Instrumental and value rationality

"Instrumental" and "value rationality" are terms scholars use to identify two ways human reason when correlating group behaviour to maintain social life. Instrumental rationality recognizes means that "work" efficiently to achieve ends. Value rationality recognizes ends that are "right," legitimate in themselves.

These two ways of reasoning seem to operate separately. Efficient means are recognized inductively in heads or brains or minds. Legitimate ends are felt deductively in hearts or guts or souls. Instrumental rationality provides intellectual tools—scientific and technological facts and theories—that appear to be impersonal, value-free means. Value rationality provides legitimate rules—moral valuations—that appear to be emotionally satisfying, fact-free ends. Every society maintains itself by correlating instrumental means with value rational ends. Together they make humans rational.

Sociologist Max Weber observed people exercising these capacities and gave them these labels that have stuck, despite scholars constantly coining new labels. Here are his original definitions, followed by a comment showing his doubt that humans are rational to believe that unconditionally right ends can be correlated with conditionally efficient means.

Social action, like all action, may be...: (1) instrumentally rational (zweckrational), that is, determined by expectations as to the behavior of objects in the environment and of other human beings; these expectations are used as "conditions" or "means" for the attainment of the actor's own rationally pursued and calculated ends; (2) value-rational (wertrational), that is, determined by a conscious belief in the value for its own sake of some ethical, aesthetic, religious, or other form of behavior, independently of its prospects of success; ...

... the more the value to which action is oriented is elevated to the status of an absolute value, the more "irrational" in this [instrumental] sense the corresponding action is. For the more unconditionally the actor devotes himself to this value for its own sake, ... the less he is influenced by considerations of the [conditional] consequences of his action[1]

This article demonstrates the paradox of mutual contamination between instrumental and value rationality by reporting the reasoning of four scholars. Harvard professors John Rawls and Robert Nozick, globally recognised as expert practitioners of value rationality, produced mutually incompatible theories of distributive justice. Neither is universally recognized as legitimate, but both continue to be defended as rational. Emory University professor James Gouinlock and Harvard professor Amartya Sen argued that Rawls and Nozick erred in believing that unconditionally valuable ends can work conditionally. Despite this disagreement, the scholarly community continues to accept as unavoidable this paradox of rationality contaminating itself.

See also

References

  1. Weber, Max (1978). Guenther Roth; Claus Wittich (eds.). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 24–6, 399–400.
  2. Rawls, John (1999). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  3. Rawls, John (2001). Justice as Fairness. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  4. Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
  5. Nozick, Robert (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton University Press.
  6. James Gouinlock (1984). introduction. The Later Works, 1925-1953. By Dewey, John. Boydston, Jo Ann (ed.). Southern Illinois University Press.
  7. Gouinlock, James S. (1993). Rediscovering the Moral Life. Prometheus Books.
  8. Sen, Amartya (2009). The Idea of Rationality. Harvard University Press.
  9. Sen, Amartya (2002). Rationality and Freedom. Harvard University Press.
  10. "Rawls rules". The Economist: 57–8. 8 September 2018.
  11. "A Manifesto". The Economist: 14. 15 September 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.