Representation on coordinate rings

In mathematics, a representation on coordinate rings is a representation of a group on coordinate rings of affine varieties.

Let X be an affine algebraic variety over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero with the action of a reductive algebraic group G.[1] G then acts on the coordinate ring of X as a left regular representation: . This is a representation of G on the coordinate ring of X.

The most basic case is when X is an affine space (that is, X is a finite-dimensional representation of G) and the coordinate ring is a polynomial ring. The most important case is when X is a symmetric variety; i.e., the quotient of G by a fixed-point subgroup of an involution.

Isotypic decomposition

Let be the sum of all G-submodules of that are isomorphic to the simple module ; it is called the -isotypic component of . Then there is a direct sum decomposition:

where the sum runs over all simple G-modules . The existence of the decomposition follows, for example, from the fact that the group algebra of G is semisimple since G is reductive.

X is called multiplicity-free (or spherical variety[2]) if every irreducible representation of G appears at most one time in the coordinate ring; i.e., . For example, is multiplicity-free as -module. More precisely, given a closed subgroup H of G, define

by setting and then extending by linearity. The functions in the image of are usually called matrix coefficients. Then there is a direct sum decomposition of -modules (N the normalizer of H)

,

which is an algebraic version of the Peter–Weyl theorem (and in fact the analytic version is an immediate consequence.) Proof: let W be a simple -submodules of . We can assume . Let be the linear functional of W such that . Then . That is, the image of contains and the opposite inclusion holds since is equivariant.

Examples

  • Let be a B-eigenvector and X the closure of the orbit . It is an affine variety called the highest weight vector variety by Vinberg–Popov. It is multiplicity-free.

The Kostant–Rallis situation

See also

Notes

  1. G is not assumed to be connected so that the results apply to finite groups.
  2. Goodman–Wallach 2009, Remark 12.2.2.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.