42nd Street Shuttle

The 42nd Street Shuttle[2] is a New York City Subway shuttle train service that operates in Manhattan. The shuttle is sometimes referred to as the Grand Central/Times Square Shuttle, since these are the only two stations it serves. The shuttle runs at all times except late nights, with trains running on three tracks underneath 42nd Street between Times Square and Grand Central. With two stations, it is the shortest regular service in the system by number of stops, running about 2,402 feet (732 m) in 90 seconds.[3] The shuttle is used by over 100,000 passengers every day, and by up to 10,200 passengers per hour during rush hours.[4]

42nd Street Shuttle
42nd Street Shuttle train of three ad-wrapped R62As at Grand Central.
Northern endTimes Square
Southern endGrand Central
Rolling stock10 R62As (3 trains)[1]
(Rolling stock assignments subject to change)
DepotLivonia Yard
Started serviceAugust 1, 1918 (1918-08-01)
IRT 42nd Street Line
TypeRapid transit
SystemNew York City Subway
LocaleMidtown Manhattan
TerminiTimes Square
Grand Central
Daily ridership100,000
OpenedOctober 27, 1904
OwnerCity of New York
Operator(s)New York City Transit Authority
Rolling stockR62A
Line length0.44 miles (0.71 km)
Number of tracks3 (formerly 4)
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8 12 in)
Electrification625V DC third rail
Route map

Times Square
Grand Central

The 42nd Street Shuttle was constructed and operated by the Interborough Rapid Transit Company (IRT), and is currently part of the A Division of New York City Transit. The tracks that it uses opened in 1904 as part of the first subway in the city. The original subway line ran north from City Hall on what is now the IRT Lexington Avenue Line to 42nd Street, from where it turned west to run across 42nd Street. Then, at Broadway, the line turned north to 145th Street on what is now the IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line. This operation continued until 1918, when construction on the Lexington Avenue Line north of 42nd Street, and on the Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line south of 42nd Street was completed. One trunk would run via the new Lexington Avenue Line down Park Avenue, and the other trunk would run via the new Seventh Avenue Line up Broadway. The section in the middle, via 42nd Street, was converted into shuttle operation.

Over the years, various attempts to convert or replace the shuttle have failed. A 1960s attempt to use automatic train operation on one of the shuttle's trains ended in a fire in 1964. A major reconstruction of the shuttle is set to take place between 2019 and 2022. The reconstruction would allow trains to be lengthened while also expanding both shuttle stations' capacity, and would bring the shuttle into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

In order to distinguish it from the other shuttles in the system, NYCT Rapid Transit Operations internally refers to it as the 0 (zero).[lower-alpha 1] Its route bullet is colored dark gray on route signs, station signs, and rolling stock with the letter "S" on the official subway map.


Creation and early years

The subway through which the shuttle runs was opened on October 27, 1904 by the Interborough Rapid Transit Company (IRT), the first day of subway service in Manhattan.[6][7] The current shuttle line was part of the first IRT subway line, which ran north to 145th Street via Broadway and south to City Hall via Park Avenue and Lafayette Street. The 42nd Street section of the line connected Broadway at Times Square, on the west, to Park Avenue at Grand Central Terminal, on the east.[8]:243244 At the Times Square end of this segment, the line curved sharply to the north under One Times Square, swinging northeast under Seventh Avenue before shifting under Broadway.[9] The platforms at Times Square are located on this curve.[10] Like the rest of the Original Subway, the line was built with a vertical clearance of 13 feet (4.0 m), and a total width of 49 feet (15 m). The maximum grade of the line is 1.0 percent between Sixth Avenue and Broadway.[11]:2 In 1910, the platforms at the two stations were extended.[12]

In 1913, the IRT, the Brooklyn Rapid Transit, and the city agreed to the Dual System of Rapid Transit to expand the city's transportation.[13] As part of the agreement, the existing IRT subway would be split into two north-south lines and a shuttle along 42nd Street. The section of the line south of 42nd Street would be connected to a newly constructed line stretching from 41st Street and Park Avenue to the Bronx, running via Lexington Avenue, while the section of the line north of 42nd Street would be connected to a newly constructed line heading south under Seventh Avenue.[8]:222223 The section along 42nd Street was left as a shuttle to connect the new East Side and West Side Lines.[12]

The new Lexington Avenue route curved off of the old line at 41st Street and ran underneath private property to reach Lexington Avenue at 43rd Street with a new Grand Central station located in the diagonal segment. Since there was 400 feet between the eastern end of the original line's station and the new Lexington Avenue Line station, a new shuttle station was to be built near the Lexington Avenue Line station. The construction of the narrow island platform station required building two new trackways extending east under 42nd Street. The two-track layout was expected to provide ample capacity for the shuttle. On August 1, 1918, the Dual System's "H system" was put into service, with through trains over the IRT Lexington Avenue Line and IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line, and only shuttle trains under 42nd Street. The station was not ready in time, and therefore wooden flooring was temporarily laid over sections of the trackways at Times Square and Grand Central.[14] The shuttle was heavily used, and the crowding conditions were so bad that the shuttle was ordered closed the next day by the Public Service Commission.[15]

The new, unused trackways of the planned station were covered with flooring and turned into a passageway between the Shuttle and Lexington Avenue stations. The shuttle reopened on September 28, 1918, with improved passageways and platforms.[12][16] Track 2 at the Grand Central station was covered over by a wooden platform.[17] A New York Times columnist later said that former southbound express track 2 was still usable for the first few hours of the shuttle's operation, but the wooden platform was placed over that track later the same day to allow shuttles to use former northbound express track 3, due to high demand for the shuttles on the former local tracks, numbered 1 and 4.[18] On the walls of the stations, black bands (at Times Square) and green bands (at Grand Central) were painted to guide passengers to the shuttle platforms.[19] The shuttle was meant to be "temporary,"[7] and by 1922, there were proposals for the shuttle to be replaced by a moving sidewalk.[20]

On March 14, 1927, the extension of the IRT Flushing Line from Fifth Avenue to Times Square under 41st Street was completed and opened for operation. The extension was expected to significantly reduce overcrowding on the shuttle, and on its first night of operation, it reduced shuttle ridership by 50%. Crowding was expected to be reduced further as riders became familiar with the extension.[21] In 1921, of the 100,000 daily shuttle riders, 25,000 transferred to the Flushing Line (then called the Queensboro subway).[22] Originally, plans for the Flushing Line called for the use of two of the four tracks between Times Square and Grand Central for the new line, and the other two for shuttle service.[23]

Proposed improvements

Throughout the history of the shuttle there have been proposals to improve service on the line and to extend the line both to the east and to the west. However, it is not feasible to extend the line in either direction, as the line is at the same level as the tracks of the Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line and those of the Lexington Avenue Line.[24] There have been several proposals to replace the line with moving walkways or conveyor belts. In 1923, H.S. Putnam proposed to replace the shuttle with an endless moving platform system. There would have been three platforms with speeds of 3 miles per hour (4.8 km/h), 6 miles per hour (9.7 km/h) and 9 miles per hour (14 km/h). The fastest platform was to have been installed with seats. Even though the plan was supported by the Chief Engineer of the New York City Rapid Transit Commission, it was not adopted.[11]:12 In 1930, Charles E. Smith, vice president of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad, proposed allowing trains from the Broadway-Seventh Avenue and Lexington Avenue Lines to use the shuttle tracks for through service, as well as discontinuing shuttle service. This also was not carried out.[25]

On February 12, 1946, work began to double the width of the passageway connecting the shuttle platforms at Grand Central and the main mezzanine over the Lexington Avenue Line platforms. As part of the work, the wooden passenger walkway, which had an average width of 15 feet (4.6 m) was replaced by a 37 feet (11 m) wide passageway with concrete flooring. This walkway had been "temporary" when it was put into place in August 1918. The new 350 feet (110 m)-long passageway covered most of the trackways used by downtown trains of the Original Subway prior to 1918. The iron railings along the planked walkway were removed. The project cost $45,800 and was intended to ease congestion. As part of the project, the upper passageway was moved to within fare control to allow passengers to go between the subway mezzanine and the entrance to Grand Central Terminal at the shuttle without paying a fare. This was accomplished by moving the turnstiles at the eastern end of the passageway.[26] In March, members of the Metallic Lathers Union Local 46 sought to halt construction on the project, which was 80 percent complete, as the union objected to having the work done by city employees who made less than union workers.[27] The rebuilt passageway opened on March 18, 1946.[28]

On June 21, 1949, William Reid, the Chairman of the New York City Board of Transportation, announced that his capital budget request for 1950 would include $3,500,000 to improve the shuttle for the first time since it was created. As part of the project, double platforms would have been constructed at both ends of the shuttle, the abandoned Track 2 would have been removed, and switches would have been installed on Track 3 to allow trains to pull into either platform on either Track 1 or Track 3. In addition, the shuttle would have been extended 200 feet (61 m) to the east to shorten transfers to the Lexington Avenue Line. Chairman Reid also stated that he would look for ways to improve service for riders before any funding arrived, noting that a way was needed to get riders to the proper platform before the car doors closed. While there were lights giving the number of the platform for the next train, they did not give passengers enough time to get to the train before their doors closed.[29]

On October 28, 1953, the Transport Workers Union (TWU) asserted that it was impossible for its members to follow the schedule of the shuttle, which called for a train every two minutes during rush hours. Its president, Michael Quill, said that if the New York City Transit Authority took action against train crews skipping scheduled runs, there would be unrest among the TWU's members.[30]

Between 1948 and 1951, the Stephens–Adamson Manufacturing Company and the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company proposed that the shuttle be replaced by a pedestrian conveyor system called "Carveyor". The "Carveyor" would have consisted of a set of wheelless cars running on conveyor belts. They would have run slowly–at speeds of 1.5 miles per hour (2.4 km/h)–in stations and would have run more quickly–at speeds of 15 miles per hour (24 km/h)–between stations. 12 cars would move along the conveyor belt,[31][32] and each car would have held 12 seated and 5 standing passengers. The system was expected to travel between Grand Central and Times Square in 1 minute 15 seconds, and was expected to move 18,000 passengers per hour as opposed to the 12,000 that could be accommodated by the existing shuttle. This proposal was formally presented to the Board of Transportation in March 1951.[33] Even though New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) and the Board of Estimate approved the plan it was not completed due to union opposition and high cost.[11]:13

On April 21, 1953, Board of Transportation Chairman Sidney H. Bingham, announced that the installation of the conveyor-belt would cost $3,800,000 and could be completed in 18 months after funding was budgeted for the project. He hoped that the city and Federal Government would each foot 25% of the bill, with the remaining 50% to come from the State.[33] Funding for the project was included in the 1953 and 1954 capital budgets.[34] On October 19, 1954, the single bid for the project was submitted by Passenger Belt Conveyors, which was a subsidiary formed the previous month by Stephens-Adamson Corporation and Goodyear Tire. The project was expected to be completed in 550 days. The cost of the project was expected to increase to $5,500,000 to pay for additional structural changes needed for the new system.[35] On November 4, 1954, the $3,881,000 contract for a modified version of the plan was awarded. The New York Times lauded the plan, stating that "the Times Square-Grand Central subway shuttle was an atrocity from the beginning and has had no substantial improvement in a third of a century."[36] Bids on the structure to accommodate the conveyor-belt, which was expected to cost $1,100,000, were to be received on December 10, 1954.[37] The contract required the approval of the New York City Board of Estimate, but never received it. In May 1955, it was announced that the project was tabled for discussion for August 25 of that year at the request of City Controller Lawrence Gerosa, who considered the plan to be dangerous. He hoped to convince the Board of Estimate to scrap the project.[38] On September 15, 1955, the Chairman of the New York City Transit Authority, which had taken over operations of the Board of Transportation in June 1953, said that the allocation of funds for the project was questionable.[34] On October 20, 1955, the NYCTA told the Board of Estimate that it was rescinding its request for $4,991,000 to build the conveyor-belt. The plan was canceled due to its high cost.[7][39]

In 1954, NYCTA created a design concept to reconfiguring the shuttle onto a tangent alignment under 42nd Street. This design was never executed because of the significant impact it would have had on utilities and the street above, and because it would have required a full shutdown of the station.[40]

On August 16, 1954, a project to replace 1,000 incandescent bulbs with 2,200 feet (670 m) of new fluorescent lighting at Grand Central platform was completed. The new lighting fixtures replaced the green and red lines of light bulbs that had indicated the way to and from the shuttle, respectively, and lit up signs directing riders to the shuttle, with additional fixtures to direct riders from the shuttle to be installed in two weeks. In addition to replacing platform lighting, lighting was replaced to the mezzanine. This project, which cost $440,000, was the beginning of a program to improve lighting at old stations across the IRT system.[41]

1960s: Automation test

Testing and operation

As part of a demonstration for automation, Track 4 was briefly automated from 1962[42] to 1964.[43] It was the first automated service in the New York City subway system.[42] On January 26, 1959, the Chairman of the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), Charles Patterson announced that the NYCTA was exploring converting the shuttle to pilot automatic operation. If the pilot were successful, the rest of the system could be converted to automatic operation in phases. The automatic system would make use of existing tracks, platforms and rolling stock with minor modifications. The project would cost $1,000,000, and Patterson said that automating the shuttle would save $150,000 annually by reducing 25 train operators and conductors. If the whole system were automated, 90% of the 3,100 train operators, and 75% of the conductors and platform conductors could be eliminated.[44]

Starting in December 1959,[45] the fully automatic train, consisting of three cars, was tested on 2,700 feet (820 m) of one of the BMT Sea Beach Line express tracks (E4) between the 18th Avenue and New Utrecht Avenue stations.[46] The train was equipped with a telephone system to keep voice communication with human dispatchers at the two shuttle terminals. At each station there was a cabinet that housed 24 relay systems that made up electronic dispatchers. The relays controlled the train's starting, acceleration, braking, and stopping, as well as the opening and closing of the car doors. The relays were operated by electrical impulses initiated by a punched tape. At full speed, the train ran at 30 miles per hour (48 km/h), slowing to 5.5 miles per hour (8.9 km/h) when coming into the two stations. When entering stations, the train passed through a series of detectors, which caused a series of tripper arms at trackside to go into the open position if the train was going at the speed. If the train was going too quickly, the tripper arms would stay upright and the train's brakes would automatically be set.[47] The equipment was built and installed by the General Railway Signal Company and the Union Switch and Signal division of the Westinghouse Air Brake Company, after several years of research and development. The NYCTA contributed between $20,000 to $30,000 on the project, while the bulk of it, between $250,000 and $300,000, was contributed by the two companies. The automation of the shuttle was opposed by the president of the Transport Workers Union, Michael J. Quill, who pledged to fight the project and called the device "insane".[48] A June 1961 report from the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) mentioned the automatic train was planned to be placed into service that November.[49]

On February 29, 1960, the NYCTA began to test a new tie-less roadbed on Track 1, which had been installed since the previous Thursday. The experiment was intended to produce a smoother and more comfortable ride for commuters, in addition to lessening the effect of moisture and erosion. It was planned that if the test succeeded, the rest of the tracks in the subway system would be retrofitted in such a manner. The set-up included two parallel strips of concrete that would serve as the roadbed. Between them, flat-bottomed steel troughs were installed, cushioned by rubber. Inside the troughs, there were rubber tie plates spaced apart with flaps that encase the rail bottom. The rails were kept in place by lug bolts that were anchored in concrete. The third rail was also mounted on concrete. This differed from the normal roadbeds, which consisted of stone, with wooden ties set into it.[50] The ties, under damp conditions, would rot and the spikes would become loose, resulting in bumpy rides. This test replicated similar roadbeds in Toronto's subway system. In order to construct the new roadbed, Track 1 had to be closed.[51] From May 6 to June 5, 1961, Track 4 was closed for the installation of the same roadbed as was tested on Track 1.[52]

In the afternoon of January 4, 1962,[53] the three-car automated train began service, with a ceremony.[42] The trains carried a stand-by motorman during the six-month trial period. The train had scheduled to begin service on December 15, 1961, but Quill threatened to strike all city- and private-owned transit in the city if the train ran.[54] Under the new contract with the TWU, the NYCTA agreed to put a motorman in the train during the experimental period.[55] While in its experimental period, the automated train was only operating during rush hours.[56] In July, the test was extended for three more months, and in October the test was extended for six additional months.[57] The chairman of the NYCTA, Charles Patterson, was disappointed by the automated shuttle train, doubting that the train could be operated without any transit personnel on board. Initially, the automation of the shuttle was expected to save $150,000 a year in labor costs; however, with one employee still required on the train, there would essentially be no savings.[58] Tape recorded messages warned passengers that the doors of the train were closing.[59] If the test succeeded, it was planned to automate the IRT Flushing Line, the Franklin Avenue Shuttle, the Myrtle Avenue Elevated, the BMT Canarsie Line, and the Culver Shuttle.[44] However, the NYCTA did not have plans to automate the whole system.[60]


On April 16, 1964, an automated train derailed on the northernmost track east of Times Square during the morning rush hour, causing a short circuit, and thus, suspending service on all three tracks.[61]

A severe fire at the Grand Central station on April 21, 1964, destroyed the demonstration train and resulted in the subsequent restoration of manual operations.[7][43] The fire began under a shuttle train on track 3, and it became larger, feeding on the wooden platform. The train on Track 1 was saved when the motorman saw smoke, and reversed the train. The basements of nearby buildings were damaged.[17] Tracks 1 and 4 returned to service on April 23, 1964,[62] while Track 3 returned to service on June 1, 1964.[63] The reinstallation of Track 3 was delayed because of the need to replace 60 beams that were damaged in the fire.[64] Initially, a decision was not made concerning whether or not the automated shuttle train should be reintroduced.[65]

From September 19, 1966 to April 1967, service on the shuttle was limited in order to allow for the reconstruction of parts of the line. The entire project cost $419,000 and included the construction of a new mezzanine at Grand Central and the replacement of the wooden platform at Times Square with a new concrete one of 300 feet (91 m).[66] As part of the project, the tiles damaged by the smoke from the fire were replaced with tiles in the city's colors of blue, white and orange, with black tiles interspersed. In addition, fluorescent lighting, which was 12 times brighter than the old lighting, was installed.[67]


In 1978 the United States Department of Transportation undertook a study to analyze and determine the feasibility of installing an Accelerating Walkway System in an urban environment. The study used the 42nd Street Shuttle as a case study. The two options the study analyzed were a one-directional reversible linear walkway and a bi-directional loop. The study found that the walkways would provide a better level of service during off-peak hours and a similar level of service during peak hours. It was estimated that it would cost between $5.4 and $13 million to install the system.[11]:i

On October 3, 1987, ten R62s made their debut on the shuttle, replacing the R17s that previously ran on the shuttle. Later, these were replaced by R62As.[68]

On November 17, 1988, the NYCTA announced plans to drop $343 million of projects from its Capital Program, including $23 million allocated for the reconfiguration of the Shuttle. The shuttle would have been rebuilt with two tracks and the platforms at Times Square would have been moved closer to other subway lines. Work was to begin in 1991, but was deferred so it could be done in conjunction with other rehabilitation work at Times Square, which was delayed.[69]

The shuttle ran at all times until September 10, 1995, when night service was discontinued in order to avoid raising fares, meaning that late-night passengers had to use the 7 train.[70][71] New York City Transit had been expecting a $160 million surplus in 1995, but due to reductions in state and Federal contributions, it was left with a deficit expected to reach $172 million. The elimination of late night service was part of a larger plan to reduce spending in order to avert a fare increase, which Governor George Pataki and Mayor Rudy Giuliani had pressured the MTA to avoid.[72] Eliminating night service on the shuttle was done to avoid the need to reduce service on corridors without alternate service. Shuttle service had been running every ten minutes overnight, and was used by 275 passengers per hour.[73]

On February 28, 2005, a shuttle train crashed into the bumper block of Track 3 at Grand Central, injuring the train operator and hospitalizing two passengers.[3] The crash caused $100,000 in damage to the 4-car train. The New York State Public Transportation Safety Board's investigation into the collision concluded that the most likely cause of the accident was the train operator falling asleep while operating the train, which led to his overrunning the stop sign and colliding into the bumper block.[74]

Planned capital reconstruction


In 1998, MTA officials announced that the Times Square station would be renovated and that the entire complex would become compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The project was to be split into two phases, each lasting four years; the renovation of the 42nd Street Shuttle platforms would occur during the second phase of renovations.[75] However, the curved platforms at Times Square made it very difficult to convert to ADA standards, and the shuttle platform renovation project was delayed. Although planning was completed in 2006, the project was delayed due to a lack of funding.[76][77]

In 2014 and 2015, the MTA commissioned WSP to undertake constructibility and feasibility studies to increase capacity on the shuttle and to make it ADA-accessible in 2014 and 2015. NYCT called for a plan that would include a wider center platform to fit accommodate two six-car trains to the east of the existing station. WSP developed a plan that allowed the shuttle to be reconstructed without any need to excavate along 42nd Street.[78] The initial study, TO-1, only called for the elimination of 36 columns along platform edges to align with train doors, and for the elimination of 20 columns in the concourse area. This plan would have kept the remaining platform columns, which are located every five feet. NYCT considered using platform screen doors to separate trains from the platforms. NYCT then asked WSP to engage in a study, TO-3, to look into eliminating all platform edge columns while keeping the station open with minimal impacts.[40]

Funding and approval

Initially, $1 million in funding for a study to develop the requirements for a second program to automate the shuttle was included in the 2015–2019 MTA Capital Program. However, this study was removed from the program in the July 2017 amendment to the Capital Program.[79]

Funding for the renovation of the Times Square shuttle platforms and the reconfiguration of the shuttle was provided as part of the 2015–2019 MTA Capital Program. Improving access to Times Square will cost $28.93 million, while the reconfiguration project will cost $235.41 million. The contract for the construction of the project was originally scheduled to be awarded in June 2018. However, this was delayed by several months because of changes to the project schedule and cost. The construction duration was expected to be extended by three months, and the cost would increase by $25 million, because of additions to the original construction plan. A construction contract was awarded on March 7, 2019, with an estimated completion date of March 2022.[80][77] The project is expected to take three years to complete.[81] On August 2, 2019, the MTA announced that work on the project would begin on August 16.[82] Work on the project will be completed in multiple phases with only minor reductions in service.[83][84][85] As part of the first phase of the work, Track 1 would be taken out of service for two weeks until August 30.[86]


As part of the project, the 42nd Street Shuttle would become ADA-accessible, and the shuttle would be reconfigured from three to two tracks, with the center track, Track 3, to be removed.[87] As part of the project, train reliability will be improved with the installation of a new signal system,[81] replacing the existing system, which dates back to the 1930s.[83] The shuttle would be able to run six-car trains, compared to the two three-car trains used for Tracks 1 and 4, and the one four-car train currently in use on Track 3,[87] increasing capacity by 20%. Times Square and Grand Central stations will be reconfigured with wide island platforms, and access improvements will be completed at Times Square.[81] Certain features of the Times Square station would be repaired and restored,[87][88] and to increase capacity,[89] 122 five-foot spaced columns between the trackways and 11 mezzanine columns will be removed. These would be replaced by 45 new fifteen-foot spaced columns that are at least two feet away from the platform edges for safety and to provide space for tactile warning strips. These columns will be supported by 45 new foundations.[40][78] A display case or plaque describing the history of the station will be installed underneath the replicated Knickerbocker lintel.[87][88]

At Times Square, a new 28-foot-wide (8.5 m) and 315 feet (96 m)-long[83] platform would be built atop the trackways of Tracks 2 and 3, the former express tracks of the original subway. The platform will extend 360 feet (110 m) to the east, and will be flanked by Track 1 on the south and Track 4 on the north. Passengers at Times Square will no longer be able to board trains on Track 1 from the south, as the track would be cut back a few hundred feet to the east, and as a portion of the area used for boarding will be used for the reconfiguration of the fare control area for the entrance leading to the southeast corner of 42nd Street and Broadway. Passengers will also no longer be able to board trains on Track 4 from the north; extending the platform to the east will allow for the abandonment of the platform currently serving trains on Track 4, which is on a very sharp curve and has gap fillers to bridge a large gap between the platform and trains.[81] This platform will be used for employee space, and the exit to 43rd Street was closed, covered over, and turned into an emergency exit starting on October 19, 2019, allowing the metal bridge over Track 4 to access the exit to be removed, which in turn will eliminate the need to remove the bridge every time a train on Track 4 needed to be removed from service.[83][81]

As part of the redevelopment of One Times Square, a new 20-foot-wide (6.1 m) entrance with a glass canopy will be built. A new elevator to the building's observation deck will be installed and maintained by Jamestown Developers.[83] The entrance will replace the exit to 43rd Street and will lead to the west side of Broadway between 42nd Street and 43rd Street, as well as a previously closed exit to the northeastern corner of 42nd Street and 7th Avenue. The space currently used by passengers heading to and from the 43rd Street exit or to and from trains on Track 4 will be placed outside of fare control for this new entrance. The portion of the existing station to the west of this new control area will no longer be accessible to passengers.[81] To the west of the end of the platform on Track 4, a wall decorated by artwork will be installed, blocking the view of the connection between Track 4 and the Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line.[78]

Previous plans also envisioned an underpass at the eastern end of the new platform. This underpass would pass under Track 4 and will lead to an existing easement passageway in the basement of the Bank of America Tower. A new fare control area will be constructed at the west end of the passageway, leading to a new entrance on the north side of 42nd Street between Broadway and Sixth Avenue. The passageway would be used for free transfer to the IND Sixth Avenue Line's 42nd Street–Bryant Park station.[81][87] The underpass will be mined below Track 4, and trains running on the track will be supported by micro-piles and skeletonized track.[40]

At Grand Central, the center track, Track 3, will be removed and the two existing platforms will be connected, providing one wide island platform, with an area of 22,000 square feet.[83] The existing northern platform will be extended further west to accommodate six-car trains, using existing employee facility rooms. New consolidated employee facility rooms will be constructed on the existing location of the switch connecting Track 1 with Track 3. The P-4 staircase at the western end of the station leading to Madison Avenue from the existing northern platform will be removed and the P-3 staircase leading there from the existing southern platform will be considerably widened.[81][90]

Track layout

Track layout
Movable pedestrian bridge
over Track 4
Times Square
End of former track 2
Grand Central

Current track in revenue service
Current track not in revenue service
Former track

Of the four shuttle tracks, only three are in use,[lower-alpha 2] with the former southbound express track space being used for platform space at each terminal. The former southbound local track is now Shuttle Track 1. Track 2 no longer exists, but the trackbed of Track 2 can be seen inside the tunnel from passing trains on Tracks 1 and 3. At the two terminals, the trackway for Track 2 is occupied by platforms that provide access to Track 3, which was the former northbound express track. The former northbound local track is Track 4.[91] Track 2 was removed between the two stations in 1975.[92] Circuit Breaker Houses have been constructed on the roadbed of Track 2.[40]

Tracks 1 and 3 are connected to each other and to the IRT Lexington Avenue Line's southbound local track south of Grand Central station. Track 4 connects to the IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line's northbound local track north of Times Square station. There is no connection between the two tracks that connect to the Lexington Avenue Line, Tracks 1 and 3, and the track that connects to the Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line, Track 4; therefore, it is now physically impossible for a train to go from the IRT Lexington Avenue Line through to the IRT Seventh Avenue Line or vice versa by using the shuttle tracks.[91] At the Times Square station, to provide a connection between the platform for Track 4 and the rest of the station complex, there is a pedestrian bridge over Track 4. The pedestrian bridge is temporarily removed to allow the train on Track 4 to leave for maintenance on an as-needed basis.[81]


Service Time period Section of line
All except nights Late nights
service no service entire line, Tracks 1 and 3 only (Track 4 rush hours only)

The shuttle operates at all times except between midnight and 5:50 a.m. weekdays and 6:00 a.m. weekends, when alternate service is provided by the 7 train.[93] When in service, each of the shuttle tracks in operation at any given time is independent of the other; e.g., the train on Track 1 simply runs back and forth on Track 1, and there is no switching involved in reversing at each terminal. To provide for quick turnaround of the shuttle trains, there is a motorman at each end of the train. Depending on which direction the train is traveling the operators swap jobs when the train gets to one end; one acts as the operator in the front and the other acts as conductor in the rear.[94] Trains run on weekdays every 2 to 4 minutes during rush hours every 5 minutes at other times. On weekends, trains run every 5 minutes during daytime hours and every 10 minutes during the early morning and late evening.[2] It takes 90 seconds for trains to travel between Times Square and Grand Central, and trains reach a top speed of 30 miles per hour (48 km/h) before they have to decelerate.[74]

It is common for shuttle trains to display advertising that entirely covers the interiors and exteriors of the train, as opposed to other routes, whose stock only displays advertising on placards inside the train. Since 2008, the MTA has tested full-train advertisements on 42nd Street Shuttle rolling stock.[95][96] While most advertisements are well received, a few advertisements have been controversial. Among the more contentious wraps that were withdrawn are a 2015 ad for the TV show The Man in the High Castle, which featured a Nazi flag,[97][98] and an ad for Fox Sports 1, in which a shuttle train and half of its seats were plastered with negative quotes about the New York Knicks, one of the city's NBA teams.[99][100]

When the shuttle is closed, the area is sometimes used for movie and TV filming.[101] For instance, some scenes from The French Connection were filmed on the 42nd Street Shuttle.[102]


Station service legend
Stops all times
Stops all times except late nights
Stops weekdays only
Stops weekdays in the peak direction only
Time period details
Station is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act
  Station is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act
in the indicated direction only
Elevator access to mezzanine only
Stations Subway transfers Connections
42nd Street Line
Times Square 1  2  3  (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)
7  <7> (IRT Flushing Line)
N  Q  R  W  (BMT Broadway Line)
A  C  E  (IND Eighth Avenue Line at 42nd Street–Port Authority Bus Terminal)
Port Authority Bus Terminal
M34A Select Bus Service
Grand Central 4  5  6  <6> (IRT Lexington Avenue Line)
7  <7> (IRT Flushing Line)
Metro-North Railroad at Grand Central Terminal

See also



  1. This is evident as the name for the PDF file of the 42nd Street Shuttle timetable is t0cur.pdf.[2] For comparison, the Rockaway Park Shuttle is publicly listed as S, but is internally referred to as the H. Its timetable file is thcur.pdf.[5]
  2. Excluding reconstruction as of 2019, which has temporarily limited the number of tracks to two at any given time. Upon its expected completion in 2022, the project will permanently reduce the number of tracks to two.


  1. "Subdivision 'A' Car Assignments: Cars Required May 9, 2019" (PDF). The Bulletin. Electric Railroaders' Association. 62 (6): 4. June 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
  2. "S Subway Timetable Between Grand Central Station and Times Square, Manhattan, Effective June 24, 2018" (PDF). Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Retrieved June 24, 2018.
  3. Chan, Sewell (March 1, 2005). "Shuttle in Grand Central Derails And Runs Into Concrete Bumper". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
  4. "42 St Shuttle: About the Project". mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  5. "S Subway Timetable, Rockaway Park Shuttle, Effective November 4, 2018" (PDF). Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
  6. "Our Subway Open, 150,000 Try It — Mayor McClellan Runs the First Official Train — Big Crowds Ride At Night — Average of 25,000 an Hour from 7 P.M. Till Past Midnight — Exercises in the City Hall — William Barclay Parsons, John B. McDonald, August Belmont, Alexander E. Orr, and John Starin Speak — Dinner at Night". New York Times. October 28, 1904. p. 1. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
  7. Stengren, Bernard (April 22, 1964). "Shuttle Is Short, Except In History". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017 via New York Times Archive.
  8. Walker, James Blaine (1918). Fifty Years of Rapid Transit, 1864-1917. Law Print. Company.
  9. "City's Tallest Structure From Base To Top". The New York Times. 1905. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 10, 2017.
  10. Williams, Keith (November 1, 2017). "Midtown's Mysterious Unused Shuttle Track". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 10, 2017.
  11. Chung, Cady C. (October 1978). Accelerating walkway system, Times Square-Grand Central Station analysis. United States Department of Transportation.
  12. Brennan, Joseph. "Abandoned Stations : proposed Grand Central shuttle platform". Abandoned Stations. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  13. "Money Set Aside For New Subways; Board of Estimate Approves City Contracts to be Signed To-day with Interboro and B.R.T." (PDF). The New York Times. March 19, 1913. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 10, 2017.
  14. "Open New Subway Lines to Traffic; Called a Triumph" (PDF). The New York Times. August 2, 1918. p. 1. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 4, 2011.
  15. "Drop Shuttle Plan as Subway Crush Becomes a Peril" (PDF). The New York Times. August 3, 1918. p. 1. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 4, 2011.
  16. "Shuttle Service In Operation". pudl.princeton.edu. Interborough Rapid Transit Company. September 27, 1918. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
  17. Buckley, Thomas (April 22, 1964). "Pavement in 42d Street at Grand Central Is Weakened by Early‐Morning Fire in the IRT Shuttle Station". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2016 via New York Times Archive.
  18. Berger, Meyer (January 17, 1955). "About New York; Hudson Sandhogs in Compressed Air Today -- The Shuttle's Missing Track 2". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
  19. "Subway Shuttle Resumes Today" (PDF). The New York Times. September 28, 1918. p. 17. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 4, 2011.
  20. "New Transit For 42nd St.; Moving Subway Platform Across Town Planned by Commission's Engineer--Arcade of Shops Tried Before. In Case of Breakdown" (PDF). The New York Times. January 29, 1922. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
  21. "New Subway Relieves Crush on Shuttle Line". Brooklyn Daily Star. March 15, 1927. p. 1. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  22. "Ask Bids On Extension of Dual Subway Link". The Standard Union. Brooklyn, New York. October 16, 1921. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  23. "Subways Linked At Times Square". The Standard Union. Brooklyn, New York. April 8, 1917. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  24. "Cost of Extending Shuttle Line" (PDF). The New York Times. November 17, 1966. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017 via New York Times Archive.
  25. "Asks Trunk Service On Subway Shuttle; C.A. Smith Proposes Through Trains Over Line Between Times Sq. and Grand Central. New Stations Necessary F. L. Stuart Suggests Deep-Level Tunnels to Solve Commuter Problem in City. Predicts Big Traffic Increase. Proposes Community Plan". The New York Times. April 17, 1930. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
  26. "Wider Walk To Aid Riders Of Shuttle; Corridor From Grand Central End of Line to Lexington Trains Being Doubled Clean-Up Drive Is Begun Transportation Board Opens Campaign to Curb Litter, Improve Car Lighting Part of New Traffic Plan Wooden Barrier to Go". The New York Times. February 12, 1946. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  27. "Union Fails to Halt Subway Shuttle Job". The New York Times. March 12, 1946. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  28. "Subway Ceremony Costs O'Dwyer 5C; Mayor Pays at the Turnstile in Dedicating New Tunnel to Times Square Shuttle More Improvements Due Pleased With Grand Central Project, He Says Progress Will Take Money". The New York Times. March 19, 1946. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  29. "$3,500,000 Sought To Repair Shuttle; Reid Plans Double Platforms at Each End and 200-Foot Grand Central Extension End Runs' Unnecessary Trains at Times Square Will Be Boarded From Same Spot if Funds Are Granted". The New York Times. June 22, 1949. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  30. "Skips On Shuttle Defended By Quill; Schedule of Train Every Two Minutes Impossible to Meet, He Says -- Rule Book Cited". The New York Times. October 29, 1953. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  31. "Endless Train to End New York Subway Jam". Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation: 101. May 1951.
  32. "Transportation: Subway of the Future". TIME. November 15, 1954. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  33. "Conveyor Belt Shown as Replacement for Shuttle". The New York Times. April 22, 1953. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  34. Levey, Stanley (September 16, 1955). "Doom of Times Sq. Belt Shuttle Indicated by Transit Authority; Belt For Shuttle Appears Doomed". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  35. "Shuttle Conveyor Brings Only One Bid". The New York Times. October 30, 1954. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  36. "Crosstown By Conveyor Belt". The New York Times. August 8, 1952. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  37. Ross, Edwin (November 5, 1954). "TA Denies to TWU It Plans Mass Layoffs". New York Daily News. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  38. "City Tables Plan On 'Moving Walk'". New York Daily News. May 17, 1955. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  39. Levey, Stanley (October 21, 1955). "Times Sq. Shuttle Keeps Trains; Belt Plan Dropped as Too Costly; Times Sq. Shuttle Won't Get A Belt". The New York Times. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  40. Hebert, Christopher D.; Hoffman, Scott W. (May 20, 2019). Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference: 2019 Proceedings. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration. pp. 132–146. ISBN 9780873354707.
  41. "Lights Lift Murk at I. R. T. Stop And 'Even the Dirt Looks Clean'". The New York Times. August 17, 1954. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  42. Katz, Ralph (January 5, 1962). "First Automated Subway Train Starts Run; Shuttle Riders Find Trip Without Crew About the Same Strike Ended One-Year Pact All 3 Will Benefit" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  43. "Subway Fire Jams N. Y. Traffic (April 22, 1964)". Chicago Tribune. April 22, 1964. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  44. Katz, Ralph (January 27, 1959). "Crewless Subway Train Studied For Test on Times Sq. Shuttle; Subway May Test Self-Run Trains". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  45. "Crewless Subway Tested In Brooklyn" (PDF). The New York Times. February 16, 1960. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  46. "Subway Train Is Automatic". Railway Signaling and Communications. Simmons-Boardman Publishing Company. 53 (11): 16–17. November 1960.
  47. Stengren, Bernard (December 13, 1961). "Disputed Automated Train Put Through Test; Electrical Impulses Start, Monitor and Stop Shuttle Runs Automated Train Put Through Test" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  48. Katz, Ralph (October 14, 1960). "Automatic Subway Train Tested For Times Sq. Shuttle Service" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  49. Annual Report For The Year Ended June 30, 1961. New York City Transit Authority. October 1961. pp. 35–36.
  50. "NYCTA Tests Concrete Roadbed". Railway Age. 151: 2. October 1961.
  51. Levey, Stanley (February 28, 1960). "Subways To Test Tieless Roadbed; Installation Also Is Without Spikes -- Economy and Smooth Riding Seen" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  52. "Shuttle To Close Track Tomorrow; Unmanned, Automatic Train Is Due Later in Year" (PDF). The New York Times. May 6, 1961. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017 via New York Times Archive.
  53. "Automatic Shuttle Has Lost Novelty For New Yorkers" (PDF). The New York Times. April 4, 1962. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  54. "T.W.U. Will Hold Strike Vote In Protest of Automated Train" (PDF). The New York Times. December 11, 1961. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  55. Katz, Ralph (January 4, 1962). "Shuttle To Begin Automated Runs; Public Tests Start Today With Stand-By Motorman Pledge on Manning" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  56. "A Better Shuttle" (PDF). The New York Times. January 6, 1962. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  57. "Automated Train Given Extension; IRT's Shuttle Will Continue Running Until July 1" (PDF). The New York Times. October 28, 1962. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  58. Stengren, Bernard (September 19, 1962). "Automated Train Disappoints City; Patterson Says High Hopes for Subway Device Have Been Diminished Research Is Extended IRT Shuttle to Be Tested for Nine Months More-- Some Savings Seen" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017 via New York Times Archive.
  59. TRI research report. 1968. p. 163.
  60. Levey, Stanley (October 25, 1961). "Crewless Trains To Fair Studied; 3 Lines May Be Automated if Shuttle Test Succeeds" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  61. "Automated Train Jumps Its Track; None Hurt as Times Square Shuttle is Derailed". The New York Times. April 17, 1964. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  62. Trumbull, Robert (April 24, 1964). "Shuttle Nearly Back to Normal". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  63. Cunningham, Joseph; DeHart, Leonard O. (January 1, 1993). A History of the New York City Subway System. J. Schmidt, R. Giglio, and K. Lang.
  64. "Reopening Put Off on One 42d St. Block". The New York Times. April 25, 1964. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  65. "Midtown Subway Shuttle Is Now Back to Normal". The New York Times. June 2, 1964. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  66. "Reconstruction Cuts Shuttle Service in Subway; 8-Month Project Curtailing Daily Travel of 24,400-- Job Will Cost $419,000" (PDF). The New York Times. October 9, 1966. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  67. Callahan, John P. (December 11, 1966). "New Look Dawns At Grand Central; Bleak Shuttle Area Cheered by Tiles in City's Colors". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  68. Levine, Richard (October 3, 1987). "42d Street Shuttle: Cars for Reviled Line". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  69. Siegel, Joel (November 18, 1988). "TA to tighten up? Would cut out 343M in projects". New York Daily News. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  70. Perez-Pena, Richard (September 11, 1995). "A Subway Station Is Shuttered, the First in 33 Years". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 4, 2011.
  71. "Neighborhood Report: New York Up Close; Coming Transit Reductions: What They Mean for You". The New York Times. August 20, 1995. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  72. Perez-Pena, Richard (February 25, 1995). "Board Votes Cuts For City Transit". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  73. "New York State Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Safety Section Abbreviated Report Case Number 8404" (PDF). dot.ny.gov. New York State Department of Transportation. April 27, 2005. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  74. Firestone, David (July 16, 1998). "Subway Station to Be Renovated, Keeping Pace With Times Square". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 28, 2018.
  75. "Transit and Bus Committee December 2016" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. February 21, 2017. p. 199. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 22, 2017. Retrieved February 21, 2017.
  76. "T7041404 Reconstruction of Times Square Shuttle - Phase 3". mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Retrieved September 3, 2017.
  77. "Times Square Shuttle Station Prepares for Reconstruction". wsp.com. WSP. April 16, 2019. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  78. "T7041412 Study for 42nd Street Shuttle". mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  79. "Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting - March 2019" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. March 25, 2019. p. 11. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  80. "42nd Street Shuttle ADA, State of Good Repair, and Capacity Enhancement Project & Grand Central Station Elevator and Escalator Replacements" (PDF). cbsix.org. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. May 30, 2019. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
  81. "Building a better 42 St Shuttle" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. August 2019. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  82. "MTA to Transform 42 St Shuttle to Provide Better Service, Fully Accessible Crosstown Transit Connection". mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  83. Ricciulli, Valeria (August 2, 2019). "MTA will overhaul century-old 42nd Street shuttle". Curbed NY. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  84. Gartland, Michael (August 2, 2019). "42nd Street shuttle to get facelift; three-year project starts Aug. 16". New York Daily News. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  85. "Planned Service Changes for: Friday, August 16, 2019". travel.mtanyct.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. August 4, 2019. Archived from the original on August 5, 2019. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  86. "Memorandum of Agreement Between Federal Transit Administration New York State Historic Preservation Office New York City Transit Authority Regarding the Times Square Shuttle Station During Contract A-35302, The Reconfiguration of the Times Square Shuttle Station, SHPO Project #17PR00545" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. April 25, 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 25, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
  87. "Amendment To The Memorandum of Agreement Between Federal Transit Administration New York State Historic Preservation Office New York City Transit Authority Regarding The Times Square Shuttle Station During Contract A-35302, The Reconfiguration of the Times Square Shuttle Station, SHPO Project #17PR00545" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. April 25, 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 25, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
  88. "Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Notice of Public Hearing and Description of Projects Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:30 P.M. Request for Federal Financial Assistance Under the Federal Transportation Authorization For Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Capital Improvement Projects" (PDF). mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. July 28, 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 28, 2017. Retrieved August 7, 2016.
  89. "MTA - Eye on the Future". web.mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Archived from the original on July 27, 2013. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  90. Marrero, Robert (January 1, 2017). "472 Stations, 850 Miles" (PDF). B24 Blog, via Dropbox. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
  91. Linder, Bernard (January 1990). "Streetcars and Spatial Analysis: Lexington Avenue Line: North and South Sections, as of 1990". Electric Railroaders' Association. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  92. "Subway Service Guide" (PDF). Metropolitan Transportation Authority. September 2019. Retrieved September 22, 2019.
  93. Schumach, Murray (August 19, 1970). "Times Sq. Shuttle Is Trip to Pandemonium" (PDF). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  94. "Untapped Mailbag: Advertising Takeovers on the Shuttle to Times Square". Untapped Cities. Retrieved May 2, 2016.
  95. Lee, Jennifer (October 2, 2008). "A 'Full Body Wrap' for Times Sq. Shuttle". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  96. Reuters (November 25, 2015). "Nazi-inspired ads for The Man in the High Castle pulled from New York subway". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  97. Robertson, Adi (November 24, 2015). "Amazon pulls Nazi symbols from New York subway ad campaign". The Verge. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  98. Bodner, Brett; Becker, Jake (October 3, 2017). "'Hopeless' Knicks greet NYC subway riders due to FS1 ad campaign". NY Daily News. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  99. Bonesteel, Matt; Bieler, Des (October 3, 2017). "Knicks owner James Dolan reportedly 'furious' at Fox Sports 'hopeless' ads". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  100. "Filming in the Subway". mta.info. Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Retrieved April 9, 2018.
  101. "The Filming Locations of The French Connection, Then and Now". Scouting NY. May 21, 2014. Retrieved April 9, 2018.

KML is from Wikidata
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.