# Irreducible component

In mathematics, specifically in algebraic geometry, the concept of **irreducible component** is used to formalize the idea that an algebraic set such as the one defined by the equation *XY* = 0 is the union of the two lines *X* = 0 and *Y* = 0. Thus an algebraic set is **irreducible** if it is not the union of two proper algebraic subsets. It is a fundamental theorem of classical algebraic geometry that every algebraic set is the union of a finite number of irreducible algebraic subsets (varieties), and that, if one removes those subsets contained in another one, this decomposition is unique. The elements of this unique decomposition are called **irreducible components**.

This notion may be reformulated in topological terms, using Zariski topology, for which the closed sets are the subvarieties: an algebraic set is irreducible if it is not the union of two proper subsets that are closed in the Zariski topology. This allows a generalization in topology, and, through it, to general schemes for which the above property of finite decomposition is not necessarily true.

## In topology

A topological space *X* is **reducible** if it can be written as a union of two non-empty closed proper subsets , of .
A topological space is **irreducible** (or **hyperconnected**) if it is not reducible. Equivalently, all non empty open subsets of *X* are dense or any two nonempty open sets have nonempty intersection.

A subset *F* of a topological space *X* is called irreducible or reducible, if *F* considered as a topological space via the subspace topology has the corresponding property in the above sense. That is, is reducible if it can be written as a union where are closed subsets of , neither of which contains .

An **irreducible component** of a topological space is a maximal irreducible subset. If a subset is irreducible, its closure is, so irreducible components are closed.

## In algebraic geometry

Every affine or projective algebraic set is defined as the set of the zeros of an ideal in a polynomial ring. In this case, the irreducible components are the varieties associated to the minimal primes over the ideal. This is this identification that allows to prove the uniqueness and the finiteness of the decomposition. This decomposition is strongly related with the primary decomposition of the ideal.

In general scheme theory, every scheme is the union of its irreducible components, but the number of components is not necessarily finite. However, in most cases occurring in "practice", namely for all noetherian schemes, there are finitely many irreducible components.

## Examples

The irreducibility depends much on actual topology on some set. For example, possibly contradicting the intuition, the real numbers are reducible for their usual topology: they are the union of the two closed intervals ]-∞,0] and [0,+∞[.

The notion of irreducible component is fundamental in algebraic geometry and rarely considered outside this area of mathematics: consider the algebraic set

*X*:= {(*x*,*y*) |*xy*= 0}.

It is subset of the plane. For the Zariski topology, its closed subsets are itself, the empty set, the singletons and the two lines defined by *x* = 0 and *y* = 0. It is thus reducible with these two lines as irreducible components.

This can also be read off the coordinate ring *k*[*x*, *y*]/(*xy*) (if the variety is defined over a field *k*), whose minimal prime ideals are (*x*) and (*y*).

*This article incorporates material from irreducible on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.*
*This article incorporates material from Irreducible component on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.*