Underfloor air distribution

Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) is an air distribution strategy for providing ventilation and space conditioning in buildings as part of the design of a HVAC system. UFAD systems use an underfloor supply plenum located between the structural concrete slab and a raised floor system to supply conditioned air through floor diffusers directly into the occupied zone of the building. UFAD systems are similar to conventional overhead systems (OH) in terms of the types of equipment used at the cooling and heating plants and primary air-handling units (AHU).[1] Key differences include the use of an underfloor air supply plenum, warmer supply air temperatures, localized air distribution (with or without individual control) and thermal stratification.[2] Thermal stratification is one of the featured characteristics of UFAD systems, which allows higher thermostat setpoints compared to the traditional overhead systems (OH). UFAD cooling load profile is different from a traditional OH system due to the impact of raised floor, particularly UFAD may have a higher peak cooling load than that of OH systems. This is because heat is gained from building penetrations and gaps within the structure itself.[3] UFAD has several potential advantages over traditional overhead systems, including layout flexibility, improved thermal comfort and ventilation efficiency,[4] reduced energy use in suitable climates and life-cycle costs. UFAD is often used in office buildings, particularly highly-reconfigurable and open plan offices where raised floors are desirable for cable management. UFAD is appropriate for a number of different building types including commercials, schools, churches, airports, museums, libraries etc.[5] Notable buildings using UFAD system in North America include The New York Times Building, Bank of America Tower and San Francisco Federal Building. Careful considerations need to be made in the construction phase of UFAD systems to ensure a well-sealed plenum to avoid air leakage in UFAD supply plenums.

System description

UFAD systems rely on air handling units to filter and condition air to the appropriate supply conditions so it can be delivered to the occupied zone. While overhead systems typically use ducts to distribute the air, UFAD systems use the underfloor plenum formed by installation of a raised floor. The plenum generally sits 0.3 and 0.46 metres (12 and 18 in) above the structural concrete slab, although lower heights are possible.[6][7] Specially designed floor diffusers are used as the supply outlets.[8] The most common UFAD configuration consists of a central air handling unit delivering air through a pressurized plenum and into the space through floor diffusers. Other approaches may incorporate fan powered terminal units at the outlets, underfloor ducts, desktop vents or connections to Personal Environmental Control Systems.[9]

UFAD air distribution and stratification

Thermal stratification is the result of processes which layer the internal air in accordance with relative density. The resulting air stratum is a vertical gradient with high-density and cooler air below and low-density and warmer air above.[10] Due to the naturally convective movement of air, stratification is used predominantly in cooling conditions.[10]

UFAD systems capitalize on the natural stratification that occurs when warm air rises due to thermal buoyancy. In a UFAD design, conditioned air stays in the lower, occupied part of the room, while heat sources such as occupants and equipment generate thermal plumes, which carry the warm air and heat source generated pollutants towards the ceiling where they are exhausted through the return air ducts.[9] The temperature stratification created by the UFAD system has implication for space setpoints. Most of an occupant's body is in an area that is colder than the temperature at the thermostat height; therefore, current practice recommends raising thermostat setpoints compared to traditional overhead systems. The optimal ventilation strategy controls the supply outlets to limit the mixing of supply air with room air to just below the breathing height of the space. Above this height, stratified and more polluted air is allowed to occur. The air that the occupant breathes will have a lower concentration of contaminants compared to conventional uniformly mixed systems.[9]

The theoretical behavior of UFAD systems is based on the plume theory for DV systems. In comparison to classic displacement ventilation (DV) systems [10] that deliver air at low velocities, typical UFAD systems deliver air through floor diffusers with higher supply air velocities. In addition to increasing the amount of mixing (and therefore potentially diminishing the ventilation performance compared to DV systems), these more powerful supply air conditions can have significant impacts on room air stratification and thermal comfort in the occupied zone. Therefore, the control and optimization of this stratification is crucial to system design and sizing, energy-efficient operation, and comfort performance of UFAD systems.[11]

Many factors, including the ceiling height, diffuser characteristics, number of diffusers, supply air temperature, total flow rate, cooling load and conditioning mode affect the ventilation efficiency of UFAD systems.[12] Swirl and perforated-floor-panel diffusers have been shown to create a low air velocity in the occupied zone, while linear diffusers created the highest velocity in the occupied zone, disturbing thermal stratification and posing a potential draft risk.[12] Additionally, floor diffusers add an element of personal control within the reach of the occupant, as users can adjust the amount of air that is delivered by the diffuser though rotating the diffuser top.

Application Characteristics

UFAD cooling load

Cooling load profiles for UFAD systems and overhead systems are different,[13] mainly due to the thermal storage effect of the lighter-weight raised floor panels compared to the heavier mass of a structural floor slab. The mere presence of the raised floor reduces the ability of the slab to store heat, thereby producing for the system with a raised floor higher peak cooling loads compared to the system without a raised floor. In the OH system, particularly in perimeter zones, part of the incoming solar heat gain is stored in the floor slab during the day, thus reducing peak zone cooling loads, and released at night when the system is off. In a UFAD system, the presence of the raised flooring transforms the solar absorbing massive floor slab into a lighter weight material, leading to relatively higher peak zone cooling loads.[5] A modeling study based on EnergyPlus simulations showed that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19% higher than an overhead cooling load and 22% and 37% of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.[14]

Center for the Built Environment developed a new index UFAD cooling load ratio (UCLR), which is defined by the ratio of the peak cooling load calculated for UFAD to the peak cooling load calculated for a well-mixed system, to calculate the UFAD cooling load for each zone with the traditional peak cooling load of an overhead (well-mixed) system. UCLR is determined by zone type, floor level and the zone orientation. The Supply Plenum Fraction (SPF), Zone Fraction (ZF) and Return Plenum Fraction (RPF) are developed similarly to calculate the supply plenum, zone and return plenum cooling load.[13]

UFAD design tools for zone airflow requirements

There are two available design tools for determining zone airflow rate requirements for UFAD system, one is developed at Purdue University as part of the ASHRAE Research Project (RP-1522).[15] The other one is developed at Center for the Built Environment (CBE) at University of California Berkeley.

ASHRAE Research Project (RP-1522) developed a simplified tool that predicts the vertical temperature difference between the head and ankle of occupants, the supply air flow rate for one plenum zone, number of diffusers and the air distribution effectiveness. The tool requires users to specify the zone cooling load and the fraction of the cooling load assigned to the underfloor plenum. It also requires users to input the supply air temperature either at the diffuser or at the duct but with the ratio of plenum flowrate to zonal supply flowrate. The tool allows users to select from three type of diffusers and is applicable to seven type of buildings, including office, classroom, workshop, restaurant, retail shop, conference room and auditorium.[9][16]

The CBE UFAD design tool based on extensive research is able to predict the cooling load for UFAD system with the input of the design cooling load calculated for the same building with an overhead system. It also predicts the airflow rate, room temperature stratification, and the plenum temperature gain for both interior and perimeter zones of a typical multi-story office buildings using UFAD system. The CBE tool allows the user to select from four different plenum configurations (series, reverse series, independent and common) and three floor-diffusers (swirl, square and linear bar grill). An online version of the design tool is publicly available at Center for the Built Environment.

Plenum air temperature rise

Plenum supply air temperature rise is the increase of the conditioned air due to convective heat gain as it travels through the underfloor supply plenum from the plenum inlet to the floor diffusers.[17] This phenomenon is also named thermal decay. Plenum air temperature rise is caused by cool supply air coming into contact with warmer than air concrete slab and raised floor. According to a modeling study, air temperature rise can be quite significant (as much as 5 °C or 9 °F) and subsequently, compared to an idealized simulated UFAD case with no air temperature rise, elevated diffuser air temperatures can lead to higher supply airflow rate and increased fan and chiller energy consumption. The same study found that air temperature rise in summer is higher than in winter and it also depends on the climate.[17] The ground floor with a slab on grade has less temperature rise compared to middle and top floors, and an increase of the supply air temperature causes a decrease in the temperature rise. The temperature rise is not significantly affected by the perimeter zone orientation, the internal heat gain and the window-to-wall ratio.[17] Supply plenum air temperature rise, thus, has implications on the energy saving potential of UFAD systems and their ability to meet cooling requirements with supply temperatures above those of conventional overhead systems. Current research suggests that both energy and thermal performance can be improved in UFAD systems by ducting air to perimeter zones where loads tend to be the greatest.[17] Critics suggest however that such underfloor ducting reduces the benefit of having a low-pressure plenum space, as well as adding design and installation complications when fitting ducts between floor tile pedestals.

Air leakage in UFAD plenums

Leakage in UFAD supply plenums can be a major cause for inefficiency in a UFAD system. There are two types of leakage—leakage into the space and leakage into pathways that bypass the space. The first category of leakage does not result in an energy penalty because air is getting to the zone it is intended to cool. The second category of leakage increases fan energy in order to maintain a constant plenum pressure, resulting in increased energy use. Careful consideration needs to be paid in the construction phase of UFAD systems to ensure a well-sealed plenum.[9]

UFAD and energy

The energy assessment of UFAD systems is a not fully solved issue, which has led to numerous research projects within the building science and mechanical engineering community. Proponents of UFAD point to the lower fan pressures required to deliver air in a building via the plenum as compared to through ducts. Typical plenum pressures are 25 pascals (0.0036 psi) (0.1 inch of water column) or less.[9] The improvements in cooling-system efficiency inherent in operation at higher temperatures save energy, and relatively higher supply air temperatures allow longer periods of economizer operation. However, an economizer strategy is highly climate-dependent and necessitates careful control of humidity to avoid condensation.[9] Critics, on the other hand, cite the shortage of rigorous research and testing to account for variations in climate, system design, thermal comfort and air quality to question whether UFAD is able to deliver improved energy efficiency in practice. Limited simulation tools, the shortage of design standards and relatively scarcity of exemplar projects compound these problems.[18][19]


Underfloor air distribution is frequently used in office buildings, particularly highly-reconfigurable and open plan offices where raised floors are desirable for cable management. UFAD is also common in command centers, IT data centers and Server rooms that have large cooling loads from electronic equipment and requirements for routing power and data cables. The ASHRAE Underfloor Air Distribution Design Guide suggests that any building considering a raised floor for cable distribution should consider UFAD.[9]

Specific space considerations should be taken when using UFAD systems in laboratories because of its critical room pressurization requirements and potential migration of chemicals into the access floor plenum due to spillage. UFAD systems are not recommended in some specific facilities or spaces, such as small non-residential buildings, wet spaces like restrooms and pool areas, kitchens and dining areas and gymnasiums, because UFAD may result in especially difficult or costly in design. UFAD systems may also be used with other HVAC systems, like displacement ventilation, overhead air distribution systems, radiant ceiling or chilled beam systems to get better performance.[9]

UFAD compared to other distribution systems

Overhead (mixing)

Conventional overhead mixing systems usually locate both the supply and return air ducts at the ceiling level. Supply air is supplied at velocities higher than typically acceptable for human comfort and the air temperature may be lower, higher, or the same as desired room temperature depending on the cooling/heating load. High-speed turbulent air jets incoming supply air mix with the room air.

A well-engineered UFAD systems have several potential advantages over traditional overhead systems, such as layout flexibility, improved thermal comfort, improved ventilation efficiency and indoor air quality, improved energy efficiency in suitable climates and reduced life cycle costs.[17][20]

Displacement ventilation

Displacement Ventilation systems (DV) work on similar principals as UFAD systems. DV systems deliver cool air into the conditioned space at or near the floor level and return air at the ceiling level. This works by utilizing the natural buoyancy of warm air and the thermal plumes generated by heat sources as cooler air is delivered from lower elevations. While similar, UFAD tends to encourage more mixing within the occupied zone and provide local air supply, which enables it to increase air motion in the space and prevent the sensation of stagnant air conditions, often associated with poor air quality. The major practical differences are that in UFAD, air is supplied at a higher velocity through smaller-size supply outlets than in DV, and the supply outlets are usually controlled by the occupants.[9]

List of notable buildings using UFAD systems

Structure Year Country City Architects Coordinates
Bank of America Tower2009NYNew York CityCook+Fox Architects40°45′20.6″N 73°59′2.81″W
David Brower Center2009CABerkeleySolomon E.T.C.-WRT37°52′10.97″N 122°15′58.53″W
San Francisco Federal Building2007CASan FranciscoMorphosis37°46′47.09″N 122°24′44.13″W
Internal Revenue Service2007MOKansas CityBNIM39°5′11.30″N 94°35′2.35″W
The New York Times Building2007NYNew YorkRenzo Piano Building Workshop40°45′23.42″N 73°59′25.15″W
Caltrans District 7 HQ2005CALos AngelesThom Mayne34°3′21.75″N 118°14′40.47″W
CalPERS HQ2005CASacramentoPickard Chilton Architects38°34′33.51″N 121°30′17.65″W
Foundry Square2005CASan FranciscoStudios Architecture et al.37°47′24.54″N 122°23′49.02″W
Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse2005CAFresnoMoore Ruble Yudell, Gruen Associates36.7377°N 119.7838°W / 36.7377; -119.7838
Visteon HQ2004MIVan Buren TownshipSmithGroupJJR42°14′39.61″N 83°25′58.53″W
Ray and Maria Stata Center2003MABostonFrank Gehry42°21′43.35″N 71°5′23.26″W
Hewlett Foundation2002CAMenlo ParkB.H. Bocook, Architects, Inc37°25′30.87″N 122°11′38.04″W
Bellagio Show Palace1998NVParadiseWill Bruder36°6′45.10″N 115°10′33.41″W
Phoenix Public Library1995AZPhoenixWill Bruder33°28′17.71″N 112°4′23.84″W
Apple Store1993CASan FranciscoBohlin Cywinski Jackson37°47′10.16″N 122°24′22.57″W
Taco Bell Headquarters2009CAIrvineLPA Architects33.6571981°N 117.7469452°W / 33.6571981; -117.7469452
Pearl River Tower 2011 China Guangzhou SOM and AS+GG23°7′36.3″N 113°19′3.36″E
Manitoba Hydro Tower2009CanadaWinnipeg, MBKuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg49°53′33.99″N 97°8′46.70″W
Vancouver Public Library1995CanadaVancouver, BCMoshe Safdie & DA architects49°16′44.72″N 123°6′57.68″W
Salesforce Tower2017CASan FranciscoPelli Clarke Pelli Architects37°47′23.64″N 122°23′48.84″W


  1. Bauman, Fred S.; Daly, Allan (2003). Underfloor Air Distribution (UFAD) Design Guide. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ISBN 978-1-931862-21-9. OCLC 54615153.
  2. Bauman, Fred; Webster, T. (2001). "Outlook for underfloor air distribution". ASHRAE Journal. 43 (6): 18–27.
  3. Bauman, Fred; Webster, Tom; Jin, Hui (2006). "Design guidelines for underfloor plenums". Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering. 78: 28–30, 32–34.
  4. Faulkner, David; Fisk, William J.; Sullivan, Douglas P. (1995). "Indoor airflow and pollutant removal in a room with floor-based task ventilation: Results of additional experiments". Building and Environment. 30 (3): 323–332. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(94)00051-S.
  5. ASHRAE Technical Resource Group On Underfloor Air Design (2013). UFAD GUIDE Design, Construction and Operation of Underfloor Air Distribution Systems. W. Stephen Comstock. ISBN 978-1-936504-49-7.
  6. Hanzawa, H.; Higuci, M. (1996), "Air flow distribution in a low-height underfloor air distribution plenum of an air conditioning system", AIJ Journal Technological Design, 3: 200–205, doi:10.3130/aijt.2.200
  7. Bauman, Fred; Pecora, Paolo; Webster, Tom (1999), How low can you go? Air flow performance of low-height underfloor plenums, Center for the Built Environment, UC Berkeley
  8. Bauman, Fred. "UFAD diffusers". Center for the Built Environment, UC Berkeley.
  9. Bauman, Fred; Daly, Allan (2003), "Underfloor Air Distribution Design Guide", ASHRAE
  10. Nielsen, P. V. (1996), Displacement Ventilation – Theory and Design, U9513, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, ISSN 0902-8005
  11. Webster, T.; Bauman, Fred; Reese, J. (2002). "Underfloor air distribution: thermal stratification". ASHRAE Journal. 44 (5).
  12. Lee, K.S.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, Q. (2009), "Air distribution effectiveness with stratified air distribution", ASHRAE Transactions, 115 (2)
  13. Schiavon, Stefano; Lee, Kwang Ho; Bauman, Fred; Webster, Tom (February–March 2011). "Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems". Energy and Buildings. 43 (2–3): 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.017.
  14. Schiavon, Stefano; Lee, Kwang Ho; Bauman, Fred; Webster, Tom (2011), "Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems", Energy and Buildings, 43 (2): 517–528, doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.017
  15. Lee, Kisup; Xue, Guangqing (June 2012). "Establishment of Design Procedures to Predict Room Airflow Requirements in Partially Mixed Room Air Distribution Systems". ASHRAE Research Project Report RP-1522.
  16. Xue, Guangqing; Lee, Kisup; Jiang,Zheng; Chen, Qingyan (2012). "Thermal environment in indoor spaces with under-floor air distribution systems: Part 2. Determination of design parameters (1522-RP)". HVAC&R Research. 18:6: 1192–1201. doi:10.1080/10789669.2012.710058 (inactive 2019-08-20).
  17. Kwang Ho, Lee; Stefano Schiavon; Fred Bauman; Tom Webster (2012). "Thermal decay in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems: Fundamentals and influence on system performance". Applied Energy. 91 (1): 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.09.011.
  18. Lehrer, David; et al. (2003), Reality new research findings on underfloor air distribution systems., Center for the Built Environment, UC Berkeley, p. 6, retrieved 2011-11-29
  19. Woods, James (2004), "What real world experience tells us about the UFAD alternative", ASHRAE Journal, retrieved 2011-11-29
  20. "UFAD Technology Overview". Center for the Built Environment. Retrieved 27 Nov 2013.

Professional and Trade groups that provide research funding and publish standards or guides regarding UFAD systems include:

  1. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, (ASHRAE) http://www.ashrae.org/
  2. Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute (ARTI)
  3. The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) http://www.ahrinet.org/
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.