction, exponentiation, and the vector cross product. In contrast to the theoretical properties of real numbers, the addition of floating point numbers in computer science is not associative, and the choice of how to associate an expression can have a significant effect on rounding error.
Definition
Formally, a binary operation ∗ on a set S is called associative if it satisfies the associative law:
 (x ∗ y) ∗ z = x ∗ (y ∗ z) for all x, y, z in S.
Here, ∗ is used to replace the symbol of the operation, which may be any symbol, and even the absence of symbol (juxtaposition) as for multiplication.
 (xy)z = x(yz) = xyz for all x, y, z in S.
The associative law can also be expressed in functional notation thus: f(f(x, y), z) = f(x, f(y, z)).
Generalized associative law
If a binary operation is associative, repeated application of the operation produces the same result regardless of how valid pairs of parentheses are inserted in the expression.[2] This is called the generalized associative law. For instance, a product of four elements may be written, without changing the order of the factors, in five possible ways:
If the product operation is associative, the generalized associative law says that all these formulas will yield the same result. So unless the formula with omitted parentheses already has a different meaning (see below), the parentheses can be considered unnecessary and "the" product can be written unambiguously as
As the number of elements increases, the number of possible ways to insert parentheses grows quickly, but they remain unnecessary for disambiguation.
An example where this does not work is the logical biconditional . It is associative, thus A(BC) is equivalent to (AB)C, but ABC most commonly means (AB and BC), which is not equivalent.
Examples
Some examples of associative operations include the following.
 The concatenation of the three strings
"hello"
," "
,"world"
can be computed by concatenating the first two strings (giving"hello "
) and appending the third string ("world"
), or by joining the second and third string (giving" world"
) and concatenating the first string ("hello"
) with the result. The two methods produce the same result; string concatenation is associative (but not commutative).  In arithmetic, addition and multiplication of real numbers are associative; i.e.,
 Because of associativity, the grouping parentheses can be omitted without ambiguity.
 The trivial operation x ∗ y = x (that is, the result is the first argument, no matter what the second argument is) is associative but not commutative. Likewise, the trivial operation x ∘ y = y (that is, the result is the second argument, no matter what the first argument is) is associative but not commutative.
 Addition and multiplication of complex numbers and quaternions are associative. Addition of octonions is also associative, but multiplication of octonions is nonassociative.
 The greatest common divisor and least common multiple functions act associatively.
 Taking the intersection or the union of sets:
 If M is some set and S denotes the set of all functions from M to M, then the operation of function composition on S is associative:
 Slightly more generally, given four sets M, N, P and Q, with h: M to N, g: N to P, and f: P to Q, then
 as before. In short, composition of maps is always associative.
 Consider a set with three elements, A, B, and C. The following operation:
× A B C A A A A B A B C C A A A
 is associative. Thus, for example, A(BC)=(AB)C = A. This operation is not commutative.
 Because matrices represent linear functions, and matrix multiplication represents function composition, one can immediately conclude that matrix multiplication is associative.[3]
Propositional logic
Rule of replacement
In standard truthfunctional propositional logic, association,[4][5] or associativity[6] are two valid rules of replacement. The rules allow one to move parentheses in logical expressions in logical proofs. The rules (using logical connectives notation) are:
and
where "" is a metalogical symbol representing "can be replaced in a proof with."
Truth functional connectives
Associativity is a property of some logical connectives of truthfunctional propositional logic. The following logical equivalences demonstrate that associativity is a property of particular connectives. The following are truthfunctional tautologies.[7]
Associativity of disjunction:
Associativity of conjunction:
Associativity of equivalence:
Joint denial is an example of a truth functional connective that is not associative.
Nonassociative operation
A binary operation on a set S that does not satisfy the associative law is called nonassociative. Symbolically,
For such an operation the order of evaluation does matter. For example:
Also note that infinite sums are not generally associative, for example:
whereas
The study of nonassociative structures arises from reasons somewhat different from the mainstream of classical algebra. One area within nonassociative algebra that has grown very large is that of Lie algebras. There the associative law is replaced by the Jacobi identity. Lie algebras abstract the essential nature of infinitesimal transformations, and have become ubiquitous in mathematics.
There are other specific types of nonassociative structures that have been studied in depth; these tend to come from some specific applications or areas such as combinatorial mathematics. Other examples are quasigroup, quasifield, nonassociative ring, nonassociative algebra and commutative nonassociative magmas.
Nonassociativity of floating point calculation
In mathematics, addition and multiplication of real numbers is associative. By contrast, in computer science, the addition and multiplication of floating point numbers is not associative, as rounding errors are introduced when dissimilarsized values are joined together.[8]
To illustrate this, consider a floating point representation with a 4bit mantissa:
(1.000_{2}×2^{0} +
1.000_{2}×2^{0}) +
1.000_{2}×2^{4} =
1.000_{2}×2^{1} +
1.000_{2}×2^{4} =
1.001_{2}×2^{4}
1.000_{2}×2^{0} +
(1.000_{2}×2^{0} +
1.000_{2}×2^{4}) =
1.000_{2}×2^{0} +
1.000_{2}×2^{4} =
1.000_{2}×2^{4}
Even though most computers compute with a 24 or 53 bits of mantissa,[9] this is an important source of rounding error, and approaches such as the Kahan summation algorithm are ways to minimise the errors. It can be especially problematic in parallel computing.[10][11]
Notation for nonassociative operations
In general, parentheses must be used to indicate the order of evaluation if a nonassociative operation appears more than once in an expression (unless the notation specifies the order in another way, like ). However, mathematicians agree on a particular order of evaluation for several common nonassociative operations. This is simply a notational convention to avoid parentheses.
A leftassociative operation is a nonassociative operation that is conventionally evaluated from left to right, i.e.,
while a rightassociative operation is conventionally evaluated from right to left:
Both leftassociative and rightassociative operations occur. Leftassociative operations include the following:
 Function application:
 This notation can be motivated by the currying isomorphism.
Rightassociative operations include the following:
 Exponentiation of real numbers in superscript notation:
 Exponentiation is commonly used with brackets or rightassociatively because a repeated leftassociative exponentiation operation is of little use. Repeated powers would mostly be rewritten with multiplication:
 Formatted correctly, the superscript inherently behaves as a set of parentheses; e.g. in the expression the addition is performed before the exponentiation despite there being no explicit parentheses wrapped around it. Thus given an expression such as , the full exponent of the base is evaluated first. However, in some contexts, especially in handwriting, the difference between , and can be hard to see. In such a case, rightassociativity is usually implied.
 Using rightassociative notation for these operations can be motivated by the Curry–Howard correspondence and by the currying isomorphism.
Nonassociative operations for which no conventional evaluation order is defined include the following.
 Exponentiation of real numbers in infix notation:[17]
 usw.
 Taking the cross product of three vectors:
 Taking the pairwise average of real numbers:
 Taking the relative complement of sets is not the same as . (Compare material nonimplication in logic.)
Antiassociativity
A binary operation ∘ on S is an antiassociative operation if and only if:
 ∀x,y,z∈S:(x∘y)∘z≠x∘(y∘z)[18]
Let (S,∘) be an algebraic strcuture.
Then (S,∘) is an antiassociative structure if and only if ∘ is an antiassociative operation.
That is, if and only if:
 ∀x,y,z∈S:(x∘y)∘z≠x∘(y∘z)[19]
See also
Look up associative property in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. 
 Light's associativity test
 Telescoping series, the use of addition associativity for cancelling terms in an infinite series
 A semigroup is a set with an associative binary operation.
 Commutativity and distributivity are two other frequently discussed properties of binary operations.
 Power associativity, alternativity, flexibility and Nary associativity are weak forms of associativity.
 Moufang identities also provide a weak form of associativity.
References

Hungerford, Thomas W. (1974). Algebra (1st ed.). Springer. p. 24. ISBN 9780387905181.
Definition 1.1 (i) a(bc) = (ab)c for all a, b, c in G.
 Durbin, John R. (1992). Modern Algebra: an Introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. p. 78. ISBN 9780471510017.
If are elements of a set with an associative operation, then the product is unambiguous; this is, the same element will be obtained regardless of how parentheses are inserted in the product
 "Matrix product associativity". Khan Academy. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
 Moore and Parker
 Copi and Cohen
 Hurley
 "Symbolic Logic Proof of Associativity". Math.stackexchange.com. 22 March 2017.
 Knuth, Donald, The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 3, section 4.2.2
 IEEE Computer Society (29 August 2008). IEEE Standard for FloatingPoint Arithmetic. IEEE. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2008.4610935. ISBN 9780738157535. IEEE Std 7542008.
 Villa, Oreste; Chavarríamir, Daniel; Gurumoorthi, Vidhya; Márquez, Andrés; Krishnamoorthy, Sriram, Effects of FloatingPoint nonAssociativity on Numerical Computations on Massively Multithreaded Systems (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2013, retrieved 8 April 2014
 Goldberg, David (March 1991). "What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About FloatingPoint Arithmetic" (PDF). ACM Computing Surveys. 23 (1): 5–48. doi:10.1145/103162.103163. Retrieved 20 January 2016. (, )
 George Mark Bergman: Order of arithmetic operations
 Education Place: The Order of Operations
 Khan Academy: The Order of Operations, timestamp 5m40s
 Virginia Department of Education: Using Order of Operations and Exploring Properties, section 9
 Bronstein: de:Taschenbuch der Mathematik, pages 115120, chapter: 2.4.1.1, ISBN 9783808556733
 Exponentiation Associativity and Standard Math Notation Codeplea. 23 August 2016. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
 Definition:Antiassociative Operation
 Definition:Antiassociative_Structure